Consumers’ Purchase Intention toward Safety Labeled Dairy Products in the Black Sea Region of Turkey

About half of raw milk production in Turkey is sold under unsanitary conditions in open-air markets or by street vendors without following appropriate food safety standards and the consumers face a very high risk of consuming potentially unsafe dairy products. This research aims to assess consumers’ awareness and attitudes about food safety, and to assess the market potential of certified labeled dairy products by determining consumers’ purchase intention toward such products. The data was collected from a survey of 423 urban households by using the method of simple random sampling in Trabzon and Samsun provinces. In order to assess the market potential of certified labeled dairy products, an orderedprobit model was specified and estimated to determine factors that may affect respondents’ purchase decision. The study reveals that a vast majority of the respondents was not aware of food safety standards and they often purchased unsafe dairy products from farmers or open-air markets. The estimated model results show that factors such as food safety attribute, food poisoning experience, looking for food safety assurance, having information about food safety standards, college education and income have significant positive effects on consumers’ purchase intention toward safety labeled dairy products, while concern for food poisoning has a significant negative effect.Keywords: Food safety; Consumer awareness and behavior; Dairy products; Ordered probit, Turkey 

-

About half of raw milk production in Turkey is sold under unsanitary conditions in open-air markets or by street vendors without following appropriate food safety standards and the consumers face a very high risk of consuming potentially unsafe dairy products. This research aims to assess consumers’ awareness and attitudes about food safety, and to assess the market potential of certified labeled dairy products by determining consumers’ purchase intention toward such products. The data was collected from a survey of 423 urban households by using the method of simple random sampling in Trabzon and Samsun provinces. In order to assess the market potential of certified labeled dairy products, an ordered probit model was specified and estimated to determine factors that may affect respondents’ purchase decision. The study reveals that a vast majority of the respondents was not aware of food safety standards and they often purchased unsafe dairy products from farmers or open-air markets. The estimated model results show that factors such as food safety attribute, food poisoning experience, looking for food safety assurance, having information about food safety standards, college education and income have significant positive effects on consumers’ purchase intention toward safety labeled dairy products, while concern for food poisoning has a significant negative effect.

___

  • Akbay C & Tiryaki G Y (2008). Unpacked and packed fluid milk consumption patterns and preferences in Turkey. Agricultural Economics 38: 9-20
  • Armagan G, Koc A & Ozden A (2009). Food safety at the dairy farm level: knowledge, practices and attitudes of farmers. Milchwissenschaft 64(1): 6-9
  • Ates H C & Ceylan M (2010). Effects of socio-economic factors on the consumption of milk, yoghurt, and cheese: insights from Turkey. British Food Journal 112(3): 23-250
  • Azabagaoglu M O & Ince F (2004). Kırklareli İlınde süt sanayinin durumu. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi-Journal of Agricultural Sciences 10(3): 323-328
  • Brewer MS & Rojas M (2008). Consumer attitudes toward issues in food safety. Journal of Food Safety 28: 1-22
  • Buzby J C, Ready R C & Skees J R (1995). Contingent valuation in food policy analysis: a case study of a pesticide-residue risk reduction. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 27(2): 613-625
  • Calvin L, Gale F, Hu D & Lohmar B (2006).Food safety improvements underway in China. Amber Waves 4(5): 16-21
  • Capistrano D I, Germano P M I & Germano M I S (2004). Open-air markets in Sao Paulo city: Hygienicsanitary. Hi Aliment 18: 37-42
  • Caswell J A & Joseph S (2006). Consumers’ food safety, environmental and animal welfare concerns: Major determinants for agricultural and food trade in the future? In. IATR Symposium of Food Regulation and Trade: Institutional Framework, Concepts of Analysis and Empirical Evidence, May 28-30, Bonn, Germany
  • Celik Y, Karli B, Bilgic A & Celik S (2005). The level of milk consumption and consumption pattern of consumers in Sanliurfa urban areas. Tarim Ekonomisi Dergisi 11(1): 5-12
  • Demirbas N & Karagozlu C (2008). Constraints in meeting food safety and quality requirements in the Turkish dairy industry: a case study of Izmir Province. Journal of Food Protection 3: 76-80
  • Erdal G &Tokgoz K (2011). Factors affecting preferences of packed and unpacked milk consumption of consumers: A case study of Erzincan. KMÜ Sosyal ve Ekonomik AraştırmalarDergisi 13(20): 111-115
  • Grunert KG (2005). Food quality and safety: Consumer perception and demand. European Review of Agricultural Economics 32(3): 369-391
  • Hasipek S & Kaleli N (2002). Ankara Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesinin yurtta kalan kız ve erkek öğrencilerinin süt ve süt ürünleri tüketim sıklığı üzerinde bir araştırma. Journal of Agricultural Sciences 8(3): 204-207
  • Hatirli S A, Ozkan B & Aktas A R (2004). Factors affecting fluid milk purchasing sources in Turkey. Food Quality and Preference 15: 509-515
  • Henson S & Traill B (1993). The demand for food safety: Market imperfections and the role of government. Food Policy 18(2): 152-162
  • Karakaya E & Akbay C (2013). Consumer consumption habits of milk and milk products in Istanbul province. Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Uludag University 27(1): 65-77
  • Karaman A D (2012).Food safety practices and knowledge among Turkish dairy businesses in different capacities. Food Control 26: 125-132
  • Karaman A D, Cobanoglu F, Tunalioglu R & Ova G (2012). Barriers and benefits of the implementation of food safety management systems among the Turkish dairy industry: A case study. Food Control 25: 732739
  • Kilic O, Akbay C & Tiryaki G Y (2009). Factors affecting packed and unpacked fluid milk Consumption.
  • Agricultural Economics –Czech 55(11): 557-563 Miller G D, Jarvis K J, McBean L D (2000). Handbook of dairy foods and nutrition. In: R G Jensen &M Kroger
  • (Eds), The Importance of Milk and Milk Products in the Diet. CRC Press, New York, pp. 4-24 Planzer S B, Cruz A G, Sant’ana A S, Silva R, Moura M R L & De Carvalho L M J (2009). Food safety knowledge of cheese consumers. Journal of Food Science 74(1): 28-30
  • Radam A, Yacob M R, Bee T S & Selamat J (2010).
  • Consumers’ perceptions, attitudes and willingness to pay towards food products with “no added msg” labeling. International Journal of Marketing Studies 2(1): 65-77 Ritson C & Mai L W(1998). The economics of food safety. Nutrition and Food Science 98: 253-259
  • Sayin C (2011). The evaluation of the point of views of the producers who supply raw milk to milk rounds men: Antalya province case. Anadolu Journal of
  • Agricultural Sciences 26(2): 149-155 Seker I, Seker P, sahin M, Ozen V S, Akdeniz A, Erkmen O, Kislali I, Sargın G & Dogu G B (2012). Elazığ ili merkez ilçede tüketicilerin süt tüketim alışkanlıkları ve bu alışkanlıkları etkileyen faktörlerin belirlenmesi.
  • Fırat Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimeleri Veteriner Dergisi 26(3): 131-143 Tiryaki G Y & Akbay C (2010). Consumers’ fluid milk consumption behaviors in Turkey: an application of multinominallogit model. Qual Quant 44: 87-98
  • TurkStat (2011). Milk Products Production Statistics.
  • Turkish Statistical Institute News Bulletin, Number 30, Ankara. http://turkstat.gov.tr (Accessed 02012)
  • Wang Z, Mao Y & Gale F (2008).Chinese consumer demand for food safety attributes in milk products. Food Policy 33: 27-36
  • Wang F, Zhang J, Mu W, Fu Z & Zhang X (2009).
  • Consumers’ perception toward quality and safety of fishery products, Beijing, China. Food Control 20: 918-922 WCS (2011). ISO 22000 HACCP Tarihsel Gelişim. www.wcs.com.tr/iso22000_tarihsel_htm (Accessed 2002)
Journal of Agricultural Sciences-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-7580
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1995
  • Yayıncı: Ankara Üniversitesi
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Sulanan ve Sulanmayan Koşullarda Yetiştirilen Nohut (Cicer arietinum L.)’un Gelişme Seyrinin Belirlenmesi

Nihal KAYAN, Murat OLGUN, İmren KUTLU, Nazife AYTER, Nurdilek GÜLMEZOĞLU

Bazı Kışlık Kolza (Brassica napus L.) Çeşitlerinin Çimlenme Döneminde Tuz Stresine Tepkilerinin Belirlenmesi

Mesut UYANIK, Şevket KARA, Kürşat KORKMAZ

Enginar Yapraklarının (Cynara scolymus L.) Konveksiyonel Kuruma Karakteristiklerinin Matematiksel Modellenmesi

Tuncay GÜNHAN, Vedat DEMİR, Abdülkadir YAĞCIOĞLU

Görüntü İşleme Tabanlı Hassas İlaçlama Robotu

Kadir SABANCI, Cevat AYDIN

Bazı Ümitvar Koca Fiğ (Vicia narbonensis L.) Hatlarının Güneydoğu Anadolu Bölgesi Yağışa Dayalı Koşullarında Ot Verim Performanslarının Belirlenmesi

Mehmet SAYAR, Yavuz HAN

Ada çayı (Salvia officinalis L.) ve Biberiye (Rosmarinus officinalis L.) (Lamiaceae) Özütlerinin Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae)’ye Akarisidal ve Ovisidal Etkileri

Sibel YORULMAZ SALMAN, Semiha SARITAŞ, Nimet KARA, Recep AY

Fosfor Çözücü Bakteri, Fosforlu Gübre ve Tavuk Gübresi Uygulamalarının Macar Fiğinde (Vicia Pannonica Roth) Tohum Verimi ve Verim Unsurları Üzerine Etkileri

Dilara FAYETÖRBAY, Mahmut DAŞCI, Binali ÇOMAKLI

Consumers’ Purchase Intention toward Safety Labeled Dairy Products in the Black Sea Region of Turkey

Mehmet BOZOĞLU, Chung L. HUANG, Wojciech FLORKOWSKİ, Bakiye KILIC TOPUZ

Türk Fındık (Corylus avellana L.) Çeşitlerinin Yapraklarında Stoma Yoğunluğu ve Dağılımının Belirlenmesi

Nurten AVCI, Ahmet AYGÜN

Altı Ekmeklik Buğday Genotipinin Diallel F4 Melez Döllerinde Sulu ve Yağmura Dayalı Koşullar Altında Populasyon Güçleri

Mustafa YILDIRIM, Mustafa ÇAKMAK