Anterior Mandibulada Segmental Sandviç Osteotomisi: Olgu Sunumu

Travmatik diş çekimleri veya kist ve tümör operasyonları sonrası vertikal alveolar kemik eksikliği implant rehabilitasyonu için büyük bir zorluk teşkil etmektedir. Kaybolan vertikal alveoler dikey boyutun geri kazanılması için kullanılan inley kemik greftleme ve distraksiyon osteogenezi primer yöntemlerdir. Öte yandan, distraktörlerin fiyatı ve yakın klinik takip gereksinimleri ve hareket eden segmentlerinin vektörel sapmaları bu yöntemin önde gelen problemleridir. Bu dezavantajların üstesinden gelmek için, implant tedavisi için inley kemik greftleme, özellikle anterior mandibulada alternatif bir dikey boyut artırma yöntemi olarak kullanılabilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Anterior Mandibula, Distraksiyon Osteogenezis, Sandviç Tekniği

Segmental Sandwich Osteotomy of the Anterior Mandible: A case report

Vertical alveolar bone deficiency after traumatic tooth extractions or cysts and tumor removal is still being a big challenge for implant rehabilitation. For this purpose, inlay bone grafting and distraction osteogenesis are the main techniques has been used. On the other hand, the price of the distractors and close clinical follow requirements and deviations of the transport segments are the leading problems of this method. To overcome these disadvantages inlay bone grafting can be used as a alternative vertical augmentation method, especially in the anterior mandibular region, for implant rehabilitation. The aim of this report is to assess the efficacy of the sandwich osteotomy for vertical augmentation in the atrophic segment of anterior mandible through clinical studies.

Keywords:

Anterior Mandibula, Distraction Osteogenesis, Sandwich Technique,

PDF

___

1. Becker W, Becker BE, Caffesse R. A comparison of demineralized freeze‐dried bone and autologous bone to induce bone formation in human extraction sockets. Journal of periodontology. 1994;65(12):1128-1133.
2. Cawood J, Howell R. A classification of the edentulous jaws. International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery. 1988;17(4):232-236.
3. Cawood J, Howell R. Reconstructive preprosthetic surgery: I. Anatomical considerations. International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery. 1991;20(2):75-82.
4. Barone A, Covani U. Maxillary alveolar ridge reconstruction with nonvascularized autogenous block bone: clinical results. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2007;65(10):2039-2046.
5. Jensen OT, Greer Jr RO, Johnson L, Kassebaum D. Vertical guided bone-graft augmentation in a new canine mandibular model. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. 1995;10(3).
6. Jensen O. Distraction osteogenesis and its use with dental implants. Dental implantology update. 1999;10(5):33.
7. Jensen OT. Alveolar segmental “sandwich” osteotomies for posterior edentulous mandibular sites for dental implants. Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery. 2006;64(3):471-475.
8. Holtermann W, Schettler D, Schnee L. Tierexperimentelle Untersuchungen zur Sandwichplastik mittels polychromer sequenzmarkierung. Bad Homburg: Vortr Jahrestagung arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Kieferchirurgie. 1976.
9. Schettler D. Sandwichtechnik mit knorpeltransplantat zur alveolarkammerhöhung im unterkiefer. Fortschr Kiefer Gesichtschir. 1976;20:61.
10. Schettler D, Holtermann W. Clinical and experimental results of a sandwich-technique for mandibular alveolar ridge augmentation. Journal of maxillofacial surgery. 1977;5:199-202.