STUDENT TEACHING ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM (STEP) AND PRESERVICE TEACHERS’ TEACHING EFFICACY IN SCIENCE

Bu kurumunda fen bilgisi bölümündeki öğretmen adaylarına sağlanan Öğrenci Öğretim Geliştirme Programının (ÖÖGP), söz konusu öğretmen adaylarının öğretme yeterliğine olan etkisi ele alınmıştır. ÖÖGP, öğretmen adaylarının öğretme yeterliğini etkileyen alanlara yönelik olarak tasarlanmış bir programdır. Öğretmenlerin öğretme kabiliyetlerine olan inançları sınıftaki performanslarını önemli oranda etkilediği için öğretme güçlendirilmesi gereken önemli bir yapıdır. ÖÖGP uygulanmıştır, ve sonrasında da program değerlendirme gerçekleştirilmiştir. Katılımcıların öğretme yeterlik düzeylerini belirlemek amacıyla, Moran ve Hoy (2001) tarafından geliştirilen Ohio Eyaleti Öğretmen Yeterlik Ölçeği’nden uyarlanan öğretme uygulanmıştır. Elde edilen veriler, ÖÖGP’nin etkisini istatistiksel analizlere tabi tutulmuştur. Ayrıca, söz konusu etkilerin cinsiyete ve bölüme göre değişiklik gösterip göstermediğini görebilmek amacıyla gerçekleştirilmiştir. programına yönelik ÖÖGP’den elde edilen çıkarımlar da çalışmada tartışılmştır

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Öğrenci Öğretim Geliştirme

The present paper discusses the effect of the Student Teaching Enhancement Program (STEP) provided to science preservice teachers in a teacher education institute on their teaching efficacy. The STEP is a program that is designed to impact the areas that influence preservice teachers’ teaching efficacy. Teaching efficacy is an important construct that should be enriched among teachers since the teachers’ belief on their ability to teach significantly affects their performance in the classroom. The STEP has been conducted for a semester and a program evaluation came after. To determine the level of teaching efficacy of the participants they were asked to answer a teaching efficacy survey adopted from the Ohio State Teacher Efficacy Scale developed by Moran and Hoy (2001). The data collected has been subjected to descriptive statistical measures to determine the effect of STEP. Also, an inferential measure was done to compare if the said effects vary by gender and major. Implications of STEP on teacher education program were also discussed.Key words: Student Teaching Enhancement Program (STEP), Innovation in Teacher Education, Teaching Efficacy, K12 Teacher Preparation

PDF

___

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2) 191-215.

Chapman, M., Polly, D., Frazier, W., Hopper, C., & Britt, M. (n.d.). Supporting Elementary Education Yearlong Interns. Unpublished manuscript, UNC Charlotte Scholarship for Teaching and Learning Grants Program.

Cheng, E. C. (2013). Enhancing the Quality of Pre-service Teachers’ Learning in Teaching Practicum. Unpublished manuscript, The Hong Kong Institute of National Library.

Cheng, Y. (2008). Paradigm Shift in Pre-Service Teacher Education: Implications for Innovations and Practice. In C. P. Lim, K. Cock, G. L. & C. Brook (Eds.) Innovative Practices in Pre-Service Teacher Education an Asia-Pacific Perspective (pp. 3-22). Rotterdam: Sensepublishers

Joseph, J. (2010). Does intention matter? Assessing the Science teaching efficacy beliefs of pre-service teachers as compared to the general student population. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 14(1), 2-14.

-

Karimvand, P. (2011). The Nexus between Iranian EFL Teachers’ self-efficacy, teaching experience and gender. English Language Teaching, 4(3), 171-183.

Lopes, A., & Tormenta, R. (2010). Pre-service teacher training, primary teachers’ identities, and school work. Literacy Information and Computer Education Journal (LICEJ), 1(1), 52-58.

MacGregor, D. (2009). Identity formation – Influences that shape beginning teachers’ professional identity – Crossing the border from pre-service to in-service teacher. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Australian Teacher Education Association (ATEA).

Montebon, D. R. (2015), A needs assessment survey on Teacher Readiness of Science Pre-Service Teachers: Towards a Contextualized Student Teaching Enhancement Program (STEP). International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 10(3), 17-26.

Oh, S. (2010). The sources that influence student teachers’ sense of efficacy. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Iowa State University.

Organizatin for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), (2009). Creating Effective Teaching and Learning Environments: First Results from TALIS. Retrieved May 24, 2015 from http://www.oecd.org/berlin/43541702.pdf

Pendergast, D., Garvis, S., & Keogh, J. (2011). Preservice student teacher self-efficacy beliefs: An insight into the making of teachers. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 36(12), 45-57.

Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing and elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 783-805.

Watson, G. (2006). Technology Professional Development: Long-Term Effects on Teacher Self-Efficacy. Jl. of Technology and Teacher Education, 14(1), 151-165.

Yılmaz, H. & Çavaş, P. (2008). The effect of the teaching practice on pre-service elementary teachers’ science teaching efficacy and classroom management beliefs. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 4(1), 45-54.