A study on the differences in legal practices in child abuse cases with examples from different countries

Sex crimes against children is a global problem. The rate of such crimes are significant even societies with high levels of education and income. This study aimed to address necessary measures to minimize this problem by discussing the data and laws regarding sex crimes against children in five countries.The study reviewed scientific data on sex crimes against children in India, Canada, the Netherlands, UK and Turkey and the relevant penal codes in these countries, and compared the respective articles and practices. India is one of the countries with the highest number of child sexual abuse cases. The most interesting aspect of the Canadian law is that the law mentions peer relationships. It is noted that the criminal justice system in the Netherlands is, as opposed to many other countries, based on principles of rehabilitation and resocialization. The longer penalty times are striking in UK Sexual Offences Act 2003.The data from Turkish Statistical Institute shows that the number of sexual abuse cases are extremely high in Turkey.Child sexual abuse is a frequent problem in the world. Unfortunately, related studies, training and legislative regulations are not sufficient to solve this problem. It is observed that abuse cases increase in countries having weak and middle economies; however, the opposite evaluation is not completely correct. It can’t be suggested that standard education programs, increased levels of income and the securing of justice are the only solutions. Sexual abuse training through standard methods are insufficient to prevent this problem. Educational specialists need to develop new educational methods to address the problem. The rehabilitation of child victims is as important as punishment of offenders. This study advocates that necessary steps should be taken for the widespread establishment of Child Protection Centers, which play a significant role in the rehabilitation and treatment of victims.

___

1. World Health Organization. Global status report on violence prevention 2014. Report No.: 9241564792.

2. World Health Organization. Child Maltreatment Infographic. https://www.who. int/violence_injury_prevention/violence/child/Child_maltreatment_infographic_ EN.pdf?ua=1. access date 15.06.2020.

3. UNICEF. Çocuk haklarına dair sözleşme. İnsan Hakları Koordinasyonu 2004. http://www.unicefturk.org/public/uploads/files/UNICEF_ CocukHaklarinaDairSozlesme.pdf. access date 15.06.2020.

4. World health organization regional office for Europe. Investing in children: the European child maltreatment prevention action plan 2015-2020, 2014. http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0009/253728/64wd13e_ InvestChildMaltreat_140439.pdf?ua=1. Access date 15.06.2020

5. World Health Organization. Global status report on violence prevention 2014. Report No.: 9241564792.

6. Singh MM, Parsekar SS, Nair SN. An epidemiological overview of child sexual abuse. J Famil Med Prim Care. 2014;3:430.

7. Sowmya Bhaskaran T, Seshadri SP. Child sexual abuse-clinical challenges and practical recommendations. J Indi Associat Child Adoles Ment Healt. 2016;12.

8. Moirangthem S, Kumar NC, Math SB. Child sexual abuse: Issues & concerns. Indi J Med Res. 2015;142:1.

9. Afifi TO, MacMillan HL, Boyle M, et al. Child abuse and mental disorders in Canada. Cmaj. 2014;186:324-32.

10. Canada Criminal Code Available from: http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca. Access date 15.06.2020.

11. World health organization regional office for Europe. European report on preventing child maltreatment. Copenhagen: WHO, 2013 Available from: http:// www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0019/217018/European-Report-onPreventing-Child-Maltreatment.pdf. Access date. 15.06.2020.

12. Euser S, Alink LR, Pannebakker F, et al. The prevalence of child maltreatment in the Netherlands across a 5-year period. Child Abuse & Neglect. 2013;37:841-51.

13. Adalet Bakanlığı İşyurtları Kurumu Daire Başkanlığı Almanya, Hollandave Amerika Birleşik Devletlerinde “Ceza” ve “Ceza İnfaz Kurumları ” Available from: http://www.iydb.adalet.gov.tr/dokumanlar/makaleler/almanya_hollanda_ abd.pdf. Access date 15.06.2020.

14. Radford L, Corral S, Bradley C, et al. Child abuse and neglect in the UK today. 2011. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/230558737_ Child_Abuse_and_Neglect_in_the_UK_Today. Access date 15.06.2020.

15. United Kingdom Sexual Offences Act. 2003. Available from: https://www. legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/42/contents. Access date 15.06.2020.

16. Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu Haber Bülteni, Güvenlik birimine gelen ve getirilen çocuklar, 2015 Available from :http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreHaberBultenleri. do?id=21544. Access date 15.06.2020.

17. Sofuoğlu Z, Oral R, Aydın F, et al. Türkiye’nin üç ilinde olumsuz çocukluk çağı deneyimleri epidemiyolojik çalışması. Türk Pediatri Arşivi. 2014; 49:47-56.

18. Özkara E, Kavaklı U, Can İÖ, et al. The comparison of penalties for child sexual abuse laws between Turkey and other countries. J Forensic Med. 2011;25:11-24.
Medicine Science-Cover
  • ISSN: 2147-0634
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2012
  • Yayıncı: Effect Publishing Agency ( EPA )