Engin KANDIRALI, Mehmet Ata TOPÇUOĞLU, Atilla SEMERCİÖZ, Ahmet METİN

Double intrauterine device: Presented with protruding urethral stone

ISSN: 1019-1941
Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 3 Sayı
Başlangıç: 1988
Yayıncı: Marmara Üniversitesi

İntrauterin araçlar doğum kontrol yöntemi olarak sık kullanılmaktadır. Uterus perforasyonu ve intrauterin aracın yer değiştirmesi seyrek görülen ciddi bir komplikasyondur. Burada üretra taşı bulgusuyla başvuran hastada saptanan çift intraüterin araç vakası sunulmuştur.

Üretra taşı ile başvuran çift: İntrauterin araç

Intrauterine devices (IUDs) are widely used for reversible contraception. Perforation of the uterus and migration of the device into the retroperitoneal or abdominal cavity is a major but an infrequent complication. We present this report to highlight two interesting aspects of this case: One is that two IUDs were present simultaneously and second is that the patient presented with urethral stone after an asymptomatic period of 10 years.

PDF

___

1) Nitke S, Rabinerson D, Dekel A, et al Lost levonorgestrel IUD: diagnosis and therapy. Contraception 2004; 69:289-293.
2) Markovitch O, Klein Z, Gidoni Y, et al Extrauterine mislocated IUD: is surgical removal mandatory? Contraception 2002; 66:105-108.
3) Hick EJ, Hernandez J, Yordan R Bladder calculus resulting from the migration of an intrauterine contraceptive device. J Urol 2004; 172:1903.
4) Hoscan MB, Kosar A, Gumustas U, et al Intravesical migration of intrauterine device resulting in pregnancy. Int J Urol 2006; 13:301-302.
5) Farmer M, Webb A. Intrauterine device insertion-related complications: can they be predicted? J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care 2003; 29:227-231.