Emine TÜMER İKİKAT

The effects of factors on death rate in the Broiler farms

Bu çalışma Broiler işletmelerinde, hayvanların ölüm oranını etkileyen üretici ve işletmeye ait faktörlerin belirlenmesi amacıyla yapılmıştır. Çalışmanın verileri 2012 yılında 87 Broiler işletmesinden elde edilmiştir. Elde edilen verilere Ki kare testi uygulanmıştır. Yapılan test sonucunda bir üretim dönemine ayrılan bütçe artıkça kümeslerdeki ölüm oranının azaldığı tespit edilmiştir. Bunun yanı sıra işletmenin alanının genişlemesi, perde açma süresinin yaklaşık 7 gün olması, işletmeye gelen civcivlerde ortalama 40 g ağırlığın tercih edilmesinin de ölüm oranını azalttığı belirlenmiştir. Ayrıca civcivlerin taşınmasında tam donanımlı AB mevzuatına uygun araçların kullanılması, otomatik sobalarla kümesin ısıtılması ve kümes dinlenme sürelerinin en az 21 gün olmasının ölüm oranlarını azaltıcı yönde etki yapacağı tespit edilmiştir. İşletmelerde ortalama ölüm oranı 9.68 olarak bulunmuştur. Bu oran %7ye düşürüldüğünde işletme başına üretim ortalama 508 kg/dönem artacaktır.

Broiler işletmelerinde ölüm oranı üzerine etkili olan faktörler

The objective of this research is to determine the effects of factors on the death rate in the Broiler farms in Mersin province, Turkey. The data of this study is obtained in the 87 Broiler farms in 2012. The chi-square test has been applied to the acquired data. The results have shown that the fewer death rates of animals are observed while the budget for the production period increases. Besides, it is also found out that the enlargement on the field of the management, 7 days long of curtain opening procedure and selection of the chicks regarding average weight as 40 g are among the factors, reducing the death rate of the animals. Moreover, usage of the fully equipped vehicles determined by the EU standards for the transportation of animals, heating the coops and 21 days of relaxation period of the coops would have statically significant effects on the decrease of the death rates. The average death rate has been found as 9.68. With the possibility 7% reducing, the average production increase 508 kg/period for each management.

PDF

___

1. Alders RG, Pym RAE: Village poultry: Stil important to millions eight thousand years after domestication. In, Proceedings of XXIII Worlds Poultry Congress, 30 June - 4 July Brisbane, Australia, 2008.
2. Rahman M: Protein for all. Proceedings of 5 International Poultry Show & Seminar organized by Worlds Poultry Science Association, Bangladesh Branch, March 01, Dhaka, Bangladesh, 2007.
3. Anonymous: The aims and developments in the broiler chicken produce in Turkey. http://www.zmo.org.tr/resimler/ekler/3640de25b7d6567ek.pdf?tipi=14, Accessed: 29.11.2012.
4. Goan C: Site selection factors for new poultry facilities. Agricultural Extension Service, The University of Tennessee, 2001.
5. Atılgan A, Coşan A, Öz H, İşler E: The reducing of the ammonia gas with vacuum system for the broiler chicken coops. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg, 16 (2): 257-262, 2010.
6. Açıl AF: The economical aspect of the Turkeys chicken. Ankara University Faculty of Agriculture, Publication Issue: 252, Ankara, 1966.
7. Çetin B: The economic analysis of the broiler managements in Ankara. Ankara University Institute of Sciences, Department of Agricultural Economy, Discipline of Agricultural Management Ankara, 1984.
8. Gülsoy A: A research made by the Turkish development foundation for the survey of the poultry managements in Ankara. Ankara University, Institute of Sciences, Department of Agricultural Economy, Discipline of Agricultural Management Ankara, 1992.
9. Ulusan HOK: The performance of incubating period of 9 weeks for the white Parent-stock chickens. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg, 2 (1): 61-64, 1996.
10. Bayaner A: The economic analysis of the chicken manufacturing based on egg in Çorum. TEAE, Ankara, 1999.
11. TÜİK: Türkiye Istatistik Kurumu, Hayvancılık istatistikleri, http://rapor.tuik.gov.tr/reports/rwservlet?hayvancilik=&report=RAPOR60.RDF&pkod=1&p_yil1=2011&p_hk1=1220201&desformat=spreadsheet&p_dil=1&ENVID=hayvancilikEnv, Accessed: 24.01.2013.
12. Sarıca M, Çam MA: The reusage of the pads and its effects for the fertility and pad features. Turkr J Vet Anim Sci, 22, 213-219, 1998.
13. Kılıç İ, Şimşek E, Yaslıoğlu E: A research on site selection for broiler facilities and its effects. GAP III. Agriculture Congress, 02-03 October, Şanlıurfa, Turkey, 2003.
14. Sekeroğlu A, Diktaş M: The effects of the slow growing chicken system on the carcass features and the meat quality. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg, 18 (6): 1007-1013, 2012.
15. Fidan H, Guneş E: A research for the describing of expenditure and labor force for the broiler poultry managements. Turk J Agri Forestry, 23 (2): 317-324, 1999.
16. Kaynak I, Güneş H, Koçak Ö: The effects of the location density to the broiler performance. Istanbul Univ Vet Fak Derg, 36 (1): 9-19, 2010.
17. Bayliss PA, Hinton MH: Transportation of broilers with special reference to mortality rates, Appl Anim Behav Sci, 28, 93-118, 1990.
18. Warriss PD, Bevis EA, Brown SN, Edwards JE: Longer journeys to processing plants are associated with higher mortality in broiler chickens. Brit Poultry Sci, 33, 201-206, 1992.
19. Ertürk YE, Tatlıdil F: The economic analysis of the broiler managements cooperating with the Koy-Tur in Kizilcahamam. Ankara, http://www.tepge.gov.tr/Dosyalar/Yayinlar/f1c8e7acba524ff9a3c594e66eec8add.pdf, Accessed: 24.01.2013.
20. Cevger Y, Yalın C: A quantitative model to determine factors affecting profits of broiler enterprises. Turk J Vet Anim Sci, 27, 1201-1205, 2003.
21. Aral Y, Yalcin C, Cevger Y, Sipahi C, Sariozkan S: Financial effects of the highly pathogenic avian influenza outbreaks on the Turkish broiler producers. Poultry Sci, 89, 1085-1088, 2010.
22. Ali MS, Hossain MM: Factors influencing the performance of farmers in broiler production of Faridpur district in Bangladesh. Worlds Poultry Sci J, 66, 123-131, 2010.
23. Newbold P: Statistics for Business and Economics. 4th ed., Prenticehall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersay, 1995.
24. Miran B: Temel istatistik. Ege Üniversitesi Basımevi, 3. Baskı, Izmir, 2010.
25. Malhotra NK: Marketing research (An applied orientation). 4th ed., p.713, Pearson Prentice Hill, Georgia, Atlanta, 2004.
26. Anonymous: Broiler production. http://www.kayseritarim.gov.tr/user/files/etlikpilicyetistiriciligi18072007.pdf, Accessed: 24.01.2013.
27. Heady OE, Balloun S, Townsley RJ: Interdisciplenary in input-output relationships and production function to improve decisions efficiency for poultry production. OECD Publication Number: 21015, Paris, 1966.
28. Lance GC: Economic evaluation of controlled environmental and conventional commercial egg production systems in Georgia. Poult Sci, 57, 835-844, 1977.
29. Antalyalı A: Avrupa Birliği ve Türkiyede hayvan refahı uygulamaları Tarım ve Köy İşleri Bakanlığı, Dış İlişkiler ve Avrupa Birliği Koordinasyon Dairesi Başkanlığı, Uzmanlık Tezi, 2007.
30. Bostan M: İstanbul ili tavukçuluk isletmeciliğinin ekonomik yapısı ve temel yönetim sorunları. 1. Ekonomik analiz sonuçları. Istanbul Univ Vet Fak Derg, 8 (2): 97-126, 1982.
31. Aho PW, Reid DW: Poultry research and the contract payment net return paradox. Poultry Sci, 70, 250-253, 1991.
32. Peter V, Chrappa V, Grom A, Hlasny O, Osszagh V, Resovsky S, Chmelik J, Sabo V: Effects of some technological factors on the productivity and economics of broiler production. Agri Eng Abst, 005-01575, 1980.
33. Öztürk D, Uluocak N, Deniz O, Çalışlar S, Efe E, Serbester U: Enerji düzeyleri farklı karma yemlerin değişik yerleşim sıklıklarında barındırılan etlik piliçlerin performans ve karkas özelliklerine etkileri. VIV. Poultry YUTAV99, Uluslararası Tavukçuluk Fuarı ve Konferansı, Bildiriler, 449-456, 36 Haziran İstanbul, 1999.
34. Shanawany MM: Broiler performance under high stocking densities. Brit Poultry Sci, 29, 43-52, 1988.
35. İşcan KM, Çetin O, Tepeli C, Dere S: The effects of stocking densityon broiler performance. Turk J Vet Anim Sci, 20, 331-335, 1996.
36. Petek M: The production parameters and economic efficiencies of different genotypes in broiler enterprises in Bursa Province and its near vicinity. Lalahan Hay Arast Enst Derg, 39 (1): 61-72, 1999.
37. Sakarya E: Ankara ili Kazan ilçesi broiler tavukçuluk işletmelerinde karlılık ve verimlilik analizleri. Ankara Üniv Vet Fak Derg, 37 (2): 375-398, 1990.
38. Ali MS, Hossain MM: Factors influencing the performance of farmers in broiler production of Faridpur District in Bangladesh, Worlds Poultry Sci J, 1 (66): 123-131, 2010.
39. Lott BD: The effect of feed intake on body temperature and water consumption of male broilers during heat exposure. Poultry Sci, 70, 410-417, 1991.
40. May JD, Lott BD: Feed consumption patterns of broilers at high environmental temperatures. Poultry Sci, 71, 331-336, 1992.
41. Altan A, Bayraktar H, Önenç A: The effects of heat stress on colour and ph of broiler meat. J Anim Prod, 42 (2): 1-8, 2001.
42. Vecerek V, Grbalova S, Vaslarova E, Janackova B, Malena M: Effect of travel distance and season of the year on death rates of broilers transported to poultry processing plants. Poultry Sci, 85 (11): 1881-1884, 2006.