Güçlendirici Liderlik ile Öğretmen İş Performansı Arasındaki İlişki: Örgütsel Bağlılığın Aracı Rolü

Bu çalışma, okul müdürlerinin güçlendirici liderliği ile öğretmenlerin iş performansı arasındaki ilişkide örgütsel bağlılığın aracı rolünü incelemektedir. Nicel desende kurgulanan mevcut araştırma kesitsel bir çalışmadır. Veriler, "Güçlendirici Liderlik Ölçeği", "Örgütsel Bağlılık Ölçeği" ve "İş Performansı Ölçeği" aracılığı ile toplanmıştır. Araştırmanın örneklemini Türkiye'nin farklı illerinde görev yapan 324 öğretmen oluşturmaktadır. Katılımcılara uygun örnekleme yöntemi ile ulaşılmış ve katılımcılar ölçekleri çevrimiçi olarak yanıtlamıştır. Değişkenler arası öngörücü ilişkiler yapısal eşitlik modeli kullanılarak ortaya çıkarılmıştır. Yapısal modelin test edilmesinden önce, ölçüm modelinin ve araştırmada kullanılan ölçeklerin geçerliliği incelenmiştir. Elde edilen bulgular ölçeklerin geçerlik ve güvenirliğine işaret etmektedir. Ölçüm modeline ilişkin uyum iyiliği değerleri alanyazındaki ölçütleri karşılamıştır. Veri çok değişkenli normal dağılım varsayımını karşılamadığından önyükleme (bootstrapping) yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Bulgular, güçlendirici okul liderliğinin öğretmenlerin iş performansı ve örgütsel bağlılığı ile pozitif ilişkili olduğunu göstermiştir. Öte yandan, örgütsel bağlılık iş performansını artırmaktadır. Son olarak, güçlendirici okul liderliği örgütsel bağlılık aracılığı ile öğretmen iş performansını dolaylı olarak etkilemektedir. Araştırma bulguları alanyazın temelinde tartışılmış ve bulgulara dayalı olarak bazı önerilerde bulunulmuştur.

The Relationship between Empowering Leadership and Teachers’ Job Performance: Organizational Commitment as a Mediator

This study investigates the mediating role of organizational commitment on the relationship between principals’ empowering leadership and teachers’ job performance. To this end, it employed a cross-sectional design, one of the quantitative methods. Data were collected through the “Empowering Leadership Behaviors Scale”, “Organizational Commitment Scale” and “Job Performance Scale”. The sample consisted of 324 teachers working in different cities in Turkey. They were employed through convenience sampling and responded to the scales online. Predictive relationships between variables were revealed using a structural equation model. Before testing the structural model, the validity of the scales and measurement model was investigated. The findings indicated that validity and reliability of scales were ensured. On the other hand, the fit indices regarding the measurement model satisfied the cutoff values in the literature. Since the data did not satisfy the multivariate normal distribution assumption, bootstrapping was used. The findings indicated that empowering leadership is positively associated with teachers’ job performance and organizational commitment. On the other hand, organizational commitment boosts job performance. Lastly, empowering school leadership enhances organizational commitment, which in turn teachers’ job performance. The findings were discussed based on the literature and some suggestions were made based on the findings.

___

  • Abdurrezzak, S., & Uğurlu, C. T. (2016). Okul liderliği davranış ve uygulamalarının okul etkililiğini sağlamadaki rolüne ilişkin öğretmen algılarının incelenmesi. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 40(1), 215-242.
  • Absar, S., & Das Swain, R. (2009). Organizational commitment of university teachers across discipline and designation. Management and Professionalisation of Higher Education Conference. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.4625.8246
  • Adeyemo, D. A. (2007). The predictive effects of job satisfaction and organizational commitment on teaching efficacy of secondary school teachers in Ibadan, Nigeria. Zimbabwe Journal of Educational Research, 19(3), 207-219.
  • Ahearne, M., Mathieu, J., & Rapp, A. (2005). To empower or not to empower your sales force? An empirical examination of the influence of leadership empowerment behavior on customer satisfaction and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 945-955. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.5.945
  • Aliakbari, M., & Amoli, F. A. (2016). The effects of teacher empowerment on teacher commitment and student achievement. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 7(4), 649-657. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2016.v7n4p649
  • Al Jabri, B., & Ghazzawi, I. (2019). Organizational commitment: A review of the conceptual and empirical literature and a research agenda. International Leadership Journal, 11(1), 78-119.
  • Amoli, F. A., & Youran, M. (2014). Delving the relationship between teacher empowerment and job satisfaction among Iranian EFL teachers in Tehran Aviation University. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 4(4), 771-777. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.4.4.771-777
  • Amundsen, S., & Martinsen, Ø. L. (2014). Empowering leadership: Construct clarification, conceptualization, and validation of a new scale. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(3), 487-511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.11.009
  • Aras, G. (2013). Personel güçlendirme yönetiminde güçlendirici liderlik davranişları uygulamasi: Kemer bölgesi beş yıldızlı otel işletmeleri örneği [Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi]. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi.
  • Arbuckle, J. L. (2019). IBM SPSS Amos 20 user’s guide. New York (NY): IBM Corporation.
  • Arnold, J. A., Arad, S., Rhoades, J. A., & Drasgow, F. (2000). The empowering leadership questionnaire: The construction and validation of a new scale for measuring leader behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 249-269.
  • Atik, S., & Celik, O. T. (2020). An investigation of the relationship between school principals’ empowering leadership style and teachers’ job satisfaction: The role of trust and psychological empowerment. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 12(3), 177-193.
  • Audenaert, M., & Decramer, A. (2018). When empowering leadership fosters creative performance: The role of problem-solving demands and creative personality. Journal of Management & Organization, 24(1), 4-18. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2016.20
  • Az, H. (2017). Relationship between organizational commitment and employee’s performance evidence from banking sector of Lahore. Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review, 7(2), 1-7.
  • Balkar, B. (2015). The relationships between organizational climate, innovative behavior and job performance of teachers. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 7(2), 81-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.15345/iojes.2015.02.007
  • Balyer, A., Özcan, K., & Yıldız, A. (2017). Teacher empowerment: School administrators’ roles. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 70, 1-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2017.70.1
  • Bashir, B., & Gani, A. (2020). Correlates of organisational commitment among university teachers in India: An empirical investigation. Asia-Pacific Journal of Management Research and Innovation, 16(1), 7-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/2319510X19872632
  • Bastian, K. H. (1995). Empowering principal leadership in democratic schools [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Texas Tech University.
  • Batugal, L. C., & Tindowen, D. J. C. (2019). Influence of organizational culture on teachers’ organizational commitment and job satisfaction: The case of catholic higher education institutions in the Philippines. Universal Journal of Educational Research 7(11), 2432-2443. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2019.071121
  • Beycioğlu, K., & Aslan, B. (2010). Öğretmen liderliği ölçeği: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. İlköğretim Online, 9(2), 764-775.
  • Blase, J., & Blase, J. (1996). Facilitative school leadership and teacher empowerment: Teacher’s perspectives. Social Psychology of Education, 1, 117-145.
  • Blase, J., & Blase, R. R. (2001). Empowering teachers: What successful principals do (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  • Bogler, R. (2005). The power of empowerment: Mediating the relationship between teachers’ participation in decision making and their professional commitment. Journal of School Leadership, 15(1), 76-98. https://doi.org/10.1177/105268460501500104
  • Bogler, R., & Berkovich, I. (2020). A systematic review of empirical evidence on teachers’ organizational commitment 1994-2018. Leadership and Policy in Schools, https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2020.1774783
  • Bogler, R., & Nir, A. E. (2012). The importance of teachers’ perceived organizational support to job satisfaction. Journal of Educational Administration, 50(3), 287-306. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231211223310
  • Bogler, R., & Somech, A. (2004). Influence of teacher empowerment on teachers organizational commitment, professional commitment and organizational citizenship behavior in schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 277-289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2004.02.003
  • Boonyarit, I., Chomphupart, S., & Arin, N. (2010). Leadership, empowerment, and attitude outcomes. The Journal of Behavioral Science, 5(1), 1-14.
  • Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1997). Task performance and contextual performance: The meaning for personnel selection research. Human Performance, 10(2), 99-109.
  • Boz, D., Duran, C., & Uğurlu, E. (2021). Örgütsel bağlılığın iş performansına etkisi. MANAS Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 10(1), 345-355.
  • Byrne, B. M. (2016). Structural equation modeling with Amos: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. New York: Routledge.
  • Carter, A. (2016). Empowering middle leaders - trends in school leadership research on the principal’s impact on school effectiveness. Australian Educational Leader, 38(1), 37-41.
  • Celep, C. (2000). Teachers’ organizational commitment in educational organizations. National FORUM of Teacher Education Journal, 10E(3), 2-21.
  • Çelik, O. T., & Konan, N. (2020). Okul müdürlerinin güçlendirici liderliği ile öğretmenlerin özyeterliği ve örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışları arasındaki ilişki. Eğitim ve Bilim, Erken Görünüm, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2020.8841
  • Çelik, O. T., & Üstüner, M. (2020). Ortaokul öğretmenlerinin örgütsel politika algıları ile örgütsel bağlılıkları ve örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışları arasındaki ilişki. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 35(1), 120-135. https://doi.org/10.16986/HUJE.2018044109
  • Cerit, Y. (2012). Lider-üye etkileşimi ile öğretmenlerin performansları arasındaki ilişki. Balıkesir University the Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 15(28), 33-45.
  • Cerit, Y., & Yıldırım, B. (2017). İlkokul müdürlerinin etkili liderlik davranışları ile okul etkililiği arasındaki ilişki. Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 6(3), 902- 914. https://doi.org/10.14686/buefad.312405
  • Chaithra, V. K., & Hiremath, U. S. (2018). Job Performance of primary and secondary school teachers. International Journal of Pure & Applied Bioscience, 6(2), 854- 860. https://doi.org/10.18782/2320-7051.6387
  • Charbonnier-Voirin, A., & Roussel, P. (2012). Adaptive performance: A new scale to measure individual performance in organizations. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 29, 280-293.
  • Cheong, M., Spain, S. M., Yammarino, F. J., & Yun, S. (2016). Two faces of empowering leadership: Enabling and burdening. Leadership Quarterly, 27, 602- 616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.01.006
  • Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2005). Research methods in education (5th Ed.). London: Routledge Falmer.
  • Çöl, G. (2008). Algılanan güçlendirmenin işgören performansı üzerine etkileri. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 9(1), 35-46.
  • Collier, J. E. (2020). Applied structural equation modeling using AMOS. New York: Routledge.
  • Croswell, L. (2006). Understanding teacher commitment in times of change [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Queensland University of Technology.
  • Dağlı, A., Elçı̇çek, Z., & Han, B. (2018). Örgütsel bağlılık ölçeği’nin Türkçeye uyarlanmasi: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi , 17(68), 1788-1800 . https://doi.org/10.17755/esosder.445932
  • Davis, J., & Wilson, S. M. (2000). Principals’ efforts to empower teachers: effects on teacher motivation and job satisfaction and stress. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 73(6), 349-353. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098650009599442
  • Demir, S. (2019). Etik iklim ve okuldan ayrılma niyeti arasındaki ilişki: Örgütsel bağlılığın aracılık rolü. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 34(3), 824-838. https://doi.org/10.16986/HUJE.2018040551
  • Demirtaş, Z. (2014). The relationship between job satisfaction and organizational commitment: A study on elementary schools. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 23(1), 253-268.
  • Dennerlein, T. (2017). Empowering leadership and employees’ achievement motivations: The role of self-efficacy and goal orientations in the empowering leadership process [Unpublished doctorate dissertation]. Erasmus University Rotterdam.
  • Devos, G., Tuytens, M., & Hulpia, H. (2014). Teachers’ organizational commitment: Examining the mediating effects of distributed leadership. American Journal of Education, 120(2), 205-231.
  • Dilekçi, Ü., & Sezgin Nartgün, Ş. (2020). Güçlendirici liderlik. In K. Yılmaz (Ed.), Liderlik, kuram-uygulama-araştırma (pp.293-309). Pegem Akademi.
  • Doğan, H., & Çelik, K. (2019). The relation between school administrators’ use of power styles and teachers’ organizational commitment and their job performance. Eğitim ve Bilim, 44(198), 37-55. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2019.7943
  • Duze, C. O. (2012). Leadership styles of principals and job performance of staff in secondary schools in delta state of Nigeria. An International Journal of Arts and Humanities, 1(2), 224-245.
  • Elmazi, E. (2018). The role of principal’s power and teacher empowerment. European Scientific Journal October, 14(28), 1-14.
  • Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
  • Firestone, W. A., & Pennell, J. R. (1993). Teacher commitment, working conditions, and differential incentive policies. Review of Educational Research, 63(4), 489- 525.
  • Firestone, W. A., & Rosenblum, S. (1988). Building commitment in urban high schools. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 10(4), 285-299.
  • Flynn, A. A. (2000). Dimensions of faculty organizational commitment related to tenure, performance and turnover intention [Unpublished doctorate dissertation]. University of Illinois.
  • Fogaça, N., Rego, M. C. B., Melo, M. C. C., Armond, P. L., & Coelho, F. A. (2018). Job performance analysis: Scientific studies in the main journals of management and psychology from 2006 to 2015. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 30(4), 231-247. https://doi.org/10.1002/piq.21248
  • Fresko, B., Kfir, D., & Nasser, F. (1997). Predicting teacher commitment. Teaching and Teacher Education, 13(4), 429-438.
  • Gkorezis, P. (2016). Principal empowering leadership and teacher innovative behavior: a moderated mediation model. International Journal of Educational Management, 30(6), 1030-1044. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-08-2015-0113
  • Gordon, S. D. (2018). Leadership’s role in teachers’ commitment and retention: A case study analysis [Unpublished doctorate dissertation]. Delaware State University.
  • Gretkierewicz, K. G. (2020). Relationships of empowerment and experience with organizational commitment in Arizona middle school teachers [Unpublished doctorate dissertation]. Grand Canyon University.
  • Griffin, M. A., Neal, A., & Neale, M. (2000). The contribution of task performance and contextual performance to effectiveness: Investigating the role of situational constraints. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49(3), 517-533.
  • Gümüş, A. (2013). İlkokul yöneticilerinde güçlendirici liderlik davranışları ile öğretmenlerde örgütsel bağlılık ilişkisi: Psikolojik güçlendirmenin aracılık rolü (Ankara ili örneği) [Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi]. Gazi Üniversitesi.
  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate data analysis. Essex: Pearson.
  • Hamid, S. F., Nordin, N., Adnan, A. A., & Sirun, N. (2013). A study on primary school teachers’ organizational commitment and psychological empowerment in the district of Klang. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 90(2013), 782-787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.07.152
  • Hao, P., He, W., & Long, L. (2018). Why and when empowering leadership has different effects on employee work performance: The pivotal roles of passion for work and role breadth self-efficacy. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 25(1) 85-100 https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051817707517
  • Holliman, S. L. (2012). Exploring the effects of empowerment, innovation, professionalism, conflict, and participation on teacher organizational commitment [Unpublished doctorate dissertation]. University of Iowa.
  • Humborstad, S. I. W., Nerstad, C. G. L., & Dysvik, A. (2014). Empowering leadership, employee goal orientations and work performance: A competing hypothesis approach. Personnel Review, 43(2), 246-271. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-01-2012- 0008
  • Kariuki, A., & Kiambati, K. (2017). Empowerment, organizational commitment, organization citizenship behavior and firm performance. Management Studies, 5(4), 290-300. https://doi.org/10.17265/2328-2185/2017.04.003
  • Kim, M., & Beehr, T. A. (2020). Empowering leadership: leading people to be present through affective organizational commitment? The International Journal of Human Resource Management. 31(16), 2017-2044, https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2018.1424017
  • Kirkman, B. L., & Rosen, B. (1999). Beyond self-management: Antecedents and consequences of team empowerment. Academy of Management Journal, 42(1), 58- 74.
  • Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
  • Knezovic, E., & Musrati, M. A. (2018). Empowering leadership, psychological empowerment, and employees’ creativity: A gender perspective. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 4(2), 51-72.
  • Koçak, S., & Burgaz, B. (2017). Ortaöğretim kurumlarındaki psikolojik sözleşme üzerinde güçlendirici liderlik davranışlarının rolü. Eğitim ve Bilim, 42(191), 351- 369. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2017.7101
  • Kõiv, K., Liik, K., & Heidmets, M. (2019). School leadership, teacher’s psychological empowerment and work-related outcomes. International Journal of Educational Management, 33(7), 1501-1514. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-08-2018-0232
  • Konan, N., & Çelik, O. T. (2018). Güçlendirici liderlik ölçeğinin eğitim örgütleri için Türkçe’ye uyarlaması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Kastamonu Education Journal, 26(4), 1043-1054. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.434140
  • Konczak, L. J., Stelly, D. J., & Trusty, M. L. (2000). Defining and Measuring Empowering Leader Behaviors: Development of an upward feedback. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60(2), 301-313. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131640021970420
  • Koopmans, L., Bernaards, C. M., Hildebrandt, V. H., Schaufeli, W. B., Vet, H. C., & Beek, A. J. (2011). Conceptual frameworks of individual work performance: A systematic review. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 53(8), 856-866. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0b013e318226a763
  • Kundu, S. C., Kumar, S., & Gahlawat, L. (2019). Empowering leadership and job performance: mediating role of psychological empowerment. Management Research Review, 42(5), 605-624. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-04-2018-0183
  • Kushman, J. W. (1992). The organizational dynamics of teacher workplace commitment: A study of urban elementary and middle schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 28(1), 5-42.
  • Laily, N., & Wahyuni, D. U. (2017). Teacher performance based on stress and organizational commitment. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 7(12), 192-199.
  • Lavrakas, P. J. (Ed.) (2008). Encyclopedia of survey research methods (Volume 1 & 2). Sage.
  • Lee, A. N., & Nie, Y. (2013). Development and validation of the school leader empowering behaviours (SLEB) scale. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 22(4), 485-495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-012-0047-8
  • Lee, A. N., & Nie, Y. (2016). Teachers’ perceptions of school leader empowering behaviors on psychological empowerment: A moderated path analysis. New Waves Educational Research & Development, 19(2), 36-58.
  • Lestari, L., & Yunianto, A. (2015). The effect of empowerment on employee performance with organizational commitment as mediating variable and organizational culture as moderation variable. 2nd Conference in Business, Accounting and Management, 2(1), 335-343.
  • Liu, Y. (2015). The Review of empowerment leadership. Open Journal of Business and Management,3, 476-482. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojbm.2015.34049
  • Lutsilili, A. S., Daniel, W., & Benson, M. (2014). Effect of teacher empowerment on public secondary school performance in Nakuru Town East Constituency, Kenya. International Journal of Science and Research, 3(5), 1517-1522.
  • Luyten, H., & Bazo, M. (2019). Transformational leadership, professional learning communities, teacher learning and learner centered teaching practices: Evidence on their interrelations in Mozambican primary education. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 60(2019), 14-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.11.002
  • Mailool, J., Kartowagiran, B., Retnowati, T. H., Wening, S., & Putranta, H. (2020). The effects of principal’s decision-making, organizational commitment and school climate on teacher performance in vocational high school based on teacher perceptions. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(4), 1675-1687. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.4.1675
  • Manz, C. C., & Sims, H. P., Jr. (1989). Superleadership: Leading others to lead themselves. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Manz, C. C., & Sims, H. P., Jr. (1991). Superleadership: Beyond the myth of heroic leadership. Organizational Dynamics, 19, 18-35.
  • Maxfield, C. R., & Flumerfelt, S. (2009). The empowering principal: leadership behaviors needed by effective principals as identified by emerging leaders and principals. International Journal of Teacher Leadership, 2(2), 39-48.
  • May, H., & Supovitz, J. A. (2011). The scope of principal efforts to improve instruction. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47(2), 332-352. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X10383411
  • Mertens, D. M. (2010). Research and evaluation in education and psychology (3rd Edition). Los Angeles: Sage.
  • Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61-89.
  • Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1997). Commitment in the workplace: theory, research and application. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
  • Meyer, J. P., Allen, N. J., & Smith, C. A. (1993). Commitment to organizations and occupations: extension and test of a three-component conceptualization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(4), 538-551.
  • Mgbere, B. C., & Andrew, M. V. (2019). Time management and female teachers’ job performance in junior secondary schools in Rivers State. International Journal of Innovative Psychology & Social Development, 7(1), 50-56.
  • Moran, K. A. (2015). Teacher empowerment: School administrators leading teachers to lead [Unpublished doctorate dissertation]. Youngstown State University.
  • Motowidlo, S., & Kell, H. J. (2013). Job performance. In N. W. Schmitt, & S. Highhouse, handbook of psychology: Industrial and organizational psychology (Volume 12) (pp. 82-103). New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Muhammad, I. G., & Abdullah, H. H. (2016). Assessment of organizational performance: Linking the motivational antecedents of empowerment, compensation, and organizational commitment. International Review of Management and Marketing, 6(4), 974-983.
  • Muhammad, N., & Hussain Ch., A. (2020). Relationship of teachers’ empowerment and organizational commitment at secondary school level in Punjab. Bulletin of Education and Research, 42(2), 69-80.
  • Muzvidziwa, I. (2014). Principalship as an empowering leadership process: The experiences of women school heads in Zimbabwe. The Anthropologist, 17(1), 213- 221. https://doi.org/10.1080/09720073.2014.11891431
  • Ndoye, A., Imıg, S. M., & Paker, M. A. (2010). Empowerment, leadership, and teachers intentions to stay in or leave the profession or their schools in North Carolina charter schools. Journal of School Choice, 4, 174-190. https://doi.org/10.1080/15582159.2010.483920
  • Önder, M. E., Akçıl, U., & Cemaloğlu, N. (2019). The relationship between teachers’ organizational commitment, job satisfaction and whistleblowing. Sustainability. 11(21), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11215995
  • Osagie, C. I., & Akinlosotu, N. T. (2017). Causal relationship between teachers’ job performance and students’ academic achievement in secondary schools in Nigeria. African Research Review, 11(4), 45-54. https://doi.org/10.4314/afrrev.v11i4.5
  • Özdemir, M., & Gören, S. Ç. (2017). Mediating role of organizational commitment in leadership coherence, psychological empowerment, and teacher performance relationship. Elementary Education Online, 16(1), 342-353. https://doi.org/10.17051/io.2017.47449
  • Özdemir, M., & Yirmibeş, A. (2016). Okullarda liderlik ekibi uyumu ve öğretmen performansı ilişkisinde iş doyumunun aracı etkisi. Gazi Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 36(2), 323-348.
  • Özgenel, M., & Koç, M. H. (2020). An Investigation on the relationship between teachers’ occupational commitment and school effectiveness. International Journal of Eurasian Education and Culture, 5(8), 494-530.
  • Pan, H. L. W. (2007). Principal leadership which empowers teachers. 5th International Conference on Education and Information Systems, Technologies, and Applications. Orlando, Florida, U.S.A.
  • Park, I. (2005). Teacher commitment and its effects on student achievement in American high schools. Educational Research and Evaluation: An International Journal on Theory and Practice, 11(5), 461-485. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803610500146269
  • Pearce, C. L., Sims, H. P., Cox, J. F., Ball, G., Schnell, E., Smith, K. A., & Trevino, L. (2003). Transactors, transformers and beyond: A multi-method development of a theoretical typology of leadership. Journal of Management Development, 22(4), 273-307. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683941311300252
  • Pearson, L. C., & Moomaw, W. (2005). The relationship between teacher autonomy and stress, work satisfaction, empowerment, and professionalism. Educational Research Quarterly, 29(1), 38-54.
  • Polat, Ş. (2019). Öğretim doyumu ve iş performansı ilişkisinin öğretmen görüşlerine göre incelenmesi. Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 19(2), 641-651.
  • Polat, Ş., & Abaslı, K. (2019). Öğretmen algılarına göre örgütsel özdeşleşme, iş performansı ve psikolojik kırılganlık arasındaki ilişki. S. Olkun, M. E. Deniz, M.Toran, M. H. Sarı, H. Kamışlı (Ed.) İlköğretim çalışmaları: Bütünsel açıdan çocuk içinde (ss. 451-475). Pegem Akademi: Ankara.
  • Princy, K., & Rebeka, E. (2019). Employee commitment on organizational performance. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(3), 891-895. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.C4078.098319
  • Ramos-Villagrasa, P. J., Barrada, J. R., Fernández-del-Río, E., & Koopmans, L. (2019). Assessing job performance using brief self-report scales: The case of the Individual Work Performance Questionnaire. Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 35(3), 195-205. https://doi.org/10.5093/jwop2019a21
  • Reitzug, U. C. (1994). A case study of empowering principal behavior. American Educational Research Journal, 31(2), 283-307.
  • Sackett, P. R., & DeVore, C. J. (2005). Counterproductive behaviors at work. In N. Anderson, D. S. Ones, H. K. Sinangil, C. Viswesvaran (eds.), Handbook of industrial, work and organizational psychology (pp. 145-164). London: Sage Publications.
  • Selamat, N., Nordin, N., & Adnan, A. A. (2013). Rekindle teacher’s organizational commitment: The effect of transformational leadership behavior. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 90(2013), 566-574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.07.127
  • Setwong, R., & Prasertcharoensuk, T. (2013). The influence of instructional leadership of school administrators on school effectiveness. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 106(2013), 2859-286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.331.
  • Sharma, S., Mukherjee, S., Kumar, A., & Dillon, W. R. (2005). A simulation study to investigate the use of cutoff values for assessing model fit in covariance structure models. Journal of Business Research, 58(7), 935-943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2003.10.007
  • Sheikh, L. (2017). Antecedents and consequences of organizational commitment of teachers: Case of University of the Punjab. Pakistan Economic and Social Review, 55(2), 391-414.
  • Short, P. M. (1994). Defining teacher empowerment. Education, 114(4), 488-492.
  • Short, P. M., Greer, J. T., & Melvin, W. M. (1994). Creating empowered schools: Lessons in change. Journal of Educational Research, 32(4), 38-52.
  • Short, P. M., & Rinehart, J. S. (1992). School participant empowerment scale: Assessment of level of empowerment within the school environment. Journal of Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52(4), 951-960.
  • Sigler, T. H., & Pearson, C. M. (2000). Creating an empowering culture: Examining the relationship between organizational culture and perceptions of empowerment. Journal of Quality Management, 5, 27-52.
  • Singh, K. (2007). Quantitative social research methods. New Delhi: Sage Publications.
  • Singh, K., & Billingsley, B. (1998). Professional support and its effects on teachers’ commitment. Journal of Educational Research, 91, 229-239.
  • Slater, R. O., & Teddlie, C. (1992). Toward a theory of school effectiveness and leadership. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 3(4), 247-257. https://doi.org/10.1080/0924345920030402
  • Somech, A. (2005). Teachers’ personal and team empowerment and their relations to organizational outcomes: Contradictory or compatible constructs? Educational Administration Quarterly, 41(2), 237-266. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X04269592
  • Sonnentag, S., Volmer, J., & Spychala, A. (2008). Job Performance. In J. Barling, & C. L. Cooper, The Sage Handbook of Organizational Behavior: Volume 1 Micro Perspectives (pp. 427-447). London: Sage Publications.
  • Tatlah, I. A., & Iqbal, M. Z. (2012). Leadership styles and school effectiveness: Empirical evidence from secondary level. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 69(2012), 790-797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.474
  • Terry, P. M. (1995). Empowerment. National Forum of Education Administration and Supervision Journal, 12(3), 13-24.
  • Thung, H-L., & Chang, Y-H. (2011). Effects of empowering leadership on performance in management team: Mediating effects of knowledge sharing and team cohesion. Journal of Chinese Human Resource Management, 2(1), 43-60. https://doi.org/ 10.1108/20408001111148720.
  • Töre, E. (2019). Öğretmenlerin örgüte duydukları duygusal bağlılıklarının tanımlanmış ve tanımlanmamış rol davranışları üzerindeki etkisinin incelenmesi. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 27(5), 2015-2025. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.3242
  • Tsui, K. T., & Cheng, Y. C. (1999). School organizational health and teacher commitment: A contingency study with multi-level analysis. Educational Research and Evaluation, 5(3), 249-268. https://doi.org/10.1076/edre.5.3.249.3883
  • Tung, H. L., & Chang, Y. H. (2011). Effects of empowering leadership on performance in management team: Mediating effects of knowledge sharing and team cohesion. Journal of Chinese Human Resources Management, 2(1), 43-60. https://doi.org/10.1108/20408001111148720
  • Uygur, K., & Arabacı, İ. (2019). Lise öğretmenlerinin personel güçlendirme algıları ile örgütsel güven algıları arasındaki ilişki: Elazığ ili örneği. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 16(1), 744-770. https://doi.org/10.23891/efdyyu.2019.140
  • Van Scotter, J. R., Motowidlo, S. J., & Cross, T. C. (2000). Effects of task performance and contextual performance on systematic rewards. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(4), 526-535.
  • Vecchio, R. P., Justin, J. E., & Pearce, C. L. (2010). Empowering leadership: An examination of mediating mechanisms within a hierarchical structure. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(2010), 530-542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.03.014
  • Visanh, P., & Xu, H. (2018). Factors affecting organizational commitment of employees of Lao development bank. Sociology International Journal, 2(6), 809-818. https://doi.org/10.15406/sij.2018.02.00141
  • Wu, V., & Short, P. M. (1996). The relationship of empowerment to teacher job commitment and job satisfaction. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 23(1), 85- 89.
  • Yao, J., You, Y., & Zhu, J. (2020). Principal-teacher management communication and teachers’ job performance: The mediating role of psychological empowerment and affective commitment. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 29(4), 365-375. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40299-019-00490-0
  • Zhang, X., & Bartol, K. M. (2010). Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: The influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1), 107-128.
  • Zhao, X., Lynch, J. G., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 197-206. https://doi.org/10.1086/651257
  • Zhu, J., Yao, J., & Zhang, L. (2019). Linking empowering leadership to innovative behavior in professional learning communities: The role of psychological empowerment and team psychological safety. Asia Pacific Education Review, 20, 657-671. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-019-09584-2