Canol KANDEMİR, Şenol KANDEMİR

4130

Muhasebe hilelerınin önlenmesive ortaya çıkarılmasında kullanılan çağdaş araç ve yöntemler

AB ve özellikle ABD’de yaşanan ve çeşitli muhasebe hileleri içeren büyük boyutlu şirket iflâslarından sonra işletmeler ve kamu kuruluşları bir yandan muhasebe hilelerini önleme ve ortaya çıkarmada kullanılan geleneksel araç ve yöntemlerin etkinliğini sorgularken diğer yandan yeni ortaya çıkan birtakım araç ve yöntemleri de daha sık ve yaygın biçimde kullanmaya başlamıştır. Çağdaş mekanizmaların kullanımı genellikle muhasebe hilelerini ortaya çıkarma ve önlemede muhasebe ve denetim alanına hukuk, güvenlik, teknoloji gibi yakından bağlantılı diğer alanların katkı ve destek vermesi biçiminde olmaktadır. Söz konusu mekanizmalar geleneksel mekanizmaları ikâme etmemekte, tam tersine hile ile mücadele gibi zor ve bir ya da birkaç kurumun yetki ve yeterliliğini aşan bir görevin ve sorumluluğun sorumlu taraflarca etkili bir biçimde yerine getirilmesine yardımcı olmaktadır. Yeni araç ve yöntemlerin etkinlik derecelerinin göreli olarak yüksek olması ve muhasebe hilelerinin giderek daha örgütlü ve karmaşık bir hale gelmesi göz önüne alındığında muhasebe hileleri ile mücadelenin elde mevcût bütün araç ve yöntemler ile geleneksel ve çağdaş yöntemlerin birlikte ve eşgüdüm içinde kullanılması ile yapılması gerektiği anlaşılmaktadır. Bu çalışma ilgili muhasebe ve denetim yazınının gözden geçirilmesiyle yeni mekanizmaların genel olarak ve özellikle nasıl kullanıldığını ve etkili biçimde kullanılabileceğini ortaya koymayı amaçlamaktadır.

The use of contemporary tools and methods for preventing and detecting accounting frauds

In the EU and especially USA, upon the occurrence of large-scale accounting scandals which involve various accounting frauds, the corporations and state-owned enterprises questioned on one hand the effectiveness of traditional tools and methods used to prevent and detect accounting frauds, on the other hand they began to use newly arisen tools and methods more frequently and commonly. The use of contemporary tools and methods brings the fields of accounting and auditing the support ond contributions of other closely-related fieds such as law, security, and technology. New tools and methods in question do not substitute for the traditional ones, but enable all parties in charge to perform and discharge such a difficult task and responsibility like the prevention and detection of accounting frauds,which falls outside the scope of authority and competence of one or a few parties only. Taking relatively high effectiveness of new tools and methods and highly organized and complex nature of accounting frauds, it is obvious that the fight against accounting frauds should be carried out with the help of all tools and methods in hand, namely by using traditional and contemporary tools in a cooperative and coordinated manner. By review of the relevant literature in accounting and auditing, this study aims at introducing how these new mechanisms are presently used and how they can effectively be used in general and particularly in preventing and detecting accounting frauds.
PDF

___

  • ACFE, (2008), 2008 ACFE Report to the Nation of Occupational Fraud & Abuse, Association of Certified Fraud Examiners”, Austin, USA.
  • Baker, Richard and Dwight M.Owsen, (2002), “Increasing the Role of Auditing in Corporate Governance, Critical Perspectives on Accounting. 13, (2002) 783-795.
  • Beasley, M.S., Carcello J.V., Hermanson, D.R. “Financial Reporting Fraud : Could It Happen to You?” The Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance. (May/June 2001) : 3-9
  • Beasley, Mark S., Joseph V. Carcello and Dana R. Hermanson, (1999), Fraudulent Financial Reporting : 1987-1997 An Analysis of U.S. Public Companies. COSO (Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission) Publications.
  • Beasley, Mark S., Joseph V. Carcello and Dana R. Hermanson, (2000), “Fraudulent Financial Reporting : Consideration of Industry Traits and Corporate Governance Mechanisms”, Accounting Horizons. 14, 4 (December 2000) . 441-454.
  • Beasley, Mark S., Joseph V. Carcello, Dana R. Hermanson and Paul Lapides, (2000), “Preventing Fraudulent Financial Reporting”, The CPA Journal (December 2000) : 15-21.
  • Biegelman, Martin T. and Joel T. Bartov, (2006). Executive Roadmap to Fraud Prevention and Internal Control: Creating a Culture of Compliance. New York : John Wiley&Sons.
  • Burrowes, Ashley W., Joseph Kastantin, Milorad M.Movicevic, (2004), “The Sarbanes-Oxley Act as a hologram of post-Enron disclosure : a critical realist commentary”, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 15(2004) 797-811.
  • Coderre, David, (2004), Fraud Detection : A Revealing Look at Fraud Data Analysis Techniques & Methods. 2. bs. Vancouver, British Columbia : Ekaros Analytical Inc
  • Coenen, Tracy, (2008). Essentials of Corporate Fraud. New York : John Wiley&Sons.
  • Crutchley, Claire E., Marlin R.H. Jensen and Beverly B. Marshall, (2007), “Climate for Scandal : Corporate Environment that Contribute to Accounting Fraud”, The Financial Review, 42(2007) 53-73.
  • Davidson, Brad A. and Clarance Ebersole, (2002), “Improving the Effectiveness of Audit Committees : A Post-Enron Update”, Bank Accounting & Finance. (April 2002).
  • Economic Crime: People, Culture & Controls, The Global Economic Crime Survey-2007, Turkey(2007). İstanbul : PriceWaterhouseCoopers Enterprise Governance, Getting the Right Balance (February 2004). New York : IFAC.
  • Giroux, Gary, (2003). Detecting Earnings Manipulation. USA : ACFE, Austin
  • Goldberg, Stephen and Dori Danko, (2003), “Corporate Governance : Big Changes Ahead”, The Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance. (July/August 2003).
  • Golden, Thomas W., Steven L. Skalak and Mona M. Clayton,, (2006), A Guide to Forensic Accounting Investigation. New York : John Wiley&Sons.
  • Green, Duncan L. Gren, (1999), “Litigation Risk for Auditors and the Risk Society”, Critical Perpectives on Accounting. 10 (1999) : 339-353.
  • Hall, J.J., (1996 ), “How to Spot Fraud” Journal of Accountancy, (October 1996) : 85-88
  • Hall, John J., (2005), “Answer Please: Fraud-Based Interviewing, Journal of Accountancy, (August 2005).
  • Imhoff, Eugene A., (2003), “Accounting Quality, Auditing and Corporate Governance”, Accounting Horizons. (Supplement 2003) : 117-128.
  • Johnson, G.G., Rudesill C.L., “An Investigation into Fraud Prevention and Detection of Small Businesses in the United States : Responsibilities of Auditors, Managers, and Business Owners”, Accounting Forum, 25, 1, (March 2001) : 56-78.
  • Krell, Eric, (2005), “What triggers financial restatements ?”, Business Finance, 10.05.
  • Latshaw, C.A., Elifoğlu, I.H., “Consideration of Fraud in a Financial Statement Audit”, Bank Accounting & Finance, (April 2003) : 27-32.
  • Lekan, Thomas, (2003), “Making an Auditor a Frauditor” Bank Accounting and Finance, (August 2003).
  • Mensah, Michael O., Hong V. Nguyen, and Satya N. Prattipati, (2006), “Transparency in Financial Statements : A Conceptual Framework from a User Perspective”, The Journal of American Academy of Business, 9, 1 (March 2006) : 47-51.
  • Miller, Paul B.W and Paul R.Bahnson, (2002). Quality Financial Reporting. New York : McGraw Hill.
  • Pacini, Carl and Richard Brody, (2005), “A Proactive Approach to Combat Fraud”, Internal Auditor, April 2005.
  • Ramos, Michael, (2008). Wiley Practioner’s Guide to GAAS 2008, New Jersey, USA : John Wiley & Sons., Hoboken,
  • Rezaee, Zabihollah, (2002), “The Three Cs of Fraudulent Financial Reporting, Internal Auditor, October 2002.
  • Rezaee, Zabiloullah, (2002). Financial Statement Fraud, March 2002, John Wiley&Sons, Inc., New York, USA.
  • Solomon, Jill, (2007). Corporate Governance and Accountability. New Jersey, USA : John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken.
  • Stern, Adrian, (2005), Focus on Fraud. California CPA. Thompson, Courtenay, (2003), “Willful Blindness”, Internal Auditor, June 2003.
  • Üstündağ, Saim, (1999). Muhasebe Standartları Oluşturulması Süreci ve Düzenleyici Kuruluşlar, Yeterlik Etüdü. Ankara.
  • Wells, Joseph T., (1990), “Six Common Myths about Fraud”, Journal of Accountancy, (February 1990).
  • Wells, Joseph T., (2004), “New Approaches to Fraud Deterrence”, Journal of Accountancy, (February 2004)
  • Wells, Joseph T., (2004), “Small Businesses, Big Losses”, Journal of Accountancy. (December 2004): 45-48.
  • Wells, Joseph T., (2008). Principles of Fraud Examination. New York: John Wiley&Sons.
Mali Çözüm-Cover
  • ISSN: 1303-5444
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1991
  • Yayıncı: İstanbul Serbest Muhasebeci Mali Müşavirler Odası
Arşiv
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

KDV oranlarındaki değişikliğin Türk finansal kiralama sektörüne etkisi

Taylan ALTINTAŞ, EMRE SELÇUK SARI

Yeni Türk ticaret kanunu'nda anonim şirket yönetim kurulunun “muhasebe ve finans denetim” sisteminin kurulmasına ilişkin devredilemez görev ve yetkisi

SENİHA DAL, Yıldırım Ercan ÇALIŞ

Vergi planlaması yöntemi olarak amortismanların vergi usul kanunu ve Türkiye muhasebe standartları açısından değerlendirilmesi

YASEMİN TAŞKIN

MUHASEBE POLİTİKALARI, MUHASEBE TAHMİNLERİNDEKİ DEĞİŞİKLİKLER VE HATALAR STANDARDINA İLİŞKİNUYGULAMA ÖNERİLERİ

Süleyman YÜKÇÜ, Seçkin GÖNEN

Muhasebe hilelerınin önlenmesive ortaya çıkarılmasında kullanılan çağdaş araç ve yöntemler

Canol KANDEMİR, Şenol KANDEMİR

Hile denetiminde yetkinliklerin değerlendirilmesi - hıle karosu

Banu MENGİ TARHAN