Ece ÇETIN, Seran TEMELLI, Ayşegül EYİGÖR

Yetiştirme Sistemleri ve Kabuk Renginin Bazı Yumurta Kalite Parametrelerine Etkisi

Bu çalışma, perakende satış yerlerinde satışa sunulan kafes, serbest dolaşımlı ve organik yetiştirme sistem-leri ile üretilmiş kahverengi ve beyaz kabuklu yumurtaların bazı yumurta kalite özelliklerinin belirlenmesi amacı ile yapıldı.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Yetiştirme sistemleri, yumurtacı tavuk, yumurta kalite özellikleri

Effect of Rearing Systems and Shell Color on Some Egg Quality Parameters

This study was conducted to determine some quality parameters of retail brown and white-shelled grade A table eggs, which were produced by cage, free-range and organic systems.For this, a total of 30 eggs, 10 from each rearing system, and 15 from each shell color were purchased, and egg weight, shape index, shell thickness, shell strength, and yolk color as outer and inner quality parameters were determined.The heaviest eggs were from cage system (65.04 g), and shape index and shell strength were the highest in organic eggs (78.37% and 41.02 N/cm2), while shell thickness was the lowest in free-range eggs (0.40 mm), and yolk color was the lightest in organic and free-range eggs (10 and 10.40). Additionally, brown eggs had higher values than white eggs in all of the parameters tested. Statistical analyses revealed that rearing systems have effect on shell thickness; while shell color has effect on both shell thickness and shape index (p<0.05).In conclusion, contrary to the consumer prejudice, retail eggs from different rearing systems do not exhibit significant differences on some quality parameters tested.

Keywords:

layer hen, egg quality parameters, Rearing systems,

PDF

___

Ahammed, M., Chae, B. J., Lohakare, J., Keo-havong, B., Lee, M. H., Lee, S. J., Kim, D. M., Lee J. Y., Ohh, S. J., 2014. Comparison of aviary, barn and conventional cage raising of chickens on laying performance and egg quality. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci., 27, 1196-1203.
Anar, Ş., 2016. Yumurta ve Yumurta Ürünleri, 1.Baskı, Dora Basım-Yayın Dağıtım Ltd.Şti., Bursa.
Artan, S., Durmuş, İ., 2015. Köy, serbest ve kafes sistemlerinde üretilen yumurtaların kalite özellikleri bakımından karşılaştırılması. Academ-ic J. Agric., 4, 89-97.
Barbosa Filho, J.A.D., Silva, M.A.N., Silva I.J.O, Coelho, A.A.D., 2005. Egg quality in layers housed in different production systems and sub-mitted to two environmental conditions. Braz. J. Poultry Sci., 8, 23-28.
Baykalır, Y., Şimşek, Ü. G., 2014. Yumurta tavukçuluğunda kullanılan yetiştirme sistemleri. F. Ü. Sağ. Bil. Vet. Derg., 28, 93-98.
Coutts, J. A., Wilson, G. C., 2007. Optimum Egg Quality. A Practical Approach, Erişim Tarihi: 01.06.2016, http://www.thepoultrysite.com/publications/1/egg-quality-handbook/
FAO. Food and Agricultural Organization. Chap-ter 2 - Marketing Quality Eggs Quality Charac-ters. Erişim Tarihi: 01.06.2016, http://www.fao.org/docrep/005/y4628e/y4628e04.htm
İpek, A., Sözcü, A., 2015. Alternatif kanatlı yet-iştirme sistemlerinde yetiştirme pratikleri ve re-fah standartları. U. Ü. Ziraat Fak. Derg., 29, 133-146.
Küçükyılmaz, K., Bozkurt, M., Herken, E. N., Çınar, M., Çatlı, A. U., Bintaş, E., Çöven, F., 2012. Effects of rearing systems on performance, egg characteristics and immune response in two layer hen genotype. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci., 25, 559-568.
Mugnai, C., Sossidou, E. N., Dal Bosco, A., Ruggeri, S., Mattioli, S., Castellini, C., 2014. The effects of husbandry system on the grass intake and egg nutritive characteristics of laying hens. J. Sci. Food Agric., 94, 459-467.
Singh, R., Cheng, K. M., Silversides, F. G., 2009. Production performance and egg quality of four strains of laying hens kept in conventional cages and floor pens. Poultry Sci., 88, 256-264.
Şekeroğlu, A., Sarıca, M., 2005. Serbest yetiştirme (free-range) sisteminin beyaz ve kahverengi yumurtacı genotiplerin yumurta verim ve kalitesine etkisi. J. Poultry Research., 6, 10-16.
TGK. Türk Gıda Kodeksi. Yumurta Tebliği 2014/55, Resmi Gazete Tarihi: 20 Aralık 2014, Sayısı: 29211, Ankara.
TS. Türk Standardı. Tavuk Yumurtası- Kabuklu, TS 1068, Resmi Gazete Tarihi: 31 Aralık 2015, Sayısı: 29579, Ankara.
USDA. United States Department of Agriculture. Egg Grading Manual, Agriculturel Marketing Service, Agricultural Handbook, Number 75. Erişim Tarihi: 01.06.2016, https://www.ces.ncsu.edu/depts/poulsci/tech_manuals/egg_grading.pdf
Van Den Brand, H., Parmentier, H. K., Kemp, B., 2004. Effects of housing system (outdoor vs cag-es) and age of laying hens on egg characteristics. Brit. Poultry Sci., 45, 745-752.
Varguez-Montero, G., Sarmiento-Franco, L., Santos-Ricalde, R., Segura-Correa, J., 2012. Egg production and quality under three housing sys-tems in the tropics. Trop. Anim. Health Prod., 44, 201-204.
Vits, A., Weitzenbürger, D., Hamann, H., Distl, O., 2005. Production, egg quality, bone strength, claw length, and keel bone deformities of laying hens housed in furnished cages with different group sizes. Poultry Sci., 84, 1511-1519.
Wang, X. L., Zheng, J. X., Ning, Z. H., Qu, L. J., Xu, G. Y., Yang, N., 2009. Laying performance and egg quality of blue-shelled layers as affected by different housing systems. Poultry Sci., 88, 1485-1492.
Yum-Bir. Yumurta Üreticileri Merkez Birliği, Yumurta Tavukçuluğu Verileri, 2015. Erişim Ta-rihi: 01.06.2016, http://www.yum-bir.org/UserFiles/File/Sektor-Verileri-2015.pdf