“Hunger and Lead”: An Ecocritical Reading of Robert Schenkkan’s The Kentucky Cycle

Creating a true awareness of history, in the sense that Leopold mentions above, entails a far larger definition of history itself, one that would incorporate a history of environment together with human history. Although in his book Leopold was originally referring to experiences like boy-scouting, Robert Schenkkan’s 1991 play The Kentucky Cycle also, albeit in quite an ironic manner, offers its audiences a similarly valuable historical awareness. This essay, in trying to prove the play’s value as environmental literature, will analyze its place in the new, more human-centered trend appearing in ecocriticism through the help of Aldo Leopold’s notion of the land ethic and through the newly emerging field of ecopsychology. Moreover, this paper will also try to establish that the play’s status as a realistic Broadway piece gives it an additional advantage in the ecocritical discourse that other works of EcoTheater do not have since its purpose is to reach large audiences that are not already engaged with environmental issues.

___

  • Brown, Lester R. “Ecopsychology and the Environmental Revolution: An Environmental Foreword.” Ecopsychology: Restoring the Earth, Healing the Mind. Eds.
  • Theodore Roszak, Mary E. Gomes and Allen D. Kanner. San Francisco, CA: Sierra Club Books, 1995. xiiixvi.
  • Buell, Lawrence. “Representing the Environment.” The Green Studies Reader: From Romanticism to Ecocriticism. Ed. Laurence Coupe. London: Routledge, 2000. 177-81.
  • Fraser, Thomson G. Ed. EcoTheater for the Global Village. Bloomington, IN: Xlibris, 2008. Garrard, Greg. Ecocriticism. New York: Routledge, 2004.
  • Head, Dominic. “The (im)possibility of Ecocriticism.” Writing the Environment: Ecocriticism and Literature. Eds. Richard Kerridge and Neil Sammells. London: Zed Books, 1998. 27- 39.
  • Leopold, Aldo. A Sand County Almanac: And Sketches Here and There. 1949. New York: Oxford UP, 1989.
  • Mack, John E. “The Politics of Species Arrogance.” Ecopsychology: Restoring the Earth, Healing the Mind. Eds. Theodore Roszak, Mary E. Gomes and Allen D. Kanner. San Francisco, CA: Sierra Club Books, 1995. 279-87.
  • May, Theresa J. “Frontiers: Environmental History, Ecocriticism and The Kentucky Cycle.” Journal of Dramatic Theory and Criticism 14.1 (1999): 159-78.
  • Mazel, David. American Literary Environmentalism. Athens, GA: U of Georgia P, 2000.
  • Roszak, Theodore. “Where Psyche Meets Gaia.” Ecopsychology: Restoring the Earth, Healing the Mind. Eds. Theodore Roszak, Mary E. Gomes and Allen D. Kanner. San Francisco, CA: Sierra Club Books, 1995. 1-17.
  • Schenkkan, Robert. The Kentucky Cycle. New York: Plume, 1993.
  • Slovic, Scott. “Foreword.” The Greening of Literary Scholarship: Literature, Theory, and the Environment. Ed. Steven Rosendale. Iowa City, IN: U of Iowa P, 2002.vii-xi.
  • Sweeting, Adam and Thomas C. Crochunis. “Performing the Wild: Rethinking Wilderness and Theater Spaces.” Beyond Nature Writing: Expanding the Boundaries of Ecocriticism. Eds.
  • Karla Armbruster and Kathleen R. Wallace. Charlottesville, VA: UP of Virginia, 2001. 325-40.
  • Wallace, Kathleen R. And Karla Armbruster. “Introduction: Why Go Beyond Nature Writing, and Where to?” Beyond Nature Writing: Expanding the Boundaries of Ecocriticism. Ed. Karla Armbruster and Kathleen R. Wallace. Charlottesville, VA: UP of Virginia, 2001. 1-25.