___

• Ağlargöz, O. (2018). Mary Parker Follett’ın yönetim düşüncesi. Amme İdaresi Dergisi, 51(1), 1-26. Argyris, C. (1977). Double Loop Learning in Organizations. Harvard Business Review, 55(5), 115-125. Bachofen, J. J. (1967). Myth, Religion, and Mother Rright, trans. Ralph Manheim. Princeton: Princeton UP. google scholar
• Bachofen, J. J. [1861] 2006. Mother Right: An Investigation of the Religious and Juridical Character of Matriarchy in the Ancient World, Translated by David Partenheimer. Newyork: The Edwin Mellen Press. google scholar
• Baransel, A., (1993). Çağdaş Yönetim Düşüncesinin Evrimi. İstanbul: İ. Ü. İşletme Fakültesi Yayını No: 257. google scholar
• Barnard, C. (1938; 1968 [30th anniversary edition]). The Functions of the Executive. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press. google scholar
• Baum, J. A. (2005). Companion to Organizations, The Blackwell companion to organizations, Oxford: Blackwell Business. google scholar
• Bebel, A. (1910). Woman and Socialism, trans. Meta L. Stern, (HEBE). Newyork: Socialist Literature Co. google scholar
• Bennis, W. (1995). The Essentials of Leadership in P. Graham (Ed.). Mary Parker Follett: Prophet of Management:163-177. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press. google scholar
• Berber, A. (2013). Klasik Yönetim Düşüncesi: Geleneksel ve Klasik Paradigmalarla Klasik ve Neo-klasik Örgüt Teorileri. İstanbul: Alfa. google scholar
• Berktay, F. (2010). Tarihin Cinsiyeti. İstanbul: Metis Yayınları. google scholar
• Boje, D. M., & Rosile, G. A. (2001). Where’s the power in empowerment? Answers from Follett and Clegg. Journal of Applied Behavior Science, 37(1), 90-117. google scholar
• Child, J. (1995). Commentary on Follett: Constructive Conflict. In P. Graham (Ed.), Mary Parker Follett, prophet of management: A celebration of writings from the 1920s (pp. 87-95). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press. google scholar
• Coase, R. (1937). The Nature of the firm. Economica 4 (November) 386 - 405. google scholar
• Cooperrider, D. L., & Srivastva, S. (1987). Appreciative inquiry in organizational life. Research in Organizational Change and Development, 1, 129-169. google scholar
• Cooperrider, D. L., & Whitney, D. (1999). Appreciative Iınquiry. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler. google scholar
• Cooperrider, D. L., & Whitney, D. (2005). Appreciative Inquiry: A Positive Revolution in Change. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler. google scholar
• Drucker, P. F. (1995). Introduction, Mary Parker Follett: Prophet of Management. In P. Graham (Ed.), Mary Parker Follett, Prophet of Management: A Celebration of Writings from the 1920s (pp. 1-9). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press. google scholar
• Engels F. (1978). Ailenin, Özel Mülkiyetin ve Devletin Kökeni, Ankara: Sol Yayınları. google scholar
• Enomoto, T. (1995). The individual in the group. In P. Graham (Ed.). Mary Parker Follett: Prophet of Management: 240-246. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press. google scholar
• Eylon, D. (1998). Understanding empowerment and resolving its paradox: Lessons from Mary Parker Follett. Journal of Management History, 4(1), 16-28. google scholar
• Fayol, H. (1988). General and Industrial Management. London: Pitman. google scholar
• Fisher, R., Ury, W. L., & Patton, B. (2011). Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement without Giving in. Newyork: Penguin Groups. google scholar
• Fişek, K. (2015). Yönetim. Ankara: SBF Yayınları. google scholar
• Follett, M. P. (1896). The Speaker of the House of Representatives. London and Bombay: Longmans, Green, and Company. google scholar
• Follett, M. (1918). The New State, Group Organization and the Solution of Popular Government. New York: David McKay Co. google scholar
• Follett, M. P. (1919). Community is a process. The Philosophical Review, 28(6), 576-588. google scholar
• Follett, M. P. (1923). Haldane Introduction to the New State. USA: Longmans, Green and Co. google scholar
• Follett, M.P. (1924). Creative Experience. New York: Longmans, Green Co. google scholar
• Follett, M Parker (1925). The Law of the Situation. New York: Longmans. google scholar
• Follett, M. P. (1928). The Teacher-Student Relation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 15(1), 1970, 137-48. google scholar
• Follett, M. P. (1949). Freedom and Coordination: Lectures in Business Organization. Garland, New York. google scholar
• Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: a Stakeholder Approach. Boston, MA: Pitman. google scholar
• Freeman, R. E., & Evan, M. (1990). Corporate governance: A stakeholder interpretation. The Journal of Behavioral Economics, 19, 337-359. google scholar
• Gergen, K. (1982). Toward Transformation in Social Knowledge. New York: Springer. google scholar
• Gerzema, J., & D’Antonio, M. (2013). The Athena Doctrine: How Women and the Men (Who Think Like Them) will Rule the Future. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. google scholar
• Gibson, J. W., & Deem, J. (2016). Leadership lessons from the past: Examining the work of Mary Parker Follett and Lillian Gilbreth. International Leadership Journal, 8(1), 3-26. google scholar
• Graham, P. (Ed.). (1995). Mary Parker Follett, Prophet of Management: A Celebration of Writings from the 1920s. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press. google scholar
• Hawking, S. W. (1988). A Brief History of Time: From the Big Bang to Black Holes. London: Bantam Press. google scholar
• Hawking, S., & Mlodinow, L. (2010). Grand Design. Newyork: Bantam Books. google scholar
• Héon, F., Damart, S., & Nelson, L. (2017). Mary Parker Follett: Change in the paradigm of integration. İçinde D. Szabla, W. Pasmore, M. Barnes ve A. Gibson (Eds). The Palgrave Handbook of Organizational Change Thinkers, pp.1-22. HAL: Post-Print hal-01629684. google scholar
• Juran, J. (1995). Managerial Breakthrough: The Classic Book on Improving Management Performance. New York: McGraw-Hill. google scholar
• Kanter, R. M. (1985), Drucker: the Unsolved Puzzle. New Management, 2(1), 10-13. google scholar
• Kanter, R. M. (1995). Preface. In P. Graham (Ed.), Mary Parker Follett, prophet of management: a celebration of writings from the 1920s (pp. xiii-xxix). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press. google scholar
• Kolb, D. A. (2014). Foundational scholars of experiential learning [PowerPoint slides]. Presented at the Power of Words, the 74th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Philadelphia. google scholar
• Koçel, T. (2010). İşletme Yöneticiliği, 12. basım. İstanbul: Beta Basım Yayım Dağıtım A.Ş. google scholar
• Machiavelli, N. (1993). Prince. Hertfordshire: Wordsworth Editions. google scholar
• Matten, D., & Crane, A. (2005). Corporate citizenship: Toward an extended theoretical conceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 30, 166-179. google scholar
• Mcgrath, J., & Bates, B. (2017). The Little Book of Big Management Theories and how to use them. Harlow UK.: Pearson. google scholar
• McGregor, D. (1960). The Human Side of Enterprise, New York, McGraw-Hill. google scholar
• McLarney, C., & Rhyno, S. (1999). Mary Parker Follett: visionary leadership and strategic management. Women in Management Review, 14(7), 292-304. google scholar
• Melé, D., & Rosanas, J. M. (2003). Power, freedom and authority in management: Mary Parker Follett’s ‘power-with’. Philosophy of Management, 3(2), 35-46. google scholar
• Mendenhall, M. E., Macomber, J. H., & Cutright, M. (2000). Mary Parker Follett: Prophet of chaos and complexity. Journal of Management History, 6, 191-204. google scholar
• Metcalf, H. C., & Urwick, L. (Eds). (1942). Dynamic Administration: The Collected papers of Mary Parker Follett. New York: Harper & Brothers Publishers. google scholar
• Monin, N., & Bathurst, R. (2008). Mary Parker Follett on the leadership of everyman. Ephemeratheory &Politics in Organization, 8(4), 447-461. google scholar
• Morgan, L. H., (1969, II). Ancient Society. New York: Meridian Books. google scholar
• Newman, M. A., & Guy, M. E. (1998). Taylor’s triangle, Follett’s web. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 20(3), 287-297. google scholar
• Nohrıa, N., (1995), “The Basis ofAuthority 141 Commentary Mary Parker Follett’s View on Power, the Giving of Orders, and Authority: An Alternative to Hierarchy or a Utopian Ideology?”, In P. Graham (Ed.), Mary Parker Follett, prophet of management: a celebration of writings from the 1920s, (pp. 141-162). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.141-162. google scholar
• Parker, L. D. (1984). Control in organizational life: The contribution of Mary Parker Follett. Academy ofManagement Review, 9(4), 736-745. google scholar
• Phipps, S. T. A. (2011). Mary, Mary, quite contrary. In a male-dominated field, women contributed by bringing a touch of spirituality to early management theory and practice. Journal of Management History, 17, 270-281. google scholar
• Ryan, L., & Rutherford, M. (2000). Mary Parker Follett: Individidualist, collectivist? Or both? Journal of Management History, 6(5), 207-223. google scholar
• Scherer, A., & Palazzo, G. (2007). Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility: Business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32, 1096- 1120. google scholar
• Scherer, A., & Palazzo, G. (2011). The new political role of business in a globalized world: A review of a new perspective on CSR and its implications for the firm, governance and democracy. Journal of Management Studies, 48, 899-901. google scholar
• Schilling, M. A. (2000). Decades ahead of her time: advancing stakeholder theory through the ideas of Mary Parker Follett. Journal of Management History, 6(5), 224-242. google scholar
• Sebenius, J. K. (2013). What Roger Fisher got profoundly right: Five enduring lessons for negotiators. Negotiation Journal, 29(2), 159-169. google scholar
• Simms, M. (2009). Insights from a management prophet: Mary Parker Follett on social entrepreneurship. Business and Society Review, 114(3), 349-363. google scholar
• Smith, A. (1776). The Wealth of Nations. New York: The Modern Library. google scholar
• Tonn, J. C. (2003). Mary P. Follett Creating Democracy, Transforming Management. London: Yale University Press. google scholar
• Weick, K. E. (1979). Cognitive processes in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, google scholar