Bilgehan AÇIKGÖZ, Banu AÇIKGÖZ, Ali Rıza KARAKOYUN, Nehir ASLAN YÜKSEL, Fatih AKCA, Ayşe Semra Demir Akca, Ferruh Niyazi Ayoğlu

Tıp Fakültesi 5. ve 6. Sınıf Öğrencilerinde Flört Şiddetinin Değerlendirilmesi

Giriş:Şiddet, yaşamımızın gerçeklerinden biridir ve en önemli sosyal sorunların başında gelmektedir. Şiddet fiziksel, cinsel veya duygusal özellikte olabilmektedir. Şiddet, flört ilişkisinde tecavüz, dövme, tehdit etme, cinsel taciz ve duygusal kötüye kullanma gibi farklı şekillerde gerçekleşebilir. Flört şiddeti de üzerinde yeterince araştırılma yapılmamış bir alandır. Bu çalışmada Tıp Fakültesi 5. ve 6. sınıf öğrencileri arasında flört şiddetinin sıklığı ve türünün belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır.Gereç: Tanımlayıcı özellikteki bu araştırmada; Mayıs-Haziran 2014 tarihleri arasında Bülent Ecevit Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi’nde öğrenim gören dönem 5 ve 6 sınıf öğrencisi 105 kişiden çalışmaya katılmayı kabul eden 88(%83,8)’inde yapılmıştır. Araştırmacılar tarafından hazırlanan anket formuyla öğrencilerin sosyo-demografik özellikleri, flört içinde şiddet uygulama ve maruz kalma durumları sorgulanmıştır. Bulgular:Çalışmaya katılan 88 kişinin yaş ortancası 24 yıl ve 33(%37,5)’ü erkektir. Öğrencilerin 69 (%78.4)’unun daha önce veya şimdi flört ilişkisi olmuştur. İlk flört yaş ortancası 17 (min:10, max:24)’dir. Daha önce flört yaşayanların 15(%22)’i flört şiddetine maruz kalmamış ve uygulamamıştır. Fiziksel 10(% 14,7)’u, 51(%75.0)’i duygusal, 9(%13.2)’u cinsel flört şiddetine maruz kalmıştır. Şiddet uygulayanların ise 16(%20,6)’sı fiziksel, 45(%66,2)’i duygusal, 5(%7,4)’i cinsel şiddet uygulamıştır. En sık maruz kalınan (%33,0) ve uygulanan (%28,4) şiddet şekli ise sesini yükselterek konuşmadır. Sonuç: Bu çalışmada en sık uygulanan ve maruz kalınan şiddet şeklinin partnerine karşı sesini yükseltmek, en sık görülen şiddet tipinin duygusal şiddet olduğu belirlenmiştir. Şiddet ve şiddeti etkileyen faktörlerin ortaya konulabilmesi için daha detaylı, uzun süreli ve değişik gruplarda yapılan çalışmalara gereksinim vardır ve şiddetin niteliksel ve niceliksel boyutunun birlikte değerlendirilmesi gerekmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Flört, şiddet, tıp öğrencisi

Evaluation of Violence in Flirtous Relationships among 5th and 6th Grade Students in a Faculty of Medicine

IntroductionViolence is one of the realities of life , and it is one of the most important social problems in life. Violence can be physical, sexual or emotional. Violence can occur in different ways in flirt affairs, such as rape, beat , threat, sexual harassment, and abuse of emotion. There has not been enough research carried out on the violence of flirt. In this study, it was aimed to determine the frequency and type of the violence of flirt among 5th and 6th grade students of faculty of medicine. Material: This descriptive study was carried out with 105 (83.8%) 5th and 6th grade students, studying at Faculty of Medicine of Bulent Ecevit University , accepted to participate in the study, between May and June 2014.With the questionnaire form prepared by the researchers, the socio-demographic characteristics of the students, their conditions of committing violence and being exposed to violence were questioned. Findings :The median age of 88 students ,participated in the study, is 24 years, and 33 (37.5%) of those are male. 69 (78.4%) of these students either previously flirted or were flirting at that moment . The median age of first flirts is 17 (min: 10, max: 24). 15 (22%) of those who flirted previously weren’t exposed to violence and didn’t commit violence. 10 (% 14,7) of the students were exposed to physical violence of flirt, 51 (75,0%) of those were exposed to emotional violence of flirt, and 9 (13,2%) of those were exposed to sexual violence of flirt. Regarding the students who committed violence of flirt; 16 (20.6%) of those committed physical violence, 45 (66.2%) of those committed emotional violence, 5 (7.4%) of those committed sexual violence. The violence of flirt, most frequently being exposed (33.0%) and committed (28.4%), is to talk by raising voice. Conclusion: It was determined in this study that raising voice against partner is the most frequently being exposed violence of flirt; and emotional violence is the most frequently committed violence of flirt. Studies ,more detailed, long-term, and with different groups, are required to be performed in order to identify violence and the factors that affect violence , and the qualitative and quantitative dimension of violence must be evaluated together.

Keywords:

Flirt, violence, medical students,

PDF

___

1. World Report on Violence and Health, Genava, World Health Organization, 2002 :9-10.
2. Prothrow-Stith D. A major step forward in violence prevention. Am J Prev Med. 2007; 33(2): 109-11.
3. Garcia-Moreno C, Jansen HA, Ellsberg M, et al; WHO Multi-country Study on Women's Health and Domestic Violence against Women Study Team. Lancet. 2006;368 :1260-9.
4. Güler Ç, Akın L, Halk Sağlığı Temel Bilgiler 2.baskı. 3. Cilt Hacettepe Yayınları 2012;1841.
5. 8. Ulusal Halk Sağlığı Kongre Kitabı II, 1. Baskı Dicle Üniversitesi Basımevi, Bir grup üniversite öğrencisinin “Flört şiddeti” konusundaki görüşleri 2002;757.
6. Tjaden P, Thoennes N. Extent, nature and consequences of intimate partner violence: findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey, National Institute of Justice, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Washington, DC 2000.
7. Makin-Byrd KN. Developmental model of partner vıolence: a longıtudınal study. Pennsylvania State University, The Graduate School Department of Psychology, Pensilvanya, 2009.
8. Hatipoğlu U.S Başkent Üniversitesi Öğrencilerinde Flört Şiddeti Prevalansı Anketi Uzmanlık Tezi Ankara, 2010.
9. Malik S, Sorenson S, Aneshensel C. Community and dating violence among adeloscents: Perpetration and victimization Journal of Adeloscent Health 1997;21: 291-302.
10. Halpern C, Spriggs A, Martin S, et al. Patterns of intimate partner violence victimization from adolescence to young adulthood in a nationally representative sample, Journal of Adolescent Health 2009;45:508–516.
11. Leary K, Slep AS, Avery-Leaf S,et al. Gender differences in dating aggression among multiethnic high school students. Journal of Adolescent Health, 2008: 42:473–479.
12. Straus MA. Dominance and symmetry in partner violence by male and female university students in 32 nations. Children and Youth Services Review, 2008, 30:252–275.
13. Sanderson M, Coker AL, Roberts RE, et al. Acculturation, ethnic identity and dating violence among Latino ninth-grade students, Preventive Medicine 2004:39:373–383.
14. Rivera-Rivera L, Allen-Leigh B, Rodríguez-Ortega G, et al. Prevalence and correlates of adolescent dating violence: Baseline study of a cohort of 7960 male and female Mexican public school students, Preventive Medicine, 2007: 44: 477–484.
15. Schiff M, Zeira A. Dating violence and sexual risk behaviors in a sample of at-risk Israeli youth. Child Abuse & Neglect, 2005:29:1249–1263.
16. Ackarda DM, Neumark-Sztainerb D. Date violence and date rape among adolescents: associations with disordered eating behaviors and psychological health. Child Abuse & Neglect, 2002: 26:455–473.
17. Muñoz-Rivas M, J. Graña, K. O’Leary, et al. Aggression in adolescent dating relationships: prevalence, justification, and health consequences. Journal of Adolescent Health, 2007:40: 298–304.
18. Saewyc EM, Brown D, Plane M, et al. Gender Differences in Violence Exposure among University Students Attending Campus Health Clinics in the United States and Canada. Journal of Adolescent Health, 2009: 45 (6);587-594.
19. Coker AL. Severe dating violence and quality of life among south carolina high school students. Am J Prev Med, 2000: 19(4); 220-227.
20. Howard D, Qıu YBS, Boekeloo B. Personal and social contextual correlates of adolescent dating violence. Journal Of Adolescent Health 2003:33;9–17.
21. Gover AR. Risky lifestyles and dating violence: A theoretical test of violent victimization. Journal of Criminal Justice 2004: 32(2);171– 180.
22. Foshee VA, Benefield Ennett ST, Bauman KE, et al. Longitudinal predictors of serious physical and sexual dating violence victimization during adolescence. Preventive Medicine, 2004:39;1007–1016.
23. Wekerle C, Wolfe DA. Dating violence in mid-adolescence: theory, significance, and emerging prevention initiatives. Clinical Psychology Review 1999:19(4) ; 435–456.
24. Ernst AA, Weiss SJ, Hall J, et al. Adult intimate partner violence perpetrators are significantly more likely to have witnessed intimate partner violence as a child than nonperpetrators. American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2009:27;641–650.
25. Foshee VA, Linder F, MacDougall JE, et al. Gender differences in the longitudinal predictors of adolescent dating violence, Preventive Medicine. 2001:32;128–141.
26. Moorea TM, Stuart GL. A review of the literature on marijuana and interpersonal violence. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 2005:10;171–192.
27. Rickert VI. Vaughan RD, Constance MW. Adolescent dating violence and date rape. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol, 2002:14:495-500.

ISSN: 1309-3878
Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 3 Sayı
Başlangıç: 2009
Yayıncı: Düzce Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Aile Hekimliği AD adına Yrd.Doç.Dr.Cemil Işık Sönmez