Analysing the Relationship between Spatial Representations and Gender in Charlotte Gilman’s Novel, Herland

This paper aims to explore the connections between architecture, interior spaces, urban environment, and social issues through the medium of literary fiction. In particular, it analyzes the spatial representations through cues and interpretations as well as their impact on social inequalities, specifically gender discrimination, which is the governing theme that shapes the plot in Charlotte P. Gilman’s utopian fiction Herland. Space within literature can be seen as an essential part of storytelling because it allows the reader to fully comprehend the surroundings that the author hopes to portray. To address the questions and issues mentioned, an indepth study of the novel, the author, the author’s time, and related publications were employed to further understand the relationship between space, gender, and literature. The conducted analysis revealed this relationship by the elimination of gender roles and the alteration of conventional spaces; thus, depicting a more utopian country, as a form of literary criticism to her dystopian era.

Charlotte Gilman’ın Herland Romanında Mekansal Temsiller ve Cinsiyet Arasındaki İlişkinin Analizi

Bu makalenin amacı, edebi kurgu aracılığıyla mimarlık, iç mekanlar, kentsel çevre ve sosyal konular arasındaki bağlantıları araştırmaktır. İpuçları ve yorumlar yoluyla mekansal temsilleri ve özellikle toplumsal cinsiyet eşitsizliği ve hatta esas olarak Charlotte P. Gilman’ın ütopyacı kurgusu Herland’i şekillendiren cinsiyet ayrımcılığı gibi temalar üzerindeki etkilerini analiz etmektir. Edebiyat içindeki mekân, hikâye anlatımının önemli bir parçası olarak görülebilir; çünkü okuyucunun yazarın literatür boyunca tam anlamıyla bütüncül olarak betimlemeyi umduğu çevreyi tam olarak kavramasını sağlar. Bahsedilen soruları ve sorunları ele almak ve mekân, cinsiyet ve edebiyat arasındaki ilişkiyi daha iyi anlamak için roman, yazar, yazarın yaşadığı dönem ve ilgili yayınlar derinlemesine incelenmiştir. Yapılan analiz, toplumsal cinsiyet rollerinin ortadan kaldırılması ve geleneksel alanların değiştirilmesi ile bu ilişkiyi ortaya çıkarmıştır; böylece distopya dönemine bir edebi eleştiri biçimi olarak daha ütopik bir ülkeyi betimlemektedir.

___

Abel, E. (1993). Virginia Woolf and the Fictions of Psychoanalysis. Chicago, USA: University of Chicago Press.

Allen, P. (1997). The Concept of Woman (Vol. 2). Michigan, Cambridge: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company.

Allen, P.W. (1988). Building Domestic Liberty: Charlotte Perkins Gilman's Architectural Feminism. University of Massachusetts Press.

Antoniades, A.C. (1992). Poetics of Architecture. Van Nostrand Reinhold.

Arnold, B. (2006). It Began This Way: The Synonymy of Cartography and Writing as Utopian Cognitive Mapping in Herland. Utopian Studies, 17(2), 299–316.

Barlas, A. (1992). Planning: A Continuum of Utopian and Non-utopian Sensibilities. METU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, 12(1-2): 37–47.

Behbahani, P.A., Ostwald, M.J. & Gu, N. (2016). A Syntactical Comparative Analysis of The Spatial Properties of Prairie Style and Victorian Domestic Architecture. Journal of Architecture, 21(3), 348–374.

Berneri, M.L. (1969). Journey through utopia. Books for Libraries Press.

Betjemann, P. (2014). Eavesdropping With Charlotte Perkins Gilman: Fiction, Transcription, and the Ethics of Interior Design. American Literary Realism, 46(2), 95–115.

Bloch, E. (1988). The Utopian Function of Art and Literature. The MIT Press.

Bolak Hisarlıgil, B. (2011). Narrative Space in “The Black Book” by Orhan Pamuk. Verlag Dr. Müller.

Bowers, E. (2018). An Exploration of Femininity, Masculinity, and Racial Prejudices in Herland. American Journal of Economics & Sociology, 77(5):1313–1327.

Bryden, I. (2012). ‘There Are Different Ways of Making the Streets Tell’: Narrative, Urban Space and Orientation. In Edward, S. & Charley, J. (Eds.), Writing the modern city. Literature, architecture, modernity (pp. 213–226), Routledge.

Christensen, A. G. (2017). Charlotte Perkins Gilman’s Herland and the Tradition of the Scientific Utopia. Utopian Studies, 28(2), 286–304.

Chase, V. (1996). Edith Wharton, the Decoration of Houses, and Gender in Turnof-the Century-America. In Coleman, D., Danze, E., Henderson, C. (Eds.), Architecture and Feminism: Yale Publications on Architecture (pp. 130–161). New York: Princeton Architectural Press.

Coleman, N. (2005). Utopias and Architecture. Routledge.

Cruea, S.M. (2005). Changing Ideals of Womanhood During the NineteenthCentury Woman Movement. General Studies Writing Faculty Publications, 1, 187–204. Retrieved from http://scholarworks.bgsu.edu/gsw_pub/1

Davis, C. (1981). Utopia and the Ideal Society. A study of English 1516-1700. Cambridge University Press.

Degler, C.N. (1956). Charlotte Perkins Gilman on the Theory and Practice of Feminism. American Quarterly, 8(1): 21–39.

Ellul, J. (1976). Search for an Image. In Bundy, R. (Ed.) Images of the Future: The Twenty-First Century and Beyond (pp. 24–34). Prometheus Books.

Essig, E. & Soparnot, R. (2019). Re-thinking Gender Inequality in the Workplace – A Framework from the Male Perspective. Management (France), 22(3):373– 410. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct= true& db=edselc&AN=edselc.2-52.0-85073098506&site=eds-live&au thtype=ip,uid

European Institute for Gender Equality. (2020). "Gender Inequality". Retrieved from https://eige.europa.eu/thesaurus/terms/1182

Gender Inequality. (2007). In Oxford Reference.com. Retrieved from https://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780198568506.001 .0001/acref-9780198568506-e-2834

Gilman, C.P. (2017 [1915]). Herland. Dover Publications. Retrieved from https://books.google.com.tr/books?id=2DGw7EmBaaAC

Gilman, C.P. (2015). Women and Economics. Booklassic. Retrieved from https://books.google.com.tr/books?id=rvcPCgAAQBAJ

Gilman, C.P. (1991 [1935]). The living of Charlotte Perkins Gilman: An Autobiography. University of Wisconsin Press. Retrieved from https://archive.org/details/livingofcharlott00gilm

Grafe, C., Havik, K. & Maaskant, M. (2006). Editorial. Architecture & Literature Reflections/Imaginations. OASE, 70, 3–7. Retrieved from https://www.oasejournal.nl/en/Issues/70/Editorial

Henry, J.E. (2018). Herland: Analysis of Major Characters. Salem Press Encyclopedia of Literature. Salem Press. Retrieved from http://search. ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ers&AN=113243654&site=edslive&authtype=ip,uid

Hudak, J. (2003). The ‘Social Inventor’: Charlotte Perkins Gilman and the (Re) Production of Perfection. Women's Studies, 32, 455–477. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/00497870310087

Kestner, J. (1981). Secondary illusion: The Novel and the Spatial Arts. Smitten, J.R. & Daghistany, A. (Eds.), Spatial Form in Narrative (pp. 101–128). Cornell University Press.

Kumar, K. (1991). Utopianism (Concepts in the Social Sciences). Open University Press.

Levitas, R. (1990). The Concept of Utopia (Utopianism & Communitarianism). Syracuse University Press.

Marcus, L. (2000). Woolf's Feminism and Feminism's Woolf. In S. Roe & S. Sellers (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Virginia Woolf (pp. 209–244). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CCOL052162 3936.011

Martell, L. (2018). Utopianism and social change: Materialism, Conflict and Pluralism. Capital & Class, 42(3), 435–452. Retrieved from http://10.0.4.153/0309816818759230

McCrary, L. (2019). From Hull-House to Herland: Engaged and Extended Care in Jane Addams and Charlotte Perkins Gilman. Politics & Gender, 15(1), 62–82.

Mumford, L. (1971). Utopia, the City and the Machine. In F.E.Manuel (Ed.), Utopias and Utopian Thought (pp. 3–24). Houghton Mifflin Co.

Mumford, L. (1969). The Story of Utopias. The Murray Printing Company.

Rendell, J., Penner, B., & Borden, I. (2000). Gender Space Architecture: An Interdisciplinary Introduction. Routledge. Retrieved from https://books. google.com.tr/books?id=fkKVXyeZ0A0C

Rona, F. (1973). Utopia and Predictions: An Aspect of Architectural Conceptualization. [Unpublished Master Thesis]. Middle East Technical University.

Smith, D. (1973). Family limitation, sexual control, and domestic feminism in victorian America. Feminist Studies, 1(3/4), 40–57. Retrieved from www.jstor.org/stable/1566479

Spurr, D. (2012). Architecture and Modern Literature. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/logi n.aspx?direct=true&db=edsebk&AN=449221&site=eds-ive&authtype=ip,uid

Thomson, S. (2004). Places Within and Without: Memory, the Literary Imagination, and the Project in the Design Studio. In E. Basta (Ed.), Memory and architecture (pp. 317–330). University of New Mexico Press.

Tuna-Ultav, Z., Çağlar, T.N. & Durmaz Drinkwater, S.B. (2015). Architectural Literary Analysis: Reading “The Death of the Street” through Ballard’s Literature and Trancik’s “Lost Space”, METU Journal of Faculty of Architecture, 32(2): 133–150.

Wladaver-Morgan, S. (2018). Charlotte Perkins Gilman. Salem Press Biographical Encyclopedia. Salem Press. Retrieved from http://search.eb scohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ers&AN=88831959&site=eds-live &au thtype=ip,uid

Woolf, V. (2004 [1929]). A Room of One’s Own. Retrieved from https://www.adelaide.edu.au/library/news/list/2020/01/07/ebooksadelaid e-has-now-officially-closed