DEMİR SKARN CEVHERİ ARAŞTIRMASINA YÖNELİK HARİTALAMADA ÖRTÜ KATSAYISI VE (AHP AĞIRLIĞINA GÖRE) TOPSIS UYGULAMALARI: SARVİYAN SAHASI ÖRNEK OLAY ÇALIŞMASI, MARKAZİ BÖLGESİ, İRAN

Bu araştırmanın amacı, kestirim amaçlı skarn potansiyel haritarında Örtü Katsayısı (ÖK) ileTOPSIS (AHP ağırlığına göre) uygulamalarını karşılaştırmaktır. Bu makalede, Kalsik Demir Skarncevherleşmesi için ölçütler ve alt ölçütler, maden üretkenlik haritaları hazırlamak açısından önemsırasına göre tanıtılmıştır. Skarn yatakları için, ÖK ve TOPSIS yöntemleri uygulanarak hazırlanan fi nalüretkenlik haritalarındaki değerler, üretkenlik değerinin 10 alt sınıfa bölünmesi ile atanmıştır. Dahaiyi karşılaştırılabilmesi açısından, her bir sınıf için atanan değer, maden aramacılığındaki ağırlığınagöre belirlenmiştir. ÖK ve TOPSIS birleştirme yöntemlerinin karşılaştırmalı analizi, saha kontrolüiçin dört adet Jeolojik Kontrol Noktası (JKN) seçilerek uygulanmıştır. 1, 2 ve 3 numaralı JKN’lerinsaha gözlemleri, sedimanter kayaçlar ile intrüzif kayaçların dokanağındaki demir mineralizasyonunudoğrulamışken, JKN-4 lokasyonunda kontakt metamorfi zma olmasına karşın Fe mineralizasyonubulunmamaktadır. Bununla birlikte, sözü edilen JKN’nda manyetizasyon belirgin bir şekilde yüksektir.Sarviyan bölgesindeki saha gözlemlerine göre, ÖK yaklaşımı ile karşılaştırıldığında, TOPSISyönteminin çok daha duyarlı olduğu anlaşılmıştır. Bu nedenle, Sarviyan ve yakın alanlarındaki KalsikFe-Skarn Mineralizasyon Üretkenlik Haritalarında TOPSIS yönteminin uygulanması önerilmektedir.

A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF INDEX OVERLAY AND TOPSIS (BASED ON AHP WEIGHT) FOR IRON SKARN MINERAL PROSPECTIVITY MAPPING, A CASE STUDY IN SARVIAN AREA, MARKAZI PROVINCE, IRAN

The aim of this research is to compare index overlay and TOPSIS (based on AHP weight) for predictive Skarn potential map. In this paper, for Calcic Iron Skarn mineralization, criteria and subcriteria introduced and ranked for generating mineral prospectivity map. The values of fi nal prospecting maps for Skarn deposit by index overlay and TOPSIS methods was specifi ed by dividing the prospectivity values into 10 classes. For better comparison, values assign to classes base on their priority in mineral exploration. The comparative analyses of index overlay and TOPSIS integration methods, has been performed by selecting four GCPs for fi eld checking. Field observation in GCP 1, 2 and 3, confi rmed Iron mineralization in the contact of intrusive bodies with sedimentary units, where the contact metamorphism was obvious but there is no observable mineralization in GCP4. Although high magnetic is distinct in mentioned GCP. Based on the fi eld checking in Sarvian area, the TOPSIS method has more accuracy compared to index overlay approach. Therefore, the TOPSIS method recommends for Calcic Iron Skarn Mineral Prospectivity Mapping in Sarvian and adjacent area.

___

  • Abedi, M., Norouzi, G. H., 2012. Integration of various geophysical data with geological and geochemical data to determine additional drilling for copper exploration. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 83, 35-45.
  • Abedi, M., Norouzi, G. H., Bahroudi, A. 2012a. Support vector machine for multi-classifi cation of mineral prospectivity areas. Computers & Geosciences, 46, 272-283.
  • Abedi, M., Torabi, S. A., Norouzi, G. H., Hamzeh, M., Elyasi, G. R. 2012b. PROMETHEE II: a knowledgedriven method for copper exploration. Computers & Geosciences, 46, 255-263.
  • Abedi, M., Torabi, S. A., Norouzi, G. H., Hamzeh, M. 2012c. ELECTRE III: A knowledge-driven method for integration of geophysical data with geological and geochemical data in mineral prospectivity mapping. Journal of applied geophysics, 87, 9-18.
  • Abedi, M., Torabi, S. A., Norouzi, G. H. 2013. Application of fuzzy AHP method to integrate geophysical data in a prospect scale, a case study: Seridune copper deposit. Bollettino di Geofi sicaTeoricaedApplicata, 54, 145-164.
  • Bonham-Carter, G.F. 1994. Geographic Information Systems for geoscientists-modeling with GIS. Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK, 398.
  • Carranza, E. J. M. 2008. Geochemical anomaly and mineral prospectivity mapping in GIS, Handbook of Exploration Environmental Geochemistry. Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 368.
  • Carranza, E.J.M., and Hale, M. 2001. Geologically constrained fuzzy mapping of gold mineralization potential, Baguio district, Philippines. Natural Resources Research, 10, 125–136.
  • Dağdeviren, M. 2008. Decision making in equipment selection: an integrated approach with AHP and PROMETHEE. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 19, 397-406.
  • Dağdeviren, M., Yavuz, S., Kılınç, N. 2009. Weapon selection using the AHP and TOPSIS methods under fuzzy environment. Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 8143-8151.
  • Feizi, F., Mansouri, E. 2012. Identifi cation of Alteration Zones with Using ASTER Data in A Part of Qom Province, Central Iran, Journal of Basic and Applied Scientifi c Research, 2,73-84.
  • Feizi, F., Mansouri, E. 2013a. Separation of Alteration Zones on ASTER Data and Integration with Drainage Geochemical Maps in Soltanieh, Northern Iran, Open Journal of Geology, 3, 134-142.
  • Feizi, F., Mansouri, E. 2013b. Introducing the Iron Potential Zones Using Remote Sensing Studies in South of Qom Province, Iran. Open Journal of Geology, 3, 278-286.
  • Hassan-Nezhad, A.A., Moore, F. 2006. A stable isotope and fluid inclusion study of the Qaleh-Zari Cu–Au– Ag deposit, Khorasan Province, Iran. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences. 27, 805–818.
  • Hwang, C.L., Yoon, K. 1981. Multiple Attribute Decision Making-Methods and Applications: A State of the Art Survey. Springer, New York.
  • Macharis, C., Springael, J., De Brucker, K., Verbeke, A. 2004. PROMETHEE and AHP: The design of operational synergies in multicriteria analysis: Strengthening PROMETHEE with ideas of AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 153, 307-317.
  • Malczewski, J. 2006. Ordered weighted averaging with fuzzy quantifi ers: GIS-based multicriteria evaluation for land-use suitability analysis, International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geo information, 8, 270-277.
  • Mansouri, E., Feizi, F., KarbalaeiRamezanali, A. A. 2015. Identifi cation of magnetic anomalies based on ground magnetic data analysis using multifractal modelling: A case study in Qoja-Kandi, East Azerbaijan Province, Iran. Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics, 22, 579-587.
  • Najafi , A., Karimpour, M. H., Ghaderi, M. 2014. Application of fuzzy AHP method to IOCG prospectivity mapping: A case study in Taherabad prospecting area, eastern Iran. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 33, 142- 154.
  • Noori, R., Feizi, F., Jafari, M. R. 2011. Determination of Cu and Mo Potential Targets in the Khatunabad Based on Analytical Hierarchy Process, West of Mianeh, Iran. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 78, 828-831.
  • Nouri, R., Afzal, P., Arian, M., Jafari, M., Feizi, F. 2013. Reconnaissance of Copper and Gold Mineralization Using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) in the Rudbar 1: 100,000 Map Sheet, Northwest Iran. Journal of Mining and Metallurgy A: Mining, 49, 9-19.
  • Nouri, R., Jafari, M. R., Arain, M., Feizi, F. 2012. Hydrothermal Alteration Zones Identifi cation Based on Remote Sensing Data in the Mahin Area, West of Qazvin Province, Iran. In Proceedings of World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology 67, World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology.
  • Önüt, S., Soner, S. 2008. Transshipment site selection using the AHP and TOPSIS approaches under fuzzy environment. Waste Management, 28, 1552-1559.
  • Pazand, K., Hezarkhani, A., Ataei, M. 2012. Using TOPSIS approaches for predictive porphyry Cu potential mapping: A case study in Ahar-Arasbaran area (NW, Iran). Computers & Geosciences, 49, 62-71.
  • Pazand, K., Hezarkhani, A., Ataei, M., Ghanbari, Y. 2011. Combining AHP with GIS for predictive Cu porphyry potential mapping: a case study in Ahar Area (NW, Iran). Natural resources research, 20, 251-262.
  • Pirmoradi, A., Vaezi, H., Baktash, P., Amiri, A. 2012. Role of SDI in index overlay Modeling and fuzzy logic in GIS to predict Malaria outbreak. Canada, Proceedings of Global Geospatial Conference 2012 Québec City, 14-17.
  • Porwal, A., Carranza, E.J.M., Hale, M. 2003. Artifi cial neural networks for mineral–potential mapping: a case study from Aravalli Province, Western India. Natural resources research, 12, 156–171.
  • Porwal, A., Carranza, E.J.M., Hale, M. 2004. A hybrid neuro-fuzzy model for mineral potential mapping. Mathematical Geology, 36, 803-826.
  • Porwal, A., Carranza, E.J.M, Hale, M. 2006. A hybrid fuzzy weights–of–evidence model for mineral potential mapping. Natural Resources Research, 15, 1–14.
  • Purtov, V.K., Kholodnov, V.V., Anfi logov, V.N., Nechkin, G.S. 1989. The role of chlorine in the formation of magnetite skarns: International Geology Review. 31, 63-71.
  • Rogge, D.M., Halden, N.M., Beaumont-Smith, C. 2006. Application of data integration for shear–hosted Au potential modelling: Lynn Lake greenstone belt, northwestern Manitoba, Canada. GIS for the Earth Sciences, 44, 191–210.
  • Saaty, T.L. 1977. A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of mathematical psychology, 15, 234-281.
  • Saaty, T.L. 1980. The analytic hierarchy process: planning, priority setting, resources allocation. New York: McGraw, pp, 281.
  • Saaty, T.L. 2005. The analytic hierarchy and analytic network processes for the measurement of intangible criteria and for decision-making.” Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys. Springer New York, 345–408.
  • Sahandi, M.R., Delavar, S.T., Sadeghi, M., Jafari, A., Moosavi, A. 2005. Geological Map of Iran (1:1,000,000). Geological Survey of Iran. .
  • Sokolov, G.A., Grigorev, V.M. 1977. Deposits of iron, in smirnov, V.I., ed., Ore deposits of the USSR: Pittman, London, 1, 7-13.
  • Vidal, C., Injoque-Espinoza, J., Sidder, G.B., Mukasa, S.B. 1990. Amphibolitic Cu-Fe skarn deposits in the central coast of Peru. Economic Geology, 85, 1447-1461.
  • Yousefi , M., Carranza, E. J. M. 2015. Prediction-area (PA) plot and C-A fractal analysis to classify and evaluate evidential maps for mineral prospectivity modeling. Computers & Geosciences, 79, 69-81.
  • Yousefi , M., KamkarRouhani, A. 2010. Principle of Mineral Potential Modeling Techniques (In Geographical Information System): Amirkabir University of Technology Press, Tehran.
Maden Tetkik ve Arama Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 0026-4563
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 3 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1950
  • Yayıncı: Cahit DÖNMEZ
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

KOZBUDAKLAR W-SKARN YATAĞININ JEOKİMYASAL KARAKTERİSTİKLERİ VE NADİR TOPRAK ELEMENTLERİNİN DAĞILIMLARI (BURSA, BATI ANADOLU)

Halim MUTLU, Ayşe ORHAN

SİNOP DEMİRCİKÖY HAVZASININ HİDROLOJİK KARAKTERİSTİKLERİNİN BELİRLENMESİ VE AYLIK DOYGUNLUK DERECESİ HARİTALARININ ÜRETİLMESİ

Mustafa Can CANOĞLU

DEMİR SKARN CEVHERİ ARAŞTIRMASINA YÖNELİK HARİTALAMADA ÖRTÜ KATSAYISI VE (AHP AĞIRLIĞINA GÖRE) TOPSIS UYGULAMALARI: SARVİYAN SAHASI ÖRNEK OLAY ÇALIŞMASI, MARKAZİ BÖLGESİ, İRAN

Edris MANSOURİ, Faranak FEİZİ, Mehran ARİAN, Alireza Jafari RAD

TİLT AÇISI YÖNTEMİNİN BATI ANADOLU BOUGUER GRAVİTE VERİLERİNE UYGULANMASI

Fikret DOĞRU, İlkin ÖZSÖZ, Oya PAMUKÇU

DOĞU PONTİDLERDE OLUR (ERZURUM) BÖLGESİNDE EOSEN MAGMATİZMASINA BAĞLI ALTERASYON ZONLARI VE ÖNEMİ

Mustafa AKYILDIZ, İsmet CENGİZ, Güzide ÖNAL, Serkan ÖZKÜMÜŞ, Mehmet ASLAN

MUNZUR DAĞLARI ALT MİYOSEN ÇÖKELLERİ MOLLUSK TOPLULUĞU VE PALEOEKOLOJİSİ (DOĞU ANADOLU, TÜRKİYE)

Müjde GÜRSOY

LEVHA TEKTONİĞİ NE ZAMAN BAŞLADI? KOMATİYİTLERİN VE MgO İÇERİKLERİNİN DEĞİŞKENLİĞİNE GÖRE LEVHA TEKTONİĞİ’NİN BAŞLANGICI

Efe DEMİRCİ, Anıl ARDAHANLIOĞLU

29 KASIM 1795 KAHRAMANMARAŞ DEPREMİ, GÜNEY TÜRKİYE

Mahmut PALUTOĞLU, Ahmet ŞAŞMAZ

GÖRGÜ (YEŞİLYURT) Pb – Zn MADENİ ÇEVRESİNDE YETİŞEN Pb-Zn-Cd AKÜMÜLATÖR BİTKİLER, MALATYA, TÜRKİYE

Güllü KIRAT

SORGUN (YOZGAT)-YILDIZELİ (SİVAS) ÖNÜLKE HAVZASININ JEOLOJİK EVRİMİ, HAVZADA ETKİN OLAN VOLKANİZMANIN PETROGRAFİK, JEOKİMYASAL ÖZELLİKLERİ VE JEOKRONOLOJİSİ

Metin BEYAZPİRİNÇ, Ali Ekber AKÇAY