Aday Öğretmenlerin Uygulamalı Eğitim Sürecinin Akran Danışma ve Kliniksel Denetim Yoluyla Desteklenmesi

Bu araştırmanın amacı, aday öğretmenlerin uygulamalı eğitim sürecinin akran danışma ve kliniksel denetim yoluyla desteklenmesidir. Araştırma deneme öncesi model ve nitel yöntem kullanılarak karma desende yürütülmüştür. Araştırmanın çalışma grubunu altı farklı okulda görev yapan 14 aday ve 14 rehber öğretmen oluşturmuştur. Deneme öncesi modelin nicel yöntemi için geliştirilen dört denence ön ve son test ile sınanmıştır. Nitel yöntem için de tüm katılımcıların akran danışma ve kliniksel denetim sürecine ilişkin görüşleri alınmıştır. Araştırma sonuçları, aday öğretmenlerin inançlarının sınıf yönetiminde yeterlikte olumlu yönde değiştiğini, ancak öğretimde yeterlik inançlarında önemli bir farklılık olmadığını göstermiştir. Aday öğretmenlerin açık ve gizli kendi alanlarında da ön ve son test puanları arasında istatistiksel farklılık bulunmamıştır. Araştırmanın nitel bulguları, akran danışma ve kliniksel denetimin uygulamalı eğitim sürecinde aday öğretmenlerin gelişimine katkı sağlayabileceğini göstermektedir. Sonuç olarak, uygun koşulların sağlanması halinde, aday öğretmenlerin yetiştirilmesinde akran danışma ve kliniksel denetimin kullanılması önerilebilir.

Promoting Practical Training Process of Novice Teachers through Peer Consultation and Clinical Supervision

The purpose of this study was to promote practical training process of novice teachers through peer consultation and clinical supervision. This study was conducted in a hybrid design using preexperimental model and qualitative method. The study participants were consisted of 14 novice teachers and 14 mentors employed in six different schools. Four hypotheses developed for the quantitative method of the study were tested via pre and posttest. The views of all the participants regarding peer consultation and clinical supervision process were obtained for the qualitative method. Results of the quantitative study revealed that novice teachers' beliefs differed positively in classroom management efficacy but there was no significant difference in teaching efficacy beliefs at the end of the study. No statistical difference between pre and posttest scores was also found in novice teachers' open and private self-areas. The qualitative findings of this study indicated that peer consultation and clinical supervision can contribute to novice teachers' development in the process of practical training. In conclusion, if appropriate conditions are met, it is recommended that peer consultation and clinical supervision be used for training novice teachers.

___

  • Acheson, K. A., & Meredith, D. G. (2003). Clinical supervision and teacher development: Pre-service and in-service applications (5th ed.). New York: John Wiley and Sons.
  • Ağaoğlu, E. (1997). Eğitimde klinik denetim. Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi.
  • Aksu, M. B., Apaydın, Ç., & Kasalak, G. (2014). Novice teachers self-efficacy belief: A study of scale development. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching. 1(4), 1-16 (online). Retrieved from http://iojet.org
  • Baron, W. (2006). Confronting the challenging working conditions of new teacher: What mentors and induction program can do. Mentors in the Making: Developing New Leaders for New Teachers. New York: Teacher College Press. Retrieved from http://books.google.com.tr
  • Benshoff, J. M. (2001). Peer consultation as a form of supervision. Reading for Child and Youth Care Workers, 31. Retrieved from http://www.cyc-net.org
  • Biss, J. L., & DuFrene, D. (2006). An examination of reverse mentoring in the workplace. Business Education Digest, 15, 30-41.
  • Creswell, J. W., & Vicki. L. P. C. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Cruz, M. J. de la T., & Pedro F. C. A. (2007). Comparative analysis of expectancies of efficacy in in-service and prospective teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(5), 641-652.
  • Eurydice. (2007). Retrieved from http://www.eurydice.org
  • Glickman, C.D., Gordon, S. P., & Ross-Gordon, J. M. (2010). Supervision and instructional leadership: A developmental approach (9th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.
  • Goldhammer, R., Anderson, R. H., & Krajewski, R. J. (1980). Clinical supervision: Special methods for the supervision of teachers (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
  • Gürsoy, E., Bulunuz, N., Göktalay, Ş. B., Bulunuz, M., Kesner, J., & Salihoğlu, U. (2013). Clinical supervision model to improve supervisory skills of cooperating teachers and university supervisors during teaching practice. Hacettepe University. Journal of Education (Special Issue: 1), 191-203.
  • Hampton, W. L. (2009). Clinical supervision: A case study of clinical supervision as it relates to the improvement of novice teachers (Unpublished master thesis). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Thesis database. (UMI No. 1466122)
  • Heppner, P. P., & Johnston, J. A. (1994). Peer consultation: Faculty and students working together to improve teaching. Journal of Counseling and Development, 72(5), 492-499.
  • Herlihy, B., Gray, N., & McCollum, V. (2002). Legal and ethical issues in school counselor supervision. Professional School Counseling, 6(1), 55.
  • Karasar, N. (2008). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi. (18. baskı). Ankara: Nobel.
  • MEB (2014). Millî eğitim temel kanunu ile bazı kanun ve kanun hükmünde kararnamelerde değişiklik yapılmasına dair kanun. http://www.resmigazete.gov.tr adresinden indirilmiştir.
  • MEB (1995). Milli eğitim bakanlığı aday memurlarının yetiştirilmesine ilişkin yönetmelik. http://mevzuat.meb.gov.tr adresinden indirilmiştir.
  • Paker, T. (1995). Clinical supervision as in-service teacher development. Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 1(11), 39-53.
  • Romi, S., & Leyser, Y. (2006). Exploring inclusion pre-service training needs: A study of variables associated with attitudes and self-efficacy beliefs. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 21(1), 85-105.
  • Ozder, H. (2011). Self-efficacy beliefs of novice teachers and their performance in the classroom. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 36(5) (online). Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2011v36n5.1
  • Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness of fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23-74. Retrieved from http://www.mpr-online.de
  • Schumacher, G., Grigsby, B., & Vesey, W. (2015). Determining effective teaching behaviors through the hiring process. International Journal of Educational http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-04-2013-0071 29(1), 139-155. Retrieved from
  • Sergiovanni, T. J. (1977). Handbook for department leadership: Concepts and practices in today's secondary schools. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Sergiovanni, T. J., & Starratt, R. J. (2002). Supervision: A redefinition (7th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Stephens, M., & Moskowitz, J. (1997). Teacher induction policy and practice among APEC members: Results of the exploratory survey. Retrieved from http://www.ed.gov/pubs/APEC/ch2.htm
  • Stronge, J. H. (2002). Qualities of effective teachers. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  • Ware, H., & Kitsantas, A. (2007). Teacher and collective efficacy beliefs as predictors of professional commitment. The Journal of Educational Research, 100(5), 303-310.
  • Wertheim, C., & Leyser, Y. (2002). Efficacy beliefs, background variables, and differentiated instruction of Israeli prospective teachers. Journal of Educational Research, 96(1), 54-63.
  • Woolfolk, A.E., Rosoff, B., & Hoy, W.K. (1990). Teachers' sense of efficacy and their beliefs about managing students. Teaching and Teacher Education, 6(2), 137-148.