___

• Allen, M.J., & Yen, W. M. (2002). Introduction to measurement theory. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.
• Altınova, H. H.,& Duyan, V. (2013). Toplumsal cinsiyet algısı ölçeğinin geçerlik güvenirlik çalışması. Toplum ve Sosyal Hizmet Dergisi, 24(2), 9-22.
• Balcı A. (1995). Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma – Yöntem, Teknik ve İlkeler. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi, Ankara.
• Bendure, J.M. (2014). Women’s shame resilience: examining various theoretical assumptions of shame resilience theory, University of Oklahoma, Graduate College, the Department Of Educational Psychology, Doctoral Thesis, Oklahoma.
• Bland, J.M.,&Altman, D.G. (1997). Statistics notes: Cronbach’s alpha. BMJ. 314 (7080): 572. doi:10.1136/bmj.314.7080.572.
• Bonett, D.G. (2002). Sample size requirements for testing and estimating coefficient alpha. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics.27: 335–340. doi:10.3102/10769986027004335.
• Bonett, D.G. (2003). Sample size requirements for comparing two alpha reliability coefficients. Applied Psychological Measurement.27: 72–74. doi:10.1177/0146621602239477.
• Bonett, D.G. (2010). Varying coefficient meta-analytic methods for alpha reliability. Psychological Methods. 15: 368–385. doi:10.1037/ a0020142. PMID 20853952.
• Butler, S.,& Wintram, C. (1991). Feminist group work. London: Sage Publications.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2007). Sosyal Bilimler İçin Veri El Kitabı, İstatistik, Araştırma Deseni, SPSS Uygulamaları ve Yorum, Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık,.
• Cerny, C.A., & Kaiser, H.F. (1977). A study of a measure of sampling adequacy for factor-analytic correlation matrices. Multivariate Behavioral Research,12(1), 43-47.
• Churchill, G.A., (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs, Journal of Marketing Research, 16(1), 64–73.
• Cronbach, L.J.& Shavelson, R.J. (2004). My Current Thoughts on Coefficient Alpha and Successor Procedures. Educational and Psychological Measurement.64 (3): 391–418. doi:10.1177/0013164404266386.
• Cinar Özdemir Ö., Tonga E., Tekindal A., &Bakar Y. (2016), Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Chronic Venous Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire (CIVIQ-20), Springer Plus 5, 381 Doi 10.1186/s40064-016-2039-2
• Çubuk Kaya, N. (2010). Farkındalık Yaratarak Kadını Güçlendirme: Güneydoğu Anadolu Bölgesinde Bir Kalkınma Modeli. Sosyoloji Araştırmaları Dergisi,13 (2), 118-143.
• Deaux, K. (1996). Social identification. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 777–795). New York: Guilford Press.
• Deaux, K.,& Stewart, A. J. (2001). Framing gendered identities. In R. K. Unger (Ed.), Handbook of the psychology of women and gender (pp. 84–100). New York: Wiley.
• Dempsey, P.A,& Dempsey, A.D. (2000). Using nursing research – process, critical evaluation and utilization. 5th Edition, Lippincott, Philadelphia-New York.
• Durutürk N., Tonga E., Gabel P. C., Acar M., & Tekindal A. (2015). Crosscultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Lower Limb Functional Index, Disability and Rehabilitation, 37 (26), 2439-2444 Doi: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1024342
• Durutürk N.,Özünlü Pekyavas N.,Çaglar A., &Tekindal M.A., (2017). Reliability and validity of RT6 accelerometer withcomparing different walking self-selected speeds, Physiotherapy Research and Reports, 1(1), 2-5, doi: 10.15761/PRR.1000102
• Enns, C. Z. (1997). Feminist theories and feminist psychotherapies: Origins, themes, and variations. New York: Harrington Park
• Field, A., (2005). Discovering statistics using SPSS. 2nd ed. London: Sage
• Gilbert, L. A. (1980). Feminist therapy. In A.M Brodsky & R. T. Hare-Mustin (Eds.), Women and psychotherapy: An assessment of research and practice (pp. 245–265). New York: Guilford Press.
• Gözüm, S, &Aksayan, S. (2003). Kültürler arası ölçek uyarlaması için rehber II: psikometrik özellikler ve kültürlerarası karşılaştırma, Hemşirelikte Araştırma Geliştirme Dergisi, 4, 9-14.
• Greenspan, M. (1983). A new approach to women and therapy. New York: McGraw-Hill.
• Johnson, D. M., Worell, J., & Chandler, R. K. (2005). Assessing psychological health and empowerment in women: The personal progress scale revised. Women & Health,4, 109-129. doi:10.1300/J013v41n01_07
• Kaiser, H.F. (1958). The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis, Psychometrika,23, 187. https://doi.org/10.1007/ BF02289233
• Kaiser, H. (1974). An index of factor simplicity. Psychometrika,39, 31–36.
• Karahan, A., Toruner, E.K., Ceylan, A., Abbasoglu, A., Tekindal, A., &Buyukgonenc, L., (2014). Reliability and Validity of a Turkish Language Version of the Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool, Journal Of Wound Ostomy and Continence Nursing,41, 4, 340-344, Doi: 10.1097/WON.0000000000000036
• Kasturirangan, A. (2008). Empowerment and programs designed to address domestic violence. Violence Against Women,14, 1465-1475. doi: 10.1177/1077801208325188
• Özdamar, K. (2002). Paket programlar ile istatistiksel veri analizi. 4. Baskı, Eskişehir: Kaan Kitabevi.
• Özgüven, İ.E. (1999). Psikolojik testler. 3. baskı, Ankara: PDREM yayınları.
• POPIN, (1995). Guidelines on Women’s Empowerment for the UN Resident Coordinator System. United Nations Population Information Network. http://www.un.org /popin/unfpa/taskforce/guide/iatfwemp.gdl.html E.T.:29/03/2018
• Rawlings, E. I., & Carter, D. K. (1977). Feminist and non-sexist psychotherapy. In E. I. Rawlings & D. K. Carter (Eds.), Psychotherapy for women (pp. 19–76). Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
• Robinson, T. L. (1999). The intersection of dominant discourses across race, gender, and other identities. Journal of Counseling and Development,77, 73–79 . Stromquist, P.N. (1995). The Theoretical and Practical Bases for Empowerment, pp. 13-22, in: C. Medel-Añonuevo (ed.) Women, Education and Empowerment: Pathways Towards Autonomy. Hamburg, Germany: UNESCO Institute for Education.
• Sturdivant, S. (1980). Therapy with women: A feminist philosophy of treatment. New York: Springer.
• Worell, J. (2001). Feminist interventions: Accountability beyond symptom reduction. Psychology of Women Quarterly,25, 335-343. doi:10.1111/1471-6402.00033
• Worell, J., & Johnson, N. G. (1997). Shaping the future of feminist psychology: Education, research, and practice. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
• Worell, J. & Remer, P. (2003). Feminist perspectives in therapy: Empowering diverse women (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
• Wyche, K. F., &Rice, J. K. (1997). Feminist therapy: From dialogue to tenets. In J. Worell & N. G. Johnson (Eds.), Shaping the future of feminist psychology: Education, research, and practice (pp. 57–72). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
• Tekindal, M. (2015). Engelli çocuğa sahip kadınların feminist grup çalışması deneyimi: bir karma yöntem araştırması. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi: Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Sosyal Hizmet Anabilim Dalı: Ankara.
• Tezbaşaran, A. (1997). Likert tipi ölçek geliştirme klavuzu. 2. Baskı. Ankara: Türk Psikologlar Derneği Yayınları.
• Tuğut, N. & Gölbaşı, Z. (2010). Cinsel Yaşam Kalitesi Ölçeği - Kadın Türkçe versiyonunun geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Cumhuriyet Tıp Dergisi, 32: 172-180.
• Tunç Tekindal, M. (2016). Feminist grup çalışması, bir sosyal hizmet uygulaması olarak engelli çocuğa sahip kadınların deneyimi. 1. Basım. Nobel Bilimsel Eserler: Ankara.
• Zeyneloğlu, S. & Terzioğlu, F. (2011). Development and Psychometrıc propertıes gender roles attıtude scale. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi (H. U. Journal of Education) 40, 409-420.