The Absurd Aspect Of The Death Of God

Öz After the death of God we came up against the loss of supreme value and thus loss of meaning, some philosophers and some writers (especially absurdist ones) call the new world as chaotic and absurd. In this paper, we will investigate the relationship between the death of God and absurdity. Our main question: Does the death of God have the absurdist vein? For this inquiry, first of all, we will try to introduce what is the meaning of the-death-of-God in absurd literature and then we will make a short conceptual analysis of absurd to show relationship between them.

___

BAUDRİLLARD J. (1993) The Transparency of Evil, Verso, New York.

BENNET Michael H. (2011) Reassessing The Theatre of the Absurd, Palgrave Macmillan

BLOCKER, Gene. (1975) The Meaning of Meaninglessness, Martinus Nijhoff.

BLOCKER, Gene. (2013) Metaphysics and Absurdity, University of America.

CAMUS, Albert. (1955) The Mtyh of Sisyphus, Vintage Books

GLICKSBERG, C. (1966) Modern Literature and the death of God, Martinus Nijhoff

CRITCHLEY, Simon. (2004) Very Little...Almost Nothing, Routledge.

DOBREZ, L. A. C. (2014) The Existential and its Exist, Bloomsbury Academic 2014

GIRARD Rene. (2008) Evolution and Conversion: Dialoges on the Origin of Culture, T&T Clark

GUARINO T. (2009) Vattimo and Theology, T&T Clark

HEIDEGGER, Martin. (2002) Off the Beaten Track, Nietzsche’s Word: God is Dead, Cambridge University Press

MASCETTI, Yaakov. (2002) Weak Thought and the Reduction of Violence: A Dialog with Vattimo,

NAGEL, Thomas, (1971) The Absurd, http://www.jstor.org/stable/2024942. 716-727

NIETZSCHE, F. (2007) Gay Science, Cambridge University Press.

SAGI Avi. (2002) Albert Camus and The Philosophy of The Absurd. Rodopi.

SHEHAN, Thomas. (2003) “Martin Heidegger”, In A Companion to the Philosophers. Second revised edition. Edited by Robert L. Arrington. Blackwell, Oxford

YOUNG, Julian. (2003) The Death of God and the Meaning of Life, Routledg

WEGENER, Adolph. (1967) Absurd In Modern Literature, http://www.jstor.org/stable/40121546