BÖLGESEL AVANTAJ YARATMAK İÇİN KÜRESEL BİR STRATEJİ BÖLGESEL YENİLİK SİSTEMLERİ (BYS)

Çeşitli coğrafi düzeylerde Bölgesel Yenilik Sistemleri (BYS) üzerine çalışmalar giderek artmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, inovasyon kapasitesinin gelişmesinde mekânsal olarak bölgenin önemini ortaya koymaktır. İnovasyon politikalarının bölgeselleşmesiyle, belirli bir bölgenin/şirketin ihtiyaçları daha etkin bir şekilde ortaya konmakta ve alınacak önlemleri izlemek ve uygulamak kolaylaşmaktadır. Bölgesel avantaj yaratmanın ilk adımı bilgi üretimi, inovasyon ve girişimciliğin gerçekleştiği ortamları tanımlamaya başlamaktadır. Bu açıdan Bölgesel Yenilik sistemi yaklaşımı, bölgelerin inovasyon kapasitesi ve rekabet yeteneği üzerinde stratejik bir rol oynamaktadır. Yenilik sisteminin verimli bir şekilde işlemesine engel olabilecek sistematik aksaklıklar da söz konusu olabilir. Bu durumda kamunun müdahalesi sitemin geneline değil ilişkilerdeki aksaklıklara odaklanmalıdır. Bu anlamda devletin düzenleyici rolü, bölgesel bilgi altyapısının geliştirilmesi, dışsal bilgi kaynaklarına ulaşımın kolaylaştırılması, beşeri sermayenin niteliğinin arttırılması, kümelenmelerin desteklenmesi, yenilikçi aktörler arasında ağyapının kurulması ve desteklenmesi gibi süreç odaklı konulara yönelmelidir.

A "GLOBAL" STRATEGY ON CONSTRUCTING "REGIONAL" ADVANTAGE BY REGIONAL INNOVATION SYSTEMS (RIS)

Studies on regional innovation systems in various geographical levels aregradually increasing. The aim of this study is to reveal the importance of region spatially in the development of innovative capacity. By the regionalization of innovation policies, needs of a specific region or company are exhibited more effectively and it becomes easier tomonitor and apply the precautions to be taken. Creating a regional advantage starts with identifying the environments where knowledge production, innovation and entrepreneurship actualise. From this point of view Regional Innovation Systems (RIS) play a strategical role on competitive ability and innovation ability of regions. Systematic malfunctions than can prevent innovation system from operating efficiently can be in question. In this case the intervention of the public need to focus on the malfunctions in the relations, not to overall system.In this sense the regulatory role of the government needs to focus on process-based issues such as developing regional knowledge infrastructure, catalysing to access external knowledge sources, increasing the human capital quality, supporting clusters, establishing networks among innovative actors and supporting them.

___

  • Amin, A. & Cohendet, P. (2003). Architectures of knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Ascani A., Cresceuzi R., & Iammarino S., (2012). Regional economic development.
  • A Review Search WP01/03. 7th European Community Framework Programme. European Commission.
  • Asheim, B. T. & Coenen, L. (2006). Contextualising regional Innovation Systems in a Globalising Learning Economy: On Knowledge Bases and Institutional Frameworks. The journal of technology transfer. 31 (1). 163-173.
  • Asheim, B. T. & Gertler, M. S. (2005). The Geography of Innovation: Regional Innovation Systems. In Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D. and Nelson, R. (eds.). The oxford handbook of ınnovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.(pp. 291- 317)
  • Asheim, B., Coenen, L., Moodysson, J., & Vang, J. (2005). Regional innovation system policy: A knowledge-based approach. CIRCLE (Centre for Innovation, Research and Competence in the Learning Economy) Working Paper.13. (pp.1-24)
  • Asheim, B.T., Isaksen, A., Nauwelaers, & C. Todtling, F. (Eds.) (2003). Regional ınnovation policy for small–medium enterprises. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar..
  • Boschma, R. (2004). Competitiveness of regions from an evolutionary perspective. Regional studies, 38(9), 1001-1014.
  • Boschma, R. (2005a). Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment. Regional studies, 39(1), 61-74.
  • Boschma, R. (2005b). Rethinking regional innovation policy. In Rethinking regional innovation and change (pp. 249-271). New York: Springer.
  • Boschma, R. A., & Lambooy, J. G. (1999). Evolutionary economics and economic geography. Journal of evolutionary economics, 9(4), 411-429.
  • Charles, D. (2003). Universities and territorial development: reshaping the regional role of UK universities. Local economy, 18(1), 7-20.
  • Cooke, P. (1998). Introduction. Origins of the Concept. Teoksessa Braczyk, H.-J., Cooke, P. & Heidenreich, M.(Eds.): Regional Innovation Systems: The Role of Governances in a Globalized World, 1st ed. pp.2-28.London: UCL Press.
  • Cooke, P. N., & De Lauerentis, C. (2002). The index of knowledge economies in the European Union: performance rankings of cities and regions. Regional Industrial Research Centre for Advanced Studies.
  • Cooke, P., & Leydesdorff, L. (2006). Regional development in the knowledge-based economy: The construction of advantage. The journal of technology transfer, 31(1), 5-15. D’Allura, Giorgia M., Marco Galvagno, & Arabella Mocciaro Li Destri. (2012). Regional Innovation Systems: A Literature Review. Business Systems Review
  • Dodgson, M. (2018). Technological collaboration in industry: strategy, policy and internationalization in innovation. Routledge.
  • Florida, R. (2002). The rise of the creative class and how it’s transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life. New York: Basic Books.
  • Frenken, K., & Boschma, R. A. (2017). Why is economic geography not an evolutionary science? Towards an evolutionary economic geography. Martin, R (eds) In Economy. London: Routledge. (pp. 127-156).
  • Frenken, K., F.G. Van Oort, T. Verburg & R.A. Boschma (2004). Variety and regional economic growth in the netherlands. Final report. Ministry of Economic Affairs.
  • Fritsch, M. and Stephan, A. (2005). Regionalization of innovation policy: introduction to the special issue. Research Policy 34 (8), 1123-127.
  • Giuliani, E. (2005). Inter-firm networks, projects and clusters: The structure of cluster knowledge networks. In DRUID Xth anniversary summer conference on Dynamics of Industry and Innovation: Organizations, Networks and Systems. Copenhagen.
  • Giuliani, E., & Bell, M. (2005). The micro-determinants of meso-level learning and innovation: evidence from a Chilean wine cluster. Research policy, 34(1), 47-68.
  • Goddard, J., & Chatterton, P. (2003). The response of HEIs to regional needs. In Economic Geography of Higher Education (pp. 33-55). Routledge.
  • Hajek, P., Henriques, R., & Hajkova, V. (2014). Visualising Components of Regional Innovation Systems Using Selforganizing Maps: Evidence from European Regions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. vol. 84, 197-214.
  • Hommen, L., & Doloreux, D. (2004). Bringing labour back in: a'new'point of departure for the regional innovation systems approach?. Knowledge Spillovers and Knowledge Management, 311.
  • Hotz-Hart, B. (2000). Innovation networks, regions and globalization. Clark, G.L., Feldman M. P &. Gertler M. S (eds) , In The oxford handbook of economic geography. 423–50. Oxford: Oxford University Press
  • Jones-Evans, D., Cooke, P., Klofsten, M., & Paasio, A. (2001). Entrepreneurial universities from the periphery. European Commission Publication EUR, 19846.
  • Korres, G. M. (2012). Handbook of Innovation Economics. Nova Science Pub Inc.
  • Korres, G. M. (2013). The European national and regional systems of innovation. In E. G. Carayannis and G. M. Korres (Eds.), The Innovation Union in Europe: A Socio‐Economic Perspective on EU Integration (pp. 85–98). Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
  • Laestadius, S. (1998). Technology Level, Knowledge Formation and Industrial Competence in Paper Manufacturing. In Eliasson, G. et al. (eds.) Micro Foundations of Economic Growth. Ann Arbour. The University of Michigan Press. pp. 212-226.
  • Lawton Smith, H. (2003). Knowledge Organizations and Local Economic Development: The Cases of Oxford and Grenoble. Regional Studies, 37(9), 899–909.
  • Lundvall, B. Å., & Borrás, S. (1998). The Globalising Learning Economy: Implications for innovation policy.
  • Mayor, M. G. O., de la Hera, M. L. B., & Ruiz, E. D. D. (2012). Empirical Study of National Technological Innovation Capability in Africa. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences. 15(4). 440-463.
  • Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge Creating Company. Oxford. New York. Oxford University Press.
  • Plum, O., & Hassink, R. (2014). Knowledge Bases, Innovativeness and Competitiveness in Creative Industries: The Case Of Hamburg’s Video Game Developers. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 1(1), 248-268.
  • Schrempf, B., Kaplan, D., & Schroeder, D. (2013). National, Regional, and Sectoral Systems of Innovation–An overview. Report for FP7 Project" Progress". European Comission. 15.09.2018. https://www. google. com. co/url. Smith, K. (2000). What is ‘The Knowledge Economy’? Knowledge-intensive Industries and Distributed Knowledge Bases. Paper presented at the DRUID Summer Conference on ‘The Learning Economy – Firms, Regions and Nation Specific Institutions’. Aalborg. June 2000.
  • Smith, K. (2005). Measuring innovation. Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D. and Nelson, R. (eds.) In The oxford handbook of innovation. (pp.148-177). Oxford: Oxford University Press,.
  • Tödtling, F. & Trippl, M. (2005). One Size Fits All? Towards a Differentiated Regional Innovation Policy Approach. Research Policy, 34, 1203-1219.
  • Uyarra, E., Edler, J., Garcia-Estevez, J., Georghiou, L., & Yeow, J. (2014). Barriers to innovation through public procurement: A supplier perspective. Technovation, 34(10), 631-645.
  • Zhang, Y., & Roelfsema, H. (2014). Globalization, foreign direct investment, and regional innovation in china. Journal of International Commerce, Economics and Policy, 05(03).