___

• Unitrin Inc v American Gen. Corp 651 A.2d 1361 (Del., 1995).
• Unocal Corp v Mesa Petroleum Corp 493 A2d 946, 9554 (Del, 1995)
• Revlon v McAndrews & Forbes Holdings Inc 506 A.2d 173 (Del., 1986)
• Re a Company (1986) B.C.L.C. 382 (UK)
• Howard Smith Ltd v Ampol Petroleum Ltd (1974) A.C. 821 (UK)
• Hogg v Cramphorn Ltd (1967) Ch. 254 (UK)
• Heron International v Lord Grade (1983) BCLC 244, (1982) Com LR 108 (UK Court of Appeal)
• Cases: Dawson International Plc v Coats Paton Plc (1988) 4 BCC 305 (UK)
• State Of Delaware - Division Of Corporations - List Of Authorized Vendors With Direct Web Access’ accessed 18 March 2017
• Ownership Structure | Türkiye İş Bankası A.Ş.’ accessed 1 April 2017.
• Governance Structure - OYAK’ < http://www.oyak.com.tr/EN/corporate/ what-oyak-is/managing-bodies.html > accessed 2 April 2017.
• European Commission - Enlargement - Turkey - Relations’ (23 November 2006) accessed 18 March 2017.
• Corporate History - 2011-2015’ Accessed 2 April 2017
• Consolidated Data’ (Borsaistanbul.com, 2017) accessed 21 April 2017
• Business Judgment Rule’ accessed 18 March 2017
• Websites: ‘Board of Directors | Türkiye İş Bankası A.Ş.’ accessed 2 April 2017
• Yurtoğlu B, ‘Ownership, Control and Performance of Turkish Listed Firms’ (2000) 27 Empirica accessed 29 March 2017
• You C, ‘The Proper Purpose Rule and the Exercise of Directors’ Power in the Context of a Takeover Battle’ (2017) 38 Business Law Review, Issue 1.
• Yeung H, ‘Managing Corporate Risks by Regulating Executive Pay: A Legal And Economic Analysis’ (2012) 2 Durham Law Review
• Yamak S and Ertuna B, ‘Corporate Governance and Initial Public Offerings in Turkey’ in Alessandro Zattoni and William Judge (eds), Corporate Governance and Initial Public Offerings: An International Perspective (Cambridge University Press (Virtual Publishing) 2012)
• Winter J, Schans Christensen J, Garrido Garcia J M, Hopt K J, Rickford J, Rossi G, Simon J, ‘Final Report of the High Level Group of Company Law Experts on issues related to takeover bids’ (2002) accessed 23 March 2017
• Wearing R T, Cases in Corporate Governance (1st edn, SAGE Publications 2005)
• Van Gerven D, Common Legal Framework For Takeover Bids In Europe (Cambridge University Press 2008)
• Turan M T and Çollak Ö, ‘Mergers and Acquisitions on the Rise, Co-Published Section: Turkey’ (2006) International Financial Law Review
• Tekinalp Ü and Başaran-Symes C, ‘New Turkish Commercial Code A blueprint for the future’ (pwc Turkey) accessed June 16, 2017
• Taylor C R, ‘The European Takeover Directive: A US Comparison’ (August 30, 2016) University of Oslo Faculty of Law Research Paper No. 2016-14
• Stout L A and others, ‘The Modern Corporation Statement on Company Law’ (October 6, 2016). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2848833 Accessed on 23.03.2017.
• Smith A, An Inquiry Into The Nature And Causes Of The Wealth Of Nations (1776) accessed 17 March 2017.
• Slaughter C M, ‘Rights Offerings, Takeovers and US Shareholders: Part 2’ (2000) 23(3) Company Lawyer
• Sjåfjell B, Towards a Sustainable European Company Law: A Normative Analysis of the Objectives of EU Law, with the Takeover Directive as a Test Case (Aspen Publishers 2009)
• Schillig M, ‘Corporate Law after Brexit’ (2016) 27(3) King’s Law Journal DOI:10 .1080/09615768.2016.1250481
• Schaafsma J R, ‘Hostile Takeover Bids and Defances: The Netherlands’ in Klaus J Hopt and Eddy Wymeersch (eds), European takeovers: law and practice (Butterworths Law 1992)
• Romano R, ‘The Future Of Hostile Takeovers: Legislation And Public Opinion’ (1988) 57 Cincinnati Law Review
• Rodriguez P I, ‘Obligations of Directors in Takeovers’ in David Cabrelli and Mathias M Siems (eds), Comparative Company Law: A Case-Based Approach (Intl Specialized Book Service 2013)
• Ribstein L, ‘Why Corporations?’ (2004) 1 Berkeley Business Law Journal
• Anonim Ortaklık Kurumsal Yönetimi (Corporate Governance) (Çağa Hukuk Vakfı Yayınları 2005)
• Paslı A, Anonim Ortaklığın Devralınması (Takeover of Corporation) (Vedat Kitapçılık 2009)
• Oba B, Tigrel B and Sener P, ‘Board Structure in Listed Firms: Evidence from an Emerging Economy’ (2014) 14 Corporate Governance 382, 384-385 accessed 29 March 2017.
• Du Plessis J J, Hargovan A, Bagaric M and Harris J, Principles of Contemporary Corporate Governance (2nd edn, Cambridge University Press 2011)
• Mukwiri J, ‘Myth Of Shareholder Primacy In English Law’ (2013) 24 European Business Law Review
• Moroğlu Arseven ‘M&A In Turkey: Lexology Navigator Q&A | Lexology’ (Lexology. com, 2017) accessed 19 April 2017.
• Morris J, ‘The Glazer Bid: In Whose Interests?’ (Practical Law) accessed 18 March 2017.
• Shareholder Primacy, Labour and the Historic Ambivalence of UK Company Law’ (September 7, 2016). University of Cambridge Faculty of Law Research Paper No. 40/2016. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/ abstract=2835990 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2835990 accessed 18 March 2017
• Moore M, ‘A Temple Built on Faulty Foundations: Piercing The Corporate Veil and the Legacy of Salomon V Salomon’ (2006) Journal of Business Law
• Monsen-Jr., R J and Downs A, ‘A Theory of Large Managerial Firms’ (1965) 73 Journal of Political Economy 221.
• McConvill J and Bagaric M, ‘Towards Mandatory Shareholder Committees in Australian Companies’ (2004) 28 Melbourne University Law Review
• Mason E S, ‘The Apologetics Of “Managerialism”’ (1958) 31 The Journal of Business
• Mäntysaari P, Comparative Corporate Governance: Shareholders As A Rule- Maker (1st edn, Springer-Verlag Berlin and Heidelberg GmbH & Co K 2005)
• Magnuson W, ‘Takeover Regulation In The United States And Europe: An Institutional Approach’ (2009) 21 Pace International Law Review
• Marks S G, ‘The Separation of Ownership and Control’ (2000) 3 Encyclopedia of Law and Economics accessed 18 March 2017.
• Lokmanhekim T and Yukaruç N N, ‘Turkey’ in Mark Zerdin (ed), The Mergers & Acquisitions Review (Law Business Research Ltd 2014)
• Loewenstein M, ‘Unocal Revisited: No Tiger In The Tank’ (2001) The Journal of Corporation Law
• Kräkel M, ‘Managerial Versus Entrepreneurial Firms: The Benefits of Separating Ownership and Control’ (2004) 56 Schmalenbach Business Review
• Kraakman R, Davies P, Hansmann H, Hertig G, Hopt K J, Kanda H and Rock E B, The Anatomy of Corporate Law: A Comparative and Functional Approach (Oxford University Press 2004)
• İpekel-Kayalı F, Türk Ticaret Kanunu’na Göre Birleşmeler (Mergers According to the Turkish Commercial Code) (Vedat Kitapçılık 2014)
• Hurt C, ‘The Hostile Poison Pill’ (2016) UC Davis Law Review, Vol. 50, No. 1, 2016; BYU Law Research Paper No. 16-04.
• Hannigan B, Company Law, (4 th edn, Oxford: Oxford UP 2016)
• Gurarda S, Ozsoz E and Ates A, ‘Corporate Governance Rating and Ownership Structure in the Case of Turkey’ (2016) 4 International Journal of Financial Studies
• Gordon R A, ‘Ownership and Compensation as Incentives to Corporation Executives’ (1940) 54 The Quarterly Journal of Economics
• Gordon J N, ‘Governance Failures Of The Enron Board And The New Information Order Of Sarbanes-Oxley’ Columbia Law School Working Paper No.216 - Harvard Law and Economics Discussion Paper No. 416.
• Gaughan P, Mergers, Acquisitions, And Corporate Restructurings (Wiley 2015)
• Gatti, M, ‘It’s My Stock and I’ll Vote If I Want To: Conflicted Voting by Shareholders in (Hostile) M&A Deals’ (February 27, 2016) 47(1) University of Memphis Law Review
• Franks J and Mayer C, ‘Hostile Takeovers and the Correction of Managerial Failure’ (1996) 40 Journal of Financial Economics
• Ferrarini G and Miller G P, ‘A Simple Theory of Takeover Regulation in the United States and Europe’ (2009) 42 Cornell International Law Journal
• Dinç İ, ‘Mandatory Takeover Bids In Turkey: An Overview Of The New Legal Regime’ (2013) IV Law & Justice Review
• Dignam A, Hicks & Goo’s Cases And Materials On Company Law (7th edn, Oxford University Press 2011)
• Davies P L, Gower’s Principles of Modern Company Law (6th ed., Sweet & Maxwell, 1997)
• Dean J, ‘Directors’ Duties In Response To Hostile Takeover Bids’ (2003) International Company and Commercial Law Review
• Çoştan H, Yeni Türk Ticaret Kanunu’na Göre Birleşme, Bölünme Ve Tür Değiştirme Kararları (According To The New Commercial Code Decisions Of Mergers, Divisions (Spin-Off/Split-Up) And Restructuring Activities) (3rd edn, Seçkin 2013)
• Çakırca T and Çiğdemtekin G, ‘Public Mergers and Acquisitions in Turkey: Overview’ (2016, Practical Law) accessed 29 March 2017.
• Cox J D and Hazen T L, Corporations: Including Unincorporated Forms Of Doing Business (2nd edn, Aspen, Wolters Kluwer 2003)
• Coffee J C, ‘The Rise of Dispersed Ownership: The Roles of Law and the State in the Separation of Ownership and Control’ (2001) 111 The Yale Law Journal
• Cranston R, ‘The Rise and Rise of the Hostile Takeover’ in Klaus J Hopt and Eddy Wymeersch (eds), European Takeovers: Law and Practice (Butterworths Law 1992)
• Clarke B, ‘Directors’ Duties During An Offer Period – Lessons From The Cadbury PLC Takeover’ (2011) UCD Working Papers in Law, Criminology & Socio-Legal Studies Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1759953 or http:// dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1759953 accessed 17 March 2017.
• Cassidy J, Concise Corporations Law (Concise) (5th edn, Federation Press 2006)
• Cara F and Lane P F, ‘The Business Judgment Rule and Unocal: Twin Barriers to Shareholder Welfare’ (1989) 5 Journal of Civil Rights and Economic Development
• Câmara P, ‘Defensive Measures Adopted by the Board: Current European Trends’ (2000) Company Law Reform in OECD Countries accessed 18 March 2017
• Cahn A and Donald D C, Comparative Company Law: Text And Cases On The Laws Governing Corporations In Germany, The UK And The USA (1st edn, Cambridge University Press 2010)
• Brudney V, ‘Corporate Governance, Agency Costs, And The Rhetoric Of Contract’ (1985) 85 Columbia Law Review
• Bilgili F and Demirkapı E, Şirketler Hukuku Dersleri ( Commercial Law Lessons) (3rd edn, Dora 2014)
• Bhagat S and Romano R, ‘Emprical Study of Corporate Law’ in Mitchell A Polinsky and Steven Shavell (eds), Handbook of Law and Economics (Amsterdam Elsevier 2007)
• Berle A A and Means G C, The Modern Corporation and Private Property (Transaction Publishers 1932)
• Berger D J, ‘A Comparative Analysis of Takeover Regulation in the European Community’ (1992) 55 Law and Contemporary Problems
• The Case Against Board Veto in Corporate Takeovers’ (2002) 69 The University of Chicago Law Review
• Bebchuk L A, ‘The Case For Increasing Shareholder Power’ (2005) 118 Harvard Law Review
• Barboutis G O, ‘Takeover Defence Tactics: Part I: The General Legal Framework On Takeovers’ (1999) 20 Company Lawyer
• Director Versus Shareholder Primacy In New Zealand Company Law As Compared To U.S.A. Corporate Law’ (2014) Law-Econ Research Paper No. 14-05
• Director Primacy In Corporate Takeovers: Preliminary Reflections’ 55 Stanford Law Review
• Bainbridge S, Bainbridge’s Mergers And Acquisitions, 3D (Concepts And Insights Series) (3rd edn, Foundation Press Thomson/West 2012)
• Ashby S, ‘Strengthening The Public Company Board Of Directors: Limited Shareholder Access To The Corporate Ballot Vs. Required Majority Board Independence’ (2005) University of Illinois Law Review
• and Skeel D A, ‘Who Writes the Rules for Hostile Takeovers, and Why?— The Peculiar Divergence of U.S. and U.K. Takeover Regulation’ (2007) 95 The Georgetown Law Journal
• Armour J, Jacobs J B and Milhaupt C J, ‘The Evolution of Hostile Takeover Regimes in Developed and Emerging Markets: An Analytical Framework’ (2011) 52 Harvard International Law Journal
• Alchian A A and Williamson O E, ‘The Economics of Discretionary Behavior: Managerial Objectives in a Theory of the Firm’ (1965) 33 Econometrica