MULTI-DIMENSIONAL PANEL DATA GRAVITY MODEL: AN ANALYSIS OF APEC COUNTRIES

The traditional gravity model of international trade has been through many changes in order to develop and answer new research questions. Taking this development into account this paper investigates a more enhanced panel data approach by extending the classic approach by allowing for both indiviual and time effects to be apparent in order to capture country specific and time effects with a multidimensional panel data model for APEC countries. By using a three dimensional panel gravity model with a least squares dummy variable approach we were able to identify countries with stronger propensities to import and export.

___

  • Aitken, N. D. (1973). The effect of the EEC and EFTA on european trade: a temporal cross-section analysis. The American Economic Review, 63(5), 881-892. Anderson, J. (1979). A theoretical foundation for the gravity equation. The American Economic Review, 69(1), 106-116.APEC (Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation). (2015). Asia pacific economic cooperation, achievements and benefits. https://www.apec.org/About-Us/About-APEC/Achievements-and-Benefits. 20.01.2019Balazsi, L., Matyas, L., & Wansbeek, T. (2018). The estimation of multidimensional fixed effects panel data models. Econometric Reviews, 37(3), 212-227.Baldwin, R., & Taglioni, D. (2006). Gravity for dummies and dummies for gravity equations. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Papers, (12516), https://www.nber.org/papers/w12516.Baltagi, H.B. (2008). Econometric analysis of panel data. England: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Bergstrand, J.H. (1989). The generalized gravity equation, monopolistic competition, and the factor-proportions theory in international trade. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 71(1), 143-153.Cheng, I.H., & Wall, J.H. (2005). Controlling for heterogeneity in gravity models of trade and integration. Economic Research Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, 87(1), 49-63.Deardorff, A.V. (1995). Determinants of bilateral trade: does gravity work in neoclassical world?. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper, (5377), https://www.nber.org/papers/w5377.Egger, P., & Pfaffermayr, M. (2003). The proper econometric specification of the gravity equation: a three-way model with bilateral interaction effects. Empirical Economics, 28, 571-580. Frankel, J.A., & Romer, D. (1996). Trade and growth: an empirical investigation. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper, (5476), https://www.nber.org/papers/w5476. Head, K., & Mayer, T. (2002). Illusory border effects: distance mismeasurement inflates estimates of home bias in trade. Centre d'etudes prospectives et d'informations internationales, Working Papers , (2002-01), http://www.cepii.fr/PDF_PUB/wp/2011/wp2011-25.pdf. Heckscher, E. (1919). The effect of foreign trade on the distribution of income. Ekonomisk Tidskrift, 21, 497-512.Hsiao, C. (2003). Analysis of panel data. New York: Chambridge University Press. Keum, K. (2010). Tourism flows and trade theory: a panel data analysis with the gravity model, The Annals of Regional Science, 44(3), 541-557. Kadaroo, J., & Seetanah, B. (2008). The role of transport infrastructure in international tourism development: a gravity model approach. Tourism Management, 29, 831-840.Krugman, P. (1980). Scale economies, product differentiation and the pattern of trade, The American Economic Review, 70(5), 950-959.Linnemann, H. (1966). An econometric study of international trade flows, Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Co..Lowe, J.M., & Sen, A. (1996). Gravity model applications in health planning. analysis of an urban hospital market. Journal of Regional Science, 36(3), 437-461.Mansfield E.D., & Bronson, R. (1994). Alliances, preferential trading arrangements and international trade. American Political Science Review, 91(1), 94-107.Mansfield E.D., & Gowa J. (1993). Power politics and international trade. The American Political Science Review, 87(2), 408-420. Matyas, L. (1997). Proper econometrics specification of the gravity model. The World Economy, 20(3), 363-368. Mayer, T., & Zignago, S. (2011). Notes on CEPII’s distance measures: the geodist database. Centre d'etudes prospectives et d'informations internationales, Working papers, (25), http://www.cepii.fr/PDF_PUB/wp/2011/wp2011-25.pdf.Morley, C., Rossello, J., & Gallego, M.S. (2014). Gravity models for tourism demand: theory and use. Annals of Tourism Research, 48, 1-40.Ohlin, B. (1933). Interregional and international trade. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Kafkas Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1309-4289
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 2 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2010
  • Yayıncı: Kafkas Üniversitesi, İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

MULTI-DIMENSIONAL PANEL DATA GRAVITY MODEL: AN ANALYSIS OF APEC COUNTRIES

Elanur TÜRKÜZ, Hatice Nazan ÇAĞLAR

SEÇİLİ G-20 ÜLKELERİNDE CARİ İŞLEMLER AÇIĞININ SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİRLİĞİ: YAPISAL KIRILMALI BİR PANEL VERİ ANALİZİ

ÖMER YALÇINKAYA

MESLEKİ EĞİTİM VE ÜNİVERSİTE EĞİTİMİNİN GENÇ İŞSİZLİK ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİ: TÜRKİYE ÜZERİNE AMPİRİK BİR ANALİZ

MUSA BAYIR, ŞEYMA ŞAHİN KUTLU

CHANTAL MOUFFE’UN AGONİSTİK DEMOKRASİ KURAMINA ELEŞTİREL BİR BAKIŞ

ADEM ÇELİK

TÜRKİYE’NİN DIŞ TİCARET HACMİNİN ÇEKİM MODELİ İLE TAHMİNİ

NEVZAT BALIKÇIOĞLU, AHMET GÜLMEZ

SAĞLIK HARCAMALARI İKTİSADİ BÜYÜME İLİŞKİSİ: OECD ÜLKELERİ ÜZERİNE BİR İNCELEME

SEYFETTİN ERDOĞAN, DURMUŞ ÇAĞRI YILDIRIM, AYFER GEDİKLİ

FİNANSAL GELİŞME VE ENERJİ TÜKETİMİ ARASINDA SAKLI EŞ BÜTÜNLEŞME İLİŞKİSİ VAR MIDIR

HASAN AYAYDIN, ALPER VELİ ÇAM, ABDULKADİR BARUT, Fahrettin PALA

BİST KOBİ SANAYİ ŞİRKETLERİNİN FİNANSAL PERFORMANSLARININ MW ve GRİ İLİŞKİSEL ANALİZ YÖNTEMLERİ İLE ÖLÇÜLMESİ

CEYDA YERDELEN KAYGIN, HAŞİM BAĞCI, DENİZ TANIR

FİNANSAL GELİŞME VE ENERJİ TÜKETİMİ ARASINDA SAKLI EŞ BÜTÜNLEŞME İLİŞKİSİ VAR MIDIR ?

Abdulkadir BARUT, Hasan AYAYDIN, Alper Veli ÇAM, Fahrettin PALA

DERGİPARK VERİ TABANINDAKİ İİBF DERGİLERİNDE YAYIMLANAN “BİLİM VE TEKNOLOJİ” KONULU MAKALELERİN BİBLİYOMETRİK ANALİZİ

Süha ÇELİKKAYA, Zeynep EZANOĞLU, Vahap KARAÇADIR