Student’s Polylingual Personality Formation in a Multiethnic Region

The aim of this study is to reveal conditions of a student’s multilingual personality formation. The research is very important for requirements of centuries-long multinational history, multilingual situation and cultural diversity. The research is significant at the cross-national level because it focuses on preparation of the young generation for active life in multiethnic and multicultural environment. This study also refers to a personality education with a complex of phsychophysiological features, communicative abilities and humanistic qualities that allow to communicate on several languages and to realize national and cultural requirements.The importance of the research at the national-regional level is determined by the location of Orenburg region. The region has always been an intersection of cultures, which creates problems of co-residence, but also contributes to the development of cooperation. The present study may be used for determination of polylingual and multicultural education aims, for revealing pedagogical conditions of a student’s polylingual personality formation in polyethnic region. It may also help to find out the methods and educational technologies that can be used in a student’s polylingual personality formation process. Modern tendencies of a polyethnic society are analyzed in this study. These tendencies are expressed in a migratory process increase, ethno-demographic transformation contributing to a more intensive intercultural and inter-ethnic cooperation, an ethnic self-determination.  As a result of theoretical justification of the problem the authors distinguish the components of a student’s multilingual personality in a polyethnic region: cognitive, emotive and behavioral. The practical part of the research describes methods and dynamics of every component of a student’s multilingual personality. 

___

  • Avseenko, N. A. (2005). Teoriya i praktika mezhkulturnoy kommunikatsii [Theory and Practice of Cross-Cultural Communication]. Moscow, MAKS Press Publ., 208. p.
  • Avtomatizirovannaya interaktivnaya sistema setevogo testirovaniya. Zaregistrirovana v ROSPATYeNT (№2011610456) [Automated interactive system of network testing. Registered in ROSPATENT (No.2011610456)]. Available at: URL: http://aist.osu.ru (accessed: 10.07.2017).
  • Batarchuk, D. S. (2010). Psikhologo-pedagogicheskoe soprovozhdenie razvitiya polikulturnoy lichnosti v usloviyakh polietnicheskoy obrazovatelnoy sredy [Psychological and Pedagogical Support of a Multicultural Person’s Development in multiethnic Educational Environment]. Vestnik TGPU. No. 12(102), pp.149-153.
  • Bogin, G. I. (1980). Sovremennaya lingvodidaktika [Contemporary Language Didactics]. Kalinin, Kalinin State University Publ., 61 p. Bulankina, N. E. (2003). Kulturnoe samoopredelenie lichnosti v poliyazykovom obrazovatelnom prostranstve. avtoreferat dis. ... doktora pedagogicheskikh nauk : 13.00.01. [Cultural Self-Determination of a Person in a Multilingual Educational Space: Dr. Pedagogical Sci. diss 13.00.01]. Moscow, 46 p.
  • Weisgerber, J. L. (2004). Native Language and the Formation of the Spirit. (Russ. ed.: Weisgerber J.L. Rodnoi yazyk I formirovanie dukkha. Moscow, Editorial URSS Publ., 232 p.
  • Vinogradov, V. V. (1980). Izbrannye trudy: O yazyke khudozhestvennoy prozy [Selected works: About the Language of Fictional Prose]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 360 p.
  • Volkov, V. N. (2012). Chelovek i ego zhiznennye miry [A human and its life worlds]. Kontekst i refleksiya: filosofiya o mire i cheloveke, No. 1, pp. 7-27.
  • Gavrov, S. (1994). Sotsiokulturnaya traditsiya i modernizatsiya rossiyskogo obshchestva [Sociocultural Tradition and Modernization of the Russian Society]. Moscow, pp. 131-140.
  • Galskova, N. D. Sovremennaya metodika obucheniya inostrannym yazykam: posobie dlya uchitelya [Contemporary Methods of Teaching Foreign Languages]. Moscow, ARKTI Publ., 2000. 165 p.
  • Gilbuh, U. Z., Garnets O.N., Korobko S.L. (1990). Fenomen umstvennoy odarennosti [Phenomenon of Intelligence]. Voprosy psikhologii, No.4. pp. 147-157.Gorshenina, S. N. (2015). Osobennosti formirovaniya polikulturnoy lichnosti v obrazovatelnom prostranstve polietnicheskogo regiona [Peculiarities of Multicultural Personality Formation in the Multiethnic Region Educational Space]. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya, No. 4. Available at: URL: https://science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=21010 (accessed: 10.07.2017).
  • Gudkova, I. N. (2013). Kulturnoe prostranstvo kak polietnicheskiy region [Cultural Space as a Multiethnic Region]. Vestnik Zabaykalskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, No. 11(102), pp. 3-7.
  • Gudkova, I. N. (2014). Kulturnoe prostranstvo kak polietnicheskiy region (na materiale Respubliki Buryatiya) [Cultural Space as a Multiethnic Region (the Republic of Buryatia’s case study)]. Culture and Civilization, No. 4, pp. 10-18.
  • Erasov B.S. (1994). Sotsialnaya kulturologiya Ch. 2 [Social Culture Studies]. P. II. Moscow, pp. 166.
  • Ivantsova, E. V. (2010). O termine «yazykovaya lichnost»: istoki, problemy, perspektivy ispolzovaniya [On the Term “linguistic persona: Background, Problems, and Prospects for Use”]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, No. 4 (12), pp. 24-32.
  • Ikonnikova, S.N. (2005). Istoriya kulturologicheskikh teoriy: Kulturnoe prostranstvo kak tsennost i natsionalnoe dostoyanie [The History of Cultural Studies Theories: Cultural Space as a Value and National Heritage]. St-Petersburg, Piter Publ., 474 p.
  • Ilina, L.E. (2017). [Reader’s Literacy as a Characteristic of a Multilingual Person. Multicultural Education and the Dialogue of Cultures] Materialy mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. Institut strategii razvitiya obrazovaniya RAO [Proc. of the Int. Sci.-Pract. Conference.]. Moscow, pp.119-125
  • Ilyasov, F. N. (2013). Metodologiya resursnogo podkhoda k analizu trudovykh motivov i ustanovok [The Methodology of the Resource-Based Approach to the Analysis of Labour Motives and Attitudes]. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i sotsialnye peremeny, No. 5, pp. 13-25.
  • Karasik, U. N. (2003). [Language Personality: Aspects of Study]. II Mezhdunar. nauch. konf. «Yazyk i kultura» [II Intern. Sci. Conf. “Language and Culture]. Moscow, pp. 362-363.
  • Karaulov Yu. N. (1987). Russkiy yazyk i yazykovaya lichnost [The Russian Language and Linguistic persona]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 262 p.
  • Kochisov, V.K., Gogitsaeva O.U. (2013). Etnopedagogicheskie aspekty polilingvalnogo obrazovaniya [Ethno-Pedagogic Aspects of Multilingual Education]. Vektor nauki TGU. Seriya: Pedagogika, psikhologiya, No.3, pp. 119-121.
  • [Cultural Space of the Eastern Siberia and Mongolia: from the Past to the Future]. Materialy mezhdunarodnogo simpoziuma [the Proc. Of Int. Symp.], June 2009. Ulan-Ude: Izdatelsko-poligraf. kompleks FGOU VPO VSGAKI, 2009. 605 p.
  • Lurie, S.V. (1997). Istoricheskaya etnologiya [Historical Ethnology]. Moscow, pp. 80-85.
  • Lyapkina, T.F. (2008). Kontseptualizatsiya kulturnogo prostranstva regiona (na primere Vostochnoy Sibiri) [Conceptualization of the Regional Cultural Space (Western Siberia’s case study)]. Fundamentalnye problemy kulturologii. V. 4: Kulturnaya politika, pp. 159-168.
  • Mosienko, L.V., Khazhgalieva G.Kh. (2016). Tsennostnye osnovaniya samoopredeleniya studentov v polilingvalnom obrazovanii [Value-Based Foundations of Students’ Self-Determination in Multilingual Education]. Vestnik Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, No. 2, pp. 39-45.
  • Regush, L. A., Orlova A. V. (2011). Pedagogicheskaya psikhologiya [Pedagogical Psychology]. 416 p. ISBN: 978-5-459-00687-2. 416p.
  • Sternin, I.A. (2006). Kontrastivnaya lingvistika [Contrastive Linguistics]. Moscow, Vostok-Zapad Publ., 206 p.
  • Tausend, J. (2004). (ed. Pochebut L.G.) Test kulturno-tsennostnykh orientatsii [Test of Cultural and Value-Based Orientations]. Sonin V.A. Psikhodiagnosticheskoe poznanie professionalnoy deyatelnosti [Psycho-Diagnostic Learning of Professional Activity]. St-Petersburg, pp. 212-215.
  • Kharmz V. (2002). Psikhologicheskaya adaptatsiya emigrantov [Psychological Adaptation of Emigrants]. St-Petersburg, 240 p.
  • Chudinov V.A. Problema yazykovogo subekta [The Problem of the Language Subject]. Available at: http://chudinov.ru/problema-yazyikovogo-subektaAide aux projets étudiants // L’Université Paris 13. [Online] Available at: https://www.univ-paris13.fr/aide-aux-projets-etudiants (July 10, 2017).
  • Angelis, de G. (2011). Teachers’ belief in the role of prior language knowledge in learning and how these influence teaching practices. International Journal of Multilingualism, 8(3), pp.216–234
  • Bolbas, B.S (2010). Istifodai tekhnologiyai navin dar talimi fankhoi maktabi va problemakhoi omuzishi dastovardkhoi ilmi va innovatsioni dar sharoiti chakhonishavi dar kishvarkhoi [Ethno-cultural education of schoolchildren in the conditions of globalization]. IDM. Sbornik nauchnykh statey. Dushanbe, ER-Graf. pp. 181—188.
  • Conseil de l'Europe C.E. Un cadre européen commun de référence pour les langues: apprendre, enseigner, évaluer, Didier, (2001). [Online] Available at : http://www.coe.int/fr/web/common-european-framework-reference-languages/homeEducation in a multilingual world: UNESCO education position paper. [Online] Available at: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0012/001297/129728e.pdf (July 10, 2017).
  • Gorter, D. (Durk) I. (2006). Linguistic Landscape: New Approach to Multilingualism p.115.
  • Harvard Comparative Values Project (1949-1955). Available at: http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3800/is_200601/ai_n18706124(July 10, 2017).
  • Haukas, Asta (2016). Teachers’ beliefs about multilingualism and a multilingual pedagogical approach, International Journal of Multilingualism, 13:1, 1-18, [Online] Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2015.1041960
  • Jana, Kusá, & Jana, Sladová, & Kamil, Kopecký & Miloš, Mlčoch (2014). Multicultural Literary Education and its Didactic Aspects. [Online] Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1168 (July 10, 2017).
  • Kirkpatrick, Andy (2014). The Language(s) of HE: EMI and/or ELF and/or Multilingualism? The Asian Journal of Applied Linguistics Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 4-15.Kluckhohn, F. and Strodbeck Variations in Value Orientations. Westport CT, Greenwood Press, 1961, 281p.
  • Lasagabaster, David (2008). Foreign Language Competence in Content and Language Integrated Courses. The Open Applied Linguistics Journal, 1, 30-41: https://benthamopen.com/contents/pdf/TOALJ/TOALJ-1-30.pdf
  • Little, David (2003). The Common European Framework and the European Language Portfolio: involving learners and their arguments in the assessment process. [Online] Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/249870164 (July 15, 2017)
  • Littlewood, W. & Yu, B. (2011). First language and target language in the foreign language classroom. Language Teaching, 44(1), 64-77.
  • Moule, Jean (2012). Cultural Competence: A primer for educators. Wadsworth/Cengage, Belmont, California. 358p.
  • Parler de valeurs. [Online] Available at: http://www.osu.ru/news/12752 (July 10, 2017).
  • Powers, Willow R. (2000). The Harvard study of values: Mirror for postwar anthropology // Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 36. (1), 15-29. Prina, F. (2016). National cultural autonomy: Russia’s model, the Tatars and ethno-cultural education. Tatarica, 1(6), pp. 175-188. [Online] Available at: http://kpfu.ru/philology-culture/journal-39tatarica39/arhiv
  • Spicer-Escalante, Maria Luisa & Jonge-Kannan, Karin de (2014). Cultural Mismatch in Pedagogy Workshops: Training Non-Native Teachers Communicative Language Teaching Utah State University. Languages, Philosophy, and Communication Studies, 12. [Online] Available at: http://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1328&context=lpsc_facpub (July 10, 2017).
  • Witte, A. (2012). Making the Case for a Post-National Cultural Analysis of Organizations," Journal of Management Inquiry 21:141. [Online] Available at: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1056492611415279 (Sept13, 2011).