Anestetiğin Estetiği Batı Postmodern Tavır ve Japon Wabi-Sabi

Japon estetiğinde Wabi-sabi (侘寂) adında geleneksel olarak benimsenmiş ünlü bir kavram bulunur. Dar bir bağlamda bu kavram kusurlu olmaktan ya da geçici olmaktan doğan güzelliği ön plana çıkarır. İlk bakışta, bu anlayış -geleneksel Batı estetiği ile karşılaştırıldığında- kendisine Batı dünyasında tekabül eden sağlam bir öğe bulamaz gibi gözükür (her ne kadar “kusurun içindeki ya da kusurun güzelliği” teması modern Batı literatürü ve felsefesinde oldukça bilinen bir şey olsa da), Batı sanatında baskın olan mükemmelliğin ve simetrinin güzelliğine dair Grek ideallerinin estetik değeri dolayısıyla. Ama özellikle Post-modern sanattaki anestetik olana (ya da estetik-olmayana) yönelik olumlu yaklaşımlarda ve sanatta modernizmin mimarideki başlangıcındaki mekân algısı ve simetri kavramına yönelik negatif eleştirilerde, Wabi-sabi ile benzerlik ya da paralellik içinde okunabilecek bazı nüanslar bulunabilir gibi gözükmektedir. “Asimetrideki güzellik”, “anestetik olan”, “çöküş estetiği”, “yıkıntı estetiği” ve “anestetik olarak çekici” gibi temalar Wabi-sabi ile karşılıklı bir okunma potansiyeline sahipmiş gibi gözükmektedir. Her ne kadar doğrudan ifade edilmemiş olsa da bazı post-modern fikirler bu karşılıklı okunma için felsefi bir temel sağlayabilir. Shibusa (渋さ), Kintsugi (金継ぎ) ve Mono no aware (物の哀れ) gibi terimlerinin de yardımıyla, bu çalışma Wabi-sabi ile anestetiğin güzelliğine dair Batı post-modern teoriler arasındaki benzerlik, farklılık ve karşılıklı ilişkileri (eğer mevcutsa bunlar) araştırmayı ve açıklamayı amaçlar.

Aesthetics of Anaesthetics: Western Postmodern Attitude and Japanese Wabi-Sabi (侘寂)

In Japanese aesthetics, there is a traditionally embraced concept named Wabi-sabi (侘寂) which cherishes -in anarrow sense- the beauty that springs from the imperfection or impermanence. At first sight, this understanding-when it is considered comparatively within traditional Western theories of aesthetics- does not find anyconcrete corresponding western element for itself (even though the theme of “the beauty in the flaw” is a wellknown idea in Western literature and philosophy), because of the dominant aesthetic values towards Greekideals of perfection and symmetry’s beauty within modern Western art. But, especially with the negativeapproach towards the concept of symmetry in the beginning of modernism within architecture and positiveopinions about the concept of Anaesthetics (or un-aesthetics) within postmodern understanding of art, theremight be something in western aesthetical theories which can be read in a similarity with Wabi-sabi. Westernaesthetical themes like “beauty in the asymmetry”, “aesthetic of the Anaesthetic one”, “aesthetic of decay”,“aesthetic of ruins” and “anaesthetically appealing” might have a possibility of a comparative reading withWabi-sabi. Even though it is not explicitly expressed, some opinions in postmodern attitude might provide aphilosophical ground for this comparative reading. With the help of some Japanese terms like Shibusa (渋さ),Kintsugi (金継ぎ), Mono no aware (物の哀れ), this paper aims to search and to explain resemblances,differences and interconnections (if there are any) between idea of wabi-sabi and some western postmoderntheories of anaesthetics.

PDF

___

ADAMS, D. (2010). The Postmodern Revolution and Anthroposophical Art. Evolving News: Research Issue 2010: 27-39.
ADORNO, T. (2002). Aesthetic Theory. Tr. Robert Hullot-Kentor. New York: Continuum.
ANDINA, T. (2017). “Normativity and Beauty in Contemporary Arts”. Rivista di estetica: Discrimination in Philosophy. 64: 151-166.
ARISTOTLE (2009). The Nicomachean Ethics. Tr. David Ross. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
BERNSTEIN, J. M. (2001). Adorno: Disenchantment and Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
BUCK-MORSS, Susan (1992). “Aesthetics and Anaesthetics: Walter Benjamin’s Artwork Essay Reconsidered”. October. 62: 3-41.
BUWERT, P. (2017). “Aesthetic Justice. Design for a Blind-spot Culture”. The Design Journal: An International Journal for All Aspects of Design. 20(1): 38-48.
CARROLL, J. (2006). Art at the Limits of Perception: The Aesthetic Theory of Wolfgang Welsch. Bern: Peter Lang Publishing.
CASEBIER, A. (2006). “Japanese Aesthetics with some Western Analogues”. The Pursuit of Comparative Aesthetics: An Interface Between East and West. Ed. Mazhar Hussain, Robert Wilkinson. Vermont: Ashgate Pub. Company, p. 227-232.
CRASNOW, S. (2007). “Feminist Anthropology and Sociology: Issues for Social Science”. Philosophy of Anthropology and Sociology. Ed. Stephen P. Turner, Mark W. Risjord, Amsterdam: Elsevier B. V., p. 755-790.
DANTO, A. C. (1997). After the End of Art. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
DANTO, A. C. (2004). “Kalliphobia in Contemporary Art”. Art Journal 63(2): 24-35.
DICKIE, G. (1964). “The Myth of the Aesthetic Attitude”. American Philosophical Quarterly 1(1): 56-65.
EAGLETON, T. (2004). The Ideology of Aesthetic. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
FELDMAN, A. (1994). “From Desert Storm to Rodney King via ex-Yugoslavia: On Cultural Anaesthesia”. The Senses Still: Perception and Memory as Material Culture in Modernity. Ed. C. Nadia Seremetakis. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, p. 87-108.
FINLAYSON, J. G. (2002). “Adorno on the Ethical and the Ineffable”. European Journal of Philosophy. 10(1): 1-25.
FOSTER, H. (1987). Postmodernism: A Preface. Anti-Aesthetics: Essays on Postmodern Culture. Ed. Hal Foster. Washington: Bay Press.
FOSTER, R. S. (2016). Adorno and Philosophical Modernism: The Inside of Things. Maryland: Lexington Books.
FRANKS, M. A. (2006). “An-aesthetic Theory: Adorno, Sexuality, and Memory”. Feminist Interpretations of Theodor Adorno. Ed. Renée J. Heberle. Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
FRITSCH, K. (2013). “On the Negative Possibility of Suffering: Adorno, Feminist Philosophy, and the Transfigured Crip To Come”. Disability Studies Quarterly, 33(4)
GASCHÉ, R. (2002). “On Some Kantian Themes in Benjamin’s ‘The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction’”. Walter Benjamin’s Philosophy: Destruction and Experience. Ed. Andrew Benjamin, Peter Osborne, p. 183-204.
GENOSKO. G. (2010). “Coping with the McLuhans: The Passively Active Receiver in Communication Theory and Cultural Studies”. Transforming McLuhan: Cultural, Critical, and Postmodern Perspectives. Ed. Paul Grosswiler. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
HABERMAS, J. (1987). “Modernity: An Incomplete Project”. Anti-Aesthetics: Essays on Postmodern Culture. Ed. Hal Foster. Washington: Bay Press, p. 3-15.
HEIDEGGER, M. (2001). Poetry, Language, and Thought. Tr. Albert Hofstadter. New York: HarperCollins.
HELMLING, S. (2009). Adorno’s Poetics of Critique. New York: Continuum.
IZUTSU, Toyo – IZUTSU, Toshihiko (1981). The Theory of Beauty in the Classical Aesthetics of Japan. Dordrecht: Springer Science+Business Media.
JULLIEN, F. (2009). The Great Image Has No Form, or on the Nonobject through Painting, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
KEENE, D. (1998). Essays in Idleness: The Tsurezuregusa of Kenkō. New York: Columbia University Press.
KEMPTON, B. (2018). Wabi Sabi: Japanese Wisdom for a Perfectly Imperfect Life. London: Piatkus.
KHOON CHOY, L. (1995). Japan: Between Myth and Reality. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co.
KOREN, L. (2008). Wabi-Sabi for Artists, Designers, Poets and Philosophers. California: Imperfect Pub.
LYOTARD, J. F. (1984). The Postmodern Condition. Tr. Geoff Bennington, Brian Massumi. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
MARKIN, P. (2016). The Growing Aestheticization of Society, Culture, and Everyday Life. Unpublished. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.2913.7681: 81-115.
McBRIDE, D. B. (1998). “Romantic Phantasms: Benjamin and Adorno on the Subject of Critique”. Monatshefte. 90(4): 465-487.
McMANUS, C. (2005). “Symmetry and Asymmetry in Aesthetics and the Arts”. European Review. 13(2): 157-180.
MERLEAU-PONTY, M. (1968). The Visible and The Invisible. Tr. Alphonso Lingis. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
MORAWSKI, S. (2003). The Troubles with Postmodernism. London: Routledge.
PADDISON, M. (2004). “Authenticity and Failure in Adorno’s Aesthetics”. The Cambridge Companion to Adorno. Ed. Tom Huhn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 198-221.
PIPPIN, R. B. (2005). The Persistence of Subjectivity: On the Kantian Aftermath. New York: Cambridge University Press.
ROSENKRANZ, K. (2015). Aesthetics of Ugliness: A Critical Edition. Tr. Andrei Pop, Mechtild Widrich. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
SANTINI, C. (2019). Kintsugi: Finding Strength in Imperfection. Missouri: Andrews McMeel Pub.
SIEGEL. E. (1997). Modern Quarterly Beginnings of Aesthetic Realism 1922- 1923: The Equality of Man, the Scientific Criticism and Other Essays. New York: Definition Press.
SORČAN, V. H. (2013). “Art of Crisis: Modern or Postmodern”. Diskusije – Discussions: Art+Media. 3: 46-49.
TOLSTOY, L. (2002). Anna Karenina. Tr. Richard Pevear, Larissa Volokhonsky. New York: Penguin Books.
TONON, M. (2015). “Adorno’s Response to Kierkegaard: The Ethical Validity of the Aesthetic?”. The Marriage of Aesthetics and Ethics. Leiden: Brill, p. 185-202.
TRIGG, D. (2009). The Aesthetics of Decay: Nothingness, Nostalgia, and the Absence of Reason. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
VIRILIO, P. (2009). The Aesthetics of Disappearance. Tr. Phil Beitchman. California: Semiotext(e).
WELSCH, W. (1990). Asthetisches Denken. Stuttgart: Reclam Verlag.
WELSCH, W. (2003). “Aesthetics beyond Aesthetics”. Action, Criticism, and Theory for Music Education 2(2): 1-26.
WITKIN, R. W. (2005). Adorno on Music. New York: Routledge.