___

• Acar, P. (2015). The effects of top management team composition on SME export performance: an upper echelons perspective. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 24(4), 833–852. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10100-015-0408-5
• Artiach, T., Lee, D., Nelson, D., & Walker, J. (2010). The determinants of corporate sustainability performance, Accounting and Finance, 50(1), 31–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467629X.2009.00315.x
• Bantel, K. A., & Jackson, S. E. (1989). Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of top team make a difference? Strategic Management Journal, 10(1), 107–124. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250100709
• Başar, A. B. ve Başar, M. (2006). Sosyal sorumluluk raporlaması ve Türkiye’deki durumu. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 6(2), 213–230.
• Becker, G. S. (1964). Human capital. New York, NY: Columbia University Press. Burns, N., & Grove, S.K. (2007). Understanding nursing research (4th ed.). Missouri: Elsevier Publication.
• Carlsson, G., & Karlsson, K. (1970). Age, cohorts and the generation of generations. American Sociological Review, 35(4), 710–718. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.546
• Carpenter, M. A. (2002). The implications of strategy and social context for the relationship between top management team heterogeneity and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 23, 275–284.
• Carpenter, M. A., Geletkanycz, M. A., & Sanders, Wm. G. (2004). Upper echelons research revisited. Antecedents, elements, and consequences of top management team composition. Journal of Management, 30(6), 749–778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.001 Carroll, A. B. (2000). Ethical challenges for business in the new millennium: Corporate social responsibility and models of management morality. Business Ethics Quarterly, 10(1), 33–42.
• Chia-Wei, H., & Chang, D. (2017). Investigating critical organizational factors toward sustainability index: Insights from the Taiwanese electronics industry. Business Ethics: A European Review, 26(4), 468–479.
• Child, J. (1972). Organizational structure, environment and performance: The role of strategic choice. Sociology, 6(1), 1–22.
• Child, J. (1974). Managerial and organizational factors associated with company performance. Journal of Management Studies, 11, 13–27.
• Chuang, T. T., Nakatani, K., & Zhou, D. (2009). An exploratory study of the extent of information technology adoption in SMEs: An application of upper echelon theory. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 22, 183–196.
• Daboub, A. J., Rasheed, A. M. A., Priem, R. M., & D. A. Gray (1995). Top management team characteristics and corporate illegal activity. The Academy of Management Review, 20, 138–170.
• Dalvi-Esfahani, M., Ramayah, T., & Nilashi, M. (2017). Modelling upper echelons’ behavioural drivers of green IT/IS adoption using an integrated interpretive structural modelling-analytic network process approach. Telematics and Informatics, 34, 583–603.
• Datta, D. K., Rajagopalan, N., & Zhang Y. (2003). New CEO openness to change and strategic persistence: The moderating role of industry characteristics. British Journal of Management, 14, 101–114.
• Davila, A., & Foster, G. (2005). Management accounting systems adoption decisions: Evidence and performance implications from earlystage/startup companies. The Accounting Review, 80(4), 1039–1068.
• Davila, A., & Foster, G. (2007). Management control systems in early-stage startup companies. The Accounting Review, 82(4), 907–937
• Dönmez, A. ve Erol, İ. (2016). Entelektüel sermayenin ölçülmesi, VAIC yöntemi yardımıyla BIST Sürdürülebilirlik Endeksi işletmeleri üzerine bir uygulama. Mali Çözüm, 26(138), 27–56.
• Dyllick, T., & Hockerts, K. (2002). Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 11, 130–141. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bse.323
• Escriba-Esteve, A., Sanchez-Peinado, L., & Sanchez-Peinado, E. (2009). The influence of top management teams in the strategic orientation and performance of small and medium-sized enterprises. British Journal of Management, 20, 581–597. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2008.00606
• Esfahani, M. D., Ramayah, T., & Nilashi, M. (2017). Modelling upper echelons behavioural drives of green IT/IS adoption using an integrated interpretive structural modelling-analytic network process approach. Telematics and Informatics, 34, 583–603.
• Evans, R. W., & Butler, F. C. (2011). An upper echelons view of “Good to Great”: principles for behavioral integration in the top management team. Journal of Leadership Studies, 5(2), 89–97.
• Feil, A., Quevedo, D., & Schreiber, D. (2017). An analysis of the sustainability index of micro and small-sized furniture industries. Clean Technologies & Environmental Policy, 19(7), 1883–1896.
• Finkelstein, S., Hambrick, D., & Cannella, A. A. (2009). Strategic leadership: Theory and research on executives, top management teams, and boards. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
• Finkelstein, S., & Hambrick, D. C. (1996). Strategic leadership: Top executives and their effects on organizations. St. Paul: West Publishing Company.
• Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach, Boston, MA: Pitman.
• Frey, M. C., & Detterman, D. K. (2004). Scholastic assessment or g? The relationship between SAT and general cognitive ability. Psychological Science, 15(6), 373–378. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ j.0956-7976.2004.00687.x
• Goutas, L., & Lane, C. (2009). The translation of shareholder value in the German business system: A comparative study of Daimler Chrysler and Volkswagen AG. Competition & Change, 13(4), 327–346.
• Hambrick, D. C. (2007). Upper echelons theory: An update. Academy of Management Review, 32, 334–343.
• Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9, 193–206. Hambrick, D. C. (1989). Guest editor’s introduction: Putting top managers in the strategy picture. Strategic Management Journal, 10, 5–15.
• Hambrick, D. C., Fukutomi, G. D. (1991). The seasons of a CEO’S tenure. Academy of Management Review, 16(4), 719–742. Hart, P., & Mellons, J. (1970). Management youth and company growth: A correlation? Management Decision, 4(2), 50–53.
• Herrmann, P., & Datta, D. K. (2002). Relationships between top management team characteristics and international diversification: An empirical investigation. British Journal of Management, 16, 69–78.
• Borsa İstanbul. (2017a). BIST Sürdürülebilirlik Endeksi 2017 Yılı Değerlemeye Tabi Şirketler Listesi. http://www.borsaistanbul.com/docs/default-source/endeksler/bist-surdurulebilirlik-endeksidegerlemeye-tabi-sirketler-listesi-2017.pdf?sfvrsn=14 adresinden 30.09.2017 tarihinde edinilmiştir.
• Borsa İstanbul. (2017c). 2016 yılı birinci üç aylık dönemi için BIST Pay Endeksleri kapsamında yer alacak paylarda değişiklik yapılmıştır. http://www.borsaistanbul.com/ duyurular/2015/12/22/2016-yili-birinci-uc-aylik-donemi-icin-bist-pay-endeksleri-kapsamindayer-alacak-paylarda-degisiklik-yapilmistir adresinden 30.09.2017c tarihinde edinilmiştir.
• Borsa İstanbul. (2017b). BIST Sürdürülebilirlik Endeksi. http://www.borsaistanbul.com/endeksler/ bist-pay-endeksleri/surdurulebilirlik-endeksi adresinden 30.09.2017b tarihinde edinilmiştir.
• Juravich, M., Salaga, S., & Babiak, K. (2017). Upper echelons in professional sport: The impact of NBA general managers on team performance. Journal of Sport Management, 31, 466–479. http://dx.doi.org/10.1123/jsm.2017-0044
• Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2001). Transforming the balanced scorecard from performance measurement to strategic management. American Accounting Association Accounting Horizons, 15(1), 87–104.
• Kassem, E., Trenz, O., Hrebicek, J., & Faldik, O. (2015). Key sustainability performance indicator analysis for czech breweries. Acta Universitatis Agraculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Burnensis, 63(6), 1937–1944.
• Kassem, E., Trenz, O., Hrebicek, J., & Faldik, O. (2016). Sustainability assessment using sustainable value added. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 220 , 177–183.
• Kimberly, J. R., & Evanisko, M. J. (1981). Organizational innovation: The influence of individual, organizational, and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations. Academy of Management Journal, 24, 689–713.
• King, T., Srivastav, A., & Williams, J. (2016). What is in an education? Implications of CEO education for bank performance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 37(C), 287–308.
• Latif, H. H., Gopalakrishnan, B., Nimbarte, A., & Currie, K. (2017). Sustainability Index development for manufacturing industry. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 25, 82–95.
• Lee Y. J., & Huang, C. M. (2007). Sustainability Index for Taipei. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 27, 505–521.
• March, J. G., & Simon, H. H. (1958). Organizations. John Wiley & Sons Inc. Meena, K., & Thakkar, J. (2014). Development of balanced scorecard for healthcare using interpretive structural modelling and analytic network process. Journal of Advances Management Resource, 11(3), 232–256.
• Mihelcic, J. R., Shonnard, D. R., Hokanson, D. R., Zhang, Q., James, V. U., Sutherland, J. W., & Schnoor, J. L. (2003). Sustainability science and engineering: The emergence of a new metadiscipline, Environ Science Technology, 37, 5314–5324.
• Mori, K., & Christodoulou, A. (2012). A review of sustainability indices and indicators: Towards a new City Sustainability Index (CSI). Environ. Impact Assessment Review, 32(1), 94–106. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2011.06.001
• Naranjo-Gil, D., Maas, V. S., & Hartmann, F. G. H. (2009). How CFOs determine management accounting innovation: An examination of direct and indirect effects. European Accounting Review, 18(4), 667–695.
• Ng, T. W., & Feldman, D. C. (2009). How broadly does education contribute to job performance? Personnel Psychology, 62, 89–134. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.01130
• Nielsen, S. (2010). Top management team diversity: A review of theories and methodologies. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12 (3), 301–316. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111 /j.1468-2370.200900263
• Oppong, S. (2014). Upper echelons theory revisited: the need for a change from casual description to casual explanation. Management, 19(2), 169–183.
• Orsato, R. J., Garcia, A., Mendes-Da-Silva, W., Simonetti, R., & Monzoni, M. (2015). Sustainability indexes: Why join in? A study of the Corporate Sustainability Index (ISE) in Brazil. Journal of Cleaner Production, 96, 161–170. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.10.071
• Oses, U., Roji, E., & Gurrutxaga Larrauri, M. (2017). A multidisciplinary sustainability index to assess transport in urban areas: a case study of Donostia-San Sebastian, Spain. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 60, 11, 1891–1922.
• Patzelt, H., zu Knyphausen-Aufse, D., & Nikol, P. (2008). Top management teams, business models, and performance of biotechnology ventures: An upper echelon perspective. British Journal of Management, 19, 205–221. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2007.00552.x
• Plöckinger, M., Aschauer, E., Hiebl, M. R. W., & Rohatschek, R. (2016). The influence of individual executives on corporate financial reporting: A review and outlook from the perspective of upper echelons theory. Journal of Accounting Literature, 37, 55–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acclit.2016.09.002
• Qi, B., Lin, J. W., Tian, G., & Lewis, H. C. X. (2018). The impact of top management team characteristics on the choice of earnings management strategies: evidence from China. Accounting Horizons, 32(1), 143–164.
• Ramon-Llorenz, M. C., Garcia-Meca, E., & Durendez, A. (2017). Influence of CEO characteristics in family firms internalization. International Business Review, 26, 786–799.
• Rodriguez-Serrano, I., Caldes, N., Rua, C., & Lechon, Y. (2017). Assessing the three sustainability pillars through the framework for integrated sustainability assessment (FISA): Case study of a solar thermal electricity project in Mexico. Journal of Cleaner Production, 149, 1127–1143. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.179
• Rogers, E. M., & Shoemaker, F. F. (1971). Communication of innovations: A cross-cultural approach. New York, NY: Free Press.
• Salzmann, O., Ionescu-Somers, A., & Steger, U. (2005). The Business case for corporate sustainability: Literature review and research options. European Management Journal, 23(1), 27–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2004.12.007
• Searcy, C., & Elkhawas, D. (2012). Corporate sustainability ratings: An investigation into how corporations use the Dow Jones Sustainability Index. Journal of Cleaner Production, 35, 79–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.05.022
• Serfling, M. A. (2014). CEO age and riskiness of corporate policies. Journal of Corporate Finance, 25, 251–273. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2013.12.013
• Siew, R. (2015). A review of corporate sustainability reporting tools (SRTs). Journal of Environmental Management, 164, 180–195. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.09.010
• Staw, B. M., & Ross, J. (1987). Understanding escalation situations: antecedents, prototypes, and solutions. Research in Organizational Behavior, 9, 39–78.
• Tacheva, S. (2007). Top management team diversity: A multilevel exploration of antecedents and consequences (Doctoral dissertation). University of St. Gallen.
• Taylor, R. N. (1975). Age and experiences as managerial information processing and decision making performance. Academy of Management Journal, 18, 74–81.
• Thomas, A. S., Litschert, R. J., & Ramaswamy, K. (1991). The performance impact of strategy manager coalignment: An empirical examination. Strategic Management Journal, 12, 509–522.
• Tihanyi, L., Ellstrand, A. E., Daily, C. M., & Dalton, D. R. (2000). Composition of the top management team and firm international diversification. Journal of Management, 26, 1157–1177. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1177/014920630002600605
• Ting, I. W. K., Azizan, N. A. B., & Kweh, Q. L. (2015). Upper echelon theory revisited: The relationship between CEO personal characteristics and financial leverage decision. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 686–694.
• Van Marrewijk, M. (2003). Concepts and definitions of CSR and corporate sustainability: Between agency and communion. Journal of Business Ethics, 44(2), 95–105.
• Waddock, S., & Smith, N. (2000). Corporate responsibility audits: Doing well by doing good. Sloan Management Review, 41(2), 75–83.
• Waldman, D., Javidan, M., & Varella, P. (2004). Charismatic leadership at the strategic level: A new application of upper echelons theory. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 355–380. http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.02.013
• Wally, S., & Baum, R. (1994). Personal and structural determinants of the pace of strategic decision-making. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 932–956.
• Wang, G., Holmes, R. M., Oh, I. S., & Zhu, W. (2016). Do CEOs matter to firm strategic actions and firm performance? A meta-analytic investigation based on upper echelons theory. Personnel Psychology, 69, 775–862. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/peps.12140
• Wiersema, M. F., & Bantel, K. A. (1992). Top management team demography and corporate strategic change. Academy of Management Journal, 35(1), 91–121.
• World Business Council for Sustainable Development. (2002). Sustainable development reporting: Striking the balance. Geneva: Author. World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our common future. Oxford Press.
• Yu, Y., Choi, Y., & Zhang, N. (2015). Strategic corporate sustainability performance of Chinese state-owned listed firms: A meta-frontier generalized directional distance function approach. The Social Science Journal, 52, 300–310. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2013.07.010
• Ziegler, A., & Schröder, M. (2010). What determines the inclusion in a sustainability stock index? A panel data analysis for European firms. Ecological Economics, 69, 848–856.