___

• Aguirre, I. (2005). Teorías y prácticas en Educación Artística. Ideas para una revisión pragmatista de la experiencia estética. Barcelona: Octaedro.
• American Educational Research Association (2017). AERA: Key Programs. Retrieved November 15, 2017, from http://www.aera.net/About-AERA/Key-Programs.
• Arnheim, R. (1993). Consideraciones sobre la educación artística. Barcelona: Edi - ciones Paidós.
• Bagnoli, A. (2009). Beyond the standard interview: the use of graphic elicitation and arts-based methods. Qualitative Research, 9, 547– 70.
• Banks, M. (2001). Visual methods in social research. London: Sage.
• Becker, H. (2002). Visual evidence: A seventh man, the specified generalization, and the work of the reader. Visual Studies, 17, 3– 11.
• Bolton, A., Pole, C. & Mizen, P. (2001). Picture this: researching child workers. So - ciology, 35, 501– 18.
• Croghan, R., Griffin, C. Hunter, J. & Phoenix, A. (2008). Young people’s constructions of self: Notes on the use and analysis of the photo-elicitation methods. Interna - tional Journal of Social Research Methodology, 11, 345– 56.
• Darbyshire, P., MacDougall, C. & Schiller, W. (2005). Multiple methods in qualita - tive research with children: more insight or just more? Qualitative Research, 5, 417– 36.
• Dikovitskaya, M. (2006). Visual culture: the study of the visual after the cultural turn. Massachusetts, MA: MIT Press, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
• Edwards, S., & Wood, P. (2012). Visual culture 1850-2010: modernity to globalisa - tion. London, UK: Tate Publishing.
• Freedman, K. (2006). Enseñar la cultura visual: Currículum, estética y la vida social del arte. Barcelona: Octaedro.
• Harper, D. A. (2006). Good Company: A tramp life. Updated and expanded edition, Boulder, CO: Paradigm.
• Harper, D. (2002). Talking about pictures: a case for photo-elicitation. Visual Studies, 17, 13– 26.
• Jameson, F. (1991). Postmodernism, or the logic of late capitalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
• Jenks, C. (2015). Visual culture. New York, N.Y: Routledge.
• Kunimoto, N. (2004). Intimate archives: Japanese-Canadian family photography, 1939-49, Art History, 27, 129– 55.
• Hodgetts, D., Chamberlain, K. & Radley, A. (2007). Considering photographs never taken during photo-production projects, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 4, 263– 80.
• Marín, R. (2011). La Investigación en Educación Artística. Educatio Siglo XXI , 29(1), 211-230.
• Mitchell, W. J. T. (1994). Picture theory: Essays on verbal and visual representation. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
• National Art Education Association. NAEA Research Commission (2017). Research Agenda.Factors. Retrieved from: https://arteducators-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/- documents/321/e6fe0112-4c68-4f34-b546-1f3ef569e1eb.pdf?1451965976
• Roldán, J., & Mena, J. (2017). Instrumentos de Investigación Basados en las Artes Visuales en Educación Artística. In Marín, R. & Roldán, J. (Eds.). Ideas visuales. Investigación Basada en Artes e investigación artística. Granada: EUG. Editorial de la Universidad de Granada.
• Rose, G. (2007). Visual methodologies: An introduction to researching with visual materials. London: Sage.
• Suchar, C. S. (2006). The physical transformations of Metropolitan Chicago: Chica - go’s central area, in J.P. Koval et al. (eds), The New Chicago: A social and cultural analysis. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
• Suchar, C. S. (1997). Grounding visual sociology in shooting scripts. Qualitative So - ciology, 20, 33– 55.
• The Verge. Sony’s prototype projector turns any table top into a touch-sensitive dis - play: A step toward holograms. Nick Statt. Mar 13, 2016. Retrieved from: https:// www.theverge.com/2016/3/13/11215454/sony-interactive-projector-future-lab- sxsw-2016.
• Wagner, J. (2007). Observing culture and social life: documentary photography, field- work, and social research. In G.C. Stanczak (ed.). Visual research methods: Im - age, society, and representation (pp. 23– 60), London: Sage.
• Adler, J. (1989). Origins of sightseeing, Annals of Tourism Research, 16, 7– 29.
• Araño, J. C. (1996). El Valor del Arte. En: Zehar: Revista de Arteleku-ko Aldizkaria. 30, 22-25.
• Armstrong, C. (1998) Scenes in a library: Reading the photograph in the book. Lon - don: MIT Press.
• Barker, M. (2009). Fantasy audiences versus fantasy audiences, in W. Buckland (ed.), Film Theory and Contemporary Hollywood Movies. London: Routledge, 286– 309.
• Baker, T., & Wang, C. (2006). Photovoice: use of a participatory action research meth - od to explore the chronic pain experience in older adults, Qualitative Health Re - search, 16, 1405– 1413.
• Banks, M. (2008). Using visual data in qualitative research. London: Sage.
• Barnard, M. (2001). Approaches to understanding visual culture. Houndmills: Pal - grave Macmillan.
• Barnet, B.A. (2009). Idiomedia: The rise of personalized, aggregated content, Con - tinuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies , 23, 93.
• Baudrillard, J. (1988). Selected writings, edited by M. Poster. Cambridge: Polity Press.
• Becker, H. (2004). Afterword: photography as evidence, photographs as exposition, in C. Knowles & J. Sweetman (eds), Picturing the social landscape: visual methods and the sociological imagination. London: Routledge, pp. 193– 7.
• Becker, H. (1982). Art worlds. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
• Bell, P. (2001). Content analysis of visual images. In T. van Leeuwen & C. Jewitt (eds), Handbook of visual analysis. London: Sage.
• Berger, J. (2013). Understanding a photograph. London: Penguin Books.
• Berger, J. (2008). Ways of seeing. London: Penguin Books.
• Blinn, L. & Harrist, A.W. (1991). Combining native instant photography and photo- elicitation, Visual Anthropology, 4, 175– 92.
• Bolton, R. (1989). In the American West: Richard Avedon Incorporated. In R. Bolton (ed.), The contest of meaning: Critical histories of photography. London: MIT Press.
• Buckinghman, D. (2009). Creative visual methods in media research: possibilities, problems and proposals. Media, Culture and Society, 31, 559– 77.
• Chandler, D. (2007). Semiotics: The basics. Abingdon: Routledge.
• Debord, G. (1983). Society of the spectacle. Detroit: Black and Red.
• Duncan, C. (1993). The aesthetics of power: Essays in critical art history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Edwards, E. (2002). Material beings: objecthood and ethnographic photographs, Vis - ual Studies, 17, 67–75.
• Evans, H. & Evans, M. (2006). Picture researcher’s handbook: An international guide to picture sources and how to use them (8th edition). Leatherhead: Pira Interna - tional.
• Frosh, P. (2003). The image factory: Consumer culture, photography and the visual content industry. London: Berg.
• Grady, J. (2004) ‘Working with visible evidence: an invitation and some practical ad - vice’, in C. Knowles & J. Sweetman (eds), Picturing the social landscape: Visual methods and the sociological imagination. London: Routledge.
• Gray, C. & Malins, J. (2004). visualizing research: A guide to the research process in art and design. New York: Routledge.
• Harper, D. (2003). Framing photographic ethnography: A case study, Ethnography , 4, 241.
• Kress, G. & Leeuwen, V. T. (2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London: Routledge.
• Mannay, D. (2015). Visual, narrative and creative research methods: Application, re - flection and ethics. New York: Routledge.
• McNiff, S. (2013). Art as research: Opportunities and challenges. Chicago, University of Chicago Press: Intellect Ltd.
• Smith, H. & Dean, T. R. (2009). Practice-led research, research-led practice in the creative arts (research methods for the arts and humanities). Edinburgh, UK: Ed - inburgh University Press.
• Sontag, S. (2013). On photography. London: Penguin Books.
• Sturken, M. & Cartwright, L. (2017). Practices of looking: An introduction to visual culture. Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.