___

• Ak O, Kutlu S, Aydın İ 2009. Length-Weight Relationship for 16 Fish Species From the Eastern Black Sea, Türkiye. Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 9: 125-126.
• Bok TD, Göktürk D, Kahraman AE, Alicli TZ, Acun T, Ateş C 2011. Length-Weight Relationships of 34 Fish Species from the Sea of Marmara, Turkey. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances 10(23): 3037-3042.
• Can MF, Basusta N, Cekic M 2002. Weight-Length Relationships for Selected Fish Species of the Small-scale Fisheries off the South Coast of Iskenderun Bay. Turk J Vet Anim Sci 26: 1181– 1183
• Ceyhan T, Akyol O, Erdem M 2009. Length-Weight Relationships of Fishes from Gökova Bay, Turkey (Aegean Sea). Turkish Journal of Zoology 33: 69-72. doi:10.3906/zoo-0802-9
• Cicek E, Avsar D, Yeldan H, Ozutok M 2006. Length– Weight Relationships for 31 Teleost Fishes Caught by Bottom Trawl Net in the Babadillimani Bight (northeastern Mediterranean). Journal of Applied Ichthyology 22(4): 290-292.
• Demirel N, Murat Dalkara E 2012. Weight−Length Relationships of 28 Fish Species in the Sea of Marmara. Turkish Journal of Zoolgy 36(6): 785-791. DOI:10.3906/zoo-1111-29.
• Erguden D, Erguden Alagoz S, Ozdemir O, Gürlek M 2017. Length-Weight Relationship and Condition Factor of Spotted Flounder Citharus linguatula (Linnaeus, 1758) in Iskenderun Bay, North-eastern Mediterranean, Turkey. NESciences 2(1): 11-17.
• Erkoyuncu İ, Erdem M, Samsun O, Özdamar E, Kaya Y 1994. A Research on the Determintion of Meat Yields, Chemical Composition and Weight-Lenght Relationship of Some Fish Species Caught in the Black Sea. İstanbul University Journal of Aquatic Products 8(1-2): 181-191 (In Turkish).
• Erzini K 1994. An Empirical Study of Variability in Length-at-Age in Marine Fishes. Journal of Applied Ichthyolgy 10(1): 17-41. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439- 0426.1994.tb00140.x
• Gongalves JMS, Bentes L, Lino PG, Ribeiro J, Carkrio AVM., Erzini K 1997. Weight-Length Relationships for Selected Fish Species of the Small-Scale Demersal Fisheries of the South and South-West coast of Portugal. Fisheries Research 30: 253-256
• İlkyaz AT, Metin G, Soykan O, Kinacigil HT 2008. Length–Weight Relationship of 62 Fish Species from the Central Aegean Sea, Turkey. Journal of Applied Ichthyology 24(6): 699-702, https://doi.org/ 10.1111/ j.1439-0426.2008.01167.x
• Ismen A, Ozen O, Altinagac U, Ozekinci U, Ayaz A 2007. Weight–Length Relationships of 63 fish Species in Saros Bay, Turkey. Journal of Applied Ichthyology 23: 707-708. doi: 10.1111/j.1439- 0426.2007.00872.x
• Kalaycı F, Samsun N, Bilgin S, Samsun O 2007. Length-Weight Relationship of 10 Fish Species Caught by Bottom Trawl and Midwater Trawl from the Middle Black Sea, Turkey. Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 7: 33-36
• Karakulak FS, Erk H, Bilgin B 2006. Length–Weight Relationships for 47 Coastal Fish Species from the Northern Aegean Sea, Turkey. Journal of Applied Ichthyology 22(4): 274-278, https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1439-0426.2006.00736.x
• Kasapoğlu N, Düzgüneş E 2013. Length-Weight Relationships of Marine Species Caught by Five Gears from the Black Sea. Mediterranean Marine Science 15(1): 95-100. doi:https://doi.org/10.12681/mms.463
• Keskin Ç, Gaygusuz Ö 2010. Length-Weight Relationships of Fishes in Shallow Waters of Erdek Bay (Sea of Marmara, Turkey). IUFS Journal of Biolog 69(2): 87-94.
• Moutopoulos DK, Stergiou KI 2002. Length–Weight and Length–Length Relationships of Fish Species from the Aegean Sea (Greece). Journal of Applied Ichthyology 18: 200-203.
• Ozaydın O, Taşkavak E 2006. Length-Weight Relationships for 47 Fish Species from Izmir Bay (eastern Aegean Sea, Turkey). Acta Adriatica: International Journal of Marine Sciences 47(2): 211-216.
• Ozaydın O, Uckun D, Akalın S, Leblebici S, Tosunoglu Z 2007. Length–Weight Relationships of Fishes Captured from Izmir Bay, Central Aegean Sea. Journal of Applied Ichthyology 23: 695-696. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0426.2007.00853.x
• Oztekin A, Ozekinci U, Daban IB 2016. Length-Weight Relationships of 26 Fish Species Caught by Longline from the Gallipoli Peninsula, Turkey (northern Aegean Sea). Cahiers de Biology Marine 57: 335-342.
• Ozvarol Y 2014. Length–Weight Relationships of 14 Fish Species from the Gulf of Antalya (northeastern Mediterranean Sea, Turkey). Turkish Journal of Zoology 38: 342-346. doi:10.3906/zoo-1308-44
• Pauly D 1993. Fishbyte Section Editorial. Naga, ICLARM Quart 16: 26.
• Pauly D 1994. Quantitative Analysis of Published Data on the Growth, Metabolism, Food Consumption, and Related Features of the Red-Bellied Piranha, Serrasalmus nattereri (Characidae). Environmental Biology of Fishes 41: 423-437.
• Petrakis G, Stergiou KI 1995. Weight-Length Relationships for 33 Fish Species in Greek Waters. Fisheries Research 21: 465-469.
• Ricker WE 1975. Computation and Interpretation of Biological Statistics of Fish Populations. Bulletin of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 191: 1-382.
• Samsun O, Akyol O, Teyhan T, Erdem Y 2017. LengthWeight Relationships for 11 Fish Species from the Central Black Sea, Turkey. Ege Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 34(4): 455-458.
• Sangun L, Akamca E, Akar M 2007. Weight-Length Relationships for 39 Fish Species from the NorthEastern Mediterranean Coast of Turkey. Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 7(1): 37- 40.
• Sparre P 1992. Introduction to Tropical Fish Stock Assessment. Part I Manual. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper 306/1. Rev 1. Rome, 376 pp.
• Sparre P, Ursin E, Venema SC 1989. Introduction to Tropical Fish Stock Assessment. Part I. Manual. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper No. 306. FAO, Rome.