Kamil Serdar İNAL, Taylan ÖNYAY, Cenk YARDIMCI, Ahmet ÖZAK

Köpeklerde Birbirine Bağlı Gastroözefageal Çoklu Balık Kancalarının Endoskopik ve Cerrahi Girişimlerle Uzaklaştırılması: 13 Olgu (2010-2017)

Bu çalışmanın amacı, köpeklerde gastroözefageal bölgeye takılan birbirlerine bağlı çoklu balık kancalarının endoskopik ve cerrahi girişimlerle uzaklaştırılmasının değerlendirilmesidir. Hastaların kayıtları alındıktan sonra gastroözefageal çoklu balık kancası olan 13 köpeğin radyografik ve endoskopik değerlendirilmeleri yapıldı. Kancaların penetrasyon derecesine bağlı olarak endoskopik, cerrahi ve endoskopi yardımlı cerrahi uzaklaştırma uygulandı. Kancaların dağılımları; kranial özofagusta 9 (%13.2), servikal özefagusta 40 (%58.8), torakal özofagusta 17 (%25) ve midede 2 (%3) idi. Kancaların uzaklaştırılması 11 olguda cerrahi, bir olguda endoskopik olarak gerçekleştirildi ve bir olguda kombine edildi. Kancaların uzaklaştırılmasına bağlı olarak komplike mukozal erozyon veya laserasyon gözlenmedi. Komplikasyon oranını azaltmak için balık kancalarını mümkün olan en kısa sürede çıkarmak oldukça önemlidir ve köpek sahipleri balık avlama alanlarında dikkatli olmaları için uyarılmalıdır.

Interconnected Multiple Gastroesophageal Fish Hook Retrievals by Endoscopic or Surgical Interventions In Dogs: 13 Cases (2010-2017)

The aim of this study was to evaluate endoscopic and/or surgical removal of interconnected, multiple fish hooks that lodge in gastroesophageal region in dogs. Medical records were obtained and clinical, radiographic and endoscopic evaluations were performed for 13 dogs with gastroesophageal multiple fish hooks. Endoscopic, surgical and endoscopy assisted surgical removal was performed depending on penetration degree of the hooks. Distribution of the hooks were 9 (13.2%) in the cranial esophagus, 40 (58.8%) in the cervical esophagus, 17 (25%) in the thoracic esophagus and 2 (3%) in the stomach. Retrieval of the hooks was performed endoscopically in 11 cases, surgically in one case and combined in one case. There were no complicated mucosal erosions or lacerations associated with removal of the hooks. It is very important to remove fish hooks as soon as possible to reduce complication rates and the dog owners should be warned to beware of f ishing areas.

PDF

___

1. Rousseau A, Prittie J, Broussard JD, Fox PR, Hoskinson J: Incidence and characterization of esophagitis following esophageal foreign body removal in dogs: 60 cases (1999-2003). J Vet Emerg Crit Care, 17 (2): 159163, 2007. DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-4431.2007.00227.x
2. Spielman B, Shaker E, Garvey M: Esophageal foreign body in dogs: A retrospective study of 23 cases. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc, 28 (6): 570-574, 1992.
3. Thompson HC, Cortes Y, Gannon K, Bailey D, Freer S: Esophageal foreign bodies in dogs: 34 cases (2004-2009). J Vet Emerg Crit Care, 22 (2): 253-261, 2012. DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-4431.2011.00700.x
4. Luthi C, Neiger R: Esophageal foreign bodies in dogs: 51 cases (19921997). Eur J Comp Gastroenterol, 3, 7-11, 1998.
5. Michels G, Jones B, Huss B, Wagner-Mann C: Endoscopic and surgical retrieval of fishhooks from the stomach and esophagus in dogs and cats: 75 cases (1977-1993). J Am Vet Med Assoc, 207 (9): 1194-1197, 1995.
6. Sale CSH, Williams JM: Results of transthoracic esophagotomy retrieval of esophageal foreign body obstructions in dogs: 14 cases (20002004). J Am Anim Hosp Assoc, 42 (6): 450-456, 2006. DOI: 10.5326/0420450
7. Teh H, Winters L, James F, Irwin P, Beck C, Mansfield C: Medical management of esophageal perforation secondary to esophageal foreign bodies in 5 dogs. J Vet Emerg Crit Care, 28 (5): 464-468, 2018. DOI: 10.1111/ vec.12757
8. Gianella P, Pfammatter NS, Burgener IA: Oesophageal and gastric endoscopic foreign body removal: Complications and follow‐up of 102 dogs. J Small Anim Pract, 50 (12): 649-654, 2009. DOI: 10.1111/j.17485827.2009.00845.x
9. King J: Esophageal foreign body and aortic perforation in a dog. Vet Med, 96 (11): 828-829, 2001.
10. Cohn LA, Stoll MR, Branson KR, Roudabush AD, Kerl ME, Langdon PF, Johannes CM: Fatal hemothorax following management of an esophageal foreign body. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc, 39 (3): 251-256, 2003. DOI: 10.5326/0390251
11. Doran IP, Wright CA, Moore AH: Acute oropharyngeal and esophageal stick injury in forty‐one dogs. Vet Surg, 37 (8): 781-785, 2008. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2008.00448.x
12. Binvel M, Poujol L, Peyron C, Dunie-Merigot A, Bernardin F: Endoscopic and surgical removal of oesophageal and gastric fishhook foreign bodies in 33 animals. J Small Anim Pract, 59 (1): 45-49, 2018. DOI: 10.1111/jsap.12794
13. Savary M, Miller G: The Esophagus: Handbook and Atlas of Endoscopy. 248, Gassmann, Switzerland, 1978.
14. Tams TR: Endoscopy and laparoscopy in veterinary gastroenterology. In, Tams TR (Ed): Handbook of Small Animal Gastroenterology. 2nd ed., 97117, Elsevier, Philadelphia, 2003.
15. Dunlap AE, Risselada M: Caudal mediastinal fish hook foreign body with pulmonary artery penetration in two dogs. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc, 55 (1): e551-01, 2019. DOI: 10.5326/jaaha-ms-6787
16. Boyd C, Claus M, Hosgood G, Smart L: Survival of two dogs with pyothorax secondary to perforating oesophageal foreign body. Aust Vet J, 95 (1-2): 41-45, 2017. DOI: 10.1111/avj.12548
17. Burton AG, Talbot CT, Kent MS: Risk factors for death in dogs treated for esophageal foreign body obstruction: A retrospective cohort study of 222 cases (1998-2017). J Vet Intern Med, 31 (6): 1686-1690, 2017. DOI: 10.1111/jvim.14849
18. Sterman AA, Mankin KMT, Ham KM, Cook AK: Likelihood and outcome of esophageal perforation secondary to esophageal foreign body in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc, 253 (8): 1053-1056, 2018. DOI: 10.2460/ javma.253.8.1053