___

• Akçam, T. (2008). Türk Ulusal Kimliği Üzerine Tezler, In; Tanıl Bora and Murat Gültekin. Modern Türkiye’de Siyasi Düşünce. (3. Baskı). İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
• Anderson, B. (1991). İmagined Community, London ve New York, Verso.
• Androutsopoulos, J. (2008). Potentials and Limitations of Discourse-Centred Online Ethnography, language@internet, Retrieved 06 January 2020 from https://www.languageatinternet.org/articles/2008/1610.
• Fernández, M., A. (2017): Platformed racism: the mediation and circulation of an Australian race-based controversy on Twitter, Facebook and YouTube, Information, Communication & Society.
• Balibar, E. (1991). Racism and Nationalism, (C. Turner, Çev.). Balibar, E. ve Wallerstein, I. Race, Nation, Class Ambigious Identities içinde (243- 291), London, New York: Verso.
• Bennett W. L, Livingston S. (2018). The disinformation order: Disruptive communication and the decline of democratic institutions. European Journal of Communication.33(2):122-139.
• Billig M (1995) Banal Nationalism. London: Sage.
• Bimber B, Gil de Zúñiga H. (2020). The unedited public sphere. New Media & Society. 22(4):700-715.
• Bozdağ, Ç. (2019). Bottom-up natinalism and discrimination on social media: An analysis of the citizenship debate about refugees in Turkey, European Journal of Cultural Studies, p. 1- 19. Erişim 22 Mayıs 2020, https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1367549419869354.
• Dahlgren, P. (2005) The Internet, Public Spheres, and Political Communication: Dispersion and Deliberation, Political Communication, 22:2, 147-162.
• Datts, M. (2020). Social Media, Populism, and Migration. Media and Communication, 8(4), Pages: 73-83.
• De Blasio, E, Marianne, K., Wolf J. S., and Michele S. (2020). The Ongoing Transformation of the Digital Public Sphere: Basic Considerations on a Moving Target, Media and Communication, 8(4), Pages 1–5.
• Ekman, M. (2019). Anti-immigration and racist discourse in social media. European Journal of Communication, 34(6), 606–618. doi:10.1177/0267323119886151.
• Eriksen, T., H. (1993). Formal and informal nationalism, Ethnic and Racial Studies, 16:1, 1-25.
• Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical Discourse Analysis, (First Published: 1995). London: Routledge.
• Filibeli, E., T., Ertuna, C. (2021). Sarcasm Beyond Hate Speech: Facebook Comments on Syrian Refugees in Turkey. International Journal of Communication, 15(2021), 2236- 2259.
• Habermas, J. (2006). Political Communication in Media Society: Does Democracy Still Enjoy an Epistemic Dimension? The Impact of Normative Theory on Empirical Research. Communication Theory, 16(4), 411–426.doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2006.00280.x.
• Hine, C. (2000). Virtual Ethnography, London: Sage.
• Hine, C. (2017). From Virtual Ethnography to the Embedded, Embodied, Everyday Internet, Edt: Hjorth L., Heather H., Anne G., ve Genevieve B. İn The Routhledge Companion Digital Ethnography, New York; Routledge (pp. 21-29).
• KhosraviNik, M., Zia, M. (2015). Persian Nationalism, Identity and Anti-Arab Sentiments in Iranian Facebook Discourses: Critical Discourse Analysis and Social Media Communication. Occupy, 13(4), 755–780.
• Kreis R. (2017). #refugeesnotwelcome: Anti-refugee discourse on Twitter. Discourse & Communication. 11(5):498-514.
• Ozduzen, O., Korkut, U., & Ozduzen, C. (2020). “Refugees are not welcome”: Digital racism, online place-making and the evolving categorization of Syrians in Turkey. New Media & Society.
• Özkırımlı, U. (2008). Türkiye’de Gayriresmi Milliyetçilik ve Popüler Milliyetçilik, In; Tanıl Bora and Murat Gültekin. Modern Türkiye’de Siyasi Düşünce. (3. Baskı). İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
• Pere, M. Carlos, R., C, Jaume, S. (2019). “Active audiences and social discussion on the digital public sphere. Review article”. El profesional de la información.
• Pink, S., Horst, H., Postill, J, Hjorth, L, Lewis, T., Tacchi, J. (2016). Digital Ethnography Principles and Practice, London: Sage.
• Polat, R. K. (2018). Religious solidarity, historical mission and moral superiority: construction of external and internal “others” in AKP’s discourses on Syrian refugees in Turkey. Critical Discourse Studies, 1–17.doi:10.1080/17405904.2018.1500925.
• Pond, P., Lewis J. (2017). Riots and Twitter: connective politics, social media and framing discourses in the digital public sphere, Information, Communication & Society, DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2017.1366539.
• Saraçoğlu, C., Belangar D. (2019). Loss and xenophobia in the city: contextualizing anti- Syrian sentiments in İzmir, Turkey, Patterns of Prejudice, 363- 383. Erişim 30 Mayıs 2021, https://doi.org/10.1080/0031322X.2019.1615779.
• Schlesinger P. (2020). After the post-public sphere. Media, Culture & Society. 42(7-8):1545-1563.
• Unger J, Wodak R, KhosraviNik M. (2016). Critical Discourse Studies and Social Media Data. In: David Silverman, ed. Qualitative Research (4.Print). London: SAGE.
• Van Dijk, T. (2018). Discourse and Migration, Z. Barrero, ve E. Y. Yalaz, (Ed.). Qualitative Research in European Migration Studies içinde (227- 247). Erişim 29 Mayıs 2020, http://www.springer.com/series/13502.
• Voloder, L. (2013). Secular citizenship and Muslim belonging in Turkey: migrant perspectives, Ethnic and Racial Studies, 36:5, 838-856.
• Wodak, R. (2001) The discourse historical approach. In: Wodak R and Meyer M (eds) Methods of Critical Discourse Studies. London: Sage, pp.63-95.