HEMŞİRELİK EĞİTİMİNDE SİMÜLASYON: SANAL GERÇEKLİK VE HAPTİK SİSTEMLER

Günümüzde hastaya zarar vermemek, hataları en aza indirmek, etik ihlalleri önlemek, sağlık alanında gelişen teknolojiye uyum sağlamak, hastaların artan beklentilerini karşılamak ve kaliteli bir bakım sunabilmek için sağlık personelinin eğitiminde yeni araçların geliştirilmesine ve kullanılmasına ihtiyaç duyulmaktadır. Dolayısıyla risksiz bir ortamda klinik senaryoların sınırsız şekilde uygulanmasına izin vererek öğrencinin kaygısını azaltmayı ve kendine olan güvenini arttırmayı, klinik karar verme becerilerini geliştirmeyi ve öğrenciye uygulama sonunda geribildirim vererek etkili öğrenmeyi sağlayan sanal gerçeklik ve haptik simülasyon sistemleri hemşirelik eğitiminde yükselen bir değer olarak yer almaktadır. Bu derlemede hemşirelik eğitiminde kullanılan sanal gerçeklik ve haptik simülasyon sistemlerine yönelik farkındalığı arttırmak amacıyla, sanal gerçeklik ve haptik sistemlerin tanımı, hemşirelik eğitimindeki yeri ve önemi ile yapılan bilimsel araştırma sonuçları tartışılmıştır.

Keywords:

Hemşirelik Simülasyon, Sanal gerçeklik,

PDF

___

Cannon-Diebl MR. Simulation in Healthcare and Nursing State of the Science. Critical Care Nursing Quarterly 2009; 32(2): 128-136.
2) Unver V, Basak T, Watts P, Gaioso V, Moss J, Tastan S, Iyigun E, Tosun N. The Reliability and Validity of Three Questionnaires: The Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning Scale, Simulation Design Scale, and Educational Practices Questionnaire. Contemporary nurse 2017; 53(1): 60-74.
3) Cant RP. Cooper SJ. Simulation‐Based Learning in Nurse Education: Systematic Review. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2010; 66(1): 3-15.
4) Alinier G, Hunt B, Gordon R, Harwood C. Effectiveness of Intermediate‐Fidelity Simulation Training Technology in Undergraduate Nursing Education. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2006; 54(3): 359-369.
5) Hizal S. Histogram Tabanlı Algoritmalarla Sanal Giriş Birimi Tasarımı. Sakarya Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Sakarya, (2009).
6) Sarikoc G. Use of Virtual Reality in the Education of Health Care Workers / Sağlık Çalışanlarının Eğitiminde Sanal Gercekliğin Kullanımı. Journal of Education and Research in Nursing 2016; 13(1): 243-248.
7) Ziv A, Small SD, Wolpe PW. Patient Safety and Simulation-based Medical Education. Medical Teacher 2000; 22(5): 489-495.
8) Seropian MA, Brown K, Gavilanes JS, Driggers B. Simulation: Not Just a Manikin. Journal of Nursing Education 2004; 43(4): 164-169.
9) Fowler-Durham C, Alden KR. Enhancing Patient Safety in Nursing Education Through Patient Simulation. In:Patient Safety and Quality: An Evidence-Based Handbook for Nurses. 2007; 51: 1-40, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville. http://www.ahrq. gov/qual/nurseshdbk/. (Access date: 25 May 2016).
10) Davis A. Virtual Reality Simulation: An Innovative Teaching Tool for Dietetics Experiential Education. The Open Nutrition Journal 2015; 9: 65-75.
11) Wiecha J, Heyden R, Sternthal E, Merialdi M. Learning in a Virtual World: Experience With Using Second Life for Medical Education. J Med Internet Res 2010; 12(1): e1.
12) Jenson CE, Forsyth DM. Virtual Reality Simulation: Using Three-dimensional Technology to Teach Nursing Students. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing 2012; 30(6): 312-318.
13) Cook LJ. Inviting Teaching Behaviors of Clinical Faculty and Nursing Students' Anxiety. Journal of Nursing Education 2005; 44(4): 156.
14) Ravert P. An Integrative Review of Computer-based Simulation in the Education Process. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing 2002; 20(5): 203-208.
15) Jung EY, Park DK, Lee YH, Jo HS, Lim YS, Park RW. Evaluation of Practical Exercises Using an Intravenous Simulator Incorporating Virtual Reality and Haptics Device Technologies. Nurse Education Today 2012; 32(4): 458-463.
16) Jamison RJ, Hovancsek MT, Clochesy JM. A Pilot Study Assessing Simulation Using Two Simulation Methods for Teaching Intravenous Cannulation. Clinical Simulation in Nursing 2006; 2(1): e9-e12.
17) Bowyer MW, Pimentel EA, Fellows JB, Scofield RL, Ackerman VL, Horne PE, Scerbo MW. Teaching Intravenous Cannulation to Medical Students: Comparative Analysis of Two Simulators and Two Traditional Educational Approaches. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 2005; 111: 57-63.
18) Vidal VL, Ohaeri BM, John P, Helen D. Virtual Reality and the Traditional Method for Phlebotomy Training Among College of Nursing Students in Kuwait: Implications for Nursing Education and Practice. Journal of Infusion Nursing 2013; 36(5): 349-355.
19) Smith PC, Hamilton BK. The Effects of Virtual Reality Simulation as a Teaching Strategy for Skills Preparation in Nursing Students. Clinical Simulation in Nursing 2015; 11(1): 52-58.
20) Tsai SL, Chai SK, Hsieh LF, Lin S, Taur FM, Sung WH, Doong JL. The Use of Virtual Reality Computer Simulation in Learning Port-A Cath Injection. Advances in Health Sciences Education 2008; 13(1): 71-87.
21) İsmailoğlu GE. İntravenöz Kateterizasyon Becerisini Kazandırmada Sanal Simülatör ve Plastik Kol Maketi Kullanımının Etkinliğinin Karşılaştırılması. Ege Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Doktora Tezi, İzmir 2015.
22) Chang KKP, Chung JWY, Wong TKS. Learning Intravenous Cannulation: A Comparison of the Conventional Method and the CathSim Intravenous Training System. Journal of Clinical Nursing 2002; 11(1): 73-78.
23) Reyes SD, Stillsmoking K, Chadwick-Hopkins D. Implementation and Evaluation of a Virtual Simulator System: Teaching Intravenous Skills. Clinical Simulation in Nursing 2008; 4(1): e43-e49.
24) Engum SA, Jeffries P, Fisher L. Intravenous Catheter Training System: Computer-based Education Versus Traditional Learning Methods. The American journal of surgery 2003; 186(1): 67-74.
25) Akçay H, Tüysüz C, Feyzioğlu B, Oğuz B. Bilgisayar Tabanlı ve Bilgisayar Destekli Kimya Öğretiminin Öğrenci Tutum ve Başarısına Etkisi. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 2008; 4(2): 169-181.