The Place of Honour Code in MiddleClass Women’s Leisure in Turkey: A High-Security Estate Case Study from Bursa

This paper investigates the role of gender in women’s everyday leisure practices in a high-security estate in Bursa, Turkey. Defined as a new type of sub-urbanisation, such residential areas have emerged in Turkey towards the end of the 1990s, and, to date, social class has been the central area of inquiry about high-Esecurity estates in Turkey. Drawing on the findings from qualitative research, the current paper argues that gender plays a central role in middle-class women’s access to and use of neighbourhood leisure spaces. Even though the community values and the middle-class rhetoric of gender equality advocate individuality and the equal use of public leisure spaces, family-level male control shaped by honour code is still dominant, in varying degrees, in preventing women from practising the leisure activities they choose.

PDF

___

Akyol Altun D. (2010). Kapalı Konut Siteleri ve “Mahalle” Kavramı, [Gated Communities and the Concept of “Mahalle”]. İdealkent, 2:216-244.
Ataca B. & Sunar D. (1999). Continuity and Change in Turkish Urban Family Life. Psychology and Developing Societies, 11: 77-90.
Ayata S. (2002). The New Middle Class and the Joys of Suburbia. In: D. Kandiyoti and A. Saktanber, ed., Fragments in Culture: The Everyday of Modern Turkey, London: I.B. Tauris: 25-43.
Aydın S. (2012). İstanbul’da “Orta Sınıf” ve Kapalı Siteler, [The Middle-class in Istanbul and Gated Communities]. İdealkent, 6:96-123.
BektaşAta L. (2016). Bir Güvenlikli Site Hikâyesi: Gündelik Hayatın Dönüşümüne Otoetnografik Yaklaşım, [A Story of High-security Estate: Auto-ethnographic Approach to the Transformation of Everyday Life]. Fe Dergi, 8(2):46-61.
Beşpınar F.U. (2010). Questioning Agency and Empowerment: Women's Workrelated Strategies and Social Class in Urban Turkey. Women’s Studies International Forum, 33: 523-532.
Blakely E.J. and Snyder M.G. (1997). Fortress America: Gated Communities in the United States. Washington D.C: Brookings Institution Press.
Bolak H.C. (1997). When Wives are Major Providers: Culture, Gender, and Family Work. Gender and Society, 11(4):409-433.
Breitung, W. (2012). Enclave Urbanism in China: Attitudes towards Gated Communities in Guangzhou. Urban Geography, 33(2): 278–94.
Coşar, S. (2007). Women in Turkish Political Thought: Between Tradition and Modernity. Feminist Review, 86: 113-131.
Datta, A. (2014). Gendered nature and urban culture: the dialectics of gated developments in Izmir, Turkey. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38(4):1363–83.
Davis M. (1992). City of Quartz: Excavating the Future in Los Angeles. New York: Vintage.
Demirbaş, G. (2018). Women’s Leisure in Urban Turkey: A Comparative Neighbourhood Study. PhD. Glasgow University.
Evan J., Jones P. (2011). The Walking Interview: Methodology, Mobility and Place, Applied Geography, 31: 849-858.
Geniş Ş. (2007). Producing Elite Localities: The Rise of Gated Communities in Istanbul. Urban Studies, 44:771-798.
Ilkkaracan I. (2012). Why so Few Women in the Labor Market in Turkey. Feminist Economics, 18(1):1-37.
Kandiyoti D. (2002). Introduction. In D. Kandiyoti & A. Saktanber (Ed.) Fragments of Culture: The Everyday of Modern Turkey. London: I.B. Tauris: 1-25.
Karaarslan F. & Karaarslan Ö.N. (2013). Modern Kent Mekanlarında Mahallenin Konumu: Modern Kent Mekanları Olarak Güvenlikli Siteler ile Mahallenin İşlevsel Kıyası. [The Place of Mahalle in Modern Urban Spaces: The Functional Comparison of High-security Estates and Mahalle as Urban Spaces]. II.Türkiye Lisansüstü Çalışmaları Kongresi Bildiriler Kitabı. Bursa: Bursa Kültür. 1185-1205
Keyder Ç. (2005). Globalization and Social Exclusion in Istanbul. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 29(1):124-134.
Kitzinger J. (1995). Introducing Focus Groups. British Medical Journal, 311: 299- 302.
Kurtuluş, H. (2005). İstanbul’da Kentsel Ayrışma: Mekânsal Dönüşümde Farklı Boyutlar, İstanbul: Bağlam Yayıncılık.
Küçükşahin S., Demir B. and Ayder T. (1997). Bursa’ya ‘Yeşil’ İlçe (‘Greencity’ District to Bursa). [Online] Hürriyet. Available at: http://www.hurriyet.com. tr/bursaya-yesil-ilce-39263331 Access date: 17/07/2015.
Low S. (2003). Behind the Gates: Life, Security and the Pursuit of Happiness in Fortress America, London: Routledge.
Meeker M. (1976a). Meaning and Society in the Near East: Examples from Black Sea Turks and the Levantine Arabs (I). International Journal of Middle East Studies, 7(2): 243-270.
Öncü, A. (1999). Istanbulites and Others: The Cultural Cosmology of ‘Middleness’ in the Era of Neo-Liberalism”. In: C. Keyder (Ed.), Istanbul Between the Global and The Local. New York: St. Martins.
Özyegin G. (2009). Virginal Facades: Sexual Freedom and Guilt among Young Turkish Women. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 16(2):103-123.
Perouse J.F. and Danış A.D. (2005). Zenginligin Mekanda Yeni Yansimalari: Istanbul’da Guvenlikli Siteler. [New Reflections of Wealth on Space: HighSecurity Estates in Istanbul]. Toplum ve Bilim, 104:92-123.
Reinharz S. (1992). Feminist Methods in Social Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rossman G.B. & Rallis S.F. (2012). Learning in the Field: An Introduction to Qualitative Research. London: Sage Publications.
Shirley, I. & Neill, C. (Eds.) (2013). Asian and Pacific Cities: Development Patterns. New York: Routledge.
Sirman, N. (2014). Contextualizing Honour. European Journal of Turkish Studies, 18:1-6.
Skeggs B. (1997). Formations of Class and Gender: Becoming Respectable. London: Sage Publications.
Sunar D. & Fisek G.O. (2005). Contemporary Turkish Families. In J.L. Roopnarine and U. P. Gielen (Ed.), Families in Global Perspective. Boston: Pearson Education: 169-184.
Sümer S. (1998). Incongruent Modernities: A Comparative Study of Higher Educated Women from Urban Turkey and Norway. Acta Sociologica, 41:115- 129.
Wheeldon J. (2011). Is a Picture Worth a Thousand Words? Using Mind Maps to Facilitate Participant Recall in Qualitative Research. The Qualitative Report, 16(2):509-522.
Zahle J. (2012). Practical Knowledge and Participant Observation. Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, 55(1):50-65