Growth and yield prediction Models for Ash (Fraxinus angustifolia Vahl.)

Growth and yield prediction Models for Ash (Fraxinus angustifolia Vahl.)

Ash (Fraxinus angustifolia subsp. oxycarpa [Bieb. ex Willd.] Franco & Rocha Afonso) is a very fast growing species that has been introduced in the plantations in Turkey for its faster growth and high range of adaptability. Ash forests formed pure stands along the alluvial delta on Sakarya stream of the East Marmara Sea region. In spite of the importance of ash, information on the growth and yield of this species is still not sufficient. In this study, growth and yield characteristics of volume and volume elements in ash forests were investigated in Adapazarı region of Turkey. Data were collected from 27 temporary sample plots from plantations ranging in age from 16 to 36 years. Models selected for ash plantations estimated number of trees, stand mean diameter, stand mean height, stand dominant height, stand basal area and total volume yield. Growth and yield characteristics of ash stands were investigated for different stand age, site index and stand densities. Relationships were determined with multiple regression analysis. Paired t- test, 45 degree line test, percent absolute deviation (AD%) and biological principle of stand development were used for the validation of chosen models. The stand number of trees, stand mean diameter, stand mean height, stand dominant height, stand basal area and stand volume yield models explain 77.4 %, 84.7 %, 92.9 %, 83.5 %, 97.3 % and 95.2 % of the total variation, respectively.

___

  • [1] Konukçu M. . 1998. Statistical Profile of Turkish Forestry. Planning Organization of Government, Ankara.
  • [2] Acatay AG, Pamay B, Kalıpsız A. 1962. Productivity and management concern of Süleymaniye ash forest. Review of Faculty of Forestry, University of Istanbul. 2:38-54. (In Turkish).
  • [3] Pamay B. 1967. An investigation of silvicultural analysis for Demirköy iğneada longos forests and necessary conditions to be taken productivity. Turkish Forestry Service Publication No: 451/43, Istanbul. (In Turkish).
  • [4] Atay İ. 1984a. Attention of silvicultural treatments for broad leaved breeding. Review of Faculty of Forestry, University of Istanbul 2:13-20. (In Turkish).
  • [5] Atay İ. 1984b. Importance and silvicultural characteristics of secondary species for ash. Review of Faculty of Forestry, University of Istanbul. 3:17-32. (In Turkish).
  • [6] Efe A, Alptekin CÜ. 1989. Important an ash forest: Haciosman. Review of Faculty of Forestry, University of İstanbul. 2:164-171. (Turkish, with English summary).
  • [7] Sarıbaş M. 1998. Our forestry in the 75 th anniversary of the republic of Turkey, (ed. Akalp T), Proceeding of the symposium: Actual status of Sakarya - süleymaniye and acarlar ash forests, external morphologic researchs on ash. 21-23 October 1998, Istanbul, pp. 247-255. Faculty of Forestry, University of Istanbul Publication No: 4187/458 (In Turkish).
  • [8] Yavuz H, Şentürk N. 1998. Our forestry in the 75 th anniversary of the republic of Turkey, (ed. Akalp T), Proceeding of the symposium: Preparing of ash stem volume table. 21-23 October 1998, Istanbul, pp. 413- 421. Faculty of Forestry, University of Istanbul Publication No: 4187/458 (In Turkish).
  • [9] Anonymous 1990. Forestry of Turkish. Planning Organization of Government, Ankara (In Turkish).
  • [10] Kapucu F, Yavuz H, Gül AU. 1999. Preparing of volume, site index and normal stocked yield table in ash stands. Karadeniz Technical University Report No: 96.113.001.4, Trabzon.(In Turkish).
  • [11] Curtis, RO, Clendenen GW, De Mars DJ. 1981. A new stand simulator for coast Douglas- fir: DFSIM User's guide. USDA Forest Service. Pacific Northwest Forest Experiment Station, General Technic Report. PNW-135.
  • [12] Schreuder HT, Hafley WL, Bennett FA. 1979. Yield prediction for unthinned natural slash pine stands. Forest Science. 25: 25-30.
  • [13] Davis LS, Johnson KN. 1987. Forest Management. 3rd edition. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York.
  • [14] Vanclay JK. 1994. Modelling Forest Growth and Yield: Applications to Mixed Tropical Forests. 312pp. CABI Publishing, New York.
  • [15] Toliver JR, Jackson BD.1989. Recommended silvicultural practices in southern wetland forest. (ed.Hook DD, Lea R), Proceeding of the symposium: The forested wetlands of the southern United States. 12- 14 July 1988, Orlando, Florida, pp.72-77. USDA Forest Service. Southern Forest Experiment Station, General Technic Report SE-50.
  • [16] Kellison RC, Young MJ. 1997. The bottomland hardwood forest of the southern United States. Forest Ecology and Management. 90:101-105.