ORTA ASYA TÜRK CUMHURİYETLERİNİN LOJİSTİK VE TAİIMACILIK PERFORMANSLARI VE VERİMLİLİKLERİNİN ANALİZİ İÇİN HİBRİD BİRÇOK KRİTERLİ KARAR VERME MODELİ

Bağımsızlıklarını elde ettiklerinden beri, Avrupa ve Asya arasında önemli bir geçiş güzergâhı olan Orta Asya Türk Cumhuriyetlerinin küresel ticaretin yanı sıra, uluslararası taşımacılık ve lojistik operasyonlar açısından önemleri giderek artmaktadırlar. Bu ülkeler geçiş ülkeleri olmalarına ek olarak, lojistik ve ulaştırma alanında yaptıkları yatırımlar sayesinde küresel ticarette birer lojistik hub ülke olabilme çabası göstermektedirler. Öte yandan ulusal gelirlerinin artmasına bağlı olarak, bu ülkelerin ithalatı da artış gösterirken, aynı zamanda ihracatlarına konu olan ürünlerin çeşitlilikleri ve artan ihracata bağlı olarak elde ettikleri gelirler artmaktadır. Söz konusu ülkelerin küresel rekabette önemli bir aktör haline gelebilmeleri için lojistik ve ulaştırma faaliyetlerine ilişkin verimliliklerinin, etkinliklerinin ve performanslarının farkında olmaları ve alacakları kararları bu faktörlere dayandırmaları son derece önem arz eden bir konudur. Bu nedenle Orta Asya Türk Cumhuriyetlerinin lojistik ve taşımacılık alanında performanslarını değerlendirebilmek için sistematik ve yapısal nitelikte çözüm yolu öneren bir metodolojiye ve modele gereksinim duyulmaktadır. Bu çalışmada söz konusu ülkelerin lojistik verimliliklerini analiz edebilmek için entegre entropi ve EATWOS yöntemlerinden oluian hibrid bir model önerilmektedir. Seçilen model ülkelerin lojistik alanında kullandıkları girdi ve çıktı faktörlerine odaklanarak, verimlilik değerlerinin hesaplanmasına olanak sağlarken, aynı zamanda ülkelerin lojistik ve ulaştırma alanında performanslarını ve verimliliklerini karşılaştırma olanağı da sağlamaktadır.

A HYBRID MCDM MODEL FOR PERFORMANCE AND PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS OF LOGISTICS AND TRANSPORTATION PERFORMANCE OF CENTRAL ASIAN TURKIC REPUBLICS

Since their independence, the importance of Central Asian Turkic Republics in the perspective of international transportation and logistics operations in addition to global trade has been increasing. Especially, in addition to being a country of transit, each of them tries to be hub countries in the international trade thanks to investments, which were made in the fields of transportation and logistics by themselves. At the same time, while the import volume of these countries is shown an increase depending on their national incomes. As well as the range of products that subject to the export, total revenue of countries is also increased day by day. In order to be important actors in international trade, they should be aware of their productivity, affectivity, and performance and should base on their decisions to these factors. Therefore, it is needed a methodology and model, which suggest systematic and structural solution way in order to evaluate the performance of the Republics of Central Asia in the fields of logistics and transportation. In this study, a hybrid model, which consists of integrated entropy and EATWOS methods, is proposed in order to analyze the logistical affectivities of these countries. While the selected model can provide the calculation of the logistic performance scores of countries and it provides an opportunity of comparison of logistics affectivity and performance of these countries by focusing the output and input factors.

PDF

___

Banister, D., Berechman, Y. (2001). Transport Investment and The Promotion of Economic Growth. Journal of Transport Geography, 9, (3), 209-218.
Brockett, P.L., Golany, B., Li, S. (1998). Analysis of Intertemporal Efficiency Trends Using Rank Statistics with an Application Evaluating the Macro Economic Performance of OECD Nations. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 11, 169-182.
Caplice, C., Sheffi, Y. (1994). A Review and Evaluation of Logistics Metrics. The International Journal of Logistics, 15, (3), 280-290.
Chow, G., Heaver, T.D., Henriksson, L.E. (1994). Logistics Performance: Definition and Measurement. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 24, (1), 17-28.
Coelli, T., Estache, A., Perelman, S., Trujillo, L. (2003). A Primer On Efficiency Measurement for Utilities and Transport Regulators. The World Bank. Washington, D.C.
Cullinane, K., T.F., Wang, D.W., Song, Ji, P. (2006). The Technical Efficiency of Container Ports: Comparing Data Envelopment Analysis and Stochastic Frontier Analysis. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 40, 4, 354-374.
Erkan, B. (2014). The Importance and Determinants of Logistics Performance of Selected Countries. Journal of Emerging Issues in Economics. Finance and Banking (JEIEFB), 3, (6), 1237-1254.
Gogoneata, B. (2008). An Analysis of Explanatory Factors of Logistics Performance of a Country. The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC Journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, 10, 24, 143-156.
Hausman, W.H., Lee, H.L. Subramanian, U. (2005). The Impact of Logistics Performance on Trade. 22, (2), 236-252.
Heikkilä, J. (2002). From Supply to Demand Chain Management: Efficiency and Customer Satisfaction. Journal of Operations Management, 20, (6), 747-767.
Hwang, C.L., Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple Attribute Decision Making – Methods and Applications – A State-Of-The-Art Survey. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, NY.
Jaramillo, C.F., Freund, C., Reis, J.G., Arvis, J. F., Wiederer, C.K., Ojala, L.M., Shepherd, B.A., Raj, A.U.L., Dairabayeva, K.S., Kiiski, T.M.M. (2018). Connecting to Compete 2018: Trade Logistics in The Global Economy - The Logistics Performance Index and Its Indicators. World Bank Group, Washington, D.C.
Karami, A., Johansson, R. (2014). Utilization of Multi Attribute Decision Making Techniques to Integrate Automatic and Manual Ranking of Options. Journal of Information Science and Engineering, 30, 519-534. Layard, R. (1994). Cost-Benefit Analysis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Li, X., Wang, K., Liu, L., Xin, J., Yang, H., Gao, C. (2011). Application of The Entropy Weight and TOPSIS Method in Safety Evaluation of Coal Mines. Procedia Engineering, 26, 2085-2091.
Liu, C.L; Lyons, A.C; (2011). An Analysis of Third-Party Logistics Performance and Service Provision. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 47, (4), 547-570.
Martí, L., Puertas, R., García L. (2014). The Importance of the Logistics Performance Index in International Trade. Applied Economics, 46, (24), 2982-2992.
Özbek, A. (2015a). Çok Ölçütlü Karar Verme Yöntemleriyle Hayırsever Kuruluşlarında Verimlilik Analizi Efficiency Analysis in Charity Organizations by Multiple Criteria Decision. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 18, (2), 99-114.
Özbek, A. (2015b). Efficiency Analysis of the Turkish Red Crescent Between 2012 And 2014. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 7, (9), 322-334.
Özbek, A. (2015c). Analysis of Private Pension Companies in Turkey by EATWOS. European Journal of Business and Management, 7, (26), 31-43.
Özbek, A. (2015d). Efficiency Analysis of Non-Governmental Organizations Based in Turkey. International Business Research, 8, (9), 95-104.
Özbek, A. (2015e). Efficiency Analysis of the Turkish Red Crescent Between 2012 And 2014. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 7, (9), 322-334.
Özbek, A. (2015f). Gönüllü Kuruluşlarda Çalıianların Electre Yöntemine Göre Değerlendirilmesi. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 14, (54), 221-233.
Özbek, A. (2016). Efficiency Analysis of Gold Mining Companies Through Financial Statements. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 6, (10), 273-290.
Özbek, A. (2017). İlkokul Öğretmenleri Sağlik Ve Sosyal Yardim Sandiği'nin Finansal Performans Analizi. Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi İŞBF Dergisi, 7, (1), 1-31.
Puertas, R., Martí, L., García, L. (2014). Logistics Performance and Export Competitiveness: European Experience. Empirica, 41, 467.
Ruamsook, K., Russell, D.M., Thomchick, E.A. (2009). Sourcing from Low‐Cost Countries: Identifying Sourcing Issues and Prioritizing Impacts On Logistics Performance. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 20, (1), 79-96.
Shepherd, Günter. (2010). Measuring Supply Chain Performance: Current Research and Future Directions. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 55, (3/4), 242-258.
Soni, V., Singh, S., & Banwet, D. (2016). Precise Decisions in Indian Energy Sector by Imprecise Evaluation. International Journal of Energy Sector Management, 10, (1), 111-118.
Tongzon, J., Heng, W. (2005). Port Privatization, Efficiency and Competitiveness: Some Empirical Evidence from Container Ports (Terminals). Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 39, (5), 405-424.
Töyli, J., Häkkinen, L., Ojala, L., Naula, T. (2008). Logistics and Financial Performance: An Analysis of 424 Finnish Small and Medium‐Sized Enterprises. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 38, (1), 57-80.
Vining, A.R; Boardman, E.A. (1992). Ownership Versus Competition: Efficiency in Public Enterprise. Public Choice, 73, (2), 205-239.
Wang, T.C., Lee, H.D. (2009). Developing A Fuzzy TOPSIS Approach Based On Subjective Weights and Objective Weights. Expert Systems with Applications, 36, (5), 8980-8985.
Yuen, C., Zhang, A., Cheung, W. (2012). Port Competitiveness from The Users' Perspective: An Analysis of Major Container Ports in China and Its Neighboring Countries. Research in Transportation Economics, 35, (1), 34-40.
https://www.stat.gov.az/ [Erişim: 10.10.2018]
http://www.stat.gov.tm/ [Erişim: 14.10.2018]
https://www.stat.tj/en/ [Erişim: 15.10.2018]
http://stat.gov.kz/[Erişim: 09.11.2018]
http://www.stat.kg/en/[Erişim: 17.10.2018]
http://www.tuik.gov.tr [Erişim: 10.10.2018]
https://www.stat.uz/en/ [Erişim: 10.09.2018]
https://data.worldbank.org/ [Erişim: 21.10.2018]
https://www.iru.org [Erişim: 27.10.2018]
https://stats.oecd.org/ [Erişim: 20.10.2018]
https://ec.europa.eu [Erişim: 18.10.2018]
https://www.iaphworldports.org/statistics [Erişim: 15.10.2018]
http://www.denizticaretodasi.org.tr [Erişim: 17.10.2018]
http://www.udhb.gov.tr [Erişim: 13.10.2018]
www.turklim.org [Erişim: 10.10.2018]
https://www.tobb.org.tr/ [Erişim: 19.10.2018]
http://www.mtk.gov.kz/ [Erişim: 19.10.2018]
https://mft.uz [Erişim: 24.10.2018]
http://mincom.gov.az [Erişim: 24.10.2018]
https://www.railways.kz/en [Erişim: 24.10.2018]
https://www railway.uz/en [Erişim: 22.10.2018]
www.tcdd.gov.tr [Erişim: 18.10.2018]
www.mintrans.tj/ [Erişim: 16.10.2018]
stat.wto.org [Erişim: 16.10.2018]
https://lpi.worldbank.org/ [Erişim: 20.11.2018]