___

• Adkins, D., & Brendler, B. M. (2015). Libraries and reading motivation: A review of the Programme for International Student Assessment reading results. IFLA Journal, 41(2), 129-139.
• Allen, L. A. (2006). Metacognition and reading: Strategies for struggling readers (Master's Thesis). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No.1440263)
• Anastasiou, D., & Griva, E. (2009). Awareness of reading strategy use and reading comprehension among poor and good readers. İlköğretim Online, 8(2), 283-297.
• Arikan, S., van de Vijver, F. J., & Yagmur, K. (2017). PISA mathematics and reading performance differences of mainstream European and Turkish immigrant students. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 29(3), 229-246.
• Arrington, C. N., Kulesz, P. A., Francis, D. J., Fletcher, J. M., & Barnes, M. A. (2014). The contribution of attentional control and working memory to reading comprehension and decoding. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18(5), 325-346.
• Artelt, C., Schiefele, U., & Schneider, W. (2001). Predictors of reading literacy. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 16(3), 363-383.
• Azzolini, D., Schnell, P., & Palmer, J. R. (2012). Educational achievement gaps between immigrant and native students in two "new" immigration countries: Italy and Spain in comparison. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 643(1), 46-77.
• Baker, L. (2002). Metacognition in comprehension instruction. In C.C. Block & M. Pressley (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Researchbased best practices (pp. 77–95). New York: Guilford.
• Bender, W. N. (2002). Differentiating instruction for students with learning disabilities. Thousand Oaks, Ca: Corwin Press.
• Berberoğlu, G., & Kalender, İ. (2005). Öğrenci başarısını yıllara, okul türlerine, bölgelere göre incelenmesi: ÖSS ve PISA analizi. Eğitim Bilimleri ve Uygulama, 22(4), 21-35.
• Bloom, B. S. (1974). Time and learning. American Psychologist, 29, 682-688.
• Boerma, I. E., Mol, S. E., & Jolles, J. (2017). The role of home literacy environment, mentalizing, expressive verbal ability, and print exposure in third and fourth graders' reading comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 21(3), 179-193.
• Brozo, W. G., Shiel, G., & Topping, K. (2007). Engagement in reading: Lessons learned from three PISA countries. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 51(4), 304-315.
• Cheema, J. R. (2018). Adolescents' enjoyment of reading as a predictor of reading achievement: New evidence from a cross‐country survey. Journal of Research in Reading, 41, 149-162.
• Chen, Q., Kong, Y., Gao, W., & Mo, L. (2018). Effects of socioeconomic status, parent-child relationship, and learning motivation on reading habit. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1297. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01297
• Chiu, M. M., & McBride-Chang, C. (2006). Gender, context, and reading: A comparison of students in 43 countries. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10(4), 331-362.
• Cummins, C., Stewart, M. T., & Block, C. C. (2005). Teaching several metacognitive strategies together increases students' independent metacognition. In S. Isreal, C. Block, K. Bauserman, & K. Kinnucan- Welsch (Eds.), Metacognition in literacy learning: Theory, assessment, instruction, and Professional development (pp. 227–296). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Çoban, Ö. (2020). Relationships between students' socioeconomic status, parental support, students' hindering, teachers' hindering and students' literacy scores: PISA 2018. World Journal of Education, 10(4), 45-59.
• Eklund, K., Torppa, M., Sulkunen, S., Niemi, P., & Ahonen, T. (2018). Early cognitive predictors of PISA Reading in children with and without family risk for dyslexia. Learning and Individual Differences, 64, 94–103.
• Elleman, A. M., Lindo, E. J., Morphy, P., & Compton, D. L. (2009). The impact of vocabulary instruction on passage-level comprehension of school-age children: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2(1), 1-44.
• Erdoğan, E., & Güvendir, M. A. (2019). Uluslararası öğrenci değerlendirme programında öğrencilerin sosyoekonomik özellikleri ile okuma becerileri arasındaki ilişki. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 20, 493-523.
• Ergül, C., Akoğlu, G., Akçamuş, M. Ç. Ö., Demir, E., Tülü, B. K., & Kudret, Z. B. (2020). Longitudinal results on phonological awareness and reading performance of turkish-speaking children by socioeconomic status. Eğitim ve Bilim. 1-20.
• Ferrer, E., Shaywitz, B. A., Holahan, J. M., Marchione, K. E., Michaels, R., & Shaywitz, S. E. (2015). Achievement gap in reading is present as early as first grade and persists through adolescence. The Journal of Pediatrics, 167(5), 1121-1125.
• Fisher, C. W., Berliner, D. C., Filby, N. N., Marliave, R., Cahen, L. S., & Dishaw, M. M. (1981). Teaching behaviors, academic learning time, and student achievement: An overview. The Journal of Classroom Interaction, 17(1), 2-15.
• Firat, T. (2019). Effects of the TWA strategy instruction on reading comprehension of students with learning disabilities. Educational Research Quarterly, 43(2), 24-54.
• Fırat, T. (2020). Öğrenme güçlüğü olan öğrenciler için sınıf yönetimi. In A. Bildiren & B. Akyol (Eds.), Özel eğitimde bütünleştirilmiş sınıf yönetimi (pp. 89–119). Pegem Akademi.
• Fırat, T., & Ergül, C. (2020). 3D strateji öğretiminin öğrenme güçlüğü olan öğrencilerin bilişsel ve üstbilişsel stratejileri kazanmalarına etkisi. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 28(3), 1390-1406.
• Fırat, T., & Koçak, D. (2019). Başarılı okuyucular ile öğrenme güçlüğü olan öğrencilerin metni anlamak için kullandıkları bilişsel ve üstbilişsel stratejiler. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 27(2), 669-681.
• Fırat, T., & Koyuncu, İ. (2023). Examining metacognitive strategy preferences of students at different reading proficiency levels. International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies, 10(1), 224-240.
• Gottfried, A. W., Schlackman, J., Gottfried, A. E., & Boutin-Martinez, A. S. (2015). Parental provision of early literacy environment as related to reading and educational outcomes across the academic lifespan. Parenting, 15(1), 24-38.
• Guo, S., Li, L., & Zhang, D. (2018). A multi-level analysis of the effects of disciplinary climate strength on student reading performance. Asia Pacific Education Review, 19(1), 1-15.
• Guthrie, J. T., Hoa, A. L. W., Wigfield, A., Tonks, S. M., Humenick, N. M., & Littles, E. (2007). Reading motivation and reading comprehension growth in the later elementary years. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 282–313.
• Güldenoğlu, B., Kargin, T., & Miller, P. (2013). Okuma güçlüğü olan ve olmayan öğrencilerin cümle anlama becerilerinin incelenmesi. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 30(76), 82.
• Gülleroğlu, D., Bilican, S., & Demirtaşlı, N. (2014). Türk öğrencilerinin PISA 2003-2006-2009 dönemlerindeki okuma becerilerini yordayan sosyoekonomik ve kültürel değişkenlerin araştırılması. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 47(2), 201-222.
• Griffin, E. A., & Morrison, F. J. (1997). The unique contribution of home literacy environment to differences in early literacy skills. Early Child Development and Care, 127(1), 233-243.
• Guthrie, J. T., & Wigfield, A. (1999). How motivation fits into a science of reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3(3), 199-205.
• Hulme, C., Nash, H. M., Gooch, D., Lervåg, A., & Snowling, M. J. (2015). The foundations of literacy development in children at familial risk of dyslexia. Psychological Science, 26(12), 1877-1886.
• İnce, M., & Gözütok, F. D. (2018). Effect of parental education and home educational resources to student' results of PISA reading skills test. İlköğretim Online, 17(2), 947- 958.
• Johann, V., Könen, T., & Karbach, J. (2020). The unique contribution of working memory, inhibition, cognitive flexibility, and intelligence to reading comprehension and reading speed. Child Neuropsychology, 26(3), 324-344.
• Kendeou, P., & van den Broek, P. (2007). The effects of prior knowledge and text structure on comprehension processes during reading of scientific texts. Memory and Cognition, 35(7), 1567-1577.
• Kır, G. (2016). Differences between school types in reading related factors based on 2009 cycle of PISA (Doctoral dissertation). Bilkent University.
• Kidron, Y., & Lindsay, J. (2014). The effects of increased learning time on student academic and nonacademic outcomes: Findings from a meta-analytic review (REL 2014–015). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Appalachia. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs.
• Klauda, S. L., & Guthrie, J.T. (2008). Relationships of three components of reading fluency to reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(2), 310–321.
• Kotte, D., Lietz, P., & Lopez, M. M. (2005). Factors Influencing Reading Achievement in Germany and Spain: Evidence from PISA 2000. International Education Journal, 6(1), 113-124.
• Koyuncu, I., Bulus, M., & Firat, T. (2022). The moderator role of gender and socioeconomic status in the relationship between metacognitive skills and reading scores. Participatory Educational Research, 9(3), 82-97.
• Kuruyer, H. G., & Özsoy, G. (2015). İyi ve zayıf okuyucuların üstbilişsel okuma becerilerinin incelenmesi: Bir durum çalışması. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 24(2), 771-788.
• Lau, K. L., & Chan, D. W. (2003). Reading strategy use and motivation among Chinese good and poor readers in Hong Kong. Journal of Research in Reading, 26(2), 177-190.
• Lau, K. L., & Ho, E. S. C. (2016). Reading performance and self-regulated learning of Hong Kong students: What we learnt from PISA 2009. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 25(1), 159-171.
• Lavy, V. (2015). Do differences in schools' instruction time explain international achievement gaps? Evidence from developed and developing countries. The Economic Journal, 125(588), F397–F424. doi:10.1111/ecoj.12233.
• Logan, S., & Johnston, R. (2009). Gender differences in reading ability and attitudes: Examining where these differences lie. Journal of Research in Reading, 32(2), 199-214.
• Ma, X. (2003). Measuring up: Academic performance of Canadian immigrant children in reading, mathematics, and science. Journal of International Migration and Integration, 4(4), 541-576.
• Manu, M., Torppa, M., Eklund, K., Poikkeus, A. M., Lerkkanen, M. K., & Niemi, P. (2021). Kindergarten pre-reading skills predict Grade 9 reading comprehension (PISA Reading) but fail to explain gender difference. Reading and Writing, 34(3), 753-771.
• McArthur, G. M., Filardi, N., Francis, D. A., Boyes, M. E., & Badcock, N. A. (2020). Self-concept in poor readers: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PeerJ, 8, e8772.
• Memisevic, H., & Cehic, I. (2022). The Importance of Metacognitive Strategies in Reading Literacy—Results of the PISA Testing in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 21(2), 116-124.
• Miyamoto, A., Pfost, M., & Artelt, C. (2019). The relationship between intrinsic motivation and reading comprehension: Mediating effects of reading amount and metacognitive knowledge of strategy use. Scientific Studies of Reading, 23(6), 445-460.
• Ning, B., Van Damme, J., Van Den Noortgate, W., Yang, X., & Gielen, S. (2015). The influence of classroom disciplinary climate of schools on reading achievement: A cross-country comparative study. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 26(4), 586-611.
• OECD. (1999). Measuring student knowledge and skills: A new framework for assessment. OECD Publishing.
• OECD. (2009). PISA 2009 assessment framework: Key competencies in reading, mathematics and science. Paris: OECD Publishing.
• OECD. (2012). PISA 2009 technical report. Paris: OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264167872-en
• OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 assessment and analytical framework. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/b25efab8-en
• OECD. (n.d.). PISA 2018 Technical Report. Retrieved November 20, 2019, from https://www.oecd.org/pisa/data/pisa2018technicalreport/
• Orellana, P., Melo, C., Baldwin, P., De Julio, S., & Pezoa, J. (2020). The relationship between motivation to read and reading comprehension in chilean elementary students. Reading and Writing, 33, 2437–2458.
• Ozuru, Y., Dempsey, K., & McNamara, D. S. (2009). Prior knowledge, reading skill, and text cohesion in the comprehension of science texts. Learning and Instruction, 19(3), 228-242.
• Ozernov‐Palchik, O., Norton, E. S., Sideridis, G., Beach, S. D., Wolf, M., Gabrieli, J. D., & Gaab, N. (2017). Longitudinal stability of pre‐reading skill profiles of kindergarten children: implications for early screening and theories of reading. Developmental Science, 20(5), e12471.
• Park, H. (2008). Home literacy environments and children's reading performance: A comparative study of 25 countries. Educational Research and Evaluation, 14(6), 489-505.
• Park, J. H., & Sakong, B. H. (2014). Effects of the library use factor on reading achievement, reading attitude and behavioral factors of PISA 2009. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 48(3), 169-191.
• Parker, P., Sanders, T., Anders, J., Sahdra, B., Shure, N., Jerrim, J., & Cull, N. (2021). Does school average achievement explain the effect of socioeconomic status on math and reading interest? A test of the Information Distortion Model. Learning and Instruction, 73, 101432.
• Pyle, N., Vasquez, A. C., Lignugaris/Kraft, B., Gillam, S. L., Reutzel, D. R., Olszewski, A., ... & Pyle, D. (2017). Effects of expository text structure interventions on comprehension: A meta‐analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 52(4), 469-501.
• Quinn, J. M., Wagner, R. K., Petscher, Y., Roberts, G., Menzel, A. J., & Schatschneider, C. (2020). Differential codevelopment of vocabulary knowledge and reading comprehension for students with and without learning disabilities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(3), 608–627.
• Rajchert, J. M., Żułtak, T., & Smulczyk, M. (2014). Predicting reading literacy and its improvement in the Polish national extension of the PISA study: The role of intelligence, trait-and state-anxiety, socioeconomic status and school-type. Learning and Individual Differences, 33, 1-11.
• Ray, A., & Margaret, W. (Eds.). (2003). PISA 2000 technical report. Paris: OECD Publishing.
• Roeschl-Heils, A., Schneider, W., & van Kraayenoord, C. E. (2003). Reading, metacognition and motivation: A follow-up study of German students in grades 7 and 8. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 18(1), 75-86.
• Rogiers, A., Keer, H. V., & Merchie, E. (2020). The profile of the skilled reader: An investigation into the role of reading enjoyment and student characteristics. International Journal of Educational Research, 99, 101512.
• Schiefele, U., Schaffner, E., Möller, J., & Wigfield, A. (2012). Dimensions of reading motivation and their relation to reading behavior and competence. Reading Research Quarterly, 47, 427–463.
• Sénéchal, M., & LeFevre, J. A. (2002). Parental involvement in the development of children's reading skill: A five‐year longitudinal study. Child Development, 73(2), 445-460.
• Sénéchal, M., & LeFevre, J. A. (2014). Continuity and change in the home literacy environment as predictors of growth in vocabulary and reading. Child Development, 85(4), 1552-1568.
• Shala, A., & Grajcevci, A. (2018). Kosovo's low performance in PISA 2015: An explanation from a socioeconomic perspective. Educational Process: International Journal, 7(1), 48-59.
• Silinskas, G., Torppa, M., Lerkkanen, M. K., & Nurmi, J. E. (2020). The home literacy model in a highly transparent orthography. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 31(1), 80-101.
• Sikora, J., Evans, M. D. R., & Kelley, J. (2019). Scholarly culture: How books in adolescence enhance adult literacy, numeracy and technology skills in 31 societies. Social Science Research, 77, 1-15.
• Soto, C., de Blume, A. P. G., Jacovina, M., McNamara, D., Benson, N., Riffo, B., & Kruk, R. (2019). Reading comprehension and metacognition: The importance of inferential skills. Cogent Education, 6(1), 1565067.
• Stanovich, K. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360–407.
• Suggate, S., Schaughency, E., McAnally, H., & Reese, E. (2018). From infancy to adolescence: The longitudinal links between vocabulary, early literacy skills, oral narrative, and reading comprehension. Cognitive Development, 47, 82-95.
• Swanson, H. L. (1999). Reading research for students with ld: A meta-analysis of intervention outcomes. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 504-532.
• Taboada, A., Tonks, S. M., Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J. T. (2009). Effects of motivational and cognitive variables on reading comprehension. Reading and Writing, 22(1), 85–106.
• Tavsancil, E., Yildirim, O., & Bilican Demir, S. (2019). Direct and ındirect effects of learning strategies and reading enjoyment on PISA 2009 reading performance. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 82, 169-189.
• Torppa, M., Lyytinen, P., Erskine, J., Eklund, K., & Lyytinen, H. (2010). Language development, literacy skills, and predictive connections to reading in Finnish children with and without familial risk for dyslexia. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43(4), 308-321.
• Torppa, M., Vasalampi, K., Eklund, K., Sulkunen, S., & Niemi, P. (2020). Reading comprehension difficulty is often distinct from difficulty in reading fluency and accompanied with problems in motivation and school well-being. Educational Psychology, 40(1), 62-81.
• Troyer, M., Kim, J. S., Hale, E., Wantchekon, K. A., & Armstrong, C. (2019). Relations among intrinsic and extrinsic reading motivation, reading amount, and comprehension: a conceptual replication. Reading and Writing, 32(5), 1197-1218.
• Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J. T. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. In M. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, P. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of Reading Research (Vol. 3, pp. 403–422). New York, NY: Routledge.
• Williams, J. P., & Atkins, J. G. (2009). The role of metacognition in teaching reading comprehension to primary students. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of Metacognition in Education (pp. 26-43). New York, NY: Routledge.
• Woessmann, L. (2003). Schooling resources, educational institutions and student performance: The international evidence. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 65, 117–170.
• Vázquez-Cano, E., la Calle-Cabrera, D., María, A., Hervás-Gómez, C., & López-Meneses, E. (2020). Socio-Family context and its influence on students' PISA reading performance scores: Evidence from three countries in three continents. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 20(2), 50-62.
• Valenzuela, J. P., Vera, G. G., & Sotomayor, C. (2015). The role of reading engagement in improving national achievement: An analysis of Chile's 2000–2009 PISA results. International Journal of Educational Development, 40, 28-39.
• van Bergen, E., Vasalampi, K., & Torppa, M. (2021). How are practice and performance related? Development of reading from age 5 to 15. Reading Research Quarterly, 56(3), 415-434.
• Zagoto, I. (2020). Academic self-concept on reading comprehension. Journal Education and Development, 8(2), 545-545.