Gustavo GOZZI

5413

Arap Baharı Sonrası Avro-Akdeniz İlişkileri Üzerine Eleştirel Bakışlar

Makale “Arap Baharı” ayaklanmaları ile başlayan dönüşümün, Roma Anlaşmasından 2015’de Komşuluk Politikasının gözden geçirilmesine kadar olan döneme dair Avrupa-Akdeniz İlişkileri tarihini ve bu ilişkilere dair gelecek perspektiflerini yeniden düşünme ihtiyacı doğurduğuna işaret etmektedir. Avrupa Devletlerinin Afrika ve Akdeniz’in Güney kıyılarında yeralan koloni geçmişi olan devletler üzerindeki etkisi çok yüksek olduğundan kolonyalizmin kültürel mirası halen oldukça güçlüdür. Makale, ”AvroAfrika Projesi” çerçevesinde eski koloni devletleri ile imzalanan ortaklık anlaşmalarının, 1957’de AET’nin kuruluşunda oynadığı önemli role vurgu yapmaktadır. Kolonyal mirasın üstesinden gelmek için Avrupa’nın, Akdeniz’in güney kıyılarındaki ülkelere yönelik korumacı politikalarının ve koşulluluk ilkesinin radikal bir biçimde değiştirilmesi gerekmektedirAkdeniz’de gerçek bir ortaklığın ve karşılıklı bağımlılık koşullarının oluşabilmesi için bu gereklidir. Bu perspektiften bakıldığında, göçmeni, hem menşe ülkesinin hem de kendisini kabul eden yeni ülkenin kalkınmasına katkıda bulunan ulusaşırı bir aktör olarak gören farklı bir göç politikasının da geliştirilmesi gerekir

Critical Perspectives on Euro-Mediterranean Relations after the “Arab Spring”

The essay points out that the transformations caused by the uprisings of the “Arab Spring” imply thenecessity of rethinking the history of the Euro-Mediterranean relations – since the Treaty of Rome(1957) until the Review of the European Neighbourhood Policy in 2015 – and of reconsidering theirfuture perspectives. In these relations the cultural legacy of colonialism is still very strong through theinfluence that the western powers have continued to exercise towards the postcolonial States both inAfrica and the southern shore of Mediterranean. In particular the study outlines the colonial concernsthat played central role in the establishment of the EEC in 1957 through the association agreementswith the postcolonial States in the frame of the project called “Eurafrica”.The overcoming of the colonial heritage ought to radically change the European protectionist policiesand the conditionality clause towards the countries of the southern shore of Mediterranean in orderto realise a condition of interdependence and a real partnership of equals in the common space ofMediterranean. In this perspective, a different migration policy which considers the migrant as atransnational actor able to contribute to the development of both his country of origin and of thereceiving one is also necessary.
PDF

___

  • Zank, W. (2009). The Gradual Europeanization of North Africa: From ‘Arab Socialism’ to a ‘Stake in the EU’s Internal Market’. In Zank, W. (ed.) Clash or Cooperation of Civilizations? Overlapping Integration and Identities. Farnham (England) – Burlington (USA): Ashgate.
  • Wallerstein, I (2005). Africa: the Politics of Independence and Unity, new edn,. Lincoln and London: University of Nebraska Press (1961).
  • M. Trentin, M. (2012). “The Distant Neighbours. The Cooperation Agreements between the EEC and the Mashreq, 1977”, in Calandri, E., Caviglia, D. and Varsori, A. (ed.) Détente in Cold War Europe. Politics and Diplomacy in the Mediterranean and the Middle East. London and New York: I.B.Tauris.
  • Tourme-Jouannet, E. (2013). What Is a Fair International Society?, Oxford and Portland. Oregon: Hart Publishing.
  • Romagnoli A. and Mengoni L. (2014). The Economic Development Process in the Middle East and North Africa. London and New York: Routledge
  • Raux, J. (2000) “Association et perspectives partenariales”, in Labouz, M.-F (ed.) Le partenariat de l’Union européenne avec les pays tiers: Conflits et convergences. Brussels: Bruylant.
  • Pocar, F. (1981). “Caratteri ed evoluzione degli accordi internazionali stipulati dalla CEE”, Diritto Comunitario e degli Scambi Internazionali, XX(1), 5-17.
  • Pierini, M. (2016). “Is the European Union Standing the Mediterranean Test? The Lack of a European Foreign and Security Policy in the Face of the Current Turmoil”, IEMed: Mediterranean Yearbook, 76-81
  • Paciello, M.C. (2013). “The Euro Crisis and Euro-Mediterranean Relations”, IEMed: Mediterranean Yearbook, 83-88.
  • Noudehou, J. (1990). “Le Nouvel Ordre Economique International: Un nouvel ordre de stabilisation interne ou un exemple de derivation?”, Revue de Droit International, 68(1), 31-38.
  • Martines, F. (1991). “La politica di cooperazione allo sviluppo della CEE”, Rivista Italiana di Diritto pubblico comunitario, 27(1), 403-421.
  • Mailafiah, O. (1997). Europe and Economic Reform in Africa: Structural Adjustment and Economic Diplomacy, London: Routledge, 60.
  • Mouhoud, El M. (2012). “The Arab Economies in the Face of the Crisis: Assessment and Perspectives since the Tunisian Revolution”, IEMed: Mediterranean Yearbook, 39 – 44.
  • S. Lavenex, S. and Stucky, R. (2011). “Partnering for Migration in EU External Relations,” in Kunz, R., Lavenex, S. and Panizzon, M. (ed.) Multilayered Migration Governance: The Promise of Partnership. London: Routledge.
  • Lannon, E. (2015). ”More for More and Less for Less”: from the Rhetoric to the Implementation of the ENI in the Context of the 2015 ENP Review, IEMed: Mediterranean Yearbook, 220-224.
  • Kothari, U. (2005). “From Colonial Administration to Development Studies: A Post-Colonial Critique of the History of Development Studies”, in Kothari, U. (ed.) A Radical History of Development Studies, ed. U. Kothari. London and New York: Zed Books.
  • Isoni, A. (2013). “Da Barcellona a Marsiglia: Le politiche dell’Unione Europea nel Mediterraneo”, in Cafaro, S. (ed.) Le relazioni euro-mediterranee: Dai primi accordi all’Unione per il Mediterraneo. Naples: ESI.
  • Hansen, P. and Jonsson, S. (2014). Eurafrica. The untold history of European Integration and Colonialism. London-New York: Bloomsbury.
  • Halliday F. (2005). “The Three Dustbins of History”, in Halliday F., Political Journeys. London: Saqi Books
  • Fanon, F. (2006). “Une crise continuée”, in Fanon, F. (ed.) Pour la révolution africaine: Écrits politiques. Paris: Éditions la Découverte.
  • European Council (2015). Council conclusions on the Review of the European Neighbourhood Policy, 20th April 2015.
  • European Commission, EU-Turkey Statement: Questions and Answers, Brussels, 19th March 2016, [Online], Available: http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-16-963_en.htm.
  • European Commission, The EU-Turkey Cooperation: A € 3 billion Refugee Facility for Turkey, Brussels, 24th November 2015.
  • European Commission and the High Representative of the EU for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (2015). Review of the European Neighborhood Policy, JOIN (2015) 50 final, Brussels, 18th November 2015.
  • European Commission and the High Representative of the EU for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (2015). Towards a New European Neighborhood Policy, JOIN (2015) 6 final, Brussels, 4th March 2015.
  • European Commission (2011). The Global Approach to Migration and Mobility, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee, and the Committee of the Regions, COM (2011) 743 final, Brussels, 18th November 2011.
  • European Commission and the High Representative of the EU for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (2011). A New Response to a Changing Neighbourhood: A Review of the European Neighbourhood Policy, COM (2011) 303, Brussels, 25th May 2011.
  • European Commission and the High Representative of the EU for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (2011). A Partnership for Democracy and Shared Prosperity with the Southern Mediterranean, COM (2011) 200 final, Brussels, 8th March 2011.
  • European Commission (1995). Strengthening the Mediterranean Policy of the European Union: Proposals for Implementing a Euro-Mediterranean Partnership, COM (95) 72 final, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
  • D’Argenio, A. (2016). “Le impronte prese con la forza”, la Repubblica, 17th March.
  • Coryell, S. (1962). “French Africa and the Common Market”, Africa Today, 9, 12-13.
  • Colombo S. and Tocci N. (2012). “The EU Response to the Arab Uprising: Old Wine in New Bottles?”, in Alcaro R. and Haubrich-Seco M. (ed.) Rethinking Western Policies in Light of the Arab Uprisings. Rome: Edizioni Nuova Cultura.
  • Cassarino, J.-P. (2012). “Reversing the Hierarchy of Priorities in EU-Mediterranean Relations”, in Peters, J. (ed.) The European Union and the Arab Spring. Plymouth: Lexington Books.
  • Brady, H. (2012). “The Schengen Crisis in the Framework of the Arab Spring”, IEMed: Mediterranean Yearbook, 275-278.
  • Borrell, J. (2016). “Crisis, Identity and Raison d’Être of ten European Union”, IEMed: Mediterranean Yearbook, 82-89.
  • Balfour, R. (2012). “New Paradigms for the EU-South Mediterranean: Rethinking Conditionality?”, IEMed: Mediterranean Yearbook, 64-68.
  • Angioi, S. (2006). Il principio di condizionalità e la politica mediterranea dell’Unione Europea, Naples: ESI.
  • Abedini, J. and Péridy, N. (2008). “The Greater Arab Free Trade Area (GAFTA): An Estimation of Trade Effects,” Journal of Economic Integration, 23(4), 848–872.
  • Abdel Aziz, N. (2016). “Managing Migration in the Eastern Mediterranean: Challenges and Opportunities”, IEMed: Mediterranean Yearbook, 109-112.
Marmara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilimler Dergisi-Cover
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 2 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2013
  • Yayıncı: Marmara Üniversitesi
Arşiv
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Birlikten Ziyade Entegre Bir Bölge: Akdeniz

Deniz GENÇ, Erhan DOĞAN

Arap Baharı Sonrası Avro-Akdeniz İlişkileri Üzerine Eleştirel Bakışlar

Gustavo GOZZI

Kuvvet ve Entegrasyon: Avro-Akdeniz İlişkilerine Tarihsel Bir Bakış

Massimiliano TRENTIN

Güney Akdeniz Perspektifinden Avro-Akdeniz Göç Olgusunun ve İşbirliği’nin Geleceği

Bachir HAMDOUCH

Doğu-Batı/Kuzey-Güney İkilikleri Çerçevesinde Coğrafi Bir Tahayyül Olarak Akdeniz

Sezgi DURGUN