ÇOK-BOYUTLU PANEL VERİ ÇEKİM MODELİ: APEC ÜLKELERİ İLE BİR UYGULAMA

Uluslararası Ticarette geleneksel Çekim Modeli, yeni araştırma soruları geliştirmek ve cevaplamak amacı ile bir çok değişiklik geçirmiştir. Meydana gelen gelişmeler dikkate alınarak bu makalede seçilmiş APEC ülkeleri için Çok-Boyutlu Panel Veri Modeli ile ülkelere özgü birim ve zaman etkilerini yakalayabilmek amacıyla Klasik Panel Veri yaklaşımı genişletilerek üç boyutlu bir panel veri modeli kullanılmıştır. Kukla Değişkenli En Küçük Kareler yaklaşımı ile üç boyutlu bir panel çekim modeli yardımı ile güçlü ithalat ve ihracat eğilimi olan ülkeler belirlenmiştir.

MULTI-DIMENSIONAL PANEL DATA GRAVITY MODEL: AN ANALYSIS OF APEC COUNTRIES

The traditionalgravity model of international trade has beenthrough many changes in order to develop andanswer new research questions. Taking thisdevelopment into account this paperinvestigates a more enhanced panel dataapproach by extending the classic approach byallowing for both indiviual and time effects tobe apparent in order to capture country specificand time effects with a multidimensional paneldata model for APEC countries. By using a threedimensional panel gravity model with a leastsquares dummy variable approach we were ableto identify countries with stronger propensitiesto import and export.

___

  • Aitken, N. D. (1973). The effect of the EEC and EFTA on European trade: a temporal cross-section analysis. The American Economic Review, 63(5), 881-892.
  • Anderson, J. (1979). A theoretical foundation for the gravity equation. The American Economic Review, 69(1), 106-116.
  • Anderson, J E. & Wincoop, E. (2003). Gravity with gravitas: a solution to the border puzzle. American Economic Review, 93 (1), 170-192. doi: 10.1257/000282803321455214
  • APEC (Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation). (2015). Asia pacific economic cooperation, achievements and benefits. 20 Ocak 2019 tarihinde https://www.apec.org/About-Us/About-APEC/Achievements-andBenefits adresinden erişildi.
  • Balazsi, L., Matyas, L., & Wansbeek, T. (2018). The estimation of multidimensional fixed effects panel data models. Econometric Reviews, 37(3), 212-227.
  • Baldwin, R., & Taglioni, D. (2006). Gravity for dummies and dummies for gravity equations. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Papers, 12516, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. https://www.nber.org/papers/w12516
  • Baltagi, H.B. (2008). Econometric analysis of panel data. England: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
  • Bayoumi, T. & Eichengreen, B. (1995). Is regionalism simply a diversion? Evidance from evolution of the EC and EFTA countries. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper, 5283, National Bereau of Economic Research, Inc. https://www.nber.org/papers/w5283
  • Bergstrand, J.H. (1989). The generalized gravity equation, monopolistic competition, and the factor-proportions theory in international trade. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 71(1), 143-153.
  • Chaney, T. (2013). The gravity equation in international trade: an explanation. NBER Working Papers, 19285, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. https://www.nber.org/papers/w19285
  • Cheng, I. H., & Wall, J.H. (2005). Controlling for heterogeneity in gravity models of trade and integration. Economic Research Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, 87(1), 49-63.
  • Deardorff, A.V. (1995). Determinants of bilateral trade: does gravity work in neoclassical world?. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper, 5377, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. https://www.nber.org/papers/w5377
  • Egger, P. (2002). An econometric view on the estimation on gravity models and the calculation of trade potentials. The World Economy, 25(2), 297-312. doi: 10.1111/1467-9701.00432
  • Egger, P., & Pfaffermayr, M. (2003). The proper econometric specification of the gravity equation: a three-way model with bilateral interaction effects. Empirical Economics, 28, 571-580.
  • Frankel, J.A., & Romer, D. (1996). Trade and growth: an empirical investigation. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper, 5476, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. https://www.nber.org/papers/w5476
  • Feenstra, R.C., Markusen, J. R., & Rose, A. K. (2001). Using the gravity equation to differentiate among alternative theories of trade. Canadian Journal of Economics, 34 (2), 430-447. doi: 10.111/0008-4085.00082.
  • Golovko, A. (2009). Çekim modeli: Avrasya ülkelerinin dış ticareti, EconAnadolu 2009: Anadolu Uluslararası İktisat Kongresi, 17-19 Haziran 2019, Eskişehir.
  • Head, K., & Mayer, T. (2002). Illusory border effects: distance mismeasurement inflates estimates of home bias in trade. Centre d'etudes prospectives et d'informations internationales, Working Papers, 2002-01, http://www.cepii.fr/PDF_PUB/wp/2011/wp2011-25.pdf
  • Heckscher, E. (1919). The effect of foreign trade on the distribution of income. Ekonomisk Tidskrift, 21, 497-512.
  • Hsiao, C. (2003). Analysis of panel data. New York: Chambridge University Press.
  • Kadaroo, J., & Seetanah, B. (2008). The role of transport infrastructure in international tourism development: a gravity model approach. Tourism Management, 29, 831-840.
  • Keum, K. (2010). Tourism flows and trade theory: a panel data analysis with the gravity model. The Annals of Regional Science, 44(3), 541-557.
  • Krugman, P. (1980). Scale economies, product differentiation and the pattern of trade. The American Economic Review, 70(5), 950-959.
  • Kurihara, Y. (2003). APEC: international trade and output, Pacific Economic Review, 8(3), 207-217.
  • Linnemann, H. (1966). An econometric study of international trade flows, Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Co.
  • Lowe, J.M., & Sen, A. (1996). Gravity model applications in health planning. analysis of an urban hospital market. Journal of Regional Science, 36(3), 437-461.
  • Mansfield E.D., & Bronson, R. (1994). Alliances, preferential trading arrangements and international trade. American Political Science Review, 91(1), 94-107.
  • Mansfield E.D., & Gowa J. (1993). Power politics and international trade. The American Political Science Review, 87(2), 408-420.
  • Matyas, L. (1997). Proper econometrics specification of the gravity model. The World Economy, 20(3), 363-368.
  • Mayer, T., & Zignago, S. (2011). Notes on CEPII’s distance measures: the geodist database. Centre d'etudes prospectives et d'informations internationales, CEPII Working papers, 25, http://www.cepii.fr/PDF_PUB/wp/2011/wp2011-25.pdf
  • Morley, C., Rossello, J., & Gallego, M.S. (2014). Gravity models for tourism demand: theory and use. Annals of Tourism Research, 48, 1-40.
  • Ohlin, B. (1933). Interregional and international trade. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Poot, J., Alimi, O., Cameron, M.P., & Mare, D. (2016). The gravity model of migration: the successful comeback of an ageing superstar in regional science. Journal of Regional Research, 36, 63-86.
  • Pöyhönen, P. (1963). A tentative model for the volume of trade between countries. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 67(3), 474-481.
  • Ravenstein, E.G. (1885). The laws of migration. Journal of Statistical Society of London, 48(2), 167-235.
  • Richardo, D. (1817). The principals of political economy and taxation, Canada: Batoche Books.
  • Sa, C., Florax, R.J.G.M., & Rietveld, P. (2004). Determinants of the regional demand for higher education in the netherlands: a gravity model approach. Regional Studies, 38(4), 375-392.
  • Shuurman, N., Berube, M., & Crooks, V.A. (2017). Measuring potential spatial to primary health care physicians using a modified growth model. The Canadian Geographer, 54(1), 29-45.
  • Tang, D. (2005). Effects of the regional trade agreements on trade: evidance from the NAFTA, ANZCER and ASEAN countries, 1989-2000. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 14(2), 241-265.
  • Tatoğlu, Y.F. (2016). Üç boyutlu sabit ve tesadüfi etkili panel veri modellerinin tahmini için çesitli yaklaşımlar. Eurasian Econometrics, Statistics and Emprical Economics Journal, 5, 60-70.
  • Tinbergen, J. (1962). Shaping the world economy: suggestions for an international economic policy. The Economic Journal, 79(301), 92-95.
  • Thursby, J. G., & Thursby, M. (1987). Bilateral trade flows, the linder hypothesis and exchange risk. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 69(3), 488- 495.
  • Vanderkamp, J. (1977). The gravity model and migration behaviour: an economic interpretation. Journal of Economic Studies, 4(2), 89-102.
  • Viorica, E. D. (2012). The econometric estimation of a gravity model for the external trade of Romania. Journal of Eastern Europe Research in Business & Economics, 2012 (2012), 1-9.
  • Westerlund, J. & Wilhelmssoni F. (2008). Estimating the gravity model without gravity using panel data. Applied Economics, 43(6), 641- 658.
Kafkas Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1309-4289
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 2 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2010
  • Yayıncı: Kafkas Üniversitesi, İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi