___

• Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu. (2021, March 18). İstatistiklerle Yaşlılar, 2020. Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu Haber Bülteni, 1–10. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Istatistiklerle-Yaslilar-2020-37227
• Akdağ, R., Tosun, N., Çinal, A., Yeşilyurt, H., Şencan, İ., Koç, O., Dilsiz, A., Bayraktar, G., Küçük, A., Yastı, A. Ç., Baş, A. Y., Kervan, Ü., & Göksel, F. (Eds.). (2011). Türkiye’de Özellikli Planlama Gerektiren Sağlık Hizmetler 2011-2023. T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı Tedavi Hizmetleri Genel Müdürlüğü.
• Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., & Antucheviciene, J. (2012). Optimization of Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment. Electronics and Electrical Engineering, 122(6), 3–6. doi: https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.eee.122.6.1810
• Dang, R., Li, X., Li, C., & Xu, C. (2021). A MCDM framework for site selection of island photovoltaic charging station based on new criteria identification and a hybrid fuzzy approach. Sustainable Cities and Society, 74, 103230. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103230
• Yılmaz, M., & Atan, T. (2021). Hospital site selection using fuzzy EDAS method: case study application for districts of İstanbul. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 41(2), 2591–2602. doi: https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS201757
• Boyacı, A. Ç., & Şişman, A. (2022). Pandemic hospital site selection: a GIS-based MCDM approach employing Pythagorean fuzzy sets. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(2), 1985–1997. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15703-7
• Karaşan, A., Kaya, İ., & Erdoğan, M. (2020). Location selection of electric vehicles charging stations by using a fuzzy MCDM method: a case study in Turkey. Neural Computing and Applications, 32(9), 4553–4574. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-018-3752-2
• Lin, M., Huang, C., & Xu, Z. (2020). MULTIMOORA based MCDM model for site selection of car sharing station under picture fuzzy environment. Sustainable Cities and Society, 53, 101873. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101873
• Wu, Y., Zhang, T., Xu, C., Zhang, B., Li, L., Ke, Y., Yan, Y., & Xu, R. (2019). Optimal location selection for offshore wind-PV-seawater pumped storage power plant using a hybrid MCDM approach: A two-stage framework. Energy Conversion and Management, 199, 112066. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2019.112066
• Şahin, T., Ocak, S., & Top, M. (2019). Analytic hierarchy process for hospital site selection. Health Policy and Technology, 8(1), 42–50. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlpt.2019.02.005
• Zečević, S., Tadić, S., & Krstić, M. (2017). Intermodal Transport Terminal Location Selection Using a Novel Hybrid MCDM Model. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 25(06), 853–876. doi: https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218488517500362
• Kharat, M. G., Kamble, S. J., Raut, R. D., Kamble, S. S., & Dhume, S. M. (2016). Modeling landfill site selection using an integrated fuzzy MCDM approach. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 2(2), 53. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-016-0106-x
• Vahidnia, M. H., Alesheikh, A. A., & Alimohammadi, A. (2009). Hospital site selection using fuzzy AHP and its derivatives. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(10), 3048–3056. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.04.010
• Al-Barakati, A., Mishra, A. R., Mardani, A., & Rani, P. (2022). An extended interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy WASPAS method based on new similarity measures to evaluate the renewable energy sources. Applied Soft Computing, 120, 108689. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2022.108689
• Mishra, A. R., & Rani, P. (2021). Multi-criteria healthcare waste disposal location selection based on Fermatean fuzzy WASPAS method. Complex & Intelligent Systems, 7(5), 2469–2484. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40747- 021-00407-9
• Alrasheedi, M., Mardani, A., Mishra, A. R., Rani, P., & Loganathan, N. (2022). An extended framework to evaluate sustainable suppliers in manufacturing companies using a new Pythagorean fuzzy entropy-SWARAWASPAS decision-making approach. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 35(2), 333–357. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-07-2020-0263
• Ayyildiz, E., Erdogan, M., & Taskin Gumus, A. (2021). A Pythagorean fuzzy number-based integration of AHP and WASPAS methods for refugee camp location selection problem: a real case study for Istanbul, Turkey. Neural Computing and Applications, 33(22), 15751–15768. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-021-06195-0
• Ayyildiz, E., & Taskin Gumus, A. (2020). A novel spherical fuzzy AHP-integrated spherical WASPAS methodology for petrol station location selection problem: a real case study for İstanbul. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(29), 36109–36120. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09640-0
• Kahraman, C., Onar, S. Ç., Öztayşi Başar, & İlbahar, E. (2019). Selection Among GSM Operators Using Pythagorean Fuzzy WASPAS Method. Journal of Multiple-Valued Logic & Soft Computing, 33(4/5), 459–469.
• Ilbahar, E., Cebi, S., & Kahraman, C. (2019). A state-of-the-art review on multi-attribute renewable energy decision making. Energy Strategy Reviews, 25, 18–33. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2019.04.014
• Ilbahar, E., & Kahraman, C. (2018). Retail store performance measurement using a novel interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy WASPAS method. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 35(3), 3835–3846. doi: https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-18730
• Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Amiri, M., & Esmaeili, A. (2016). Multi-criteria evaluation of green suppliers using an extended WASPAS method with interval type-2 fuzzy sets. Journal of Cleaner Production, 137, 213–229. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.031
• World health statistics 2022: monitoring health for the SDGs, sustainable development goals. (2022). World Health Organization. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.