Nikola ČOBANOVIĆ, Urška JAMNIKAR-CIGLENEČKI, Andrej KIRBIŠ, Manja KRIŽMAN, Marina ŠTUKELJ, Ivan VIĆIĆ, Nedjeljko KARABASIL

Domuzlarda Antemortem Muayenedeki Klinik Bulgular İle Postmortem Muayenede Belirlenen Patolojik Lezyonların Tutarlılığı

Bu çalışmanın amacı, kesim domuzlarının barınakta antemortem muayenesi sırasında kaydedilen klinik semptomlar ile post-mortem muayenesinde belirlenen patolojik lezyonlar arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemektir. Böylece, klinik semptomlar postmortem muayenede belirlenen patolojik lezyonların doğru bir göstergesi ise, sadece bu parametreleri hayvan sağlığı ve refahı takip sistemine dahil etmek mümkün olabilir. Çalışma 39 küçük ölçekli çiftlikten temin edilen 1033 domuz üzerinde gerçekleştirildi. Antemortem muayene sırasında domuzlar öksürük, aksırma ve solunum güçlüğü yönünden klinik olarak incelendi. Kesilen domuzlar pnömoni, plörezi ve karaciğer süt lekeleri açısından incelendi. Spearman korelasyon analizi kullanılarak yapılan değerlendirmede klinik semptomlar ile patolojik lezyonlar arasında ilişki bulunmadı. Oluşturulan karakteristik eğrilere ve eğrilerin altında kalan alana göre, ölüm sonrası incelemede patolojik lezyonlar bakımından “pozitif çiftlikler”, ön inceleme sırasında kaydedilen klinik semptomlarla doğru bir şekilde tespit edilemedi. Bu sonuçlar, domuz sağlığı ve refahının izlenmesinde postmortem muayenede patolojik lezyonların kaydedilmesinin, antemortem muayene sırasında klinik semptomların kaydedilmesinden daha güvenilir ve uygulanabilir bir yöntem olduğunu göstermektedir. Bu nedenle, rutin postmortem veteriner hekim muayene sürecinin bir parçası olarak patolojik lezyon skorlamasının kullanılması, çiftlik düzeyinde domuz sağlığını ve refahını etkileyen altta yatan sorunların göstergesi olarak işlev görebilir.

Coherence of Clinical Symptoms at Antemortem Inspection and Pathological Lesions at Postmortem Inspection in Slaughter Pigs

The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between clinical symptoms recorded during the antemortem inspection in the lairage and pathological lesions at postmortem inspection of slaughter pigs. If clinical symptoms were an accurate indicator of pathological lesions at postmortem inspection it could be possible to incorporate only those parameters in the health and welfare monitoring system. The study was conducted on 1033 pigs originated from 39 small-scale farms. During the antemortem inspection, pigs were clinically inspected for the presence of coughing, sneezing and laboured breathing. The plucks of slaughtered pigs from each farm were examined for pneumonia, pleurisy and liver milk spots. No relationship was found between clinical symptoms and pathological lesions using Spearman correlation analysis. According to receiver operating characteristic curves and the area under the curves, ‘positive farms’ for pathological lesions at the postmortem inspection could not be accurately detected by the clinical symptoms recorded during antemortem inspection. These results suggest that the recording of pathological lesions at postmortem inspection is more reliable and feasible method for pig health and welfare monitoring than the recording of clinical symptoms during the antemortem inspection. Therefore, incorporating of pathological lesions scoring as part of the routine postmortem veterinary inspection process could function as iceberg indicators of underlying problems affecting pig health and welfare at farm level.

PDF

___

1. Jäger HC, McKinley TJ, Wood JLN, Pearce GP, Williamson S, Strugnell B, Done S, Habernoll H, Palzer A, Tucker AW: Factors associated with pleurisy in pigs: A case-control analysis of slaughter pig data for England and Wales. PloS One, 7 (2): e29655, 2012. DOI: 10.1371/ journal.pone.0029655
2. Nathues H, Spergser J, Rosengarten R, Kreienbrock L, grosse Beilage E: Value of the clinical examination in diagnosing enzootic pneumonia in fattening pigs. Vet J, 193 (2): 443-447, 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j. tvjl.2012.01.013
3. Dold C, Holland CV: Ascaris and ascariasis. Microbes Infect, 13 (7): 632637, 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.micinf.2010.09.012
4. Dalmau A, Temple D, Rodriguez P, Llonch P, Velarde A: Application of the Welfare Quality® protocol at pig slaughterhouses. Anim Welfare, 18 (4): 497-505, 2009.
5. Rocha LM, Velarde A, Dalmau A, Saucier L, Faucitano L: Can the monitoring of animal welfare parameters predict pork meat quality variation through the supply chain (from farm to slaughter)? J Anim Sci, 94 (1): 359-376, 2016. DOI: 10.2527/jas.2015-9176
6. Dalmau A, Nande A, Vieira-Pinto M, Zamprogna S, Di Martino G, Ribas JCR, da Costa MP, Halinen-Elemo K, Velarde A: Application of the Welfare Quality® protocol in pig slaughterhouses of five countries. Livest Sci, 193, 78-87, 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.livsci.2016.10.001
7. Sanchez-Vazquez MJ, Smith RP, Kang S, Lewis F, Nielen M, Gunn GJ, Edwards SA: Identification of factors influencing the occurrence of milk spot livers in slaughtered pigs: A novel approach to understanding Ascaris suum epidemiology in British farmed pigs. Vet Parasitol, 173 (3-4): 271-279, 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.06.029
8. Čobanović N, Jamnikar-Ciglenečki U, Kirbiš A, Križman M, Štukelj M, Karabasil N: Impact of various housing conditions on the occurrence of pathological lesions in slaughtered pigs. Veterinarski Glasnik, 73 (1): 1729, 2019. DOI: 10.2298/VETGL190318010C
9. Karabasil N, Čobanović N, Vučićević I, Stajković S, Becskei Z, Forgách P, Aleksić-Kovačević S: Association of the severity of lung lesions with carcass and meat quality in slaughter pigs. Acta Vet Hung, 65 (3): 354-365, 2017. DOI:
10.1556/004.2017.034 10. Čobanović N, Vasilev D, Dimitrijević M, Teodorović V, Janković L, Karabasil N: Blood parameters, carcass and meat quality of slaughter pigs with and without liver milk spots. Biotechnol Anim Husb, 33 (4): 397407, 2017. DOI: 10.2298/bah1704397c
11. Čobanović N, Janković Lj, Vasilev D, Dimitrijević M, Teodorović V, Kureljušić B, Karabasil N: Slaughterline records of various postmortem pathological lesions and their influence on carcass and meat quality in slaughtered pigs. Anim Sci J, 90 (11): 1475-1483, 2019. DOI: 10.1111/asj.13287
12. Jaeger HJ, Pearce GP, Tucker AW, Wood JLN, Done S, Strugnell B, Williamson S, Woodger N, Burling J, Habernoll H, Dewhirst J: Pleurisy in Pigs: Associated risk factors and impact on health, welfare and performance 2005-2008. Milton Keynes BPEX (British Pig Executive), 2009. [http://www.bpex.org.uk/KTRandD/ResearchAndDevelopment/ Pleurisy.aspx]; Accessed: 15/11/2019.
13. Leruste H, Brscic M, Heutinck LFM, Visser EK, Wolthuis-Fillerup M, Bokkers EAM, Stockhofe-Zurwieden N, Cozzi G, Gottardo F, Lensink BJ, Van Reenen CG: The relationship between clinical signs of respiratory system disorders and lung lesions at slaughter in veal calves. Prev Vet Med, 105 (1-2): 93-100, 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2012.01.015
14. Becker PM, Van Wikselaar PG, Mul MF, Pol A, Engel B, Wijdenes JW, van der Peet-Schwering CMC, Wisselink HJ, Stockhofe-Zurwieden N: Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae is impaired by the garlic volatile allyl methyl sulfide (AMS) in vitro and in-feed garlic alleviates pleuropneumonia in a pig model. Vet Microbiol, 154 (3-4): 316-324, 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j. vetmic.2011.07.011
15. Morris CR, Gardner IA., Hietala SK, Carpenter TE: Enzootic pneumonia: comparison of cough and lung lesions as predictors of weight gain in swine. Can J Vet Res, 59 (3): 197-204, 1995.
16. Ostanello F, Dottori M, Gusmara C, Leotti G, Sala V: Pneumonia disease assessment using a slaughterhouse lung-scoring method. J Vet Med A, 54 (2): 70-75, 2007. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0442.2007.00920.x
17. Baraldi TG, Neves Cruz NDR, Dalla Costa FA, Pereira DA, Storino GY, Da Silva AF, Panzardi A, De Oliveira LG: Association between coughing, pneumonia index and pleurisy. In proceedings of the II Simpósio Internacional de Produção e Sanidade de Suínos, Jaboticabal, Brazil, April 05-07, 2017.
18. Emikpe BO, Jarikre TA, Adediran OA, Olaniyi MO, Dikeogu TC: Haematology, bronchoalveolar cellular changes and pathology of swine pneumonia in Nigeria. Sokoto J Vet Sci, 16 (2): 1-9, 2018. DOI: 10.4314/ sokjvs.v16i2.1
19. Čobanović N, Stanković, SD, Dimitrijević M, Suvajdžić B, Grković N, Vasilev D, Karabasil N: Identifying physiological stress biomarkers for prediction of pork quality variation. Animals, 10 (4):614, 2020. DOI: 10.3390/ani10040614
20. Welfare Quality®: Welfare Quality® assessment protocol for pigs (sow and piglets growing and finishing pigs). Welfare Quality® Consortium, L., The Netherlands, 2009.
21. SPSS: Statistical Package for Social Sciences for Windows (version S23.0). SPSS Inc., Armonk, NY: IBM Corp., USA, 2015.
22. Akobeng AK: Understanding diagnostic tests 3: Receiver operating characteristic curves. Acta Paediatr, 96 (5): 644-647, 2007. DOI: 10.1111/ j.1651-2227.2006.00178.x
23. Akobeng AK: Understanding diagnostic tests 1: Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values. Acta Paediatr, 96 (3): 338-341, 2007. DOI: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2006.00180.x
24. Kanora A: Effect on productivity of treating fattening pigs every 5 weeks with flubendazole in feed. Vlaams Diergeneeskd Tijdschr, 78, 170175, 2009.
25. Scollo A, Gottardo F, Contiero B, Mazzoni C, Leneveu P, Edwards SA: Benchmarking of pluck lesions at slaughter as a health monitoring tool for pigs slaughtered at 170 kg (heavy pigs). Prev Vet Med, 144, 20-28, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2017.05.007
26. Dalmau A, Fabrega E, Manteca X, Velarde A: Health and welfare management of pigs based on slaughter line records. J Dairy Vet Anim Res, 1 (3): 73-78, 2014. DOI: 10.15406/jdvar.2014.01.00016