NÜKLEER TIP UYGULAMALARINDA İNTERNAL DOZİMETRİ METODLARININ DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ
Nükleer tıp uygulamalarında tanı ve tedavi amaçlı birçok radyonüklid kullanılır. Vücuttaki farklı organlar tarafından soğurulan radyasyon dozunun bilinmesi bu uygulamaların risklerinin ve yararlarının değerlendirilebilmesi açısından oldukça önemlidir. İnternal dozimetri vücut içindeki radyonüklidler ile dokuda depo edilen radyasyon enerjisinin uzaysal ve zamansal dağılımı ve miktarının belirlenmesi ile ilgilenir. Nükleer tıpta tiroid kanseri ve hipertiroidi tedavisinde yaygın kullanımı olan I-31 radyoizotopunun yanında, son yıllarda hepatosellüler karsinoma ve nöroendokrin tümör tedavisinde rutin uygulamaya giren Lu-177 ve Y-90 radyoizotopları da başarı ile uygulanmaktadır. Risk değerlendirilmesi açısından, organ doz hesapları Medikal İnternal Radyasyon Dozimetri (MIRD) tarafından belirlenen standart uygulamanın yanısıra, hastaya spesifik olarak kinetik ve anatomik parametrelerin değerlendirilmesi açısından önemlidir. Bu çalışmada internal dozimetri hesaplarında kullanılan metotlar ele alınmış, bu metodlarda farklı yaş ve cinsiyetlerdeki bireyleri temsil eden uygun modeller, matematiksel formulasyonlar ile açıklanmıştır
Evaluation of Internal Dosimetry Methods in Nuclear Medicine Applications
Many radionuclides are used for diagnostic and therapeutic in nuclear medicine applications. The knowledge of radiation dose absorbed by different organs in the body is critical to evaluate known risks and benefits of these applications. Internal dosimetry deals with the determination of the amount and the spatial and temporal distribution of radiation energy deposited in tissue by radionuclides within the body. Widely used in nuclear medicine in the treatment of thyroid cancer and hyperthyroidism radioisotope I-131, as well as routine practice in recent years into the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma and neuroendocrine tumor Lu-177 and Y-90 also successfully applied to radioisotopes. In terms of risk assessment, the organ dose calculations Medical Internal Radiation Dosimetry (MIRD), as well as the application of the standard set by the patient-specific parameters in the evaluation of kinetics and anatomy is important. The methods used internal dosimetry calculations in this study are considered and the appropriate models representing individuals of different ages and regardless of gender are described with mathematical formulations.
___
- 1. Stabin MG, Siegel JAPhysical models and dose factors
for use in internal dose assessment. Health Phys
2003;85:294-310.
- 2. Toohey RE, Stabin MG, Watson BA. The
AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents internal
radiation dosimetry: Principles and applications.
Imaging Therapeutic Tecchology 2000;20:533-46.
- 3. Stabin MG. Nuclear Medine dosimetry. Phys Med Biol
2006;51:R187-R202.
- 4. Zanzonico PB. Internal radionuclide radiation
dosimetry: A Review of basic concepts and recent
developments nuclear medicine service, Memorial
Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, 1999 New
York Oct. 12
- 5. Lassmann M, Hanscheid H, Chiesa C, Hindorf C, Flux
G, Luster M. EANM Dosimetry Committee series on
standard operational procedures for pre-therapeutic
dosimetry I: blood and bone marrow dosimetry in
differentiated thyroid cancer therapy. Eur J Nucl Med
Mol Imaging 2008;35:1405-12.
- 6. Nieuwlaat WA, Hermus AR, Ross HA, Buijs WC,
Edelbroek MA, Bus JW, Corstens FH, Huysmans DA.
Dosimetry of radioiodine therapy in patientswith
nodular goiter after pretreatment with a single, low
dose of recombinant human thyroid-stimulating
hormone.J Nucl Med 2004;45:626-33.
- 7. Stabin MG. Radiation protection and dosimetry: An
introduction in health physics, Springer, New York,
2007:205-28.
- 8. Stabin MG. Personal computer software for internal
dose assessment in nuclear medicine. MIRDOSE. J
Nucl Med 1996;37:538-46.
- 9. Sabbir A, Demir M, Yasar D, Uslu I. Quantification of
absorbed doses to urine bladder depending on drinking
water during radiooiodine therapy to thyroid cancer
patients: a clinical study using MIRDOSE3 Nuclear
Medicine Communications 2003;24:749-54.
- 10. Stabin MG, Siegel JA, Sparks RB, Eckerman KF,
Breitz HB.Contribution to red marrow absorbed dose
from total body activity: a correction to the MIRD
method. J Nucl Med 2001;42:492-8.
- 11. Cristy M, Eckerman K. Specific absorbed fractions of
energy at various ages from internal photons sources.
Oak Ridge Oak Ridge National Laboratory; 1987: V1-
V7.ORNL/TM-8381/V7
- 12. Stabin MG. Nuclear medicine dosimetry. Phys Med
Biol 2006;51:R187-R202.
- 13. Siegel JA. Establishing a clinically meaningful
predictive model of hematologic toxicity in
nonmyeloablative targeted radiotherapy: practical
aspects and limitations of red marrow dosimetry.
Cancer Biother Radiopharm 2005;20(2):126-40.
- 14. Shen S1, DeNardo GL, Sgouros G, O'Donnell RT,
DeNardo SJ.Practical determination of patient-specific
marrow dose using radioactivity concentration in blood
and body. J Nucl Med 1999;40:2102-6.
- 15. Sorenson J.A., Phepls M. Physics in Nuclear Medicine
2004 Second Edition
- 16. Demir M. Nükleer tıp fiziği ve klinik uygulamaları ders
kitabı. Türkiye Kitabevi, İstanbul, 2008.
- 17. Esser JP, Krenning EP, Teunissen JJ, Kooij PP, van
Gameren AL, Bakker WH, Kwekkeboom DJ.
Comparison of [177Lu-DOTA0,Tyr3] octreotate and
[177Lu-DOTA0,Tyr3] octreotide: which peptide is
preferable for PRRT? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging
2006; 33:1346-51.
- 18. Stubbs J. Anew mathematical model of gastrointestinal
transit incorporating age- and gender-dependent
physiological parameters. In Proc: Fifth International
Radiopharmaceutical Dosimetry Symposium, Oak
Ridge Associated Universities, Oak Ridge, TN,
1992:229-42.
- 19. ICRP, 1979. Limits for Intakes of Radionuclides by
Workers. ICRP Publication 30 (Part 1). Ann ICRP 2 (3-
4).
- 20. ICRP, 1998. Radiation Dose to Patients from
Radiopharmaceuticals (Addendum to ICRP
Publication 53). ICRP Publication 80. Ann. ICRP 28
(3).