Influence of Rootstock and Variety on Leaf Nutrient Concentration of Pear Grown on a Nutrient-Sufficient Soil

Study was aimed to investigate the effect of rootstock, variety andtheir combination on mineral nutrition of pear. For this reason,Deveci, Santa Maria and Akca varieties grafted on Quince A, QuinceC, BA 29 and OHF 333 rootstocks were used as plant materials. Tocompare nutritional status of plants, N, P, K, Ca, Mg, Fe, Cu, Mn Znand B analysis were made on leaf samples. According to results, it wasseen that individual effect of rootstock and variety and theircombinations had significant effect on pear mineral nutritiongenerally. Although there was a significant variation depending onrootstock and variety differences, we could not reach a certain resultwhich rootstock and variety or their combinations were prominent ongeneral mineral nutrient concentration of pear. We assumed that thiswas due to preventing of the effectiveness of rootstock or varietybecause of sufficient nutrient levels in the soil.

Besin Elementi Bakımından Yeterli Bir Toprakta Yetiştirilen Armudun Mineral Beslenmesi Üzerine Anaç ve Çeşidin Etkisi

Araştırmada armudun mineral beslenmesi üzerine anaç, çeşit ve onların kombinasyonlarının etkisini incelemek amaçlanmıştır. Bu nedenle, bitki materyali olarak Quince A, Quince C, BA 29 ve OH x F333 anaçlarına aşılanmış Deveci, Santa Maria ve Akca çeşitleri kullanılmıştır. Bitkilerin beslenme durumlarının karşılaştırılması için yaprak örneklerinde N, P, K, Ca, Mg, Fe, Cu, Mn Zn ve B analizleri yapılmıştır. Sonuçlar, Anaç ve çeşitler ile onların kombinasyonlarının armudun mineral beslenmesi üzerinde anlamlı derecede etkili olduğunu göstermiştir. Bu anlamlı etkiye rağmen, hangi anacın, çeşidin veya kombinasyonun armudun genel beslenme durumu üzerinde daha etkili olduğuna yönelik kesin bir sonuca ulaşılamamıştır. Bu durumda, topraktaki yeterli miktarda bulunan besin elementleri nedeniyle anaç veya çeşidin etkinliğinin engellenmiş olabileceği düşünülmektedir.

PDF

___

Allison LE, Moodie CD 1965. Carbonate. In C.A. Black et al. (Eds.), Methods of Soil Analysis. (pp. 1379– 1400), Madison, WI, USA: Am. Soc. of Agron. Inc. Part 2, Agronomy 9.

Alpaslan M, Guneş A, Inal A 2005. Deneme Tekniği. Ankara Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları, No: 1543.

Bremner JM 1965. Total Nitrogen 1. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties, 1149-1178.

Campbell J 2003. Pear Rootstock. NWS Agriculture, Edt. Noad B., ISSN: Orange Agricultural Institute. 0725-7759. The State of New South Wales.

Clark RB, Gross RD 1986. Plant Genotype Differences to Iron. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 9 (3-7): 471-491.

Dakora FD, Phillips DA 2002. Root Exudates as Mediators of Mineral Acquisition in Low-Nutrient Environments. In Food Security in NutrientStressed Environments: Exploiting Plants’ Genetic Capabilities (pp. 201-213). Springer, Dordrecht.

Dayal V, Dubey AK, Singh SK, Sharma RM, Pandey RN 2017. Effect of Polyembryonic Rootstocks on Leaf Mineral Composition of Five Cultivars under Inceptisol. The Horticultural Society of India (Regd.), 74(2): 210-213.

Dubey AK, Sharma RM 2016. Effect of Rootstocks on Tree Growth, Yield, Quality and Leaf Mineral Composition of Lemon (Citrus limon (L.) Burm.). Scientia Horticulturae, 200: 131-136.

Erdal I, Askin MA, Kucukyumuk Z, Yildirim F, Yildirim A 2008. Rootstock has an Important Role on Iron Nutrition of Apple Trees. World Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 4 (2): 173-177.

Erdem H, Ozturk B 2012. Effect of Foliar Applied Zinc on Yield, Mineral Element Contents and Biochemical Properties of Pear Varieties Grafted to BA-29 Rootstock. Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture, 7(1): 93-106.

FAO 2018. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. http: // www. fao. org/ faostat

Fazio G, Chang L, Grusak MA, Robinson TL 2015. Apple Rootstocks Influence Mineral Nutrient Concentration of Leaves and Fruit. NY Fruit Q, 23: 11-15.

Ikinci A, Bolat I, Ercisli S, Kodad O 2014. Influence of Rootstocks on Growth, Yield, Fruit Quality and Leaf Mineral Element Contents of Pear Cv. Santa Maria’ in Semi-Arid Conditions. Biological Research, 47(71): 1-8.

Jackson ML 1967. Soil chemical analysis, New Delhi: Prentice Hall of India Private Limited.

Jones JB Jr, Wolf B, Mills HA 1991. Plant Analysis Handbook. A Practical Sampling, Preparation, Analysis, and Interpretation Guide, Micro-Macro Publishing, Inc: Athens, GA.

Kacar B 2009. Soil Analysis (Second Press). Nobel Press. 1387.

Keren R, Bingham FT 1985. Boron in Water, Soils, and Plants. Advanced Soil Science, 1: 229‐ 276.

Knudsen D, Peterson GA, Pratt PF 1982. Lithium, Sodium, and Potassium. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties, 225-246.

Kucukyumuk Z, Erdal I 2011. Rootstock and Cultivar Effect on Mineral Nutrition, Seasonal Nutrient Variation and Correlations among Leaf, Flower and Fruit Nutrient Concentrations in Apple Trees. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 17(5): 633-641.

Kucukyumuk Z, Kucukyumuk C, Erdal I, Eraslan F 2015. Effects of Different Sweet Cherry Rootstocks and Drought Stress on Nutrient Concentrations. - Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 21(3): 431-438.

Lindsay WL, Norvell WA 1969. Development of a DTPA Micronutrient Soil Test, Soil Science Society of American Proceeding, 35, 600-602.

Marschner P 2012. Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants, 3rd Ed. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, USA.

Mayer NA, Ueno B, Nava G, Neves TRD 2018. Leaf Nutrient Content on Seven Plum Cultivars with Grafted by Budding or Own-Rooted Trees. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura, 40 (3): 1-12.

Meland M 2010. Performance of Six European Plum Cultivars on Four Plum Rootstocks Growing in A Northern Climate. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section B–Soil and Plant Science, 60(4): 381-387.

Mestre L, Reig G, Betrán J, Pinochet J, Moreno MA 2015. Influence of Peach–Almond Hybrids and Plum-Based Rootstocks on Mineral Nutrition and Yield Characteristics of ‘Big Top’Nectarine in Replant and Heavy-Calcareous Soil Conditions. Scientia Horticulturae, 192: 475-481

Mugasha WA, Bollandsås OM, Eid T 2013. Relationships between Diameter and Height of Trees in Natural Tropical Forest in Tanzania. Southern Forests: A Journal of Forest Science, 75: 221–237.

Nava G, Ciotta MN, Pasa MDS, Boneti JIDS 2018. Mineral Composition of Leaves and Fruits of Apple ‘Fuji’on Different Rootstocks in the Region of São Joaquim-SC. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura, 40(2): 1-10.

Olsen SR 1954. Estimation of Available Phosphorus in Soils by Extraction with Sodium Bicarbonate. United States Department of Agriculture; Washington.

Peng H, Yan Z, Chen Y, Zhao X, Han W 2019. Effects of Body Size and Root to Shoot Ratio on Foliar Nutrient Resorption Efficiency in Amaranthus Mangostanus. American Journal of Botany,106 (3): 363-370.

Reig G, Forcada CF, Mestre L, Jiménez S, Betrán JA, Moreno MÁ 2018. Horticultural, Leaf Mineral and Fruit Quality Traits of Two ‘Greengage’ Plum Cultivars Budded on Plum Based Rootstocks in Mediterranean Conditions. Scientia Horticulturae, 232: 84-91.

Rengel Z 2001. Genotypic Differences in Micronutrient Use Efficiency in Crops. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 32(7-8): 1163-1186.

Sau S, Ghosh SN, Sarkar S, Gantait S 2018. Effect of Rootstocks on Growth, Yield, Quality, and Leaf Mineral Composition of Nagpur Mandarin (Citrus reticulata Blanco.), Grown in Red Lateritic Soil of West Bengal, India. Scientia Horticulturae, 237: 142-147.

Tsipouridis C, Simonis AD, Bladenopoulou S, Isaakidis A, Stylianidis D 1990. Nutrient Element Variability in The Leaves of Peach Trees, in Relation to Cultivar and Rootstocks. In 23 rd international Horticulture Congress. Firenze, August.

Vijaya D, Rao BS 2015. Effect of Rootstocks on Petiole Mineral Nutrient Composition of Grapes (Vitis vinifera L. Cv. Thompson Seedless). Current Biotica, 8(4): 367-374.

Westwood MN 1995. Temperate-Zone Pomology: Physiology And Culture. 3rd Ed. Timber Press, Portland, Oregon.