ŞEKERLİ VE TATLANDIRICILI İÇECEK VERGİSİNİ UYGULAYAN ÜLKE ÖRNEKLERİ VE TÜRKİYE DEĞERLENDİRMESİ

Vergiler, kamu harcamalarının finansmanını karşılama amacı dışında, ekonomik ve sosyal amaçlarla da alınabilmektedir. Şekerli ve tatlandırıcılı içecekler üzerindeki vergiler esasen daha sağlıklı bir toplum yapısına ulaşmada kullanılabilecek bir araç olarak karşımıza çıkmaktadır. Şekerli ve tatlandırıcılı içeceklerin içinde bulunan ilave kalorili şeker ve tatlandırıcıların neden olduğu hastalıkların önüne geçebilmek için vergilerle bu içeceklerin tüketiminin azaltılması yoluna gidilebilmektedir. Bu çalışmada, şekerli ve tatlandırıcılı içecek tüketiminin insan sağlığına olumsuz etkileri ele alınmakta, bu içeceklerin tüketiminin gelişimi ve artış nedenleri ortaya konulmakta, şekerli ve tatlandırıcılı içecek vergisini uygulayan ülke örnekleri incelenmekte ve Türkiye uygulaması değerlendirilmektedir. Anahtar Sözcükler: Vergileme, Şeker vergisi, Şeker vergisi uygulamaları, Türkiye’de şeker vergisi ABSTRACT

APPLYING OF SUGAR AND SWEETENED BEVERAGE TAX IN SAMPLE COUNTRIES AND EVALUATION OF TURKEY

There are also social purposes of taxes as well as fiscal purpose. The tax on sugar and sweetened beverages can be used as instruments to achieve healthy society. In order to combat diseases caused added caloric sugars and sweeteners which found in sugar and sweetened beverages, levy on taxes in order to reduce consumption of these beverages. In this study, the negative human health effects of sugar and sweetened beverage consumption are discussed, the reasons for the development and increase of consumption of these beverages are explained, examples of countries applied sugar and sweetened beverage tax are examined and Turkey implementation is evaluated.

___

  • Andreyeva Tatiana, W. Long, Michael ve Brownell, Kelly D. (2010). “The impact of food prices on consumption: a systematic review of research on the price elasticity of demand for food”, American Journal of Public Health, 100(2): 216-22.
  • APHA (2012). Taxes on Sugar-Sweetened Beverages. 1 Ağustos 2017 tarihinde https://www.apha.org/policies-and-advocacy/public-health-policy-statements/policy-database/2014/07/23/13/59/taxes-on-sugar-sweetened-beverages, adresinden erişildi.
  • Department Of Finance (2017). Sugar-Sweetened Drinks Tax. Budget 2018. Information Note.
  • EFSA (2013). “Energy” drinks report, Parma; 7 Ağustos 2017 tarihinde http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/press/news/130306, adresinden erişildi.
  • Falbe, Jennifer vd. (2016). “Impact of the Berkeley Excise Tax on Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Consumption”, Ajph Research, 106 (10): 1865-1871.
  • Fleming, Tom vd. (2014). “Global, regional, and national prevalence of overweight and obesity in children and adults during 1980–2013”, Lancet, 384 (9945): 766–81.
  • Gortmaker, Steven L. vd. (2015). “Three Interventions That Reduce Childhood Obesity Are Projected To Save More Than They Cost To Implement”, Health Affaırs 34(11): 1932–1939.
  • Hopkins, Johns ve Donaldson, Elisabeth (2013). “Advocating for Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Taxation”, A Case Study of Mexico, 2-34.
  • Huth, Peter J. vd. (2013). “Major food sources of calories, added sugars, and saturated fat and their contribution to essential nutrient intakes in the U.S. diet” Nutrition Journal, 12 (2013) :116.
  • IPH (2012). Proposed Sugar Sweetened Drinks Tax: Health Impact Assessment. The Institute of Public Healt in Ireland, Technical Report.
  • Köhler, K. vd. (2016). “Reducing the consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages and their negative health impact in Estonia, Evidence brief for policy”, Evidence-informed Policy Network (EVIPNet) Europe, Number 1.
  • Lavin, Rachel ve Timpson, Hannah (2013). Exploring the Acceptability of a Tax on Sugar-Sweetened Beverages. Brief Evidence Review. Applied Health and Wellbeing Partnership Centre for Public Health Liverpool John Moores University.
  • Malik, Vasanti, Schulze, Matthias B. ve Hu, Frank B. (2006). “Intake of sugar-sweetened beverages and weight gain: a systematic review”, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 84(2): 274–288.
  • Nakhimovsky, Sharon S. vd. (2016). “Taxes on Sugar-Sweetened Beverages to Reduce Overweight and Obesity in Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review”, Plos One, 1-22.
  • National Treasury (2016). Taxatıon of Sugar Sweetened Beverages, Policy Paper. South Africa.
  • OECD (2014), Obesity Update, 12 Eylül 2017 tarihinde http://www.oecd. org/health/Obesity-Update-2014.pdf, adresinden erişildi.
  • Paarlberg, Robert, Mozaffarian, Dariush ve Micha, Renata (2017). “Viewpoint: Can U.S. local soda taxes continue to spread?” Food Policy, 71 (2017): 1–7.
  • PAHO (2015). Taxes on Sugar-sweetened Beverages as a Public Health Strategy: The Experience of Mexico, Mexico Representative Office. Mexico D. F. Mexico 2015.
  • Popkin Barry M. Hawkes, Corinna (2016). “Sweetening of the global diet, particularly beverages: patterns, trends, and policy responses”, The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology, 4 (2):174- 1886.
  • Singh, Gitanjali M. vd. (2015a). “Estimated Global, Regional, and National Disease Burdens Related to Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Consumption in 2010”, Circulation, 132 (8): 639-666.
  • Singh, Gitanjali M. vd. (2015b). “Global, Regional, and National Consumption of Sugar-Sweetened Beverages, Fruit Juices, and Milk: A Systematic Assessment of Beverage Intake in 187 Countries”, PLoS One, 10 (8): 1-20.
  • Sustain (2013). A Children’s Future Fund: How food duties could provide the money to protect children’s health and the world they grow up in. 9 Eylül, 2017 tarihinde http://www.abpm.org.br/portugues/mensagens/imprensa/0532013/reinounidoachildrenfuture.pdf, adresinden erişildi.
  • James, T. W. Philip vd. (2005). Overweight and obesity (high body mass index). Geneva: World Health Organization.
  • The Lancet (2016). “Non-Communicable Disease Risk Factor Collaboration Trends inadult body-mass index in 200 countries from 1975 to 2014: a pooledanalysis of 1698 population-based measurement studies with 19·2 million participant”, 387 (10026): 1377–96.
  • Torre, Sophie B.D. vd. (2016). “Sugar-sweetened beverages and obesity risk in children and adolescents: a systematic analysis on how methodology quality may influence conclusions”, Journal of The Academy of Nutrıtıon and Dıetetıcs, 116 :638–659.
  • Wang, Y. Claire vd. (2012). “Penny-Per-Ounce Tax On Sugar-Sweetened Beverages Would Cut Health And Cost Burdens Of Diabetes”, Health Affairs, 31(1): 199–207.
  • WHO (2008). 2008–2013 Action Plan for the Global Strategy for the Prevention and Control of Noncommunicable Diseases. Geneva, 15 Eylül 2017
  • tarihinde http://www.who.int/nmh/publications/ncd_action_plan_en.pdf , adresinden erişildi.
  • WHO (2014). Global status report on noncommunicable diseases 2014. Geneva, 15 Eylül 2017 tarihinde http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstre am/10665/148114/1/9789241564854_eng.pdf, adresinden erişildi.
  • WHO (2015). Guideline: Sugars intake for adults and children. World Health Organization. 2015:1-49. Available from: 15 Eylül 2017 tarihinde http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/guidelines/sugars_intake/en/ adresinden erişildi.
  • WHO (2016). Global report on diabetes. 15 Eylül 2017 tarihinde http:// apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/204871/1/9789241565257_eng.pdf, adresinden erişildi.
  • WHO (2016). Taxes on sugary drinks: Why do it?, 15 Eylül 2017 tarihinde http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/250303/1/WHO-NMH-PND-16.5- eng.pdf, adresinden erişildi.
  • T. C. Yasalar (12.06.2002). Özel Tüketim Vergisi Kanunu, Ankara: Resmi Gazete (24783 sayılı).
  • T. C. Yasalar (05.12.2017). 7061 No’lu Bazı Vergi Kanunları İle Diğer Bazı Kanunlarda Değişiklik Yapılmasına Dair Kanun, Ankara: Resmi Gazete (30261 sayılı).