MEMENİN PAPİLLER NEOPLAZİLERİ: 10 YILLIK TEK MERKEZ DENEYİMİMİZ

Giriş: Memenin nadir görülen bir tümörü olan invaziv papiller neoplazilerinin kliniği, patolojisi ve cerrahisi tartışıla- rak daha iyi anlaşılmasını sağlamak amaçlanmaktadır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Ocak 2010 ile Ocak 2020 tarihleri arasında meme kanseri nedeniyle opere edilen 2531 has- tanın verileri retrospektif olarak incelendi. Hastaların 46’sında papiller neoplazi saptadı. Hastalar ın demografik, klinik, patolojik verileri ile, takip ve sağkalım bilgileri incelendi. Bulgular: Hastaların tamamı kadındı ve ortanca yaş 56 idi. 44 hastada tümör tek taraflıydı. Otuz (%65,2) hasta- ya meme koruyucu cerrahi uygulandı. İki veya daha çok odakta tümör saptanan hasta sayısı 11 (%23,9) olarak belirlendi. Histopatolojik olarak sırasıyla 28 (%61,0) hastada İnvaziv Papiller Karsinom, 6 (%13,0) hastada Solid Papiller Karsinom, 6 (%13,0) hastada Enkapsüle Papiller Karsinom, 6 (%13,0) hastada Papiller Duktal Karsinoma İnsitu olarak bulundu. Hastaların ortalama takip süresi 32,5 ay (Q1-Q3:12-75) olup, ex olan hasta sayısı 3 (%6,5) olarak bulundu. Hastaların ortalama sağkalım süreleri 142,3 ay, standart hata 8,8 ortalama için %95 güven aralığı 124,8-159,6’dır. Sonuç: Memenin papiller neoplazileri son derece nadir görüldüğü için bu grup meme patolojilerinin iyi anla şıla- bilmesi için daha fazla klinik araştırmaya ihtiyaç vardır.

PAPILLARY NEOPLASIA OF THE BREAST: 10 YEAR SINGLE CENTER EXPERIENCE

Introduction:It is aimed to provide a beter understanding of papillary neoplasia,which is a rare tumor of breast,by discussing its clinic,pathology and surgery Material and Method: Data of 2531 patients who were operated for breast cancer between January 2010 and January 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Papillary neoplasia was detected in 46 of the patients. Demographic, clinical and pathological data of the patients, as well as follow –up and survival in formation were analyzed. Results:All patients were female and the median age was 56 years. Tumor was in 44 patients. Thirty (65.2%) patients underwent breast –conserving sur gery. The number of patients with tumors in two or more foci was determined as 11 (23.9%). Histopathologically, invasive papillary carcin oma was found in 28 (61.0%) patients, Solid papillary carcinoma in 6 (13.0%) patients, encapsulated papillary carcinoma in 6 (13.0%) patients, and papillary ductal carcinoma insitu in 6 (13.0%) patients, respectively.The mean follow-up period of the patients was 32.5 months (Q1-Q3:12-75), and the number of ex patients was found to be 3 (6.5%). The mean survival time of the patients was 142.3 months,with a standart error of 8.8,the 95% confidence interval was 124.8-159.6. Conclusion: Since papillary neoplasms of the breast are extremely rare, more clinical research is needed to be- ter understand this pathologies.

___

  • 1. Waks A G, Winer EP. Breast cancer treatment: a review. Jama2019; 321(3): 288-300.
  • 2. Sun YS, Zhao Z, Yang ZN, Xu F, Lu H J, Zhu ZY et al. Risk factors and preventions of br east cancer.International journal of Biological Sciencesm 2017; 13(11): 1387-97.
  • 3. Momenimovahed Z, Salehiniya H. Epidemiological characteristics of and risk factors for breast cancer in the world.Breast Cancer: Targets and Therapy 2019; 11: 151-64.
  • 4. Rakha EA, Ellis IO. Diagnostic challenges in papillary lesions of the breast. Pathology 2018; 50(1): 100-10.
  • 5. Hashmi AA, Munawar S, Rehman N, Ahmed O, Islam S, As ghar IA et al. Invasive papi llary carcinoma of the breast: clinicopathological features and hormon ereceptor profile. Cureus 2021; 13(2): e13480.
  • 6. Şenel F, Karaman H, Eroğlu M, Tuna Ö. Invasive papillary breast carcinoma, solid variant with neuroendocrine differentiation. Turkish Journal of Surgery 2017; 33(4): 302-4.
  • 7. Ramezani M, Amirian F, Badfar K, Mohammadi K, Kavousi F, Sadeghi M. Microinvasive Papi llary carcinoma of thebreast with mucinous differentiation and high grade ductal carcinoma in situ: A case report study. Basic &Clinical Cancer Research 2017; 9(3): 46-9.
  • 8. Sukpanich R, Lertsithichai P, Chirappapha P, Suvikapakornkul R, Wasuthit Y, Sukornyothin T et al. Prognosis and clinical outcome of papillary carcinoma of the breast at a tertiary care hospital. TheThai Journal of Surgery 2020; 40(4): 101-6.
  • 9. Lokuhetty D, White VA, Watanabe R, Cree IA. WHO Classificati on of tumours of the breast tumours (5th edition). IARC; France 2019.
  • 10. Dieci MV, Orvieto E, Dominici M, Conte P, Guarneri V. Rare breast cancer subtypes: histological, molecular, and clinical peculiarities. Oncologist 2014; 19(8): 805-13.
  • 11. Sauer T. The cytomorphological spectrum of papillary lesions in the breast. MJ Cyto 2017; 1(1): 005.
  • 12. Singh PK, Rehman F, Rathod V, Sinha L, Jha CK. Intracystic papillary carcinoma of the male breast: Dilemmas in diagnosis and management. Breast Disease 2020; 39(2): 105-7.
  • 13. Mastoraki A, Papadoliopoulou M, Konstantiadou I, Mastoraki S, Danias N, Arkadopoulos N. Giant intracystic papillary carcinoma of the breast report of a case and review of the literature. Journal of Gynecologic Surgery 2020; 33(3): 122-5.
  • 14. Clement Z, Jones M. Solid papillary carcinoma of the breas t: A review. International Journal of Surgery and Medicine 2017; 3(1): 57–9.
  • 15. Lozada JR, Basili T, Pareja F, Alemar B, Paula ADC, Gularte ‐Merida R et al. Solid papillary breast carcinomas resembling the tall cell variant of papillary thyroid neoplasms (solid papillary carcinomas with reverse polarity) harbour recurrent mutations affecting IDH 2 and PIK 3 CA: a validation cohort. Histopathology 2018; 73(2): 339-44.
  • 16. Tariq A, Pan K, Olatunji OA, Graciano C, Li Z, Sun F. Phosphorous fertilization alleviates drought effects on Alnuscre mastogyne by regulating its antioxidantand osmotic potential. Scientific Reports 2018; 8(1): 1-11.
  • 17. Limaiem F, Ahmad F. Mucinous breast carcinoma. 2020 Nov 9. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): Stat Pearls Publishing; 2021 Jan.
  • 18. Tan BY, Thike AA, Ellis IO, Tan PH. Clinicopathologic characteristics of solid pap illary carcinoma of the breast. Am J Surg Pathol 2016; 40(10): 1334-42.
  • 19. Li X, Xu Y, Ye H, Qin S, Hou F, Liu W. Encapsulated papillary carcinoma of the breast: A clinicopathological study of 49 cases. Curr Probl Cancer 2018; 42(3): 291-301.
  • 20. Tariq MU, Idress R, Qureshi MB, Kay ani N. Solid papillary carcinoma of breast; a detailed clinicopathological study of 65 cases of an uncommon breas tneoplasm with literature review. Breast J 2020; 26(2): 211-5.
İzmir Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Tıp Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1305-5151
  • Başlangıç: 1995
  • Yayıncı: İzmir Bozyaka Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

MEMENİN PAPİLLER NEOPLAZİLERİ: 10 YILLIK TEK MERKEZ DENEYİMİMİZ

Sümeyye EKMEKÇİ, Tayfun KAYA, Hüseyin Salih SEMİZ, Semra SALİMOĞLU, Gizem KILINÇ, Cengiz AYDIN

PEDİATRİK VİTİLİGO HASTALARINDA 308-NM EXCİMER LAMBA VE TOPİKAL TAKROLİMUS KOMBİNASYONUNUN ETKİNLİĞİ

Betül TAŞ, Sibel ALPER, Banu TAŞKIN, Zahide ERIŞ EKEN

İDİOPATİK MEMBRANÖZ GLOMERÜLONEFRİTLERDE C4d VE IgG4 BOYANMASININ KLİNİKOPATOLOJİK PARAMETRELERLE İLİŞKİSİ

Enver VARDAR, Erhan TATAR, Funda TAŞLI, Rafet Güneş ÖZTÜRK

PROSTAT BEZİNİN FARMAKOKİNETİK ANALİZİ VE BENİGN-MALİGN HASTALIKLAR İLE FARMOKOKİNETİK PARAMETRELERİN KORELASYONU

Zehra Hilal ADİBELLİ, İbrahim Halil BOZKURT, Ertuğrul ŞEFİK, Bülent GÜNLÜSOY, Enver VARDAR, Hülya MOLLAMEHMETOĞLU, Gülşen YÜCEL OĞUZDOĞAN

ANOMALİ BÖBREKLERDE FLEKSİBLE ÜRETEROSKOPİ (f-URS) DENEYİMLERİMİZ

Fatih GÖKALP, Halil İbrahim BOZKURT, Salih POLAT, Dursun BABA, Ömer KORAŞ, Murat ŞAHAN, Özgür DEYİRMENCİ

ACİL GEÇİCİ KALP PİLİ TAKILAN HASTALARIN KLİNİK ÖZELLİKLERİ VE HASTANE İÇİ MORTALİTE ORANLAR

Zeynep YAPAN EMREN, Ahmet ERSEÇGİN, Ferhat Siyamend YURDAM, Oktay ŞENÖZ

KALP CERRAHİSİNİN İŞİTME FONKSİYONLARI ÜZERİNE ETKİSİNİN ARAŞTIRILMASI

Akif İŞLEK, Hasan İNER, Asuman Feda BAYRAK

YOĞUN BAKIMDA MİYASTENİA GRAVİS: 5 YILLIK TEK MERKEZ TECRÜBESİ

Zeki Tuncel TEKGÜL, Hüseyin ÖZKARAKAŞ, Yaprak Özüm ÜNSAL BİLGİN, Mehmet Uğur BİLGİN, İbrahim ERPİN

OBEZİTENİN BÖBREK TAŞI NEDENİYLE UYGULANAN PRONE-PERKÜTAN NEFROLİTOTOMİNİN SONUÇLARI ÜZERİNE ETKİSİ

Tansu DEĞİRMENCİ, Serkan YARIMOĞLU, Gürkan CESUR, Özgür DEYİRMENCİ, M.Bilal NART

OTOMATİZE İDRAR ANALİZÖR SEDİMENT İLE MANUEL MİKROSKOBİK SEDİMENT SONUÇLARININ KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

Giray BOZKAYA, Sibel BİLGİLİ, Gizem ERCAN, Nuriye UZUNCAN