Yener Okutan, Münir Tolga Yücel, Mustafa Borga Dönmez, Tuğçe Gezer

MDP İçerikli Primerin On Farklı Rezin Siman ve Kumlanmış Monolitik Zirkonya Arasındaki Bağlanma Dayanımına Etkisi

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı kendinden adezivli farklı yapıştırma sistemlerinin kumlanmış monolitik zirkonyaya bağlanma dayanımını (SBS) metakriloiloksidesil dihidrojen fosfat (MDP) esaslı seramik primeri uygulaması yaparak veya yapmadan değerlendirmektir.Gereç ve Yöntemler: Toplamda 200 adet monolitik zirkonya örneği hazırlandı ve 50-µm alüminyum oksit kumu kullanılarak 2,5 bar basınç altında kumlandı. Daha sonra, 10 farklı kendinden adezivli rezin siman MDP içerikli primer uygulaması yapılarak veya yapılmadan zirkonya örneklere bağlandı. Rezin uygulanmış örneklere 24 saat suda bekleme süresinden sonra 5.000 termal döngü (5- 55 °C) uygulandı. Örneklerin SBS değerleri evrensel bir test makinesi kullanılarak ölçüldü. Başarısızlık tipleri stereomikroskop altında incelendi. Veriler iki-yönlü ANOVA ve Tukey dürüstçe anlamlı fark testleri kullanılarak istatistiksel olarak analiz edildi. Bulgular: İstatistiksel analizler farklı rezin siman grupları arasında önemli farklılıklar olduğunu ortaya koymuştur (p

Effect of an MDP-containing Primer on the Bond Strength Between Ten Different Resin Cements and Air-abraded Monolithic Zirconia

Objective: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the shear bond strength(SBS) of different self-adhesive luting systems to airborne-particleabraded monolithic zirconia ceramic, with or without the application of a10-methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP)-based ceramic primer.Materials and Methods: A total of 200 monolithic zirconia specimens wereprepared and air-abraded using 50-µm aluminum oxide particles under a pressureof 2.5 bar. Ten different self-adhesive resin cements were then bonded to thezirconia specimens with or without the use of an MDP-containing primer. After24 h of water storage, all of the resin-bonded samples were thermocycled 5,000times (5-55 °C). The SBS of the specimens was measured using a universal testingmachine, and failure types were examined under a stereomicroscope. The datawere statistically analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s honestly significantdifference tests.Results: Statistical analyses revealed significant differences between the differentresin cement groups (p

PDF

___

1. Pittayachawan P, McDonald A, Petrie A, Knowles JC. The biaxial flexural strength and fatigue property of Lava Y-TZP dental ceramic. Dent Mater 2007; 23: 1018-29.
2. Denry I, Kelly JR. State of the art of zirconia for dental applications. Dent Mater 2008; 24: 299-307.
3. Piconi C, Maccauro G. Zirconia as a ceramic biomaterial. Biomaterials 1999; 20: 1-25.
4. Kosmac T, Oblak C, Jevnikar P, Funduk N, Marion L. Strength and reliability of surface treated Y-TZP dental ceramics. J Biomed Mater Res 2000; 53: 304-13.
5. Manicone PF, Rossi Iommetti P, Raffaelli L. An overview of zirconia ceramics: basic properties and clinical applications. J Dent 2007; 35: 819-26.
6. Kitayama S, Nikaido T, Takahashi R, Zhu L, Ikeda M, Foxton RM, et al. Effect of primer treatment on bonding of resin cements to zirconia ceramic. Dent Mater 2010; 26: 426-32.
7. Preis V, Letsch C, Handel G, Behr M, Schneider-Feyrer S, Rosentritt M. Influence of substructure design, veneer application technique, and firing regime on the in vitro performance of molar zirconia crowns. Dent Mater 2013; 29: 113-21.
8. Alessandretti R, Borba M, Benetti P, Corazza PH, Ribeiro R, Della Bona A. Reliability and mode of failure of bonded monolithic and multilayer ceramics. Dent Mater 2017; 33: 191-7.
9. Sailer I, Makarov NA, Thoma DS, Zwahlen M, Pjetursson BE. All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part I: Single crowns (SCs). Dent Mater 2015; 31: 603-23.
10. Pjetursson BE, Sailer I, Makarov NA, Zwahlen M, Thoma DS. All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part II: Multiple-unit FDPs. Dent Mater 2015; 31: 624-39.
11. Venezia P, Torsello F, Cavalcanti R, D’Amato S. Retrospective analysis of 26 complete-arch implant-supported monolithic zirconia prostheses with feldspathic porcelain veneering limited to the facial surface. J Prosthet Dent 2015; 114: 506-12.
12. Nakamura K, Harada A, Inagaki R, Kanno T, Niwano Y, Milleding P, et al. Fracture resistance of monolithic zirconia molar crowns with reduced thickness. Acta Odontol Scand 2015; 73: 602-8.
13. Edelhoff D, Ozcan M. To what extent does the longevity of fixed dental prostheses depend on the function of the cement? Working Group 4 materials: cementation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007; 18: 193-204.
14. Blatz MB, Sadan A, Kern M. Resin-ceramic bonding: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 2003; 89: 268-74.
15. Guazzato M, Albakry M, Ringer SP, Swain MV. Strength, fracture toughness and microstructure of a selection of all-ceramic materials. Part II. Zirconia-based dental ceramics. Dent Mater 2004; 20: 449-56.
16. Thompson JY, Stoner BR, Piascik JR, Smith R. Adhesion/ cementation to zirconia and other non-silicate ceramics: where are we now? Dent Mater 2011; 27: 71-82.
17. Wolfart M, Lehmann F, Wolfart S, Kern M. Durability of the resin bond strength to zirconia ceramic after using different surface conditioning methods. Dent Mater 2007; 23: 45-50.
18. Kumbuloglu O, Lassila LV, User A, Vallittu PK. Bonding of resin composite luting cements to zirconium oxide by two air-particle abrasion methods. Oper Dent 2006; 31: 248-55.
19. Zhang Y, Lawn BR, Rekow ED, Thompson VP. Effect of sandblasting on the long-term performance of dental ceramics. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2004; 71: 381-6.
20. Zhang Y, Lawn BR, Malament KA, Van Thompson P, Rekow ED. Damage accumulation and fatigue life of particle-abraded ceramics. Int J Prosthodont 2006; 19: 442-8.
21. Guazzato M, Quach L, Albakry M, Swain MV. Influence of surface and heat treatments on the flexural strength of Y-TZP dental ceramic. J Dent 2005; 33: 9-18.
22. Kern M. Bonding to oxide ceramics—laboratory testing versus clinical outcome. Dent Mater 2015; 31: 8-14.
23. Kern M, Barloi A, Yang B. Surface conditioning influences zirconia ceramic bonding. J Dent Res 2009; 88: 817-22.
24. Yang B, Barloi A, Kern M. Influence of air-abrasion on zirconia ceramic bonding using an adhesive composite resin. Dent Mater 2010; 26: 44-50.
25. Zhao L, Jian YT, Wang XD, Zhao K. Bond strength of primer/ cement systems to zirconia subjected to artificial aging. J Prosthet Dent 2016; 116: 790-6.
26. Yagawa S, Komine F, Fushiki R, Kubochi K, Kimura F, Matsumura H. Effect of priming agents on shear bond strengths of resin-based luting agents to a translucent zirconia material. J Prosthodont Res 2018; 62: 204-9.
27. Koizumi H, Nakayama D, Komine F, Blatz MB, Matsumura H. Bonding of resin-based luting cements to zirconia with and without the use of ceramic priming agents. J Adhes Dent 2012; 14: 385-92.
28. Dias de Souza GM, Thompson VP, Braga RR. Effect of metal primers on microtensile bond strength between zirconia and resin cements. J Prosthet Dent 2011; 105: 296-303.
29. de Souza G, Hennig D, Aggarwal A, Tam LE. The use of MDPbased materials for bonding to zirconia. J Prosthet Dent 2014; 112: 895-902.
30. Yang L, Chen B, Xie H, Chen Y, Chen Y, Chen C. Durability of Resin Bonding to Zirconia Using Products Containing 10-Methacryloyloxydecyl Dihydrogen Phosphate. J Adhes Dent 2018; 20: 279-87.
31. Inokoshi M, De Munck J, Minakuchi S, Van Meerbeek B. Metaanalysis of bonding effectiveness to zirconia ceramics. J Dent Res 2014; 93: 329-34.
32. de Oyagüe RC, Monticelli F, Toledano M, Osorio E, Ferrari M, Osorio R. Influence of surface treatments and resin cement selection on bonding to densely-sintered zirconium-oxide ceramic. Dent Mater 2009; 25: 172-9.
33. Lee SE, Bae JH, Choi JW, Jeon YC, Jeong CM, Yoon MJ, et al. Comparative Shear-Bond Strength of Six Dental Self-Adhesive Resin Cements to Zirconia. Materials 2015; 8: 3306-15.
34. Ahn JS, Yi YA, Lee Y, Seo DG. Shear Bond Strength of MDPContaining Self-Adhesive Resin Cement and Y-TZP Ceramics: Effect of Phosphate Monomer-Containing Primers. Biomed Res Int 2015; 2015: 389234.
35. Lehmann F, Kern M. Durability of resin bonding to zirconia ceramic using different primers. J Adhes Dent 2009; 11: 479-83.
36. Sailer I, Hämmerle CH. Zirconia ceramic single-retainer resinbonded fixed dental prostheses (RBFDPs) after 4 years of clinical service: a retrospective clinical and volumetric study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2014; 34: 333-43.
37. Chen L, Suh BI, Brown D, Chen X. Bonding of primed zirconia ceramics: evidence of chemical bonding and improved bond strengths. Am J Dent 2012; 25: 103-8.
38. Nagaoka N, Yoshihara K, Feitosa VP, Tamada Y, Irie M, Yoshida Y, et al. Chemical interaction mechanism of 10-MDP with zirconia. Sci Rep 2017; 7: 45563.
39. Feitosa VP, Sauro S, Ogliari FA, Ogliari AO, Yoshihara K, Zanchi CH, et al. Impact of hydrophilicity and length of spacer chains on the bonding of functional monomers. Dent Mater 2014; 30: 317-23.
40. Wegner SM, Kern M. Long-term resin bond strength to zirconia ceramic. J Adhes Dent 2000; 2: 139-47.
41. de Souza GM, Silva NR, Paulillo LA, De Goes MF, Rekow ED, Thompson VP. Bond strength to high-crystalline content zirconia after different surface treatments. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2010; 93: 318-23.
42. Al-Harbi FA, Ayad NM, Khan ZA, Mahrous AA, Morgano SM. In vitro shear bond strength of Y-TZP ceramics to different core materials with the use of three primer/resin cement systems. J Prosthet Dent 2016; 115: 84-9.
43. Schmid-Schwap M, Graf A, Preinerstorfer A, Watts DC, Piehslinger E, Schedle A. Microleakage after thermocycling of cemented crowns--a meta-analysis. Dent Mater 2011; 27: 855-69.