Comparison of intravenous versus intraperitoneal interleukin-10 gene delivery in mouse model of sepsis
Sepsiste IL-10 kullanımına yönelik en yaratıcı yöntem IL-10un deneysel modelde gen tedavisi şeklinde verilmesidir. Biz çalışmamızda IL-10un erken sepsiste intravenöz ve intraperitoneal kinetiğini karşılaştırdık. Araştırmamız prospektif kontrollü çalışmadır. Yirmi adet Swiss-Albino dişi fare kullanılarak altı grup oluşturulmuştur. İntra-abdominal sepsis çekal ligasyon ve ponksiyon (ÇLP) yöntemiyle ortaya çıkarılmıştır. Deney hayvanlarına ya intraperitoneal veya intravenöz olarak IL-10 lipozomal gen transferi yapılmıştır. Hayvanlar enjeksiyon sonrası 24. saatte sakrifiye edilmişlerdir. Bunu akciğer, karaciğer, dalak, vena kava dokularının çıkarılması izlemiştir. İmmünhistokimyasal boyamada intraperitoneal verilişten sonra karaciğer boyanmasının daha belirgin olduğu görülmüştür. İntravenöz verilişten sonra tüm endotelyal dokuların boyandığı görülmüştür. Transgenin doku ekspresyonunun ÇLP ve intravenöz enjeksiyon yapılan grupta diğer gruplara göre çok daha belirgin olduğu görülmüştür. Sonuçlarımız aynı zamanda göstermiştir ki IL-10un pro-inflamatuar etkisi intravenöz verilişte daha belirgindir ve kendisini IL-6 indüksiyonuyla göstermektedir. IL-10 un halen keşfedilmeyi bekleyen tedavi edici özelliği vardır.
Farelerde intraabdominal sepsis modelinde intravenöz ve intraperitoneal interlökin 10 lipozom aracılı gen tedavisinin karşılaştırılması
The most novel approach utilizing IL-10 in sepsis is IL-10 gene delivery in experimental model of sepsis. In our study, we aimed to compare kinetics of intravenous versus intraperitoneal delivery of IL-10 gene transfer in early stages of sepsis. This is a prospective controlled experimental study. Six groups were gathered with 20 Swiss-Albino female mice. Intra-abdominal sepsis was induced by cecal ligation and puncture (CLP). Animals had either intraperitoneal or intravenous IL-10 liposomal gene transfer. Animals were sacrified 24 h after injections, followed by harvest of lung,liver,spleen,vena cava tissues. Immunostaining revealed more prominent staining in liver after intraperitoneal delivery. All endothelial tissues stained with intravenous delivery. There was striking difference between tissue expressions of transgene of animals in CLP intravenous group when compared to other groups. Our results point out that pro-inflammatory action of IL-10 is prominent in intravenous gene delivery which shows itself with induction of zyon. IL-10 still may harbor therapeutical potential which still needs to be explored.
___
- 1. Çöl R, Keskin E: Effects of platelet-activating factor receptor antagonist (PAFRA) on selected inflammatory and biochemical parameters in lipopolysaccharide-induced rat endotoxemia model. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg, 19 (1): 97-102, 2013.
- 2. Jenkins I: Evidence-based sepsis therapy: A hospitalist perspective. J Hosp Med, 1 (5): 285-295, 2006.
- 3. Annane D, Bellissant E, Cavaillon JM: Septic shock. Lancet, 365 (9453): 63-78, 2005.
- 4. Howell G, Tisherman SA: Management of sepsis. Surg Clin North Am, 86 (6): 1523-1539, 2006.
- 5. Kabay B, Kocaefe C, Baykal A, Ozguc M, Sayek I: Liposome-mediated intraperitoneal interleukin 10 gene transfer increases survival in cecal ligation and puncture model of sepsis. Shock, 26 (1): 37-40, 2006.
- 6. Ergönül S, Aşkar TK: The Investigation of heat shock protein (HSP 27), malondialdehyde (MDA), nitric oxide (NO) and interleukin (IL-6, IL-10) levels in cattle with Anaplasmosis. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg, 15 (4): 575-579, 2009.
- 7. Ocuin LM, Bamboat ZM, Balachandran VP, Cavnar MJ, Obaid H, Plitas G, DeMatteo RP: Neutrophil IL-10 suppresses peritoneal inflammatory monocytes during polymicrobial sepsis. J Leukoc Biol, 89 (3): 423-432, 2011.
- 8. Manley MO, ORiordan MA, Levine AD, Samir Q: Interleukin 10 extends the effectiveness of standard therapy during late sepsis with serum interleukin 6 levels predicting outcome. Infect Immun, 70, 4441-4446, 2002.
- 9. Latifi SQ, ORiordan MA, Levine AD: Interleukin-10 Controls the onset of ırreversible septic shock. Infect Immun, 70 (8): 4441-4446, 2002.
- 10. Kahlke V, Dohm C, Mees T, Brötzmann K, Schreiber S, Schröder J: Early interleukin-10 treatment improves survival and enchances immune function only in males after hemorrhage and subsequent sepsis. Shock, 18 (1): 24-28, 2002.
- 11. Rongione AJ, Kusske AM, Ashley SW, Reber HA, McFadden DW: Interleukin-10 prevents early cytokine release in severe intraabdominal infection and sepsis. J Surg Res, 70 (2): 107-112, 1997.
- 12. Bolger AP, Sharma R, von Haehling S, Doehner W, Oliver B, Rauchhaus M, Coats AJ, Adcock IM, Anker SD: Effect of interleukin-10 on the production of tumor necrosis factor-alpha by peripheral blood mononuclear cells from patients with chronic heart failure. Am J Cardiol, 90 (4): 384-389, 2002.
- 13. Fuchs AC, Granowitz EV, Shapiro L, Vannier E, Lonnemann G, Angel JB, Kennedy JS, Rabson AR, Radwanski E, Affrime MB, Cutler DL, Grint PC, Dinarello CA: Clinical, hematologic, and immunologic effects of interleukin-10 in humans. J Clin Immunol, 16 (5): 291-303, 1996.
- 14. Huhn RD, Radwanski E, O‟Connell SM, Sturgill MG: Pharmacokinetics and immunomodulatory properties of intravenously administered recombinant human interleukin- in healthy volunteers. Blood, 87 (2): 699-705, 1996.
- 15. Remick DG: Cytokine therapeutics for the treatment of sepsis: Why has nothing worked? Curr Pharm Des, 9 (1): 75-82, 2003.
- 16. Schneider CP, Schwacha MG, Chaudry IH: The role of interleukin-10 in the regulation of the systemic inflammatory response following trauma- hemorrhage. Biochim Biophys Acta, 1689 (1): 22-32, 2004.
- 17. Templeton NS: Cationic liposome-mediated gene delivery in vivo. Biosci Rep, 22 (2): 283-295, 2002.