THE IMAGES OF DESIRE IN THE 1960S, AND EARLY 1970S TURKISH LOVE FILMS: THE EXAMPLE OF ÖMER LÜTFİ AKAD

This study critically analyzes the images of desire in the 1960s, and early 1970s Turkish cinema, focusing upon Ömer Lütfi Akad’s films. Arriving from Gilles Deleuze’s idea that film-makers think with images, and thus, films include certain ideas of their directors, it is therefore investigated how the films analyzed here present the ideas about desire as love, and desire in love. Using an intertextual reading method, the study exhibits the main and dominant themes, and images about desire in these films. With this way, it is being tried to show with which discourses and ideas on desire these images and themes have similarities. In this sense, the study lays barely that the images of desire as lacking, and desire as directed to the Good and Beautiful life dominate in these films. Around these images that are purified from bad and harmful passions, instincts, and appetites; desire is fictionalized as a force to satisfy the needs and lacks of the lovers. Therefore, the study claims that the films exclude, and control the other forms and expressions of desire in the narrative structure through a cinematic operation. 

THE IMAGES OF DESIRE IN THE 1960S, AND EARLY 1970S TURKISH LOVE FILMS: THE EXAMPLE OF ÖMER LÜTFİ AKAD

This study critically analyzes the images of desire in the 1960s, and early 1970s Turkish cinema, focusing upon Ömer Lütfi Akad’s films. Arriving from Gilles Deleuze’s idea that film-makers think with images, and thus, films include certain ideas of their directors, it is therefore investigated how the films analyzed here present the ideas about desire as love, and desire in love. Using an intertextual reading method, the study exhibits the main and dominant themes, and images about desire in these films. With this way, it is being tried to show with which discourses and ideas on desire these images and themes have similarities. In this sense, the study lays barely that the images of desire as lacking, and desire as directed to the Good and Beautiful life dominate in these films. Around these images that are purified from bad and harmful passions, instincts, and appetites; desire is fictionalized as a force to satisfy the needs and lacks of the lovers. Therefore, the study claims that the films exclude, and control the other forms and expressions of desire in the narrative structure through a cinematic operation.

___

  • Akad, Ö. L. (1959). Yalnızlar Rıhtımı. Türkiye: İpek FilmAkad, Ö. L. (1968a). Vesikalı Yarim. Türkiye: Şeref Film.Akad, Ö. L. (1968b). Kader Böyle İstedi. Türkiye: Şeref Film.Akad, Ö. L. (1969). Seninle Ölmek İstiyorum. Türkiye: Şeref Film.Akad, Ö. L. (1971). Vahşi Çiçek. Türkiye: Erman Film.Akad, Ö. L. (1974). Esir Hayat. Türkiye: Erman Film. Aksoy, O. (1965). Hıçkırık. Türkiye: Erman Film. Badiou, A. (2012). In Praise of Love. London: Serpents Tail.Bauman, Z. (1989). Liquid Love: On the Frailty of Human Bonds. Cambridge: Polity Press.Best, S. & Kellner, D. (1991). Postmodern Theory: Critical Interrogations. Hampshire: MacmillanBourdieu, Pierre. (1993). The Field of Cultural Production. New York: Columbia University Press.Butler, J. (1987). Subjects of Desire. New York: Columbia University Press.Butler, J. (1997). The Psychic Life of Power. California: Stanford University Press.Certeau, M. (1988). The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkeley, Los Angeles: University of California Press.Deleuze, G. (1986). Cinema 1: The Movement Image. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Deleuze, G. (1989). Cinema 2: The Time Image. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Deleuze, G. & Guattari, F. (1994). What Is Philosophy?. New York: Columbia University Press.Deleuze, G. & Guattari, F.. (2000). Anti Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Eğilmez, E. (1971). Son Hıçkırık. Türkiye: Arzu Film.Erksan, M. (1967). Ayrılsak da Beraberiz. Türkiye: Sine Film.Erksan, M. (1970). Sevenler Ölmez. Türkiye: Akün Film. Freud, S. (2001).The Freud Reader. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Fromm, E. (2000). The Art of Loving. New York: Continuum.Goodchild, P. (1989). Deleuze and Guattari: An Introduction to the Politics of Desire. London: Sage.Irigaray, L. (1993). An Ethics of Sexual Difference. New York: Cornell University Press.Lacan, J.. (1991).The Seminar of Jacques Lacan: Freud’s Paper on Technique (163-202). New York, London: W. W. Norton Company.Lacan, J. (1997). The Seminar of Jacques Lacan: The Ethics of Psychoanalysis. New York, London: W. W. Norton Company.Lacan, J. (1997). The Seminar of Jacques Lacan: On Feminine Sexuality, The Limits of Love and Knowledge. New York, London: W. W. Norton Company.Levinas, E. (1979). Totality and Infinity. Boston, London: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. Levinas, E. (1998). Entre Nous: On Thinking-of-the-Other. New York: Columbia University Press.Levinas, E. (1994). Otherwise Than Being or Beyond Essence. Dordtrecht: Kluwer.Nizami. (1965). Leyla ile Mecnun. İstanbul: Milli Eğitim Basımevi.Plato. (1989). The Symposium. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Refiğ, H. (1965a). Canım Sana Feda. Türkiye: Uğur Film. Refiğ, H. (1965b). Kırık Hayatlar. Türkiye: Uğur Film.Refiğ, H. (1972). Aşk Fırtınası. Türkiye: Er Film.Reich, W. (1970). The Mass Psychology of Fascism. New York: Straus & Giroux.Reich, W. (1974). The Sexual Revolution. New York: Straus & Giroux.Ross, Alison. (2005). Desire. Parr, A. (Ed.) , The Deleuze Dictionary içinde (pp. 63-64). Şeyh Galip. (2010). Hüsn Ü Aşk. İstanbul: İş Bankası Yayınları.Yücel, H. A. (2006). Kerem ile Aslı. İstanbul: İş Bankası Yayınları.Zizek, S. (1991). Looking Awry. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Zizek, S. (1999). The Zizek Reader. Oxford, Malden: Blackwell Publishers.