___

• Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions. London: Sage Publications.
• Anton, J. (1996). Call venter management by the numbers. Santa Maria: Press on Regardless.
• Bauer, T. N. & Green, S. G. (1996). Development of a leader-member exchange: A longitudinal test. Academy of Management Journal 39(6), 1538–1567. doi:10.2307/257068
• Berdicchia, D. (2015). The relationship between LMX and performance: The mediating role of role breadth self efficacy and crafting challenging job demands. Electronic Journal of Management 1, 1-28.
• Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions 349–381.
• Bliese, P. D. (2002). Multilevel random coefficient modeling in organizational research: Examples using SAS and S-PLUS. In F. Drasgow & N. Schmitt (Eds.), The Jossey-Bass business & management series. Measuring and analyzing behavior in organizations: Advances in measurement and data analysis, 401–445.
• Boies, K. & Howell, J. M. (2006). Leader–member exchange in teams: An examination of the interaction between relationship differentiation and mean LMX in explaining team-level outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(3), 246–257. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.02.004
• Bolino, M. C. & Turnley, W. H. (2009). Relative deprivation among employees in lowerquality leader–member exchange relationships. The Leadership Quarterly, 20, 276–286. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.03.001
• Borman, W. C. & Motowidlo, S. J. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to ınclude elements of contextual performance. Personnel Selection in Organizations, 71-98.
• Borman, W. C. (2004). The concept of organizational citizenship. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13 (6), 238-241.
• Breevaart K., Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E. & van den Heuvel, M. (2015). Leader-member exchange, work engagement, and job performance. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 30(7). doi:10.1108/jmp-03-2013-0088
• Chan, S.C.H. & Mak, W. (2012). Benevolent leadership and follower performance: the mediating role of leader–member exchange (LMX). Asia Pacific Journal Management, 29(2), 285–301. doi:10.1007/s10490-011-9275-3
• Chiaburu D.S., Smith T.A., Wang, J. & Zimmerman, R.D. (2014). Relative ımportance of leader ınfluences for subordinates’ proactive behaviors, prosocial behaviors, and task performance a meta-analysis. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 13, 70-86.
• Chiniara, M. & Bentein, K. (2018). The servant leadership advantage: when perceiving low differentiation in leader-member relationship quality influences team cohesion, team task performance and service OCB. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(2), 333–345. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.05.002
• Clarke, N. & Mahadi, N. (2016). Differences between follower and dyadic measures of lmx as mediators of emotional intelligence and employee performance, wellbeing, and turnover intention. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 1-12.
• Dansereau F., Graen G. B. & Haga WJ. (1975). A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations: Alongitudinal investigation of the role making process. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13, 46–78. doi: 10.1016/0030- 5073(75)90005-7.
• Dawson, J. F. (2014). Moderation in management research: What, why, when and how. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29, 1-19. doi.org/10.1007/s10869-013-9308-7. De Ruyter, K. O., Wetzels, M., & Feinberg, R. (2001). Role stress in call centers: Its effects on employee performance and satisfaction. Journal of interactive Marketing, 15(2), 23-35. doi:10.1002/dir.1008
• Detert, J. R. & Burris, E. R. (2007). Leadership behavior and employee voice: ıs the door really open? The Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 869-884. doi:10.2307/20159894
• Dienesch, R. M., & Liden, R. C. (1986). Leader-member exchange model of leadership: A critique and further development. Academy of Management Review, 11, 618–634. doi:10.5465/amr.1986.4306242
• Dulebohn, J. H., Bommer, W. H., Liden, R. C., Brouer, R. L., & Ferris, G. R. (2012). A meta-analysis of antecedents and consequences of leader-member exchange. Journal of Management, 38(6), 1715–1759. doi:10.1177/0149206311415280
• Erdogan, B. & Bauer, T. N. (2010a). Differentıated leader-member exchanges: the moderating role of justice climate. Academy of Management Proceedings, 1, 1–6. doi:10.5465/ambpp.2010.54492402
• Erdogan, B. & Bauer, T. N. (2010b). Differentiated leader–member exchanges: the buffering role of justice climate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(6), 1104–1120. doi: 10.1037/a0020578
• Furst, S. A. & Cable, D. M. (2008). Employee resistance to organizational change: Managerial influence tactics and leader-member exchange. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(2), 453–462. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.2.453
• Gerstner, C. R. & Day, D. V. (1997). Meta-analytic review of leader–member exchange theory: correlates and construct ıssues. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 827−844. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.82.6.827
• Goodman, S. A. & Svyantek, D. J. (1999). Person–organization fit and contextual performance: do shared values matter. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 55(2), 254–275. doi:10.1006/jvbe.1998.1682
• Graen, G. & Cashman, J. F. (1975). A role making model in formal organizations: A developmental approach. In J. G. Hunt & L. L. Larson (Eds.), Leadership frontiers, 143−165. Kent, OH: Kent State Press.
• Graen, G. B. & Scandura, T. A. (1987). Toward a psychology of dyadic organizing. Research in Organizational Behavior, 9, 175–208.
• Graen, G. B. & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (lmx) theory of leadership over 25 years: applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219–247. doi:10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5
• Griffin, M. A., Neal, A. & Parker, S., K., (2007). A new model of work role performance: Positive behaviour in uncertain and interdependent contexts. Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), 327–347. doi:10.2307/20159857
• Gürbüz, S. & Ayhan, Ö. (2017). Lidere yakın olmanın dayanılmaz hafifliği: Lider-üye etkileşimi, görev performansı, tecrübe ve terfi edebilirlik arasındaki ilişkilerin testi. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 32(80), 1–15
• Harris, K. J., Wheeler, A. R. & Kacmar, K. M. (2009). Leader–member exchange and empowerment: Direct and interactive effects on job satisfaction, turnover intentions, and performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(3), 371–382.
• Harris, T. B., Li, N. & Kirkman, B. L. (2014). Leader–member exchange (LMX) in context: How LMX differentiation and LMX relational separation attenuate LMX’s influence on OCB and turnover intention. The Leadership Quarterly, 25, 2, 314–328. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.09.001
• Harrison, D. A. & Klein, K. J. (2007). What’s the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1199–1228. doi:10.5465/amr.2007.26586096
• Henderson, D. J., Liden, R. C., Glibkowski, B. C. & Chaudhry, A. (2009). LMX differentiation: A multilevel review and examination of its antecedents and outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(4), 517–534. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.04.003
• Hooper D.T. & Martin R. (2008). Beyond personal leader–member exchange (LMX) quality: The effects of perceived LMX variability on employee reactions. Leadership Quarterly, 19, 20–30. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.12.002
• Hu, L. T. & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cut-off criteria for fit indexes ın covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55.
• Ilies, R., Nahrgang, J. D. & Morgeson, F. P. (2007). Leader–member exchange and citizenship behaviors: a meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 269−277. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.269
• Janssen, O. & van Yperen, N. W. (2004). Employees’ goal orientations, the quality of leader-member exchange, and the outcomes of job performance and job satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 47(3), 368–384. doi:10.5465/20159587
• Jawahar, I. M., Meurs, J. A., Ferris, G. R. & Hochwarter, W. A. (2008). Self-efficacy and political skill as comparative predictors of task and contextual performance: A two-study constructive replication. Human Performance, 21(2), 138–157. doi:10.1080/08959280801917685
• Jawahar, I. M. & Ferris, G. R. (2011). A longitudinal ınvestigation of task and contextual performance ınfluences on promotability judgments. Human Performance, 24(3), 251–269. doi:10.1080/08959285.2011.580806
• Lai, J. Y. M., Chow, C. W. C. & Loi, R. (2016). The interactive effect of LMX and LMX differentiation on followers’ job burnout: Evidence from tourism industry in Hong Kong. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 1–27. doi:10.1080/09585192.2016.1216875
• Law, K. S., Wang, H. & Hui, C. (2009). Currencies of exchange and global LMX: How they affect employee task performance and extra-role performance. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 27(4), 625–646. doi:10.1007/s10490-009-9141-8
• Le Blanc, P. M. & González-Romá, V. (2012). A team level investigation of the relationship between leader–member exchange (LMX) differentiation, and commitment and performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(3), 534–544. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.12.006
• Lee, K. & Chae, Y. J. (2017). LMX differentiation, diversity, and group performance. Career Development International, 22(2), 106–123. doi:10.1108/cdi-11-2015-0154
• Liao, H., Liu, D. & Loi, R. (2010). Looking at both sides of the social exchange coin: A social cognitive perspective on the joint effects of relationship quality and differentiation on creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 53(5), 1090–1109. doi:10.5465/amj.2010.54533207
• Liden, R. C. & Maslyn, J. M. (1998). Multidimensionality of leader–member exchange: An empirical assessment trough scale development. Journal of Management, 24, 43−72.
• Liden, R. C., Sparrowe, R. T. & Wayne, S. J. (1997). Leader-Member Exchange Theory: The Past and Potential For The Future, Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 15, 47-119.
• Liden, R. C., Erdogan, B., Wayne, S. J. & Sparrowe, R. T. (2006). Leader-member exchange, differentiation, and task interdependence: Implications for individual and group performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 723–746. DOI: 10.1002/job.409
• Ma, L. & Qu, Q. (2010). Differentiation in leader–member exchange: A hierarchical linear modeling approach. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(5), 733–744. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.07.004
• Manata, B. (2019). The effects of LMX differentiation on team performance: Investigating the mediating properties of cohesion. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 154805181984279. doi:10.1177/1548051819842792
• Martin, R., Epitropaki, O., Thomas, G. & Topakas, A. (2010). A critical review of leader-member relationship (LMX) research: future prospects and directions. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 25: 61-91.
• Martin, R., Thomas, G., Legood, A. & Russo, S. D. (2017). Leader–member exchange (LMX) differentiation and work outcomes: Conceptual clarification and critical review. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(2), 151–168. doi:10.1002/job.2202
• Mcdonald, D. & Smith, A. (1995). A proven connection. Compensation & Benefits Review, 27, 1: 59–64.
• Naidoo, N. J., Scherbaum, C. A., Goldstein, H. W. & Graen, G. B. (2010). A longitudinal examination of the effects of LMX, ability, and differentiation on team performance. J Bus Psychol (2011) 26:347–357. doi 10.1007/s10869-010-9193-2
• Nielsen, K., Randall, R., Yarker, J. & Brenner, S.-O. (2008). The effects of transformational leadership on followers’ perceived work characteristics and psychological well-being: a longitudinal study. Work & Stress, 22(1), 16–32. doi:10.1080/02678370801979430
• Nishii, L. H. & Mayer, D. M. (2009). Do inclusive leaders help to reduce turnover in diverse groups? The moderating role of leader–member exchange in the diversity to turnover relationship. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(6), 1412–1426. doi:10.1037/a0017190
• Özdevecioğlu, M. & Kanıgür, S. (2009) Çalışanların ilişki ve görev yönelimli liderlik algılamalarının performansları üzerindeki etkileri. Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 11(16), 53-82.
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, N. P. & Lee, J. Y. (2003). The mismeasure of management) and its implications for leadership research. The Leadership Quarterly, 14(6), 615-656.
• Raudenbush, S., Bryk, A., Cheong, Y. F., Congdon, R. & du Toit, M. (2004). Hlm 6: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling. United State of America.
• Scandura, T. A. & Graen, G. B. (1984). Moderating effects of initial leader–member exchange status on the effects of a leadership intervention. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(3), 428–436. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.69.3.428
• Shusha, A. (2013). The mediating role of leader-member exchange in the relationship between transformational leadership and job performance. European Journal of Business and Management, 5(8), 157-164.
• Sui, Y., Wang, H., Kirkman, B. L. & Li, N. (2015). Understanding the curvilinear relationships between LMX differentiation and team coordination and performance. Personnel Psychology, 69(3), 559–597. doi:10.1111/peps.12115
• Şahin, F. (2018). Lider-üye etkileşimi ile işten ayrılma niyeti arasındaki ilişki üzerinde cinsiyetin etkisi. Ege Akademik Bakış, 11(2), 277 – 288.
• Tekin, E. (2018). Lider-üye etkileşiminin çalışan performansı üzerindeki etkisinde örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışının aracı rolü. Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 8(16), 343-363.
• Uhl-Bien, M., Graen, G. B. & Scandura, T. A. (2000). Implications of leader–member exchange (LMX) for strategic human resource management systems: relationships as social capital for competitive advantage. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 18, 137–185.
• Ünlü, O. & Yürür, S. (2011) duygusal emek, duygusal tükenme ve görev/bağlamsal performans ilişkisi: Yalova'da hizmet sektörü çalışanları ile bir araştırma. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Sayı: 37, Ocak-Haziran, 183-207.
• Walumbwa, F. O., Cropanzano, R. & Hartnell, C. A. (2009). Organizational justice, voluntary learning behavior, and job performance: A test of the mediating effects of identification and leader-member exchange, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(8), 1103-1126.
• Wayne, S. J. & Ferris, G. R. (1990). Influence tactics, affect, and exchange quality in supervisor-subordinate ınteractions: A laboratory experiment and field study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(5), 487–499. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.75.5.487
• Wayne, S. J., Shore, L. M. & Liden, R. C. (1997). Perceived organizational support and leader–member exchange: A social exchange perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 82−111.
• Wheelan, S. A. (2009). Group size, group development, and group productivity. Small Group Research, 40(2), 247–262. doi:10.1177/1046496408328703
• van Yperen, N.W., Berg, A.E. & Willering, M.C. (1999). Towards a better understanding of the link between participation in decision‐making and organizational citizenship behaviour: a multilevel analysis. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72(3), 377-392. doi:10.1348/096317999166734
• Vidyarthi, P.R., Liden, R. C., Anand, S., Erdogan, B. & Ghosh, S. (2010). Where do i stand? Examining the effects of leader–member exchange social comparison on employee work behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(5), 849–861. doi:10.1037/a0020033
• Zhang, Z., Waldman, D. A. & Wang, Z. (2012). A multilevel investigation of leader- member exchange, informal leader emergence, and individual and team performance. Personnel Psychology, 65(1), 49–78. Doi:10.1111/J.1744-6570.2011.01238.X