___

• Ades, A. ve Di Tella, R. (1997). The new economics of corruption: A survey and some new results. Political Studies, 45(3), 496-515.
• Algan, N., Aktakas, B. G. ve Tekin, İ. (2014). Toplumsal bir mesele olarak yolsuzluk ve büyüme ilişkisi: Türkiye örneği. International Conference on Eurasian Economies, 1-10.
• Anderson, J. ve Marcouiller, D. (2002). Insecurity and the pattern of trade: An empirical investigation. Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(2), 342-352.
• Bai, J., Jayachandran, S., Malesky, E. J. ve Olken, B. A. (2013). Does economic growth reduce corruption? Theory and evidence from Vietnam. NBER Working Paper, 19483, 1-56.
• Bandyopadhyay, S. ve Roy, S. (2007). Corruption and trade protection: Evidence from Panel data. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Working Paper, 22A, 1-22.
• Braun, M. ve Di Tella, R. (2004). Inflation, ınflation variability, and corruption. Economics & Politics, 16(1), 77-100.
• Bayar, G. (2010). Türkiye’de yolsuzluk-ekonometrik bir inceleme. Erciyes Üniversitesi SBE Dergisi, 28, 105-131.
• Berksoy, T. ve Yıldırım, N. E. (2017). Yolsuzluk kavramına genel bir bakış: problemler ve çözüm önerileri. Journal of Awareness, 2(1), 1-18.
• Beverelli, C. ve Ticku, R. (2020). Trade facilitation and tariff evasion. Chapman University Economic Science Institute Working Papers, 20-24, 1-37.
• Breitung, J. (2000). The local power of some unit root tests for panel data. In B. H. Baltagi (Eds.), Nonstationary Panels, Panel Cointegration, and Dynamic Panels, (pp. 161-178), Amsterdam: JAI Press.
• Breusch, T. S., ve Pagan, A. R. (1980). The lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. The Review of Economic Studies, 47(1), 239–253.
• Broadman, Harry G. ve Recanatini, F. (2001). Seeds of corruption: Do market ınstitutions matter? MOCT-MOST, 11, 359–392.
• Campante, Filipe R., Chor, D. ve Do, Quoch-Anh (2009). Instability and the incentives for corruption. Economics and Politics, 21(1), 42-92.
• Campbell, N. ve Saha, S. (2013). Corruption, democracy and Asia-Pacific countries. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 18(2), 290-303.
• Damania, R., Fredriksson, P. G. ve Mani, M. (2004). The persistence of corruption and regulatory compliance failures: Theory and evidence. Public Choice, 12, 363–390.
• De Jong, E. ve Bogmans, C. (2011). Does corruption discourage international trade? European Journal of Political Economy, 27, 385–398.
• Drenski, A., Hallren, R. ve Lee, J. N. (2019). Tariff evasion in global trade data. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 28(7), 829–842.
• Drury, A. C., Krieckhaus., J. ve Lusztig, M. (2006). Corruption, democracy, and economic growth. International Political Science Review, 27(2), 121–136.
• Dumitrescu, E. I. ve Hurlin, C. (2012). Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Economic Modelling, 29(4), 1450-1460.
• Dutt, P. (2009). Trade protection and bureaucratic corruption: An empirical investigation. The Canadian Journal of Economics, 42(1), 155-183.
• Dutt, P. ve Traca, D. (2010). Corruption and bilateral trade flows: Extortion or evasion. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 92(4), 843-860.
• Efeoğlu, R., Azgün, S. ve Emsen, Ö. (2020). Makroekonomik performans göstergelerinin yolsuzluğa etkisi. İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 9(3) , 2116-2137.
• Elbahnasavy, N. G. ve Revier, C. F. (2012). The determinants of corruption: Cross-country-panel data analysis. The Developing Economies, 50(4), 311-33.
• Gatti, R. (1999). Corruption and trade tariffs, or a case for uniform tariffs. The World Bank Development Research Group Discussion Paper.
• Gatti, R. (2004). Explaining corruption: Are Open countries less corrupt? Journal of International Development, 16(6), 851-861.
• Gerni, M., Emsen, Ö. S., Özdemir, D. ve Buzdağlı, Ö. (2012). Yolsuzluğun belirleyicileri ve büyüme ile ilişkileri. International Conference on Eurasian Economies, 131-139.
• Gezikol, B. ve Tunahan, H. (2018). The econometric analysis of the relationship between perceived corruption, foreign trade and foreign direct investment in the context of international indices. Alphanumeric Journal, 6(1), 117-132.
• Gil-Pareja, S., Llorca-Vivero, R. ve Martínez-Serrano, J. A. (2019). Corruption and international trade: A comprehensive analysis with gravity. Applied Economic Analysis, 27(79), 3-20.
• Goel, Rajeev K., ve Nelson, Michael A. (2005). Economic freedom versus political freedom: Cross-country influences on corruption. Australian Economic Papers, 44(2), 121-133.
• Graeff, P., ve Mehlkop, G. (2003). The impacts of economic freedom on corruption: Different patterns for rich and poor countries. European Journal of Political Economy, 19(3), 605-620.
• Hamdi, H. ve Hâkimi, A. (2019). Corruption, FDI, and growth: An empirical investigation into the Tunisian context. The International Trade Journal, 34(4), 415-440.
• Im, К., M. H. Pesaran ve Y. Shin (2003) Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics, 115, 53-74.
• Jiankun, L., Bo, M. ve Hongsheng, Z. (2019). Corruption, productivity, and import liberalization in China: A firm-level analysis. Japan External Trade Organization, Institute of Developing Economies Discussion Paper, 748, 1-25.
• Johansen, S. (1988), Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12(2-3), 231-254.
• Kao, C. ve Chiang, M. H. (2001). On the estimation and inference of a cointegrated regression in panel data. In: Baltagi, B.H., Fomby, T.B., Carter Hill, R. (Eds.), Nonstationary Panels, Panel Cointegration, and Dynamic Panels; Advances in Econometrics, (pp. 179–222), Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
• Kapetanios, G., Pesaran, M.H. ve Yamagata, T. (2011). Panels with non-stationary multifactor error structures. Journal of Econometrics, 160, 326–348.
• Kaufmann, D. (1997). Corruption: The facts. Foreign Policy, 107, 114–131.
• Kellenberg, D. ve Levinson, A. (2018). Misreporting trade: Tariff evasion, corruption, and auditing standards. Review of International Economic, 27(1), 106-129.
• Knack, S. ve Azfar, O. (2003). Trade intensity, country size and corruption. Economics of Governance, 4(1), 1-18.
• Kolstad, I. ve Wiig, A. (2015). Does democracy reduce corruption? Democratization, 23(7), 1198–1215.
• Konu, A. ve Ata, A.Y. (2016). Yolsuzluk ve ekonomik özgürlük ilişkisi: AB ülkeleri üzerine yatay kesit analizi. Niğde Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 9(1), 195-207.
• Kotera, G., Okada, K. ve Samreth, S. (2012). Government size, democracy, and corruption: An Empirical investigation. Economic Modelling, 29, 2340–2348.
• Laajaj, R., Eslava, M. ve Kinda, T. (2019), The costs of bureaucracy and corruption at customs: Evidence from the computerization of imports in Colombia. Documento CEDE No. 2019-08, 1-41.
• Lederman, D., Loayza N. ve Soares R. R. (2005). Accountability and corruption: Political institutions matter. Economics and Politics, 17(1), 1-35.
• Leff, N. (1964). Economic development through bureaucratic corruption. American Behavioral Scientist, 82, 337–341.
• Lewandowski, P. (2007). PESCADF: stata module to perform pesaran's cadf panel unit root test in presence of cross section dependence. Warsaw School of Economics, Institute for Structural Research. Retrieved from http://fmwww.bc.edu/repec/bocode/p/pescadf.ado/
• Macrae, J. (1982). Underdevelopment and the economics of corruption: A game theory approach. World Development, 10(8), 677–687.
• Maajed, Muhammad T. (2014). Corruption and trade. Journal of Economic Integration, 29(4), 759-782.
• Mauro, P. (1995), Corruption and growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(3), 681-712.
• Mazllami, J. (2019). The impact of human development in corruption mitigation: a comparative analysis between Macedonia and Albania. Economia Aziendale Online, 10(1), 191-202.
• Montinola, G. R. ve Jackman, R. W. (2002). Sources of corruption: A cross-country study. British Journal of Political Science, 32(1), 147-170.
• Musila, J. W. ve Sigue, S. P. (2010). Corruption and international trade: An empirical investigation of African countries. The World Economy, 33(1), 129-146.
• Nye, J. (1967). Corruption and political development: A cost-benefit analysis. American Political Science Review, 61(2), 417–427.
• Pedroni, P. (2001). Fully modified OLS for heterogeneous cointegrated panels. In: Baltagi, B.H., Fomby, T.B., Carter Hill, R. (Eds.), Nonstationary Panels, Panel Cointegration, and Dynamic Panels; Advances in Econometrics, (pp. 93–130), Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
• Pellegrini, L., ve Gerlah, R. (2008). Causes of corruption: A survey of cross-country analyses and extended results. Economics of Governance, 9(3), 245-263.
• Pesaran, M. H. (2004). General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. IZA Discussion Paper No. 1240.
• Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(2), 265-312.
• Pesaran, M. H. ve Yamagata, T. (2008). Testing slope homogeneity in large panels. Journal of Econometrics, 142, 50–93.
• Phillips, P. ve Hansen, B. (1990). Statistical inference in instrumental variables regression with I(1) processes. Review of Economic Studies, 57, 99–125.
• Rehman, H. U. ve Naveed, A. (2007). Determinants of corruption and its relation to GDP (A Panel Study). Journal of Political Studies, 12, 27‐59.
• Reinikka, R., ve Svensson, J. (2005). Fighting corruption to improve schooling: Evidence from a newspaper campaign in Uganda. Journal of European Economic Association, 3, 259–267.
• Rock, M. T. (2009). Corruption and democracy. Journal of Development Studies, 45(1), 55-75.
• Rock, M. T. ve Bonnett, H. (2004). The comparative politics of corruption: Accounting for the East Asian paradox in empirical studies of corruption, growth and investment. World Development, 32(6), 999-1017.
• Saha, S. ve Ben Ali, M. S. (2017). Corruption and economic development: New evidence from the Middle Eastern and North African countries. Economic Analysis and Policy 54, 83–95.
• Saikkonen, P. (1991). Asymptotically efficient estimation of cointegration regressions. Econometric Theory, 7, 1–21.
• Sandholtz, W. ve Koetzle, W. (2000). Accounting for corruption: Economic structure, democracy and trade. International Studies Quarterly, 44, 31–50.
• Sandholtz, W., ve Gray, M. M. (2003). International integration and national corruption. International Organization, 57, 761–800.
• Sarvar, S. ve Pervaiz, K. M. (2013). An empirical investigation between trade liberalization and corruption: A panel data approach. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 4(3), 179-189.
• Serra, D. (2006). Empirical determinants of corruption: A sensitivity analysis. Public Choice, 126(1), 225–256.
• Shabbir, G. ve Anwar, M. (2008). Determinants of corruption in developing countries. The Pakistan Development Review, 46(4), 751-764.
• Shirazi, M. A. (2011). The impact of corruption on international trade. Denver Journal of International Law & Policy, 40(1-3), 435-446.
• Stock, J. ve Watson, M. (1993). A simple estimator of cointegrating vectors in higher order integrated systems. Econometrica, 61, 783–820.
• Swamy, P. A. V. B. (1970) Efficient inference in a random coefficient regression model, Econometrica, 38, 311–23.
• Thede, S. ve Gustafson, N. (2012). The multifaceted impact of corruption on international trade. The World Economy, 35(5), 651-666.
• Tosun, M.U. (2003). Yolsuzluğun nedenleri üzerine ampirik bir çalışma. Akdeniz İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi, 5, 125-146.
• Treisman, D. (2007). What have we learned about the causes of corruption from ten years of cross-national empirical research? Annual Review of Political Science, 10(1), 211–244.
• Türedi, S. ve Altıner, A. (2016). Economic and political factors affecting corruption in developing countries. International Journal of Economics and Research, 7(1), 120–136.
• Westerlund, J. (2007). Testing for error correction in panel data. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 69, 709–748.
• Yakub, A., Sessu, A., Sjahruddin, H. ve Haryono (2020). Exploring the nexus between foreign aid, corruption and economic growth in ASEAN countries. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 11(2), 63-83.