Wen WANG, Cunfang ZHANG, Linyong HU, Sijia LIU

CRISPR/Cas9 Sistemi Kullanılarak Ectodysplasin A (eda) İfade Etmeyen Zebra Balığı Üretimi

Ektodisplasin A (EDA) deri uzantılarının gelişiminde, özellikle balık pullarında, hayati bir rol oynar. CRISPR/Cas9 sistemi kullanılarak eda mutasyonlu zebra balığı modeli bulundu. Eda’nın ekson 4’ünde iki lokusu hedefleyen CRISPR/Cas9 nükleazları oluşturuldu ve zebra balığı embriyolarına enjekte edildi. Eda ekson 4’e yönelik CRISPR-Cas9 aracılı mutasyon sıklığı yaklaşık %16 idi; bu, zebra balığındaki diğer genlerinkine kıyasla nispeten düşüktü. F0 jenerasyonunda, hedeflenen bölge etrafında sırasıyla 5 bp, 6 bp, 8 bp ve 87 bp’lik bir silme ve 11 bp’lik bir ekleme dahil olmak üzere beş eda mutant türü elde edildi ve bunların hepsi sadece bir allelde gerçekleşti. Ancak tüm F0 üyelerinin pulları yabani akranlarına kıyasla normaldi. F1 jenerasyonunda, tamamı eda’ya bi-allelik 11-bp ilavesinden kaynaklanan az sayıda pulla çevrili beş adet pulsuz mutant elde edildi. Ekleme, eda’nın çerçeve kayması mutasyonuna neden olur ve Western Blot tekniği ile belirlendiği üzere EDA’nın ekspresyonunda azalma ve fonksiyon inaktivasyonuna yol açar. Bu çalışma, balık pullarının gelişiminde EDA’nın işlevini açıklamak için iyi bir model oluşturmaktadır.

Generation of Ectodysplasin A (eda)-targeted Knockout Zebrafish Via the CRISPR/Cas9 System

Ectodysplasin A (EDA) plays a vital role in the development of skin appendages, especially in fish scales. Zebrafish model with the mutation ofeda was found using CRISPR/Cas9 system. CRISPR/Cas9 nucleases targeting to two loci in exon 4 of eda, were constructed and injected intozebrafish embryos, respectively. CRISPR-Cas9 mediated mutation frequency toward eda exon 4 was approximately 16%, which was relativelylow compared with that of other genes in zebrafish. Five eda mutant types were obtained in F0 generation including a deletion of 5 bp, 6 bp,8 bp and 87 bp, and an insertion of 11 bp around the targeted site respectively, and all of which happened just in one allele. But the scalesof all F0 founders were normal compared with their wild counterparts. In the F1 generation, five scale loss mutants with few scales coveredwere achieved that were all caused by bi-allelic 11-bp insertion in eda. The insertion results in frameshift mutation of eda and leads to loss ofexpression and function inactivation of EDA as determined by western blotting. This provides a good model for elucidating the function ofEDA in the development of fish scales.

PDF

___

1. Li J, Zhang BB, Bu JW, Du JL: Intron-based genomic editing: A highly efficient method for generating knockin zebrafish. Oncotarget, 6, 17891- 17894, 2015. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.4547
2. Kowalczyk-Quintas C, Schneider P: Ectodysplasin A (EDA) - EDA receptor signalling and its pharmacological modulation. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev, 25 (2): 195-203, 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2014.01.004
3. Koguchi-Yoshioka H, Wataya-Kaneda M, Yutani M, Murota H, Nakano H, Sawamura D, Katayama I: Atopic diathesis in hypohidrotic/ anhidrotic ectodermal dysplasia. Acta Derm Venereol, 95 (4): 476-479, 2015. DOI: 10.2340/00015555-1978
4. Cluzeau C, Hadj-Rabia S, Jambou M, Mansour S, Guigue P, Masmoudi S, Bal E, Chassaing N, Vincent MC, Viot G, Clauss F, Maniere MC, Toupenay S, Le Merrer M, Lyonnet S, Cormier-Daire V, Amiel J, Faivre L, de Prost Y, Munnich A, Bonnefont JP, Bodemer C, Smahi A: Only four genes (EDA1, EDAR, EDARADD, and WNT10A) account for 90% of hypohidrotic/anhidrotic ectodermal dysplasia cases. Hum Mutat, 32 (1): 70-72, 2011. DOI: 10.1002/humu.21384
5. Srivastava AK, Pispa J, Hartung AJ, Du YZ, Ezer S, Jenks T, Shimada T, Pekkanen M, Mikkola ML, Ko MSH, Thesleff I, Kere J, Schlessinger D: The Tabby phenotype is caused by mutation in a mouse homologue of the EDA gene that reveals novel mouse and human exons and encodes a protein (ectodysplasin-A) with collagenous domains. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 94 (24): 13069-13074, 1997. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.94.24.13069
6. Harris MP, Rohner N, Schwarz H, Perathoner S, Konstantinidis P, Nusslein-Volhard C: Zebrafish eda and edar mutants reveal conserved and ancestral roles of ectodysplasin signaling in vertebrates. Plos Genet, 4 (10):e1000206, 2008. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000206
7. Schneider P, Street SL, Gaide O, Hertig S, Tardivel A, Tschopp J, Runkel L, Alevizopoulos K, Ferguson BM, Zonana J: Mutations leading to X-linked hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia affect three major functional domains in the tumor necrosis factor family member ectodysplasin-A. J Biol Chem, 276 (22): 18819-18827, 2001. DOI: 10.1074/ jbc.M101280200
8. Pääkkönen K, Cambiaghi S, Novelli G, Ouzts LV, Penttinen M, Kere J, Srivastava AK: The mutation spectrum of the EDA gene in X-linked anhidrotic ectodermal dysplasia. Hum Mutat, 17 (4): 349, 2001. DOI: 10.1002/humu.33
9. Bayes M, Hartung AJ, Ezer S, Pispa J, Thesleff I, Srivastava AK, Kere J: The anhidrotic ectodermal dysplasia gene (EDA) undergoes alternative splicing and encodes ectodysplasin-A with deletion mutations in collagenous repeats. Hum Mol Genet, 7 (11): 1661-1669, 1998. DOI: 10.1093/hmg/7.11.1661
10. Zhang C, Tong C, Ludwig A, Tang Y, Liu S, Zhang R, Feng C, Li G, Peng Z, Zhao K: Adaptive evolution of the eda gene and scales loss in Schizothoracine fishes in response to uplift of the Tibetan plateau. Int J Mol Sci, 19 (10):2953, 2018. DOI: 10.3390/ijms19102953
11. Hwang WY, Fu YF, Reyon D, Maeder ML, Tsai SQ, Sander JD, Peterson RT, Yeh JRJ, Joung JK: Efficient genome editing in zebrafish using a CRISPR-Cas system. Nat Biotechnol, 31 (3): 227-229, 2013. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.2501
12. Kell MJ, Riccio RE, Baumgartner EA, Compton ZJ, Pecorin PJ, Mitchell TA, Topczewski J, LeClair EE: Targeted deletion of the zebrafish actin-bundling protein L-plastin (lcp1). Plos One, 13 (1):e0190353, 2018. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190353
13. Hruscha A, Krawitz P, Rechenberg A, Heinrich V, Hecht J, Haass C, Schmid B: Efficient CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing with low off-target effects in zebrafish. Development, 140, 4982-4987, 2013. DOI: 10.1242/ dev.099085
14. Auer TO, Duroure K, Concordet JP, Del Bene F: Crispr/Cas9- mediated conversion of egfp-into gal4-transgenic lines in zebrafish. Nat Protoc, 9, 2823-2840, 2014. DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2014.187
15. Seda M, Crespo B, Corcelli M, Jenkins D: A CRISPR/Cas9-generated zebrafish mutant implicates PPP2R3B loss in idiopathic scoliosis pathogenesis in Turner syndrome. BioRxiv, 2018.
16. Makino S, Fukumura R, Gondo Y: Illegitimate translation causes unexpected gene expression from on-target out-of-frame alleles created by CRISPR-Cas9. Sci Rep, 6:39608, 2016. DOI: 10.1038/srep39608
17. Varshney GK, Pei W, LaFave MC, Idol J, Xu L, Gallardo V, Carrington B, Bishop K, Jones M, Li M, Harper U, Huang SC, Prakash A, Chen W, Sood R, Ledin J, Burgess SM: High-throughput gene targeting and phenotyping in zebrafish using CRISPR/Cas9. Genome Res, 25, 1030-1042, 2015. DOI: 10.1101/gr.186379.114
18. Colosimo PF, Hosemann KE, Balabhadra S, Villarreal G, Dickson M, Grimwood J, Schmutz J, Myers RM, Schluter D, Kingsley DM: Widespread parallel evolution in sticklebacks by repeated fixation of ectodysplasin alleles. Science, 307 (5717): 1928-1933, 2005. DOI: 10.1126/ science.1107239
19. Zhang C, Xu K, Hu L, Wang L, Zhang T, Ren C, Zhang Z: A suicidal zinc finger nuclease expression coupled with a surrogate reporter for efficient genome engineering. Biotechnol Lett, 37, 299-305, 2015. DOI: 10.1007/s10529-014-1690-3