ELEŞTİREL KURAM PERSPEKTİFİNDEN KIBRIS SORUNU

Bu makalenin amacı, Kıbrıs adasının içinde bulunduğu gerçekleri de göz önüne alarak, sorunların çözümlenmesine dair oluşması muhtemel yeni bir yapıyı, eleştirel kuram açısından analitik bir çerçeve içinde incelemektir. Adadaki siyasi bir değişim ve dönüşüm, ulusal egemenlik yerine toplumsal hürriyet kavramının önünde duran engellerin aşılabilmesi, bireysel anlamda daha geniş bir özgürlük alanının oluşturulabilmesi, Kıbrıs Türk ve Rum toplumlarının 'Kıbrıslılık' kimliği altında ve rasyonel bir şekilde tekrardan bütünsel olarak yapılandırılabilmesi, eleştirel kuram açısından analiz edilecektir. Kıbrıs'ta toplumlararası siyasetin rasyonel bir şekilde yeniden yapılandırılması eleştirel kuramın üzerinde durduğu özerklik, güvenlik ve kimlik kavramları bağlamında ayrıca ele alınacaktır.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Kıbrıs, Eleştirel Kuram, Hürriyet, Self-Determinasyon, Güvenlik, Kimlik, Toplum

Grounding itself on the realities in the Cyprus conflict, this article aims to provide an analytical study of a possible new structure for the solution of the problems in the island from a critical theory point of view. This involves a discussion, from a critical theory perpective, of the recent political transformation and change in the island, the removal of the obstacles for the substitution of national sovereignty with that of social freedoms, and a re-unification of the Turkish and the Greek communities of the island on a comprehensive basis. Finally, the proposed restructuring of inter-communal politics on a rational basis will be analysed through the critical theory notions of autonomy, security, and identity.

Keywords:

Cyprus, Critical Theory, Emancipation, Self-Determination, Security, Identity, Society,

PDF

___

Kitaplar: • Adorno, T. W. ve Horkheimer, M., Dialectic of Enlightenment, çeviren Edmund Jephcott, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2002. • Cashmore, E., Dictionary of Race and Ethnic Relations, London and New York: Routledge, 1996. • Cox, R. W., ‘Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory’ içinde Robert O. Keohane (ed.), Neorealism and its Critics, New York: Columbia University Press, 1986. • Devetak, R., ‘Critical Theory’ içinde Burchill, S. (et al.), Theories of International Relations, London: Mcmillan Press, 1995. • Eriksen, E. O. ve Weigard, J., Understanding Habermas: Commincating Action and Deliberative Democracy, New York: Continuum, 2004. • Habermas, J., Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1996. • Hannay, D., Cyprus – The Search For a Solution, London and New York: I.B. Tauris & Co. Ltd., 2005. • Heinze, C., Cyprus Conflict 1964-1985, London and Nicosia: K. Rustem & Brother Publication, 1986. • Hoffman, M., ‘Agency, Identity and Intervention’ içinde Forbes, I. and Hoffman, M. (eds.), Political Theory, International Relations and the Ethics of Intervention, London: Routledge, 1993. • Horkheimer, M., Critical Theory – Selected Essays, New York: Continuum International Publishing Company, 2002. • Horkheimer, M., Critical Theory, New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1972. • Kaplan, M., ‘The New Great Debate: Traditionalism vs. Science in International Relations’, World Politics, Vol.19, No.1, 1966. • Linklater, A., Critical Theory and World Politics – Citizenship, Sovereignty and Humanity, Oxon: Routledge Press, 2007. • Linklater, A., The Transformation of Political Community: Ethical Foundations of the Post-Westphalian Era, Cambridge: Polity Press, 1998. • Linklater, A., ‘The Achievements of Critical Theory’ içinde Smith, S., Booth, K. & Zalewski, M. (ed.), International Theory: Positivism and Beyond, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.

• Linklater, A., ‘What is a Good International Citizen?’ içinde Keal, P. (ed.), Ethics and Foreign Policy, Canberra: Allen & Unwin Press,1992.

• Linklater, A., Beyond Realism and Marksizm, London: Routledge, 1990.

• Linklater, A., Beyond Realism and Marxism: Critical Theory and International Relations, London: Macmillan Press,1990.

• Lordos, A., Kaymak, E. and Tocci, N., A People’s Peace in Cyprus – Testing Public Opinion on the Options for a Comprehensive Settlement, Brussels: Centre for European Policy Studies, 2009.

• Martin, H., Kings of Peace, Pawns of War: the untold story of peace-making, London and New York: Continuum Publishers, 2006.

• Marx, K., Selected Writings, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977.

• Morgenthau, H. J., Truth and Power, New York: Knopf, 1970.

• Necatigil, Zaim M., The Cyprus Question and the Turkish Position in International Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.

• Skinner, B. F., The Behavior of Organisms, New York: Appleton CenturyCroft, 19 • Stephen, M., The Cyprus Question, London: Northgate Publications, July 2001. Dergiler: • Booth, K., ‘Security and Emancipation’, Review of International Studies, Vol.17, No.4, 1991. • Booth, K., ‘Security in Anarchy: Utopian Realism in Theory and Practice’, International Affairs, Vol.67, No.3, 1991. • Bull, H., ‘International Theory: A Case for a Classical Approach’, World Politics, Vol.18, No.2, April 1966. • Cox, R. W., ‘Multilateralism and World Order’, Review of International Studies, Vol.18, No.2, 1992. • Cox, R. W., ‘Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory’, Millenium: Journal of International Studies, Vol.10, No.2, 1981. • Hoffman, M., ‘Critical Theory and the Inter-Paradigm Debate’, Millenium: Journal of International Studies, Vol.16, No.2, 1987. • Hürsoy, S., ‘Cyprus Problem in the Scope of Ethnic Reality’, Review of International Law and Politics, Vol.6, No.21, 2010.

• Pabst, M., ‘Neue Bemühungen zur Beilegung des Zypernkonfliktes’, Österreichische Militaerische Zeitschrift, Heft 5, 2000.

• Wirth, L. ‘Types of Nationalism’, The American Journal of Sociology, Vol.41, No.6, May 1936.

Resmi Kaynaklar: • ‘Basic Structure of the Republic of Cyprus’, Cyprus Conference, Lancaster House: February 19, 1959. • Council Regulation (EC) No 866/2004 of 29 April 2004 on a regime under Article 2 of Protocol 10 to the Act of Accession, Official Journal of the European Union, (L 206/51-56, 09/06/2004). • Financing Protocol Establishing a Financial Assistance Programme to Encourage the Economic Development of the Turkish Cypriot Community, <http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/pdf/turkish_cypriot_community/fp_final_en.pdf> (Erişim tarihi: 16.08.2009). • Treaty of Guarantee between the Republic of Cyprus, Greece and Turkey, Lancaster House: February 19, 1959.

Internet Kaynakları ve Gazeteler: • ‘Cyprus ‘spurns historic chance’,’ BBC News, (25 April 2004), <http://news.bbc. co.uk/2/hi/europe/3656753.stm> (Erişim tarihi: 16.08.2009). • Evripidou, S., ‘The really tough talks start now’, Cyprus Mail, (4 September 2008). • ‘EU belohnt Zyperns Türken für Zustimmung – Brüssel sagt Finanzhilfe und Handelserleichterung zu’, Handelsblatt, Nr. 81, 24.04.2004. • Kant, I., The Critique of Pure Reason, çeviren J.M.D. Meiklejohn, (US: The Pensylvannia State University, 2010) <http://www2.hn.psu.edu/faculty/jmanis/kant/ Critique-Pure-Reason6x9.pdf> (Erişim Tarihi: 01.11.2012). • Thesis on Feuerbach’. Markscı internet arşivi: <http://www.marxists.org/archive/ marx/works/1845/theses/theses.pdf > (Ziyaret tarihi: 01.11.2012).