Rethinking large group lectures – how far in this format?
Objective: The aim of this study is to determine the perceptions, attitudes, and behaviour of medical students and lecturers regarding the lectures and their effects on students’ learning behaviour. Materials and Methods: This was a qualitative study including multi-methods. Researchers observed lecture ambiance and activities in two courses. Lectures were observed and slide-presentations were evaluated. Additionally, in-depth and focus group interviews were conducted. Results: Two researchers attended and observed 75 lectures. The average number of attendees was 51.21. Eighty percent of lecturers did not introduce any activities to attract attention and prepare students for the lecture. Only 12% of lectures were taught interactively. Of the evaluated 43 (69.80%) slide-presentations, sufficient association or integration was not made between clinical and basic sciences. Conclusion: This study revealed that the lectures created negative feelings and thoughts in students and lecturers, and led to undesirable attitudes and behaviour. It is essential to focus on giving interactive lectures which aim at developing reasoning, decisionmaking, and evaluation competencies. The most significant factors determining students’ attendance and appraisal of the lectures were related to the preparation of the lecturers, the intensity of the content, integration between basic science and clinical science, and the presentation skills.
___
- [1] Jones SE. Reflections on the Lecture: Outmoded Medium or
Instrument of Inspiration?. J Furth High Educ 2007;31: 397-
406. doi: 10.1080/030.987.70701656816.
- [2] Narayan R, Rodriguez C, Araujo J. Constructivism –
constructive learning theory. In: Beverly J Irby, ed. The
Handbook of Educational Theories. 1st ed. US: Information
Age Publishing, 2013:169,183.
- [3] Long A, Lock B. Lectures and large group. In: Swancwick T,
ed. Understanding Medical Education; Evidence, Theory and
Practice. 2nd ed. UK:Wiley Blackwell, 2014:137,148.
- [4] Asad MR, Amir K, Tadvi NA, et al. Perception of medical
undergraduate students about interactive lectures in an
outcome‐based integrated curriculum: a cross-sectional
study. J Educ Health Promot 2017;6:100. doi: 10.4103/jehp.
jehp_38_17
- [5] Massingham P, Herrington T. Does Attendance Matter? An
Examination of Student Attitudes, Participation, Performance
and Attendance. J Univ Teach Learn Pract 2006;3:83-103. doi:
10.53761/1.3.2.3.
- [6] Bates M, Curtis S, Dismore H. Learning approaches and
lecture attendance of medical students. J Furth High Educ
2018;42:248-58. doi: 10.1080/0309877X.2016.126.1089.
- [7] Flexner A. Medical education in the United States and
Canada: a report to the Carnegie Foundation for the
Advancement of Teaching. Bulletin No. 4, 1910. http://archive.
carnegiefoundation.org/publications/pdfs/elibrary/Carnegie_
Flexner_Report.pdf (Accessed on November 11, 2021).
- [8] Mustafa T, Farooq Z, Asad Z, et al. Lectures in medical
educaton: what students think?. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad
2014;26:21-5.
- [9] Manzoor I, Mumtaz A, Habib M, Tariq S, Elahee M, Javaid I.
Lectures in medical education: students’ views. J Ayub Med
Coll Abbottabad 2011;23:118-21.
- [10] Webb EM, Naeger DM, Fulton TB, Straus CM. Learning
objectives in radiology education: why you need them
and how to write them. Acad Radiol 2013;20:358-63. doi:
10.1016/j.acra.2012.10.003.
- [11] Moss K, Crowley M. Effective learning in science: the
use of personal response systems with a wide range of
audiences. Comput Educ 2011;56:36-43. doi: 10.1016/j.
compedu.2010.03.021.
- [12] Jen A, Webb EM, Ahearn B, Naeger DM. Lecture evaluations
by medical students: concepts that correlate with scores. J Am
Coll Radiol 2016;13:72-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2015.06.025.
- [13] Dhaliwal U. Absenteeism and under achievement in final year
medical students. Natil Med J India 2003;16:34-7.
- [14] Massingham P, Herrington T. Does attendance matter? An
examination of students’ attitudes, participation, performance
and attendance? J Uni Teach Learn Pract 2006;3:83-103. doi:
10.53761/1.3.2.3.
- [15] Charlton BG. Lectures are an effective teaching method
because they exploit human evolved ‘human nature’ to
improve learning. Med Hypotheses 2006;67:1261-65. doi:
10.1016/j.mehy.2006.08.001.
- [16] Chaudhry R, Dullo P, Gupta U. Attitude of 1st year MBBS
medical students about two different visual aids in Physiology
lectures. Pak J Physiol 2009;5:16-9.
- [17] Bollemier SG, Wenger PJ, Fornaish AB. Impact of online
lecture-capture on student outcomes in a therapeutic course.
Am J Pharma Educ 2010;74:1-5. doi: 10.5688/aj7407127.
- [18] Campbell AM, Ikonne US, Whelihan KE, Lewis JH. Faculty
perspectives on student attendance in undergraduate medical
education. Adv Med Educ Pract 2019;10: 759-68. doi: 10.2147/
AMEP.S208960.
- [19] Ikonne U, Campbell AM, Whelihan KE, Bay RC, Lewis JH.
Exodus from the classroom: student perceptions, lecture
capture technology, and the inception of on-demand
preclinical medical education. J Am Osteopath Assoc
2018;118:813-23. doi: 10.7556/jaoa.2018.174.
- [20] Zazulia AR, Goldhoff P. Faculty and medical student attitudes
about preclinical classroom attendance. Teach Learn Med
2014;26:327-34. doi: 10.1080/10401.334.2014.945028.
- [21] Chen F, Lui AM, Martinelli SM. A systematic review of the
effectiveness of flipped classrooms in medical education. Med
Educ 2017;51:585-97. doi: 10.1111/medu.13272.
- [22] Stevens CD. Repeal and replace? A note of caution for medical
school curriculum reformers. Acad Med. 2018;93:1425-27.
doi: 10.1097/ACM.000.000.0000002219.
- [23] Buja LM. Medical education today: all that glitters is not gold.
BMC Med Educ 2019;19:110. doi: 10.1186/s12909.019.1535-9.
- [24] Shahrvini B, Baxter SL, Coffey CS, MacDonald BV, Lander L.
Pre-clinical remote undergraduate medical education during
the COVID-19 pandemic: a survey study. Res Sq 2021;21:13.
doi: 10.1186/s12909.020.02445-2.
- [25] Wayne DB, Green M, Neilson EG. Medical education in the
time of COVID-19. Sci Adv 2020;6:eabc7110. doi:10.1126/
sciadv.abc7110.
- [26] Liang ZC, Ooi SBS, Wang W. Pandemics and their impact on
medical training: lessons from Singapore. Acad Med 2020
Sep;95:1359-61. doi: 10.1097/ACM.000.000.0000003441.
- [27] Sandhu P, de Wolf M. The impact of COVID-19 on the
undergraduate medical curriculum. Med Educ Online
2020;25:1764740. doi: 10.1080/10872.981.2020.1764740.
- [28] Woolliscroft JO. Innovation in response to the COVID-19
pandemic crisis. Acad Med 2020;95:1140-42. doi: 10.1097/
ACM.000.000.0000003402.