___

• Ataizi, M. (1999). Bilgisayar destekli durumlu öğrenmede bilissel bicim ve iceriğin gerceklik düzeyinin sorun çözme becerilerinin gelisimine etkisi. Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi. Anadolu Üniversitesi, Eskişehir
• Burton, J. K. & MerriH, P. F. (1992). Needs assessment: Goals, needs, and design: Priorities. In L. J. Briggs, K. L. Gustafson, & M. H. TiHman (Eds.), Instructional Principles and applications. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
• Deryakulu, D. (2000). Yapıcı öğrenme. A. Şimşek (Ed.), Sınıfta demokrasi. Ankara: Eğitim Sen.
• Gustafson, K. L., Tillman, M. H., & Childs, J. W. (1992). The future of instructional design. In L. J. Briggs, K. L. Gustafson, & M. H. Tillman (Eds.), Instructional design: Principles and applications. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
• Halff, H. M. (1993). Prospects for automating instructional design. In J. M. Spector, M. C. Polson, & D. J. Muraida (Eds.), Automating instructional design: Concepts and issues. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
• Jonassen, D. H. (1991). Evaluating constructivist leaming. Educational Technology. .3.l(9).
• Kintsch, E. (1993). Principles ofinstruction from research on human cognition. In J. M. Spector, M. C. Polson, & D. J. Muraida (Eds.), Automating instructional design: Concepts and issues. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications
• Milano, M. & Ullius, D. (1998). Designing powerful training: The seguentialiterative modeL. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• Şimşek, A. (1993, January). Design considerations for computer-based cooperative leaming: The integration ofresearch into design. Paper presented at the annual meeting ofthe Association for Educational Communications and Technology. Washington, DC.
• ------------- (1998). Eğitsel iletişimde çokortamh teknolojik gelişmeler. Kurgu. Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi iletişim Bilimleri Fakültesi Yay.