COMMON PRINCIPLES OF JUDICIAL REVIEW OF ADMINISTRATION IN EUROPE:A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF FRANCE, THE UK, THE ECHR AND THE EU
Bu çalışma Avrupada idari yargının ortak prensiplerinin mevcut olup olmadığını tespit etmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Bugün hukukun pek çok alanında yaşanan uluslararasılaşma süreci bilhassa 1950lerden itibaren Avrupada artarak devam etmektedir. Diğer hukuk alanları kadar belirgin olmasa da, idare yargıda doğal olarak bu uluslararasılaşma sürecinin dışında kalamamıştır. Yazar, bu çalışmada idarenin yargısal denetiminde Avrupada ortak ilkelerinin mevcut olup olmadığını tespit etmek için Avrupa Konseyi ve Avrupa Birliği hukuk alanları ile Kıta Avrupası Hukuk Sistemi (civil law) ve Anglo Sakson Hukuk Sisteminin (common law) önde gelen temsilcileri olan Fransız ve İngiliz idari yargı sistemlerini, mukayeseli hukuk usulüne göre incelemeye çalışmaktadır. Bu makalede, Avrupadaki ulusal idari yargı sistemlerinin kendilerine özgü karekteristik özelliklerini halen daha önemli ölçüde muhafaza ettikleri, bu sistemler arasındaki farklılıkların benzerliklerden çok daha fazla ve belirgin olduğu, bununla birlikte söz konusu sistemler arasındaki farklılık ne kadar fazla ve geniş olursa olsun bu sistemlerin, bilhassa Avrupa İnsan Hakları Mahkemesi ve Avrupa Birliği Adalet Divanı içtihatları sayesinde güçlü bir uluslarüstü ve uluslararası etkileşim sürecine girdiği sonucuna varılmaktadır. Çalışmanın sonunda, söz konusu etkileşime rağmen henüz Avrupa yargı alanında idari yargının ortak ilkelerinden henüz söz edilemese de, hem AHİM hem de ATADın daha cesur, açık ve sürükleyici içtihatları ile gelecek onyıllarda Ortak Avrupa İdari Yargısının ortaya çıkabilmesinin mümkün olduğu öngörülmektedir.
The purpose of this dissertation is to examine whether common principles for judicial review of administration exist in the European legal area. Today, law has been transforming into a form of internationalization in many areas in the world. This process is more visible in some fields of law in recent decades. In Europe, law has become more international from 1950s onwards; it is called as Europeanization of law. Naturally, administrative judiciary has not stayed out of this process. The author attempts to find principles within the context of the Council of Europe and EU legal areas as well as French and British administrative judicial systems as two examples of European national jurisdictions by using a mixture of historical and comparative methods. This study presents that European national administrative judicial systems have been still continuing to preserve their own peculiar characteristics to a large extent, therefore divergences among different European administrative judiciary systems are much bigger and more obvious than convergences. Also, the study presents that, no matter how this divergence is wide, these systems have been in a strong supranational or international interaction by the impact of the case law of the ECtHR and the ECJ. This dissertation concludes that this interaction, however, has not reached a sufficient level yet to assert that common principles of judicial review have been formed. This study suggests that more explicit, distinct and leading case law from the both the ECtHR and the ECJ is needed for the emergence of European ius commune of judicial review.
___
Aust, Anthony. 2010. Handbook of International Law. New York: Cambridge University Press.Bingham, Tom. 2010. The Rule of Law. London: Allen Lane.
Bono, Ricardo Gosalbo. 2011. Comparative Law and Legal Traditions as Foundations of European Union Law. Brussels.
Cane, Peter. 2011. Administrative Law. New York: Oxford University Press.
Franklin, Burt. 1970. Comparative Administrative Law: An Analysis of Administrative Systems, National and Local, of the United States, England, France and Germany. New York.
Galera, Susana (ed.). 2010. Judicial Review: A Comparative Analysis Inside the European Legal System. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing. Jaffe, Louis L. 1965. Judicial Control of Administrative Action. Boston: Little Brown and Company.
Kuijer, Martin. 2004. The Blindfold of Lady Justice - Judicial Independence and Impartiality in Light of the Requirements of Article 6 ECHR. Wolf Legal Publishers.
Spurin, Corbett Haselgrove. 2004. Constitutional and Administrative Law: Chapter 11. The Nationwide Academy for Dispute Resolution (UK) Ltd. Chapter in an edited book
Aguilera, Bruno. 2010. Law as a Limit to Power: The Origins of the Rule of Law in the European Legal Tradition. In Judicial Review: A Comparative Analysis inside the European Legal System, edited by Susana Galera, 15- 35. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.
Albarino Julia Ruiloba, Susana Galera. 2010. European Regional Tradition-The Council of Europe. In Judicial Review: A Comparative Analysis inside the European Legal System, edited by Susana Galera, 173- 208. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.
Arnold, Rainer. 2010. European Constitutionalism after the Second World War. In Judicial Review: A Comparative Analysis inside the European Legal System, edited by Susana Galera, 37-48. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.
Auby, Jean-Bernard and Lucie Cluzel Metayer. 2007. Administrative Law in France. In Administrative Law of the European Union, Its Member States and the United States: A comparative Analysis, edited by Rene Seerden and Frits Stroink, 61-92. Antwerpen-Groningen: Maastrichts Europees Instituut voor Transnationaal Rechtswetenschappelijk Onderzoek.
Borraccetti, Marco. 2011. Fair Trial, Due Process and Rights of Defence in the EU Legal Order. In The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: From Declaration to Binding Instrument, edited by Giacomo Di Federico, 95- 108. Bologna: Interdepartmental Research Center on European Law (CIRDE).
Craig, Paul. 2009. Judicial Review and Questions of Law: A Comparative Perspective. In Comparative Administrative Law, edited by Susan RoseAckerman& Peter Lindseth. University of Oxford.
Galera, Susana. 2010. European Legal Tradition and the EU legal System: Understandings and Premises about the Rule of Laws Requirements. In Judicial Review: A Comparative Analysis inside the European Legal System, edited by Susana Galera, 277-300. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.
Galera, Susana. 2010. The European Contribution to an Emerging Global Law. In Judicial Review: A Comparative Analysis inside the European Legal System, edited by Susana Galera, 301-308. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.
Katharine Thompson, Brian Jones. 2007. Administrative Law in the United Kingdom In Administrative Law of the European Union, Its Member States and the United States: A comparative Analysis, edited by Rene Seerden and Frits Stroink (eds.), 61-92. Antwerpen-Groninge: Maastrichts Europees Instituut voor Transnationaal Rechtswetenschappelijk Onderzoek.
Lageot, Celine. 2010. National Legal Tradition-France. In Judicial Review: A Comparative Analysis inside the European Legal System, edited by Susana Galera, 71-85. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing. Nassimpian, Dimitra. 2010. National Legal Tradition-United Kingdom. In Judicial Review: A Comparative Analysis Inside the European Legal System, edited by Susana Galera, 157-172. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.
Plato. 1997. Complete Works. In Plato, Laws, Book IV, 715 d; Plato, Complete Works, by John M. Cooper et al, 1402. Indiana: Hackett Publishing Company Inc.
Widdershoven, Rob. 2007. European Administrative Law. In Administrative Law of the European Union, Its Member States and the United States (Ius Commune Europaeum), by Frits Stroink René Seerden, 289-346. Antwerpen: Intersentia. Periodical materials (articles)
Aucoin, Louis M. 1992. Judicial Review in France: Access of the Individual Under French and European Community Law in the Aftermath of Frances Rejection of Bicentennial Reform. Boston College International and Comparative Law Review: 443-469.
Duffy, John F. 1998. Administrative Common Law in Judicial Review. Texas Law Review, 77: 113-214.
Federico Fabbrini. 2008. Kelsen in Paris: Frances Constitutional Reform and the Introduction of a Posteriori Constitutional Review of Legislation. German Law Journal: 1297-1312.
Harlow, Carol. 2006. Global Administrative Law: The Quest for Principles and Values. The European Journal of International Law, 17: 187-214.
Knight, Dean R. 2008. A Murky Methodology: Standards of Review in Administrative Law. New Zealand Journal of Public and International Law, 6: 180-215.
Richard Vetterli and Gary Bryner. 1993. Hugo Grotius and Natural Law: A Reinterpretation. Political Science Reviewer (Brigham Young University): 370-402.
Sweet, Alec Stone. 2003. Why Europe Rejected American Judicial Review and Why It May Not Matter. Michigan Law Review, Aug: 2744- 2780.
Winkler, Roland. 2008. Administrative Justice in Europe: The EU Acquis, Good Practice and Recent Developments. Croatian Public Administration: 887-911.
Report & Working Paper & Conference Paper
Creelman, Ann. 2010. US-Style Judicial Review for France? Michigan: International Society of Primerus Law Firms.
Lawson, Rick. 2006. The Monitoring of Fundamental Rights in the European Union as a Contribution of the European Legal Space (III): The Role of the European Court of Human Rights. Reflexive Governance in the Public Interest, Sub-network Fundamental Rights. Louvain: REFGOV. 1-21.
Ponthoreau, Marie-Claire. 2009. What Are the Justifications for French Judicial Review? Conference:Judicial Review: Why, Where and for Whom? Jerusalem: The Hebrew University of Jerusalem May 31- June 1. 1-12.
Stephen, Sir Ninian. 1999. The Principles of the Rule of Law. Annual Lawyers Lecture St James Ethics Centre.
Venice Commission, 2011. Report on the Rule of Law CDL- AD (2011)003rev. Strasbourg: Council of Europe (European Commission For Democracy Through Law).
Woehrling, Jean-Marie. 2006. Judicial Control of Administrative Authorities in Europe: Toward a Common Model. Prethodno Znanstveno Priopcenje (Preliminary Scientific Report) (OECD Sigma Programme (European Integration and Administrative Reform)): 35-56.
Book published electronically
Geant, A. J. The Government of Louis XIV (1661-1715). University of Mannheim. http://www.uni-mannheim.de/mateo/camenaref/cmh/cmh501. html (Accessed March 4, 2012).
Internet site
Association of the Councils of State and Supreme Administrative Jurisdictions of the European Union. ACA Europe. http://www.aca-europe. eu/en/eurtour/eurtour_en.lasso (Accessed April 21, 2012)
The Public Law Project, Information Leaflets: A brief guide to the grounds for judicial review 2006, http://www.publiclawproject.org.uk/ AdviceGeneral.html (Accessed April 13, 2012)
Administrative Court of the UK: http://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/rcjrolls-building/administrative-court/applying-for-judicial-review http://www.wikipedia.org
Legal cases
European Court of Human Rights, Golder v. the United Kingdom, no. 4451/70 [1975].
European Court of Human Rights, Airey v. Ireland, no.6289/73 [1979].
European Court of Human Rights, Deweer v. Belgium, no.6903/75 [1980].
European Court of Human Rights, Fayed v. the United Kingdom, no. 17101/90 [1994].
European Court of Human Rights, Ilaşcu and others v. Moldova and Russia, no. 48787/99 [2004].
European Court of Human Rights, De Geouffre de la Pradelle v. France, no. 12964/87 [1992].
European Court of Human Rights, Schmautzer-Austria, no. 15523/89 [1995]
European Court of Human Rights, Bellet v. France, no. 23805/94 [1995].
European Court of Human Rights, Waite and Kennedy v. Germany, no. 26083/94, [1999].
European Court of Human Rights, Brumarescu v. Romania, no.28342/95 [1999].
European Court of Human Rights, Z. and others v. The United Kingdom, no. 29392/95 [2001].
European Court of Human Rights, Ferrazzini v. Italy, no. 44759/98 [2001].
European Court of Human Rights, Chevrol v. France, no.49636/99 [2003].
European Court of Human Rights, Gorraiz Lizarraga and others v. Spain, no. 62543/00 [2004].
European Court of Justice, Baustahlgewebe GmbH vs. Commission, C-185/95 P. [1998] ECR I-8417.
European Court of Justice, Corus UK Ltd, C-199/99 P, [2003] ECR I-11177. European Court of Justice, Asian Institute of Technology (AIT), C-547/03P [2005] ECR I-845
European Court of Justice, Hans-Martin Tillack, C-521/04 P (R) [2005] ECR I-3103.
European Court of Justice, Booker Aquacultur Ltd and Hydro Seafood GSP Ltd, Joined cases C-20/00 and C/64/00 [2003] ECR I-7411.
- ISSN: 1309-9485
- Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 2 Sayı
- Başlangıç: 2010
- Yayıncı: Türkiye Adalet Akademisi